txschools.net

Unofficial · not affiliated with the Texas Education Agency · what this is

Ranked list · Region 08: Mt Pleasant school districts

Region 08: Mt Pleasant school districts with the largest overall score declines since 2021-22

46 districts · since 2021-22 · TEA data fetched 15 August 2026

The change in overall score since 2021-22, from TEA's re-scored "2021-22 What If" figure to the figure it published for 2025-26. TEA re-scored 2021-22 under the rules it adopted for 2022-23 and publishes that re-scoring as "2021-22 What If". This ranking reads the re-scored series, so the change spans one consistent methodology rather than a break. Measured across Region 08: Mt Pleasant school districts, of which 46 districts are ranked below.

Download this table (CSV)

What this ranking counts

46 districts of 46 districts are ranked here.

Ordered by the largest fall first. A negative figure is a decline.

38 of the ranked districts share a placement with at least one other. Tied districts print the same placement and the next placement skips, so two districts sharing 3rd are both 3rd and the one behind them is 5th.

A ranking by a raw figure is not a measure of teaching quality on its own: it correlates with school size and, more strongly, with how many of a school's students live in poverty. Every entity page on this site instead compares a school against a peer group — districts with districts, campuses with campuses — whose share of economically disadvantaged students falls within 10 percentage points of its own, because a comparison against the state average measures the composition of a school's intake at least as much as anything the school did. This list does not: it orders by the raw figure alone. How the peer group is chosen.

The top 21

21 rows, not 20: 3 districts share 19th place, and cutting a tie in half is how a ranked list stops being true. The full list follows.

Region 08: Mt Pleasant school districts with the largest overall score declines since 2021-22: the leading 21 of 46 districts
RankDistrictCountyRatingLargest gain in overall score2021-22 "What If"2025-26Students
1stHubbard ISDBowieF−35.0875254
2ndQueen City ISDCassC−5.08479860
3rd tiedChapel Hill ISDTitusB−4.08884943
3rd tiedHoney Grove ISDFanninB−4.09187674
5th tiedLiberty-Eylau ISDBowieD−3.069661,784
5th tiedLinden-Kildare CISDCassB−3.08481585
5th tiedMaud ISDBowieA−3.09390459
5th tiedPewitt CISDMorrisB−3.08683794
5th tiedRivercrest ISDRed RiverB−3.08784665
10th tiedCumby Collegiate ISDHopkinsC−2.08078485
10th tiedSulphur Springs ISDHopkinsC−2.079774,060
12th tiedDetroit ISDRed RiverC−1.07776469
12th tiedHooks ISDBowieB−1.08382883
12th tiedHughes Springs ISDCassB−1.086851,044
12th tiedMiller Grove ISDHopkinsB−1.08786314
12th tiedPleasant Grove ISDBowieA−1.092912,348
12th tiedRed Lick ISDBowieA−1.09190515
12th tiedRedwater ISDBowieB−1.087861,092
19th tiedAvery ISDRed RiverA±0.09393295
19th tiedDaingerfield-Lone Star ISDMorrisC±0.07979988
19th tiedPrairiland ISDLamarB±0.082821,060

The full list: all 46 districts

Region 08: Mt Pleasant school districts with the largest overall score declines since 2021-22: all 46 rows
RankDistrictCountyLargest gain in overall score2021-22 "What If"2025-26
1stHubbard ISDBowie−35.08752
2ndQueen City ISDCass−5.08479
3rd tiedChapel Hill ISDTitus−4.08884
3rd tiedHoney Grove ISDFannin−4.09187
5th tiedLiberty-Eylau ISDBowie−3.06966
5th tiedLinden-Kildare CISDCass−3.08481
5th tiedMaud ISDBowie−3.09390
5th tiedPewitt CISDMorris−3.08683
5th tiedRivercrest ISDRed River−3.08784
10th tiedCumby Collegiate ISDHopkins−2.08078
10th tiedSulphur Springs ISDHopkins−2.07977
12th tiedDetroit ISDRed River−1.07776
12th tiedHooks ISDBowie−1.08382
12th tiedHughes Springs ISDCass−1.08685
12th tiedMiller Grove ISDHopkins−1.08786
12th tiedPleasant Grove ISDBowie−1.09291
12th tiedRed Lick ISDBowie−1.09190
12th tiedRedwater ISDBowie−1.08786
19th tiedAvery ISDRed River±0.09393
19th tiedDaingerfield-Lone Star ISDMorris±0.07979
19th tiedPrairiland ISDLamar±0.08282
22nd tiedBloomburg ISDCass+1.08788
22nd tiedFannindel ISDDelta+1.06768
22nd tiedPittsburg ISDCamp+1.09091
22nd tiedSaltillo ISDHopkins+1.09091
22nd tiedTexarkana ISDBowie+1.07576
27th tiedChisum ISDLamar+2.08183
27th tiedCooper ISDDelta+2.07779
27th tiedNorth Hopkins ISDHopkins+2.08486
27th tiedParis ISDLamar+2.07880
31st tiedHarts Bluff ISDTitus+3.07578
31st tiedMount Vernon ISDFranklin+3.08386
33rd tiedAvinger ISDCass+4.08387
33rd tiedDeKalb ISDBowie+4.07983
35th tiedComo-Pickton CISDHopkins+5.08186
35th tiedMalta ISDBowie+5.08489
35th tiedNorth Lamar ISDLamar+5.07277
35th tiedSimms ISDBowie+5.08186
39thAtlanta ISDCass+6.08187
40thMount Pleasant ISDTitus+7.08188
41st tiedClarksville ISDRed River+8.06169
41st tiedNew Boston ISDBowie+8.07987
43rdLeary ISDBowie+9.08190
44thMcLeod ISDCass+10.08292
45thJefferson ISDMarion+12.06577
46thSulphur Bluff ISDHopkins+15.07287

The other end, and the other lists

The other end of this list: Region 08: Mt Pleasant school districts with the largest overall score gains. Both ends are published, because a site that prints only the flattering half of an ordering is advertising.

Other rankings of Region 08: Mt Pleasant school districts

Overall score ranked elsewhere

Every ranked list on this site, with what each one counts.

Where this comes from

Every figure in this table comes from data the Texas Education Agency publishes at txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA publishes the ratings; it does not publish this ordering. This site is unofficial and is not affiliated with TEA. How this site works records the snapshot this page was built from and what this site does and does not verify about it.

Download the whole dataset · how this site works · every ranked list on this site