Recent movement
Overall score rose 29 points
61 to 90 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 90 is 12.5 points above the 77.5 average among 90 districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Geographic public school district
Leary ISD
Bowie County · Region 08: Mt Pleasant · 106 students
Official district websiteEnrollment, registration and eligibility
- Current score
- 90/1002025-26
- Change
- +9 ptssince 2021-22
- Score vs similar economic context
- +12.5 ptsvs 77.5 average · 90 rated districts serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 4 of 90tied with 2 others
- Score vs region
- +7.3 ptsvs 82.7 average · 46 rated districts in Region 08: Mt Pleasant
- Region 08: Mt Pleasant placement
- 6 of 46tied with 2 others
- Score vs county
- +7.8 ptsvs 82.2 average · 13 rated districts in Bowie County
- Bowie County placement
- 2 of 13tied with 2 others
- Score vs similar-size group
- +9.8 ptsvs 80.2 average · 83 similarly sized rated districts
- Similar size placement
- 10 of 83tied with 4 others
- Score vs state
- +8.3 ptsvs 81.7 average · 1,019 rated Texas districts
- Texas placement
- 129 of 1,019tied with 36 others
A90
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 79 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.5 average for 90 rated districts serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 82.7 average for 46 rated districts in Region 08: Mt Pleasant.The current score is above the 82.2 average for 13 rated districts in Bowie County.The current score is above the 80.2 average for 83 similarly sized rated districts.The current score is above the 81.7 average for 1,019 rated Texas districts.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Recent domain gain
School Progress rose 32 points
60 to 92 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 92 is 13.4 points above the 78.6 average among 90 districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
- Tied for 2nd of 90 districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 2 districts share that value.
Current strength
Academic Growth above the similar-context average
92 +22.1 pts vs 69.9
- 92 is 22.1 points above the 69.9 average among 90 districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
- 1st of 90 districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Recent movement
Overall score rose 29 points
61 to 90 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 90 is 7.3 points above the 82.7 average among 46 districts in Region 08: Mt Pleasant reporting this measure.
- 1st of 46 districts in Region 08: Mt Pleasant reporting both years for one-year gain.
Recent domain gain
School Progress rose 32 points
60 to 92 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 92 is 9.4 points above the 82.6 average among 46 districts in Region 08: Mt Pleasant reporting this measure.
- Tied for 2nd of 46 districts in Region 08: Mt Pleasant reporting this measure; 2 districts share that value.
- 1st of 46 districts in Region 08: Mt Pleasant reporting both years for one-year gain.
Current strength
Academic Growth above the Region 08: Mt Pleasant average
92 +19.3 pts vs 72.7
- 92 is 19.3 points above the 72.7 average among 46 districts in Region 08: Mt Pleasant reporting this measure.
- 1st of 46 districts in Region 08: Mt Pleasant reporting this measure.
- 1st of 46 districts in Region 08: Mt Pleasant reporting both years for one-year gain.
Recent movement
Overall score rose 29 points
61 to 90 2024-25 to 2025-26
- Tied for 2nd of 13 districts in Bowie County reporting this measure; 3 districts share that value.
Recent domain gain
School Progress rose 32 points
60 to 92 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 1st of 13 districts in Bowie County reporting this measure.
Top placement
Academic Growth
92 1st of 13 districts in Bowie County reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureRecent movement
Overall score rose 29 points
61 to 90 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 90 is 9.8 points above the 80.2 average among 83 similarly sized districts reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
School Progress rose 32 points
60 to 92 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 92 is 12.4 points above the 79.6 average among 83 similarly sized districts reporting this measure.
STAAR result
Science above similar-size averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 54%vs 43.2% avg · +10.8 pts
- Masters
- 31%vs 16.2% avg · +14.8 pts
Among 82 similarly sized districts reporting this measure.
See the full measureRecent movement
Overall score rose 29 points
61 to 90 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 90 is 8.3 points above the 81.7 average among 1,019 Texas districts reporting this measure.
- 1st of 1,019 Texas districts reporting both years for one-year gain.
Recent domain gain
School Progress rose 32 points
60 to 92 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 92 is 11.4 points above the 80.6 average among 1,019 Texas districts reporting this measure.
- 2nd of 1,019 Texas districts reporting both years for one-year gain.
Current strength
Academic Growth above the Texas average
92 +19.5 pts vs 72.5
- 92 is 19.5 points above the 72.5 average among 1,018 Texas districts reporting this measure.
- Tied for 2nd of 1,017 Texas districts reporting both years for one-year gain; 2 districts share that change.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this district.
Read the full rating context and placement
Leary ISD is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.5 average for 90 rated districts serving a similar economic context. It is up 9 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 4th of 90 rated districts serving a similar economic context (tied with 2 others).
Leary ISD is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.7 average for 46 rated districts in Region 08: Mt Pleasant. It is up 9 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 6th of 46 rated districts in Region 08: Mt Pleasant (tied with 2 others).
Leary ISD is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.2 average for 13 rated districts in Bowie County. It is up 9 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2nd of 13 rated districts in Bowie County (tied with 2 others).
Leary ISD is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.2 average for 83 similarly sized rated districts. It is up 9 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 10th of 83 similarly sized rated districts (tied with 4 others).
Leary ISD is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.7 average for 1,019 rated Texas districts. It is up 9 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 129th of 1,019 rated Texas districts (tied with 36 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
- Overview
- 5 years of ratings
- Where the score comes from
- Student outcomes
- Who this district serves
- Student counts behind the percentages
- Enrollment over time
- Students crossing district lines
- Discipline and removal from class
- Community around the district
- 1 schools in this district
- Spending per student
- Teachers
- Where this district ranks best
- Where this comes from
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this district has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 79 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | A | 90 | 77.5 90 reporting | 81.7 1,019 reporting |
| 2024-25 | D | 61 | 74.1 90 reporting | 80.3 1,019 reporting |
| 2023-24 | F | 58 | 72.9 89 reporting | 78.7 1,017 reporting |
| 2022-23 | C | 73 | 73.0 89 reporting | 79.2 1,018 reporting |
| 2021-22 | B | 81 | 76.9 89 reporting | 80.6 1,017 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Leary ISD
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (90 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 72 | C | 8 |
| School Progress | 92 | A | — |
| Closing the Gaps | 86 | B | 4 |
| Academic Growth | 92 | A | — |
| Relative Performance | 81 | B | 9 |
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 4 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this district that better measure is School Progress (92), so Student Achievement (72) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 92.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (90 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only districts for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this district serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 106
- Economically disadvantaged
- 93.4%+4.0 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 0.0%−26.9 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 17.0%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 95.7%+2.9 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 8.5%−15.4 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Leary ISD
- African American 4.7%
- Hispanic 7.5%
- White 79.2%
- American Indian 0.9%
- Two or More Races 7.5%
Selected comparison average For districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 90 reporting for every category shown · 90 in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 76.3%
- White 9.8%
- American Indian 0.2%
- Asian 0.5%
- Two or More Races 1.7%
Selected comparison average For Region 08: Mt Pleasant · 46 reporting for every category shown · 46 in full cohort
- African American 11.7%
- Hispanic 18.5%
- White 62.5%
- American Indian 0.5%
- Asian 0.5%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 6.2%
Selected comparison average For Bowie County · 13 reporting for every category shown · 13 in full cohort
- African American 14%
- Hispanic 10.3%
- White 67.2%
- American Indian 0.5%
- Asian 0.6%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 7.2%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized districts · 83 reporting for every category shown · 83 in full cohort
- African American 3.8%
- Hispanic 39.2%
- White 53.4%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 0.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3%
Statewide average 1,019 reporting for every category shown · 1,019 Texas districts in full cohort
- African American 6.3%
- Hispanic 43.1%
- White 45.4%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.4%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.3%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 106
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 99
- Emergent bilingual students
- 0
- Special education students
- 18
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 106 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 13 (10.9%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 106
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- −13
Decrease · −10.9%
- Change since 2021–22
- +1
Increase · +1.0%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This district
- 106
- Selected comparison
- 6,104
| School year | Students enrolledLeary ISD | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 105 | First available year | 6,525.5 |
| 2022–23 | 93 | Decrease of 12 (11.4%) | 6,561.3 |
| 2023–24 | 120 | Increase of 27 (29.0%) | 6,456.6 |
| 2024–25 | 119 | Decrease of 1 (0.8%) | 6,348.5 |
| 2025–26 | 106 | Decrease of 13 (10.9%) | 6,104 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting districts in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this district's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Students crossing district lines
How many students live in one public-school district and attend in another. These are movement counts, not a measure of family satisfaction or school quality.
- Transfers in
- 44
Live in another district; attend here · 2025–26
- Transfers out
- 74
Live here; attend in another public district or charter · 2025–26
- Transfers in minus transfers out
- −30
Arithmetic context only
Transfers in · 2025–26
- This district
- 44
- Selected comparison
- 434.4
Transfers out · 2025–26
- This district
- 74
- Selected comparison
- 1,406
Transfers in minus out · 2025–26
- This district
- −30
- Selected comparison
- −1,236
| School year | Transfers inLeary ISD | Transfers outLeary ISD | In minus outLeary ISD | Transfers inselected comparison average | Transfers outselected comparison average | In minus outselected comparison average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 24 | 76 | −52 | 316.9 | 1,249.5 | −1,134 |
| 2022–23 | 30 | 82 | −52 | 373.9 | 1,310.7 | −1,215 |
| 2023–24 | 37 | 71 | −34 | 376.9 | 1,336.3 | −1,149 |
| 2024–25 | 44 | 76 | −32 | 394.1 | 1,399.9 | −1,222 |
| 2025–26 | 44 | 74 | −30 | 434.4 | 1,406 | −1,236 |
Largest reported origins for transfers in
- Hooks ISD 01990216
- Texarkana ISD 01990716
Top reported flows only. TEA published 2 of 7 counterpart counts and masked 5.
Largest reported destinations for transfers out
- Hooks ISD 01990265
Top reported flows only. TEA published 1 of 5 counterpart counts and masked 4.
Selected comparison figures are average reported counts, not rates; group size and district enrollment affect them. They provide scale context and are not a performance judgment. This district's official totals do not change when the comparison does.
Source: TEA Student Transfer Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The totals are TEA's official district rows; this site does not add masked detail cells. A transfer records a mismatch between district of residence and public district or charter of attendance. It does not say why a family transferred, whether the move was optional, or whether either school is better.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- Suppressed
Rate not available
- Disciplinary actions
- Suppressed
Rate not available
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 126
2024–25
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 134 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2021–22 | 128 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2022–23 | 119 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| 2023–24 | 137 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| 2024–25 | 126 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| In-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized districts can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this district's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Community around the district
A district serves a place as well as a roster. These Census estimates describe the resident community without treating its circumstances as an explanation or a verdict on students.
- People living inside the district boundary
- 874
2024 Census estimate
- Children ages 5–17
- 186
Living inside the boundary
- Children ages 5–17 in families in poverty
- 36
19.4%
- School-age child poverty rate
- 19.4%
36 of 186
Boundary population
- This district
- 874
- Selected comparison
- 36,620.2
School-age population
- This district
- 186
- Selected comparison
- 7,295.9
School-age population in poverty
- This district
- 36
- Selected comparison
- 2,183.6
School-age child poverty rate
- This district
- 19.4%
- Selected comparison
- 27.1%
Population averages provide neutral scale context and can differ sharply across a region, county or the state. The poverty-rate comparison is the like-for-like percentage; none of these Census measures is treated as school performance.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2024 Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates, fetched 24 August 2026. These are modeled estimates for residents inside the geographic district, not the students enrolled by the district. A family's poverty status is context, never a school-quality measure.
1 schools in this district
Number of schools in the district
- This district
- 1
- Selected comparison
- 10.3
The selected comparison is a neutral average district size. This district's school count and school-type mix remain its own facts.
- Elementary
- 1
Browse all 1 schoolsName, type, rating, score and enrollment
| School | Type | Rating | Score | Students |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leary Elem | Elementary | A | 90 | 106 |
Spending per student
The selected txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference stay visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Leary ISD
- TEA peer group
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This district
- $11,886
- Selected comparison
- $21,986
This district spends $14,043 less per student than TEA's peer group, and $7,086 less per student than the state average.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Leary ISD | TEA peer group | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $11,141 | $14,290 | $13,054 | $14,799 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 90 rated districts reporting |
| 2019 | $9,016 | $14,384 | $13,108 | $14,842 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 90 rated districts reporting |
| 2020 | $8,474 | $16,581 | $14,058 | $15,723 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 90 rated districts reporting |
| 2021 | $11,834 | $17,863 | $14,797 | $16,956 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 90 rated districts reporting |
| 2022 | $11,953 | $19,817 | $15,708 | $21,213 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 90 rated districts reporting |
| 2023 | $13,793 | $21,827 | $16,792 | $23,614 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 90 rated districts reporting |
| 2024 | $12,485 | $23,517 | $18,125 | $21,463 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 90 rated districts reporting |
| 2025 | $11,886 | $25,929 | $18,972 | $21,986 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 90 rated districts reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers
- Average salary
- $53,006−$12,410 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 11−414.1 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 9.7−3.6 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Leary ISD
- Beginning 9.2%
- 1 to 5 years 18.3%
- 6 to 10 years 9.2%
- 11 to 20 years 45%
- 21 to 30 years 18.3%
Selected comparison average For districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 90 reporting for every category shown · 90 in full cohort
- Beginning 7.7%
- 1 to 5 years 26.6%
- 6 to 10 years 17.4%
- 11 to 20 years 27%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 5.5%
Selected comparison average For Region 08: Mt Pleasant · 46 reporting for every category shown · 46 in full cohort
- Beginning 6%
- 1 to 5 years 23.2%
- 6 to 10 years 18.1%
- 11 to 20 years 28.8%
- 21 to 30 years 17.8%
- Over 30 years 6.1%
Selected comparison average For Bowie County · 13 reporting for every category shown · 13 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 20.3%
- 6 to 10 years 19.5%
- 11 to 20 years 32.7%
- 21 to 30 years 16.1%
- Over 30 years 5.3%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized districts · 83 reporting for every category shown · 83 in full cohort
- Beginning 9.8%
- 1 to 5 years 24.3%
- 6 to 10 years 13.9%
- 11 to 20 years 26.1%
- 21 to 30 years 17.9%
- Over 30 years 8.2%
Statewide average 1,019 reporting for every category shown · 1,019 Texas districts in full cohort
- Beginning 6.4%
- 1 to 5 years 23.9%
- 6 to 10 years 17.7%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 17.7%
- Over 30 years 5.5%
Teacher turnover over time
TEA reported a 0.0% teacher turnover rate in 2024–25.
Teacher turnover rate · 2024–25
- This district
- 0.0%
- Selected comparison
- 21.5%
| School year | Teacher turnover rateLeary ISD | Average turnover rateselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 9.1% | 18.2% |
| 2021–22 | 9.1% | 21.0% |
| 2022–23 | 18.2% | 24.8% |
| 2023–24 | 20.0% | 23.0% |
| 2024–25 | 0.0% | 21.5% |
TEA defines this district rate as the share of teacher full-time equivalents from the prior fall who are not employed as teachers in the district in the current fall. That can include leaving the district or remaining in a different role; it is not a campus-level measure. The comparison average changes with the selected group; this district's reported rate does not.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this district ranks best
Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
3 measures
-
1of 90
Academic Growth
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 90 that report this measure
-
1of 90
Reading — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 90 that report this measure
-
1of 13
School Progress
Bowie County · of the 13 that report this measure
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
5 measures
-
2of 90
All Subjects — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 90 that report this measure · tied with 2
-
2of 13
Overall score
Bowie County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 2 · full ranking
-
3of 90
Science — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 90 that report this measure
-
3of 90
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 90 that report this measure
-
3of 13
Closing the Gaps
Bowie County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 2
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
9 measures
-
4of 90
Science — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 90 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
4of 90
Attendance
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 90 that report this measure
-
7of 13
Science — Meets
Bowie County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
9of 13
Relative Performance
Bowie County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
9of 13
Reading — Meets
Bowie County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
10of 13
Student Achievement
Bowie County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
10of 13
All Subjects — Meets
Bowie County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
10of 13
Math — Approaches
Bowie County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
10of 11
Social Studies — Approaches
Bowie County · of the 11 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this district ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this district; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no district would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.