District · Traditional
Mount Pleasant ISD
Titus County · Region 08: Mt Pleasant · 5,019 students
Mount Pleasant ISD is rated B by TEA, scoring 88 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.2 average of the 281 districts serving a similar share of economically disadvantaged students, and above the statewide average of 81.7. It is up 7 points since 2021-22 — both years scored under TEA's current rules, since TEA rewrote them in 2023; under the rules in force back then it scored 84.
Ranks 210th of 1,019 Texas districts (tied with 42 others), and 10th of 46 in Region 08: Mt Pleasant (tied with 1 other).
Jump to a section
5 years of ratings
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 84 that year.
| Year | Rating | Score | Similar | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | B | 88 | 78.2 | 81.7 |
| 2024-25 | B | 88 | 76.3 | 80.3 |
| 2023-24 | B | 84 | 74.8 | 78.7 |
| 2022-23 | B | 80 | 75.4 | 79.2 |
| 2021-22 | B | 81 | 77.7 | 80.6 |
How this district's change over time is ranked
TEA publishes most measures for one year only, so a change ranking exists just where the same figure is published across years — the overall score, the five score domains, and per-student spending. This page does not yet state where Mount Pleasant ISD itself places on these lists, only that the lists exist; open one to find this district's own row.
Texas districts
Region 08: Mt Pleasant
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Mount Pleasant ISD
- Similar student population (281)
- Region 08: Mt Pleasant (46)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 83 | B | 7 |
| School Progress | 90 | A | — |
| Closing the Gaps | 84 | B | 6 |
| Academic Growth | 74 | C | 6 |
| Relative Performance | 90 | A | — |
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 6 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this district that better measure is School Progress (90), so Student Achievement (83) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 90.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar student population (281)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The tick on each bar marks the average for Similar student population (281 districts) — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
- Four-Year
- 99.1%+3.5 pts vs similar
- Five-Year
- 99.1%+2.9 pts vs similar
- Six-Year
- 98.9%+3.2 pts vs similar
- Dropout Rate
- 0.1%−0.7 pts vs similar
College, career and military readiness
| Criterion | This district | similar | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total credit for CCMR criteria | 97.0% | 86.9% | +10.1 |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course | 81.4% | 54.8% | +26.6 |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA | 13.8% | 22.0% | −8.2 |
| Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s) | 8.6% | 6.0% | +2.6 |
| Earned college credit for a dual credit course | 31.5% | 30.5% | +1.0 |
| Earned an industry-based certification | 32.1% | 43.7% | −11.6 |
| Earned a level I or level II certificate | 5.7% | 2.6% | +3.1 |
| Earned an associate degree | 0.0% | 4.4% | −4.4 |
| Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit | 0.0% | 2.5% | −2.5 |
| Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness | 3.4% | 3.9% | −0.5 |
| Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student | 9.7% | 10.1% | −0.4 |
| Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces | 2.9% | 3.2% | −0.3 |
Who this district serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 5,019
- Economically disadvantaged
- 76.7%+1.1 pts vs similar
- English learners
- 45.3%+28.2 pts vs similar
- Special education
- 18.5%±0.0 pts vs similar
- Attendance
- 93.8%+0.1 pts vs similar
- Chronically absent
- 17.1%−2.2 pts vs similar
Student demographics
- African American 11.8%
- Hispanic 70.6%
- White 15.4%
- American Indian 0.2%
- Asian 0.5%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 1.5%
Spending per student
Compared against TEA's own peer group, which controls for size and student population, and against the state.
- Mount Pleasant ISD
- TEA peer group
- Texas average
Spends $4,358 less per student than its peer group, and $4,360 less than the state average.
Teachers
- Average salary
- $61,114−$2,988 vs similar
- Teachers
- 397
- Students per staff member
- 12.6
Teaching experience
- Beginning 2.9%
- 1 to 5 years 28.3%
- 6 to 10 years 18.7%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 17.3%
- Over 30 years 4.1%
Where this district ranks best
Out of 123 rankings computed across every published metric and every comparison group, these are the placements that stand out. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
-
4of 46
Relative Performance
Region 08: Mt Pleasant · of the 46 that report this measure
-
5of 46
School Progress
Region 08: Mt Pleasant · of the 46 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
5of 42
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
Region 08: Mt Pleasant · of the 42 that report this measure
-
9of 42
Earned a level I or level II certificate
Region 08: Mt Pleasant · of the 42 that report this measure
-
10of 46
Overall score
Region 08: Mt Pleasant · of the 46 that report this measure · tied with 1 · full ranking
-
10of 42
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
Region 08: Mt Pleasant · of the 42 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
14of 281
School Progress
Similar student population · of the 281 that report this measure · tied with 2
-
14of 281
Relative Performance
Similar student population · of the 281 that report this measure · tied with 4
-
1of 42
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
Region 08: Mt Pleasant · of the 42 that report this measure · tied with 41
-
10of 45
Social Studies — Masters
Region 08: Mt Pleasant · of the 45 that report this measure · tied with 3
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this district ranks poorly. Each statement below states its cohort and its denominator so it can be checked — a rank without an n is a boast, not a fact. Ties are shown because a shared ceiling is not a sole first place. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no district would put in a press release.
9 schools in this district
| School | Type | Rating | Score | Students |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mount Pleasant HS | High School | A | 93 | 1,491 |
| Mount Pleasant JH | Middle / Jr. High | B | 89 | 702 |
| Child Development Center | Elementary | B | 88 | 428 |
| Annie Sims Elem | Elementary | B | 84 | 529 |
| E C Brice Elem | Elementary | B | 84 | 419 |
| P E Wallace MS | Middle / Jr. High | B | 82 | 693 |
| Frances Corprew Elem | Elementary | B | 81 | 379 |
| Vivian Fowler Elem | Elementary | C | 77 | 370 |
| Mount Pleasant DAEP | K-12 | Not Rated | — | 8 |
Where this comes from
Every figure on this page comes from data the Texas Education Agency publishes at txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026 and archived with a checksum so each number stays traceable to the bytes TEA served.