+1.9 ptsvs 91.1 average · 636 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
176 of 636tied with 98 others
Score vs region
+12.6 ptsvs 80.4 average · 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville
Region 06: Huntsville placement
19 of 314tied with 11 others
Score vs county
+11.1 ptsvs 81.9 average · 133 rated schools in Montgomery County
Montgomery County placement
9 of 133tied with 7 others
Score vs similar-size group
+5.4 ptsvs 87.6 average · 131 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
27 of 131tied with 13 others
Score vs state
+11.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
588 of 7,646tied with 249 others
A93
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 95 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 91.1 average for 636 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80.4 average for 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville.The current score is above the 81.9 average for 133 rated schools in Montgomery County.The current score is above the 87.6 average for 131 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
85%vs 74.4% avg · +10.6 pts
Masters
47%vs 44.5% avg · +2.5 pts
Among 626 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
The Woodlands HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 91.1 average for 636 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 176th of 636 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 98 others).
The Woodlands HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.4 average for 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 19th of 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville (tied with 11 others).
The Woodlands HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.9 average for 133 rated schools in Montgomery County. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 9th of 133 rated schools in Montgomery County (tied with 7 others).
The Woodlands HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 87.6 average for 131 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 27th of 131 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 13 others).
The Woodlands HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 95 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement93 A+0.9 vs similar economic context · 626 reporting
School Progress86 B−1.4 vs similar economic context · 624 reporting
Closing the Gaps93 A+4.3 vs similar economic context · 622 reporting
Academic Growth72 C−13.7 vs similar economic context · 621 reporting
Relative Performance86 B+7.3 vs similar economic context · 624 reporting
The Woodlands HS
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (636 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
93
A
—
School Progress
86
B
4
Closing the Gaps
93
A
—
Academic Growth
72
C
8
Relative Performance
86
B
4
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (93), so
School Progress (86) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 93.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level94%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 626 reporting
Meets grade level85%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 626 reporting
Masters grade level47%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 626 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level90%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 626 reporting
Meets grade level82%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 626 reporting
Masters grade level28%−20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 626 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level93%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 624 reporting
Meets grade level75%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 624 reporting
Masters grade level34%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 624 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level98%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 587 reporting
Meets grade level92%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 587 reporting
Masters grade level71%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 587 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level99%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 225 reporting
Meets grade level92%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 225 reporting
Masters grade level75%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 225 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (636 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
Four-Year
98.5%+11.1 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 112 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
99.1%+10.7 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 112 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
98.6%+11.8 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 112 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.3%+0.1 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 113 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
Total credit for CCMR criteria
89.0%+0.5 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
Criterion
This school% of graduates
Averagesimilar economic context
Differencepercentage points
Reportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria
89.0%
88.5%
+0.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 108 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
75.4%
68.9%
+6.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 110 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
75.3%
56.8%
+18.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 110 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
53.0%
36.4%
+16.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 110 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
43.1%
36.4%
+6.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 110 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification
24.4%
27.9%
−3.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 110 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate
0.0%
0.3%
−0.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 110 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree
0.0%
0.8%
−0.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 110 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
0.0%
9.4%
−9.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 110 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
1.8%
2.3%
−0.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 110 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
3.7%
5.7%
−2.0
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 110 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
1.2%
1.8%
−0.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 110 rated schools reporting
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of
meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this
school minus the average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate,
counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that
criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
Graduates in the report
1,086
Class of 2023–24
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
439
40.4% of graduates
Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
408
37.6% of graduates
Not trackable
239
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
This school
1,086
Selected comparison
432.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 95 rated schools reporting
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
This school
439
Selected comparison
199.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 95 rated schools reporting
Texas-public enrollment rate
This school
40.4%
Selected comparison
49.2%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 95 rated schools reporting
−8.8 pts vs similar economic context
Not-found rate
This school
37.6%
Selected comparison
39.7%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 95 rated schools reporting
−2.1 pts vs similar economic context
Not-trackable rate
This school
22.0%
Selected comparison
11.1%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 95 rated schools reporting
+10.9 pts vs similar economic context
Most common named Texas public destinations
LONE STAR COLLEGE - MONTGOMERY (000721)119
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY (003632)78
BLINN COLLEGE DISTRICT (003549)38
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
4,430
Economically disadvantaged
12.5%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
7.1%−3.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
7.3%−8.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.8%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
10.1%+3.2 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
The Woodlands HS
African American 5.3%
Hispanic 29.8%
White 50.3%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 10%
Two or More Races 4.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 636 reporting for every category shown · 636 in full cohort
African American 6%
Hispanic 19.6%
White 48.2%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 20.1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 06: Huntsville · 314 reporting for every category shown · 314 in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 38.9%
White 42.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Montgomery County · 133 reporting for every category shown · 133 in full cohort
African American 9%
Hispanic 43.3%
White 39.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 131 reporting for every category shown · 131 in full cohort
African American 15.7%
Hispanic 46.8%
White 24.7%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 8.8%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
4,419
Economically disadvantaged students
553
Emergent bilingual students
314
Special education students
321
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
322
Students in TEA mobility denominator
4,568
TEA-published mobility rate
7%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 4,430 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 14 (0.3%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
4,430
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−14
Decrease · −0.3%
Change since 2021–22
+51
Increase · +1.2%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
4,430
Selected comparison
863.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 632 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for The Woodlands HS
School year
Students enrolledThe Woodlands HS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
4,379
First available year
874.4
2022–23
4,361
Decrease of 18 (0.4%)
894.9
2023–24
4,498
Increase of 137 (3.1%)
880.4
2024–25
4,444
Decrease of 54 (1.2%)
873.8
2025–26
4,430
Decrease of 14 (0.3%)
863.1
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
282
6.2% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
739
16.35 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
4,519
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
6.2%
Selected comparison
5.3%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 382 rated schools reporting
+0.9 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
16.35
Selected comparison
9.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 448 rated schools reporting
+7.0 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for The Woodlands HS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
4,418
85
1.9%
147
3.33
3.9%
6.4
2021–22
4,553
154
3.4%
315
6.92
5.4%
9.4
2022–23
4,491
189
4.2%
380
8.46
5.6%
9.6
2023–24
4,568
249
5.5%
556
12.17
5.4%
9.5
2024–25
4,519
282
6.2%
739
16.35
5.3%
9.4
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for The Woodlands HS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
282
6.2%
739
16.35
5.3%
9.4
In-school suspensions
255
5.6%
606
13.41
5.0%
7.5
Out-of-school suspensions
30
0.7%
40
0.89
2.4%
3.1
DAEP placements
77
1.7%
87
1.93
1.8%
2
Mandatory DAEP placements
68
1.5%
74
1.64
1.6%
1.7
Discretionary DAEP placements
12
0.3%
13
0.29
0.9%
1
JJAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
The Woodlands HS
Parent district: Conroe ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$12,691
Selected comparison
$10,794
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 627 rated schools reporting
+$1,897 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $12,691 per student for this campus, $20,990 per student for its parent district, Conroe ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
The Woodlands HS
Parent district: Conroe ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,508
$12,724
$13,054
$7,304
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 534 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,531
$12,027
$13,108
$7,406
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 551 rated schools reporting
2020
$6,670
$11,626
$14,058
$7,713
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 564 rated schools reporting
2021
$6,873
$13,576
$14,797
$8,290
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 573 rated schools reporting
2022
$8,382
$14,960
$15,708
$9,529
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 584 rated schools reporting
2023
$7,673
$15,772
$16,792
$9,630
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 593 rated schools reporting
2024
$7,996
$16,120
$18,125
$10,607
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 612 rated schools reporting
2025
$12,691
$20,990
$18,972
$10,794
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 627 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$71,550+$2,299 vs similar economic context
Teachers
249+193.6 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
17.7+2.8 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
The Woodlands HS
Beginning 1.6%
1 to 5 years 14.2%
6 to 10 years 25.6%
11 to 20 years 36.6%
21 to 30 years 18.4%
Over 30 years 3.5%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 636 reporting for every category shown · 636 in full cohort
Beginning 4.3%
1 to 5 years 23.5%
6 to 10 years 20%
11 to 20 years 32.4%
21 to 30 years 16.9%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 06: Huntsville · 314 reporting for every category shown · 314 in full cohort
Beginning 7.5%
1 to 5 years 27.7%
6 to 10 years 18.9%
11 to 20 years 27.6%
21 to 30 years 13.6%
Over 30 years 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Montgomery County · 133 reporting for every category shown · 133 in full cohort
Beginning 7.4%
1 to 5 years 29.1%
6 to 10 years 22.3%
11 to 20 years 27.6%
21 to 30 years 11.5%
Over 30 years 2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 131 reporting for every category shown · 131 in full cohort
Beginning 5.3%
1 to 5 years 23.9%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 29.9%
21 to 30 years 14.9%
Over 30 years 3.1%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for The Woodlands HS in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classThe Woodlands HS · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English
21
18.4
Secondary languages other than English
20.7
21
Secondary math
24.3
18.6
Secondary science
25.9
21.3
Secondary social studies
26.3
21.3
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
6 measures
1of 226
Science — Masters
Region 06: Huntsville · of the 226 that report this measure
1of 132
All Subjects — Meets
Montgomery County · of the 132 that report this measure
1of 125
Social Studies — Masters
Region 06: Huntsville · of the 125 that report this measure
1of 88
Science — Meets
Montgomery County · of the 88 that report this measure
1of 73
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
Region 06: Huntsville · of the 73 that report this measure
1of 17
Five-Year Graduation Rate
Montgomery County (standard accountability only) · of the 17 that report this measure · tied with 1
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
6 measures
2of 132
All Subjects — Approaches
Montgomery County · of the 132 that report this measure · tied with 2
2of 73
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
Region 06: Huntsville · of the 73 that report this measure
2of 39
Social Studies — Approaches
Montgomery County · of the 39 that report this measure · tied with 2
2of 39
Social Studies — Meets
Montgomery County · of the 39 that report this measure
2of 17
Four-Year Graduation Rate
Montgomery County (standard accountability only) · of the 17 that report this measure
3of 17
Six-Year Graduation Rate
Montgomery County (standard accountability only) · of the 17 that report this measure · tied with 1
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
7 measures
4of 88
Science — Approaches
Montgomery County · of the 88 that report this measure · tied with 1
4of 17
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
Montgomery County · of the 17 that report this measure
5of 132
Reading — Meets
Montgomery County · of the 132 that report this measure
7of 131
Attendance
Similar size · of the 131 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 17
College, career or military ready
Montgomery County · of the 17 that report this measure
8of 17
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
Montgomery County · of the 17 that report this measure
9of 131
All Subjects — Masters
Similar size · of the 131 that report this measure · tied with 1
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
1 measure
356of 7,227
Math — Approaches
Texas average · of the 7,227 that report this measure · tied with 95
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 170902003.