Recent movement
Overall score rose 3 points
86 to 89 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 89 is 10.9 points above the 78.1 average among 2,083 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Traditional public school campus
Mount Pleasant JH
Titus County · Region 08: Mt Pleasant · 702 students
Official school websiteSchool information and family resources
- Current score
- 89/1002025-26
- Change
- +5 ptssince 2021-22
- Score vs similar economic context
- +10.9 ptsvs 78.1 average · 2,083 rated schools serving a similar economic context
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
- 283 of 2,083tied with 59 others
- Score vs region
- +7.5 ptsvs 81.5 average · 142 rated schools in Region 08: Mt Pleasant
- Region 08: Mt Pleasant placement
- 34 of 142tied with 4 others
- Score vs county
- +5.9 ptsvs 83.1 average · 14 rated schools in Titus County
- Titus County placement
- 4 of 14among reporting schools
- Score vs similar-size group
- +8.4 ptsvs 80.6 average · 4,296 similarly sized rated schools
- Similar size placement
- 984 of 4,296tied with 155 others
- Score vs state
- +7.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
- Texas placement
- 1,913 of 7,646tied with 285 others
B89
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 81 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 78.1 average for 2,083 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 81.5 average for 142 rated schools in Region 08: Mt Pleasant.The current score is above the 83.1 average for 14 rated schools in Titus County.The current score is above the 80.6 average for 4,296 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Recent domain gain
Academic Growth rose 6 points
76 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 82 is 9.5 points above the 72.5 average among 1,874 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
- Meets
- 47%vs 43.4% avg · +3.6 pts
- Masters
- 23%vs 17.1% avg · +5.9 pts
Among 1,928 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measureRecent movement
Overall score rose 3 points
86 to 89 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 89 is 7.5 points above the 81.5 average among 142 schools in Region 08: Mt Pleasant reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Academic Growth rose 6 points
76 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 82 is 9.4 points above the 72.6 average among 123 schools in Region 08: Mt Pleasant reporting this measure.
Current strength
Closing the Gaps above the Region 08: Mt Pleasant average
90 +11.8 pts vs 78.2
- 90 is 11.8 points above the 78.2 average among 127 schools in Region 08: Mt Pleasant reporting this measure.
Recent movement
Overall score rose 3 points
86 to 89 2024-25 to 2025-26
See the full measureRecent domain gain
Academic Growth rose 6 points
76 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 2nd of 13 schools in Titus County reporting this measure.
Top placement
Closing the Gaps
90 2nd of 13 schools in Titus County reporting this measure · 2025-26
See the full measureRecent movement
Overall score rose 3 points
86 to 89 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 89 is 8.4 points above the 80.6 average among 4,296 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Academic Growth rose 6 points
76 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 82 is 5.7 points above the 76.3 average among 4,134 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Closing the Gaps above the similar-size average
90 +12 pts vs 78
- 90 is 12 points above the 78 average among 4,174 similarly sized schools reporting this measure.
Recent movement
Overall score rose 3 points
86 to 89 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 89 is 7.7 points above the 81.3 average among 7,646 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Recent domain gain
Academic Growth rose 6 points
76 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26
- 82 is 6.3 points above the 75.7 average among 7,090 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Current strength
Closing the Gaps above the Texas average
90 +11.3 pts vs 78.7
- 90 is 11.3 points above the 78.7 average among 7,185 Texas schools reporting this measure.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Mount Pleasant JH is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.1 average for 2,083 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 283rd of 2,083 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 59 others).
Mount Pleasant JH is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.5 average for 142 rated schools in Region 08: Mt Pleasant. It is up 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 34th of 142 rated schools in Region 08: Mt Pleasant (tied with 4 others).
Mount Pleasant JH is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.1 average for 14 rated schools in Titus County. It is up 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 4th of 14 rated schools in Titus County.
Mount Pleasant JH is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.6 average for 4,296 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 984th of 4,296 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 155 others).
Mount Pleasant JH is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 5 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,913th of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 285 others).
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 81 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | B | 89 | 78.1 2,083 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | B | 86 | 77.8 2,072 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | B | 83 | 75.4 2,060 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
| 2022-23 | B | 80 | 75.8 2,037 reporting | 79.1 7,377 reporting |
| 2021-22 | B | 84 | 81.7 2,020 reporting | 83.7 7,283 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Mount Pleasant JH
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,083 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 79 | C | 1 |
| School Progress | 88 | B | 2 |
| Closing the Gaps | 90 | A | — |
| Academic Growth | 82 | B | 8 |
| Relative Performance | 88 | B | 2 |
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 2 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (88), so Student Achievement (79) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 88.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,083 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 702
- Economically disadvantaged
- 76.9%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 43.9%+17.9 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 13.1%−5.7 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 94.0%+0.4 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 17.7%−1.8 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Mount Pleasant JH
- African American 10.7%
- Hispanic 70.8%
- White 17.4%
- Asian 0.1%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 0.9%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,083 reporting for every category shown · 2,083 in full cohort
- African American 13.6%
- Hispanic 64.3%
- White 16.9%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.8%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 2.9%
Selected comparison average For Region 08: Mt Pleasant · 142 reporting for every category shown · 142 in full cohort
- African American 16.3%
- Hispanic 21.3%
- White 54.6%
- American Indian 0.5%
- Asian 0.7%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 6.5%
Selected comparison average For Titus County · 14 reporting for every category shown · 14 in full cohort
- African American 7.9%
- Hispanic 61.2%
- White 28.3%
- American Indian 0.2%
- Asian 0.7%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 1.7%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 4,296 reporting for every category shown · 4,296 in full cohort
- African American 12.4%
- Hispanic 53.9%
- White 24.3%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 5.3%
- Pacific Islander 0.2%
- Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- African American 11.5%
- Hispanic 52.6%
- White 27.8%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 4.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 702
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 540
- Emergent bilingual students
- 308
- Special education students
- 92
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 76
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 755
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 10.1%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 702 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 11 (1.5%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 702
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- −11
Decrease · −1.5%
- Change since 2021–22
- −85
Decrease · −10.8%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This school
- 702
- Selected comparison
- 641.4
| School year | Students enrolledMount Pleasant JH | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 787 | First available year | 659.8 |
| 2022–23 | 760 | Decrease of 27 (3.4%) | 662.8 |
| 2023–24 | 695 | Decrease of 65 (8.6%) | 659.4 |
| 2024–25 | 713 | Increase of 18 (2.6%) | 658 |
| 2025–26 | 702 | Decrease of 11 (1.5%) | 641.4 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- 204
27.0% of cumulative year-end enrollment
- Disciplinary actions
- 535
70.86 per 100 students
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 755
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
- This school
- 27.0%
- Selected comparison
- 13.2%
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
- This school
- 70.86
- Selected comparison
- 32
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 827 | 191 | 23.1% | 411 | 49.70 | 8.9% | 17.7 |
| 2021–22 | 829 | 250 | 30.2% | 659 | 79.49 | 12.8% | 30.8 |
| 2022–23 | 801 | 286 | 35.7% | 878 | 109.61 | 13.6% | 33.7 |
| 2023–24 | 742 | 243 | 32.8% | 658 | 88.68 | 13.6% | 33.6 |
| 2024–25 | 755 | 204 | 27.0% | 535 | 70.86 | 13.2% | 32 |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | 204 | 27.0% | 535 | 70.86 | 13.2% | 32 |
| In-school suspensions | 198 | 26.2% | 444 | 58.81 | 11.7% | 23.4 |
| Out-of-school suspensions | 38 | 5.0% | 75 | 9.93 | 8.0% | 12.4 |
| DAEP placements | 13 | 1.7% | 14 | 1.85 | 5.3% | 6.4 |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | 13 | 1.7% | 14 | 1.85 | 3.2% | 3.7 |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Mount Pleasant JH
- Parent district: Mount Pleasant ISD
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $9,219
- Selected comparison
- $12,959
For 2025, TEA reported $9,219 per student for this campus, $14,612 per student for its parent district, Mount Pleasant ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Mount Pleasant JH | Parent district: Mount Pleasant ISD | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $7,157 | $11,323 | $13,054 | $8,050 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,951 rated schools reporting |
| 2019 | $7,013 | $11,709 | $13,108 | $8,204 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,972 rated schools reporting |
| 2020 | $8,303 | $13,472 | $14,058 | $8,736 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,990 rated schools reporting |
| 2021 | $8,169 | $18,184 | $14,797 | $9,321 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,002 rated schools reporting |
| 2022 | $8,428 | $18,319 | $15,708 | $10,654 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,020 rated schools reporting |
| 2023 | $8,860 | $16,120 | $16,792 | $11,229 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,037 rated schools reporting |
| 2024 | $9,801 | $15,322 | $18,125 | $12,261 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,058 rated schools reporting |
| 2025 | $9,219 | $14,612 | $18,972 | $12,959 | average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,070 rated schools reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
- Average salary
- $60,684−$6,076 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 51+7.2 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 13.8−0.2 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Mount Pleasant JH
- Beginning 3.7%
- 1 to 5 years 29.9%
- 6 to 10 years 22.2%
- 11 to 20 years 21.3%
- 21 to 30 years 19.5%
- Over 30 years 3.5%
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,083 reporting for every category shown · 2,083 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.8%
- 1 to 5 years 27.5%
- 6 to 10 years 19%
- 11 to 20 years 27.2%
- 21 to 30 years 15.1%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Selected comparison average For Region 08: Mt Pleasant · 142 reporting for every category shown · 142 in full cohort
- Beginning 5.6%
- 1 to 5 years 24.2%
- 6 to 10 years 18.4%
- 11 to 20 years 27.3%
- 21 to 30 years 17.2%
- Over 30 years 6.5%
Selected comparison average For Titus County · 14 reporting for every category shown · 14 in full cohort
- Beginning 3.7%
- 1 to 5 years 29.2%
- 6 to 10 years 20%
- 11 to 20 years 27.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.6%
- Over 30 years 3.8%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 4,296 reporting for every category shown · 4,296 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.1%
- 1 to 5 years 26.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.9%
- 11 to 20 years 29%
- 21 to 30 years 15.2%
- Over 30 years 2.9%
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
- Beginning 6.2%
- 1 to 5 years 25.6%
- 6 to 10 years 19.2%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
| Grade or subject | Average students per classMount Pleasant JH · 2024–25 | Average students per classselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Secondary English | 18.9 | 15.5 |
| Secondary languages other than English | 20.1 | 18.3 |
| Secondary math | 15.4 | 16.5 |
| Secondary science | 17.2 | 17.8 |
| Secondary social studies | 16.8 | 17.9 |
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this school ranks best
Out of 114 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
3 measures
-
2of 13
Closing the Gaps
Titus County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
2of 13
Academic Growth
Titus County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
3of 13
Reading — Masters
Titus County · of the 13 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
13 measures
-
4of 14
Overall score
Titus County · of the 14 that report this measure
-
4of 13
All Subjects — Masters
Titus County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 2
-
5of 13
Reading — Approaches
Titus County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
5of 13
Math — Masters
Titus County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
6of 13
School Progress
Titus County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
6of 13
Relative Performance
Titus County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
7of 13
Student Achievement
Titus County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
7of 13
Math — Meets
Titus County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
8of 13
All Subjects — Approaches
Titus County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
8of 13
Reading — Meets
Titus County · of the 13 that report this measure
-
9of 14
Per-student spending
Titus County · of the 14 that report this measure
-
9of 13
All Subjects — Meets
Titus County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1
-
9of 13
Math — Approaches
Titus County · of the 13 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 225902041.