txschools.net

Unofficial · not affiliated with the Texas Education Agency · what this is

District · Traditional

Jefferson ISD

Marion County · Region 08: Mt Pleasant · 1,105 students

Learn more & enroll

C77

Jefferson ISD is rated C by TEA, scoring 77 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 79.5 average of the 350 districts serving a similar share of economically disadvantaged students, and below the statewide average of 81.7. It is up 12 points since 2021-22 — both years scored under TEA's current rules, since TEA rewrote them in 2023; under the rules in force back then it scored 72.

Ranks 729th of 1,019 Texas districts (tied with 47 others), and 38th of 46 in Region 08: Mt Pleasant (tied with 2 others).

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. How this district's change over time is ranked
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. Who this district serves
  7. Spending per student
  8. Teachers
  9. Where this district ranks best
  10. 4 schools in this district
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Compare against
90807060 Districts like this oneTexas averageJefferson ISD 6573716677 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 72 that year.

Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSimilarState
2025-26C7779.581.7
2024-25D6677.780.3
2023-24C7175.978.7
2022-23C7376.779.2
2021-22D6578.480.6

How this district's change over time is ranked

TEA publishes most measures for one year only, so a change ranking exists just where the same figure is published across years — the overall score, the five score domains, and per-student spending. This page does not yet state where Jefferson ISD itself places on these lists, only that the lists exist; open one to find this district's own row.

Texas districts

Region 08: Mt Pleasant

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement73 C−5.2 vs similar · −8.5 vs region
  • School Progress77 C−3.3 vs similar · −5.6 vs region
  • Closing the Gaps77 C+0.5 vs similar · −3.1 vs region
  • Academic Growth77 C+6.5 vs similar · +4.3 vs region
  • Relative Performance75 C−4.9 vs similar · −6.6 vs region
  • Jefferson ISD
  • Similar student population (350)
  • Region 08: Mt Pleasant (46)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement73C7
School Progress77C3
Closing the Gaps77C3
Academic Growth77C3
Relative Performance75C5

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 3 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this district that better measure is School Progress (77), so Student Achievement (73) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 77.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level68%−4 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level42%−2 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level16%+0 vs Similar student population

Reading

  • Approaches grade level71%−3 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level48%−1 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level16%−0 vs Similar student population

Math

  • Approaches grade level63%−4 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level32%−5 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level13%+0 vs Similar student population

Science

  • Approaches grade level69%−6 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level44%−3 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level20%+1 vs Similar student population

Social Studies

  • Approaches grade level70%−2 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level49%+5 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level22%+4 vs Similar student population
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar student population (350)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The tick on each bar marks the average for Similar student population (350 districts) — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
95.8%−0.3 pts vs similar
Five-Year
98.6%+2.0 pts vs similar
Six-Year
96.5%+0.4 pts vs similar
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.6 pts vs similar

College, career and military readiness

CCMR criteria
CriterionThis districtsimilarGap
Total credit for CCMR criteria77.0%88.8%−11.8
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course11.6%57.7%−46.1
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA11.6%23.5%−11.9
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)0.0%5.6%−5.6
Earned college credit for a dual credit course20.9%31.8%−10.9
Earned an industry-based certification45.3%43.7%+1.6
Earned a level I or level II certificate8.1%2.0%+6.1
Earned an associate degree8.1%4.2%+3.9
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%2.7%−2.7
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness11.6%3.8%+7.8
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student17.4%9.6%+7.8
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces8.1%3.5%+4.6

Who this district serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
1,105
Economically disadvantaged
70.7%+1.0 pts vs similar
English learners
1.9%−12.8 pts vs similar
Special education
21.0%+2.4 pts vs similar
Attendance
93.2%−0.9 pts vs similar
Chronically absent
24.1%+7.0 pts vs similar

Student demographics

African American: 31.2%Hispanic: 7%White: 53.9%American Indian: 0.4%Asian: 0.6%Two or More Races: 6.9%
  • African American 31.2%
  • Hispanic 7%
  • White 53.9%
  • American Indian 0.4%
  • Asian 0.6%
  • Two or More Races 6.9%

Spending per student

Compared against TEA's own peer group, which controls for size and student population, and against the state.

$10k$15k$21k20182020202220242025
  • Jefferson ISD
  • TEA peer group
  • Texas average

Spends $2,718 less per student than its peer group, and $1,929 less than the state average.

Teachers

Average salary
$57,420−$6,201 vs similar
Teachers
95
Students per staff member
11.6

Teaching experience

Beginning: 12.5%1 to 5 years: 22.2%6 to 10 years: 18.4%11 to 20 years: 27.1%21 to 30 years: 13.6%Over 30 years: 6.2%
  • Beginning 12.5%
  • 1 to 5 years 22.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 18.4%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 13.6%
  • Over 30 years 6.2%

Where this district ranks best

Out of 123 rankings computed across every published metric and every comparison group, these are the placements that stand out. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

  • 3of 42

    Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness

    Region 08: Mt Pleasant · of the 42 that report this measure

  • 3of 42

    Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student

    Region 08: Mt Pleasant · of the 42 that report this measure

  • 5of 42

    Earned a level I or level II certificate

    Region 08: Mt Pleasant · of the 42 that report this measure

  • 6of 42

    Earned an associate degree

    Region 08: Mt Pleasant · of the 42 that report this measure

  • 6of 42

    Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces

    Region 08: Mt Pleasant · of the 42 that report this measure

  • 37of 978

    Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness

    Texas average · of the 978 that report this measure

  • 1of 981

    Dropout Rate (lowest is best)

    Texas average (standard accountability only) · of the 981 that report this measure · tied with 506 · full ranking

  • 1of 338

    Dropout Rate (lowest is best)

    Similar student population (standard accountability only) · of the 338 that report this measure · tied with 161

  • 1of 42

    Dropout Rate (lowest is best)

    Region 08: Mt Pleasant (standard accountability only) · of the 42 that report this measure · tied with 26

  • 1of 42

    Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit

    Region 08: Mt Pleasant · of the 42 that report this measure · tied with 41

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this district ranks poorly. Each statement below states its cohort and its denominator so it can be checked — a rank without an n is a boast, not a fact. Ties are shown because a shared ceiling is not a sole first place. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no district would put in a press release.

4 schools in this district

Schools in this district
SchoolTypeRatingScoreStudents
Jefferson HSHigh SchoolB84360
Jefferson ElemElementaryB81377
Jefferson JHMiddle / Jr. HighC73230
Jefferson MSElementaryC72138

Where this comes from

Every figure on this page comes from data the Texas Education Agency publishes at txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026 and archived with a checksum so each number stays traceable to the bytes TEA served.

Download this district as CSV · JSON · the whole dataset