txschools.net

Unofficial · not affiliated with the Texas Education Agency · what this is

District · Traditional

Conroe ISD

Montgomery County · Region 06: Huntsville · 72,218 students

Learn more & enroll

B85

Conroe ISD is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.7 average of the 296 districts serving a similar share of economically disadvantaged students, and above the statewide average of 81.7. It is up 2 points since 2021-22 — both years scored under TEA's current rules, since TEA rewrote them in 2023; under the rules in force back then it scored 89.

Ranks 350th of 1,019 Texas districts (tied with 50 others), and 17th of 55 in Region 06: Huntsville (tied with 3 others).

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. How this district's change over time is ranked
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. Who this district serves
  7. Spending per student
  8. Teachers
  9. Where this district ranks best
  10. 68 schools in this district
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Compare against
908070 Districts like this oneTexas averageConroe ISD 8384858585 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 89 that year.

Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSimilarState
2025-26B8583.781.7
2024-25B8582.980.3
2023-24B8581.178.7
2022-23B8481.879.2
2021-22B8382.680.6

How this district's change over time is ranked

TEA publishes most measures for one year only, so a change ranking exists just where the same figure is published across years — the overall score, the five score domains, and per-student spending. This page does not yet state where Conroe ISD itself places on these lists, only that the lists exist; open one to find this district's own row.

Texas districts

Region 06: Huntsville

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement85 B+0.7 vs similar · +5.0 vs region
  • School Progress83 B+1.5 vs similar · +3.5 vs region
  • Closing the Gaps84 B+2.4 vs similar · +6.9 vs region
  • Academic Growth77 C+2.4 vs similar · +5.4 vs region
  • Relative Performance83 B+2.4 vs similar · +3.7 vs region
  • Conroe ISD
  • Similar student population (296)
  • Region 06: Huntsville (55)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement85B5
School Progress83B7
Closing the Gaps84B6
Academic Growth77C3
Relative Performance83B7

Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 5 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this district that better measure is Student Achievement (85), so School Progress (83) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 85.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level81%+2 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level62%+8 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level33%+11 vs Similar student population

Reading

  • Approaches grade level81%−0 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level64%+4 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level31%+7 vs Similar student population

Math

  • Approaches grade level80%+4 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level58%+10 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level29%+11 vs Similar student population

Science

  • Approaches grade level85%+3 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level65%+8 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level40%+13 vs Similar student population

Social Studies

  • Approaches grade level83%+6 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level63%+11 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level39%+15 vs Similar student population
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar student population (296)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The tick on each bar marks the average for Similar student population (296 districts) — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
97.7%+1.5 pts vs similar
Five-Year
98.4%+1.7 pts vs similar
Six-Year
98.4%+1.8 pts vs similar
Dropout Rate
0.3%±0.0 pts vs similar

College, career and military readiness

CCMR criteria
CriterionThis districtsimilarGap
Total credit for CCMR criteria80.0%89.4%−9.4
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course56.4%58.1%−1.7
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA44.6%31.5%+13.1
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)33.8%8.5%+25.3
Earned college credit for a dual credit course33.4%37.9%−4.5
Earned an industry-based certification29.3%41.7%−12.4
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.1%1.5%−1.4
Earned an associate degree0.0%2.6%−2.6
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit1.9%4.6%−2.7
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness3.7%2.9%+0.8
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student4.7%7.7%−3.0
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces2.3%3.3%−1.0

Who this district serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
72,218
Economically disadvantaged
44.4%−1.4 pts vs similar
English learners
20.2%+12.3 pts vs similar
Special education
15.3%−2.5 pts vs similar
Attendance
95.0%±0.0 pts vs similar
Chronically absent
12.9%+0.8 pts vs similar

Student demographics

African American: 11%Hispanic: 40.8%White: 37.3%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 5.7%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.7%
  • African American 11%
  • Hispanic 40.8%
  • White 37.3%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 5.7%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.7%

Spending per student

Compared against TEA's own peer group, which controls for size and student population, and against the state.

$10k$16k$22k20182020202220242025
  • Conroe ISD
  • TEA peer group
  • Texas average

Spends $2,607 more per student than its peer group, and $2,018 more than the state average.

Teachers

Average salary
$69,598+$4,336 vs similar
Teachers
4,793
Students per staff member
15.1

Teaching experience

Beginning: 6.2%1 to 5 years: 25.7%6 to 10 years: 22.3%11 to 20 years: 30.8%21 to 30 years: 12.9%Over 30 years: 2.1%
  • Beginning 6.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 25.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 22.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 30.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 12.9%
  • Over 30 years 2.1%

Where this district ranks best

Out of 123 rankings computed across every published metric and every comparison group, these are the placements that stand out. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

  • 3of 54

    Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)

    Region 06: Huntsville · of the 54 that report this measure

  • 4of 55

    All Subjects — Masters

    Region 06: Huntsville · of the 55 that report this measure

  • 4of 55

    Math — Masters

    Region 06: Huntsville · of the 55 that report this measure

  • 6of 55

    Reading — Masters

    Region 06: Huntsville · of the 55 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 6of 55

    Social Studies — Masters

    Region 06: Huntsville · of the 55 that report this measure

  • 7of 55

    Science — Masters

    Region 06: Huntsville · of the 55 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 9of 54

    Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA

    Region 06: Huntsville · of the 54 that report this measure

  • 12of 283

    Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)

    Similar student population · of the 283 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 43of 978

    Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)

    Texas average · of the 978 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 6of 55

    Math — Meets

    Region 06: Huntsville · of the 55 that report this measure · tied with 3

  • 7of 55

    Social Studies — Meets

    Region 06: Huntsville · of the 55 that report this measure · tied with 3

  • 7of 54

    Earned an associate degree

    Region 06: Huntsville · of the 54 that report this measure · tied with 47

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this district ranks poorly. Each statement below states its cohort and its denominator so it can be checked — a rank without an n is a boast, not a fact. Ties are shown because a shared ceiling is not a sole first place. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no district would put in a press release.

68 schools in this district

Schools in this district
SchoolTypeRatingScoreStudents
Collins IntMiddle / Jr. HighA95749
David ElemElementaryA95569
McCullough JHMiddle / Jr. HighA942,206
Mitchell IntMiddle / Jr. HighA941,139
Ride ElemElementaryA94457
Stewart ElemElementaryA94944
Hines ElemElementaryA94896
The Woodlands HSHigh SchoolA934,419
Tough ElemElementaryA93965
Deretchin ElemElementaryA931,071
Clark IntMiddle / Jr. HighA93972
Bush ElemElementaryA93651
Knox JHMiddle / Jr. HighA921,372
Suchma ElemElementaryA92892
College Park HSHigh SchoolA913,146
York JHMiddle / Jr. HighA912,047
Galatas ElemElementaryA91670
Broadway ElemElementaryA91847
Stockton JHMiddle / Jr. HighA901,365
Cox IntMiddle / Jr. HighA901,035
Lamar ElemElementaryA90650
Powell ElemElementaryA90727
Booker T Washington HSHigh SchoolB89164
Grand Oaks HSHigh SchoolB893,905
Runyan ElemElementaryB89582
Buckalew ElemElementaryB89648
Birnham Woods ElemElementaryB89795
Wilkerson IntMiddle / Jr. HighB88675
Giesinger ElemElementaryB88654
Oak Ridge HSHigh SchoolB862,698
Kaufman ElemElementaryB86778
Eissler ElemElementaryB86706
Oak Ridge ElemElementaryB85555
Hailey ElemElementaryB85565
Snyder ElemElementaryB85794
Peet JHMiddle / Jr. HighB841,379
Irons JHMiddle / Jr. HighB841,288
Cryar IntMiddle / Jr. HighB84797
Reaves ElemElementaryB84663
Campbell ElemElementaryB83591
Conroe HSHigh SchoolB825,191
Caney Creek HSHigh SchoolB822,831
Glen Loch ElemElementaryB82480
Moorhead JHMiddle / Jr. HighB811,396
Hope ElemElementaryB81763
Vogel IntMiddle / Jr. HighB80893
Houser ElemElementaryB80569
Ford ElemElementaryB80784
Houston ElemElementaryC79728
Bartlett ElemElementaryC79999
Veterans Memorial IntMiddle / Jr. HighC76871
Wilkinson ElemElementaryC76709
Bradley ElemElementaryC76919
Grangerland IntMiddle / Jr. HighC75588
Gordon-Reed ElemElementaryC75761
Rice ElemElementaryC73558
San Jacinto ElemElementaryC73650
Patterson ElemElementaryC731,046
Bozman IntMiddle / Jr. HighC711,200
Travis IntMiddle / Jr. HighD69514
Armstrong ElemElementaryD69562
Anderson ElemElementaryD67634
Austin ElemElementaryD66970
Conroe Virtual SchoolK-12D66245
Milam ElemElementaryF58667
Creighton ElemElementaryF58616
JJAEPK-12Not Rated32
Juvenile Detention CtrK-12Not Rated16

Where this comes from

Every figure on this page comes from data the Texas Education Agency publishes at txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026 and archived with a checksum so each number stays traceable to the bytes TEA served.

Download this district as CSV · JSON · the whole dataset