Recent movement
Overall score rose 5 points
84 to 89 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 89 is 4.6 points above the 84.4 average among 257 districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Geographic public school district
Malta ISD
Bowie County · Region 08: Mt Pleasant · 208 students
Official district websiteEnrollment, registration and eligibility
- Current score
- 89/1002025-26
- Change
- +5 ptssince 2021-22
- Score vs similar economic context
- +4.6 ptsvs 84.4 average · 257 rated districts serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 62 of 257tied with 17 others
- Score vs region
- +6.3 ptsvs 82.7 average · 46 rated districts in Region 08: Mt Pleasant
- Region 08: Mt Pleasant placement
- 9 of 46among reporting districts
- Score vs county
- +6.8 ptsvs 82.2 average · 13 rated districts in Bowie County
- Bowie County placement
- 5 of 13among reporting districts
- Score vs similar-size group
- +5.3 ptsvs 83.7 average · 181 similarly sized rated districts
- Similar size placement
- 56 of 181tied with 11 others
- Score vs state
- +7.3 ptsvs 81.7 average · 1,019 rated Texas districts
- Texas placement
- 166 of 1,019tied with 43 others
B89
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 84 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 84.4 average for 257 rated districts serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 82.7 average for 46 rated districts in Region 08: Mt Pleasant.The current score is above the 82.2 average for 13 rated districts in Bowie County.The current score is above the 83.7 average for 181 similarly sized rated districts.The current score is above the 81.7 average for 1,019 rated Texas districts.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Recent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 5 points
80 to 85 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 85 is 2.8 points above the 82.2 average among 257 districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 63%vs 55.7% avg · +7.3 pts
- Masters
- 30%vs 23.2% avg · +6.8 pts
Among 257 districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measureRecent movement
Overall score rose 5 points
84 to 89 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 89 is 6.3 points above the 82.7 average among 46 districts in Region 08: Mt Pleasant reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 5 points
80 to 85 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 85 is 4.9 points above the 80.1 average among 46 districts in Region 08: Mt Pleasant reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the Region 08: Mt Pleasant average
96.8% +2.2 pts vs 94.6%
- 96.8% is 2.2 percentage points above the 94.6% average among 46 districts in Region 08: Mt Pleasant reporting this measure.
- 1st of 46 districts in Region 08: Mt Pleasant reporting this measure.
Recent movement
Overall score rose 5 points
84 to 89 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureRecent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 5 points
80 to 85 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureTop placement
Attendance
96.8% 1st of 13 districts in Bowie County reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureRecent movement
Overall score rose 5 points
84 to 89 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 89 is 5.3 points above the 83.7 average among 181 similarly sized districts reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 5 points
80 to 85 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 85 is 4 points above the 81 average among 181 similarly sized districts reporting this measure.
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-size averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 63%vs 48.9% avg · +14.1 pts
- Masters
- 30%vs 18.2% avg · +11.8 pts
Among 181 similarly sized districts reporting this measure.
See the full measureRecent movement
Overall score rose 5 points
84 to 89 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 89 is 7.3 points above the 81.7 average among 1,019 Texas districts reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Closing the Gaps rose 5 points
80 to 85 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 85 is 5.9 points above the 79.1 average among 1,015 Texas districts reporting this measure.
STAAR result
All Subjects above Texas averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 63%vs 49.7% avg · +13.3 pts
- Masters
- 30%vs 19.6% avg · +10.4 pts
Among 1,019 Texas districts reporting this measure.
See the full measureSelected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this district.
Read the full rating context and placement
Malta ISD is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 84.4 average for 257 rated districts serving a similar economic context. It is up 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 62nd of 257 rated districts serving a similar economic context (tied with 17 others).
Malta ISD is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.7 average for 46 rated districts in Region 08: Mt Pleasant. It is up 5 points since 2021-22.
Malta ISD is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.2 average for 13 rated districts in Bowie County. It is up 5 points since 2021-22.
Malta ISD is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.7 average for 181 similarly sized rated districts. It is up 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 56th of 181 similarly sized rated districts (tied with 11 others).
Malta ISD is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.7 average for 1,019 rated Texas districts. It is up 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 166th of 1,019 rated Texas districts (tied with 43 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
- Overview
- 5 years of ratings
- Where the score comes from
- Student outcomes
- Who this district serves
- Student counts behind the percentages
- Enrollment over time
- Students crossing district lines
- Discipline and removal from class
- Community around the district
- 1 schools in this district
- Spending per student
- Teachers
- Where this district ranks best
- Where this comes from
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this district has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 84 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | B | 89 | 84.4 257 reporting | 81.7 1,019 reporting |
| 2024-25 | B | 84 | 83.4 257 reporting | 80.3 1,019 reporting |
| 2023-24 | A | 91 | 81.5 257 reporting | 78.7 1,017 reporting |
| 2022-23 | B | 80 | 82.2 257 reporting | 79.2 1,018 reporting |
| 2021-22 | B | 84 | 82.7 257 reporting | 80.6 1,017 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Malta ISD
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (257 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 90 | A | — |
| School Progress | 84 | B | 6 |
| Closing the Gaps | 85 | B | 5 |
| Academic Growth | 82 | B | 8 |
| Relative Performance | 84 | B | 6 |
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 5 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this district that better measure is Student Achievement (90), so School Progress (84) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 90.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (257 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only districts for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this district serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 208
- Economically disadvantaged
- 41.3%−1.5 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 0.0%−7.6 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 17.3%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 96.8%+1.7 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 4.3%−7.2 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Malta ISD
- African American 1.9%
- Hispanic 4.8%
- White 84.6%
- American Indian 1.4%
- Two or More Races 7.2%
Selected comparison average For districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 257 reporting for every category shown · 257 in full cohort
- African American 4.3%
- Hispanic 31.2%
- White 59%
- American Indian 0.4%
- Asian 1.4%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.5%
Selected comparison average For Region 08: Mt Pleasant · 46 reporting for every category shown · 46 in full cohort
- African American 11.7%
- Hispanic 18.5%
- White 62.5%
- American Indian 0.5%
- Asian 0.5%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 6.2%
Selected comparison average For Bowie County · 13 reporting for every category shown · 13 in full cohort
- African American 14%
- Hispanic 10.3%
- White 67.2%
- American Indian 0.5%
- Asian 0.6%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 7.2%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized districts · 181 reporting for every category shown · 181 in full cohort
- African American 2.6%
- Hispanic 35.8%
- White 58.1%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 0.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 2.9%
Statewide average 1,019 reporting for every category shown · 1,019 Texas districts in full cohort
- African American 6.3%
- Hispanic 43.1%
- White 45.4%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.4%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.3%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 208
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 86
- Emergent bilingual students
- 0
- Special education students
- 36
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 208 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 15 (6.7%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 208
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- −15
Decrease · −6.7%
- Change since 2021–22
- 0
No change
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This district
- 208
- Selected comparison
- 4,892
| School year | Students enrolledMalta ISD | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 208 | First available year | 4,733.3 |
| 2022–23 | 220 | Increase of 12 (5.8%) | 4,835.1 |
| 2023–24 | 212 | Decrease of 8 (3.6%) | 4,878.5 |
| 2024–25 | 223 | Increase of 11 (5.2%) | 4,915 |
| 2025–26 | 208 | Decrease of 15 (6.7%) | 4,892 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting districts in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this district's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Students crossing district lines
How many students live in one public-school district and attend in another. These are movement counts, not a measure of family satisfaction or school quality.
- Transfers in
- 172
Live in another district; attend here · 2025–26
- Transfers out
- 40
Live here; attend in another public district or charter · 2025–26
- Transfers in minus transfers out
- +132
Arithmetic context only
Transfers in · 2025–26
- This district
- 172
- Selected comparison
- 286.3
Transfers out · 2025–26
- This district
- 40
- Selected comparison
- 470.5
Transfers in minus out · 2025–26
- This district
- +132
- Selected comparison
- −188
| School year | Transfers inMalta ISD | Transfers outMalta ISD | In minus outMalta ISD | Transfers inselected comparison average | Transfers outselected comparison average | In minus outselected comparison average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 167 | 33 | +134 | 233.9 | 369.7 | −142 |
| 2022–23 | 181 | 31 | +150 | 235.1 | 394.5 | −164 |
| 2023–24 | 172 | 40 | +132 | 246.3 | 407 | −164 |
| 2024–25 | 180 | 30 | +150 | 267.3 | 452 | −188 |
| 2025–26 | 172 | 40 | +132 | 286.3 | 470.5 | −188 |
Largest reported origins for transfers in
- New Boston ISD 019905104
- DeKalb ISD 01990143
- Simms ISD 01990917
Top reported flows only. TEA published 3 of 8 counterpart counts and masked 5.
Largest reported destinations for transfers out
- New Boston ISD 01990517
- DeKalb ISD 01990116
Top reported flows only. TEA published 2 of 6 counterpart counts and masked 4.
Selected comparison figures are average reported counts, not rates; group size and district enrollment affect them. They provide scale context and are not a performance judgment. This district's official totals do not change when the comparison does.
Source: TEA Student Transfer Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The totals are TEA's official district rows; this site does not add masked detail cells. A transfer records a mismatch between district of residence and public district or charter of attendance. It does not say why a family transferred, whether the move was optional, or whether either school is better.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- Suppressed
Rate not available
- Disciplinary actions
- Suppressed
Rate not available
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 234
2024–25
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 228 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| 2021–22 | 219 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| 2022–23 | 225 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| 2023–24 | 220 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2024–25 | 234 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| In-school suspensions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized districts can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this district's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Community around the district
A district serves a place as well as a roster. These Census estimates describe the resident community without treating its circumstances as an explanation or a verdict on students.
- People living inside the district boundary
- 591
2024 Census estimate
- Children ages 5–17
- 95
Living inside the boundary
- Children ages 5–17 in families in poverty
- 12
12.6%
- School-age child poverty rate
- 12.6%
12 of 95
Boundary population
- This district
- 591
- Selected comparison
- 29,826.7
School-age population
- This district
- 95
- Selected comparison
- 5,289.9
School-age population in poverty
- This district
- 12
- Selected comparison
- 531
School-age child poverty rate
- This district
- 12.6%
- Selected comparison
- 12.9%
Population averages provide neutral scale context and can differ sharply across a region, county or the state. The poverty-rate comparison is the like-for-like percentage; none of these Census measures is treated as school performance.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2024 Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates, fetched 24 August 2026. These are modeled estimates for residents inside the geographic district, not the students enrolled by the district. A family's poverty status is context, never a school-quality measure.
1 schools in this district
Number of schools in the district
- This district
- 1
- Selected comparison
- 7.3
The selected comparison is a neutral average district size. This district's school count and school-type mix remain its own facts.
- Elementary
- 1
Browse all 1 schoolsName, type, rating, score and enrollment
| School | Type | Rating | Score | Students |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Malta Elem | Elementary | B | 89 | 208 |
Spending per student
The selected txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference stay visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Malta ISD
- TEA peer group
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This district
- $12,115
- Selected comparison
- $23,612
This district spends $13,814 less per student than TEA's peer group, and $6,857 less per student than the state average.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Malta ISD | TEA peer group | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $7,442 | $14,290 | $13,054 | $14,013 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 257 rated districts reporting |
| 2019 | $7,406 | $14,384 | $13,108 | $14,395 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 257 rated districts reporting |
| 2020 | $7,199 | $16,581 | $14,058 | $15,410 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 257 rated districts reporting |
| 2021 | $8,125 | $17,863 | $14,797 | $16,507 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 257 rated districts reporting |
| 2022 | $10,890 | $19,817 | $15,708 | $17,909 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 257 rated districts reporting |
| 2023 | $10,082 | $21,827 | $16,792 | $19,275 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 257 rated districts reporting |
| 2024 | $11,633 | $23,517 | $18,125 | $21,959 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 257 rated districts reporting |
| 2025 | $12,115 | $25,929 | $18,972 | $23,612 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 257 rated districts reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers
- Average salary
- $64,692−$432 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 18−316.1 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 11.5−1.2 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Malta ISD
- Beginning 5%
- 1 to 5 years 19.3%
- 6 to 10 years 29.3%
- 11 to 20 years 27.1%
- 21 to 30 years 5%
- Over 30 years 14.4%
Selected comparison average For districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 257 reporting for every category shown · 257 in full cohort
- Beginning 5.4%
- 1 to 5 years 21.7%
- 6 to 10 years 17.8%
- 11 to 20 years 31.3%
- 21 to 30 years 18.6%
- Over 30 years 5.3%
Selected comparison average For Region 08: Mt Pleasant · 46 reporting for every category shown · 46 in full cohort
- Beginning 6%
- 1 to 5 years 23.2%
- 6 to 10 years 18.1%
- 11 to 20 years 28.8%
- 21 to 30 years 17.8%
- Over 30 years 6.1%
Selected comparison average For Bowie County · 13 reporting for every category shown · 13 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 20.3%
- 6 to 10 years 19.5%
- 11 to 20 years 32.7%
- 21 to 30 years 16.1%
- Over 30 years 5.3%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized districts · 181 reporting for every category shown · 181 in full cohort
- Beginning 7.3%
- 1 to 5 years 22.3%
- 6 to 10 years 16.4%
- 11 to 20 years 28.4%
- 21 to 30 years 19.1%
- Over 30 years 6.6%
Statewide average 1,019 reporting for every category shown · 1,019 Texas districts in full cohort
- Beginning 6.4%
- 1 to 5 years 23.9%
- 6 to 10 years 17.7%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 17.7%
- Over 30 years 5.5%
Teacher turnover over time
TEA reported a 10.7% teacher turnover rate in 2024–25.
Teacher turnover rate · 2024–25
- This district
- 10.7%
- Selected comparison
- 18.5%
| School year | Teacher turnover rateMalta ISD | Average turnover rateselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 18.0% | 14.6% |
| 2021–22 | 33.1% | 17.6% |
| 2022–23 | 5.5% | 19.8% |
| 2023–24 | 10.6% | 19.2% |
| 2024–25 | 10.7% | 18.5% |
TEA defines this district rate as the share of teacher full-time equivalents from the prior fall who are not employed as teachers in the district in the current fall. That can include leaving the district or remaining in a different role; it is not a campus-level measure. The comparison average changes with the selected group; this district's reported rate does not.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this district ranks best
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
2 measures
-
1of 46
Science — Approaches
Region 08: Mt Pleasant · of the 46 that report this measure
-
1of 46
Attendance
Region 08: Mt Pleasant · of the 46 that report this measure
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
12 measures
-
2of 46
Reading — Masters
Region 08: Mt Pleasant · of the 46 that report this measure
-
2of 46
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Region 08: Mt Pleasant · of the 46 that report this measure
-
2of 13
Math — Masters
Bowie County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
3of 13
Student Achievement
Bowie County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
3of 13
Academic Growth
Bowie County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
3of 13
All Subjects — Approaches
Bowie County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
3of 13
All Subjects — Meets
Bowie County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
3of 13
All Subjects — Masters
Bowie County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
3of 13
Reading — Approaches
Bowie County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
3of 13
Reading — Meets
Bowie County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
3of 13
Math — Approaches
Bowie County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
3of 13
Math — Meets
Bowie County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
5 measures
-
5of 13
Overall score
Bowie County · of the 13 that report this measure · full ranking
-
6of 13
Closing the Gaps
Bowie County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
8of 13
Relative Performance
Bowie County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
9of 13
School Progress
Bowie County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
10of 13
Science — Meets
Bowie County · of the 13 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this district ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this district; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no district would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.