+4.1 ptsvs 87.9 average · 947 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
216 of 947tied with 112 others
Score vs region
+11.6 ptsvs 80.4 average · 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville
Region 06: Huntsville placement
31 of 314tied with 10 others
Score vs county
+10.1 ptsvs 81.9 average · 133 rated schools in Montgomery County
Montgomery County placement
17 of 133tied with 4 others
Score vs similar-size group
+11.0 ptsvs 81 average · 3,153 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
297 of 3,153tied with 144 others
Score vs state
+10.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
838 of 7,646tied with 318 others
A92
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is flat; under the rules in force back then it scored 92 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 87.9 average for 947 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80.4 average for 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville.The current score is above the 81.9 average for 133 rated schools in Montgomery County.The current score is above the 81 average for 3,153 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
72%vs 65.8% avg · +6.2 pts
Masters
40%vs 33.9% avg · +6.1 pts
Among 926 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Suchma Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 87.9 average for 947 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 216th of 947 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 112 others).
Suchma Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.4 average for 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 31st of 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville (tied with 10 others).
Suchma Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.9 average for 133 rated schools in Montgomery County. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 17th of 133 rated schools in Montgomery County (tied with 4 others).
Suchma Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81 average for 3,153 similarly sized rated schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 297th of 3,153 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 144 others).
Suchma Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 92 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement92 A+3.3 vs similar economic context · 926 reporting
School Progress89 B+4.4 vs similar economic context · 924 reporting
Closing the Gaps92 A+6.6 vs similar economic context · 918 reporting
Academic Growth89 B+7.9 vs similar economic context · 909 reporting
Relative Performance84 B+4.1 vs similar economic context · 924 reporting
Suchma Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (947 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
92
A
—
School Progress
89
B
1
Closing the Gaps
92
A
—
Academic Growth
89
B
1
Relative Performance
84
B
6
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (92), so
School Progress (89) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 92.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level87%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 926 reporting
Meets grade level72%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 926 reporting
Masters grade level40%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 926 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level90%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 926 reporting
Meets grade level75%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 926 reporting
Masters grade level44%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 926 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level85%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 924 reporting
Meets grade level70%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 924 reporting
Masters grade level36%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 924 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level86%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 844 reporting
Meets grade level62%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 844 reporting
Masters grade level38%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 844 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (947 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
898
Economically disadvantaged
27.4%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
19.7%+9.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
14.2%−3.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.4%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
11.2%+1.0 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Suchma Elem
African American 13.3%
Hispanic 28.6%
White 31.4%
American Indian 0.1%
Asian 21%
Two or More Races 5.6%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 947 reporting for every category shown · 947 in full cohort
African American 8.8%
Hispanic 28.6%
White 48.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 8.9%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 06: Huntsville · 314 reporting for every category shown · 314 in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 38.9%
White 42.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Montgomery County · 133 reporting for every category shown · 133 in full cohort
African American 9%
Hispanic 43.3%
White 39.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,153 reporting for every category shown · 3,153 in full cohort
African American 12.7%
Hispanic 52.5%
White 24.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.4%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
892
Economically disadvantaged students
244
Emergent bilingual students
176
Special education students
127
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
166
Students in TEA mobility denominator
1,328
TEA-published mobility rate
12.5%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 898 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 530 (37.1%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
898
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−530
Decrease · −37.1%
Change since 2021–22
−124
Decrease · −12.1%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
898
Selected comparison
815.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 938 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Suchma Elem
School year
Students enrolledSuchma Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
1,022
First available year
829.4
2022–23
1,215
Increase of 193 (18.9%)
834.5
2023–24
1,381
Increase of 166 (13.7%)
828.8
2024–25
1,428
Increase of 47 (3.4%)
825
2025–26
898
Decrease of 530 (37.1%)
815.3
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
79
5.4% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
167
11.35 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
1,471
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
5.4%
Selected comparison
8.3%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 690 rated schools reporting
−2.9 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
11.35
Selected comparison
16.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 778 rated schools reporting
−5.3 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Suchma Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
1,030
36
3.5%
76
7.38
6.5%
11.6
2021–22
1,150
44
3.8%
85
7.39
8.7%
17.5
2022–23
1,315
73
5.5%
167
12.70
9.1%
18.2
2023–24
1,429
89
6.2%
216
15.12
8.5%
17.5
2024–25
1,471
79
5.4%
167
11.35
8.3%
16.6
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Suchma Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
79
5.4%
167
11.35
8.3%
16.6
In-school suspensions
79
5.4%
162
11.01
7.4%
13
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Suchma Elem
Parent district: Conroe ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$7,582
Selected comparison
$11,434
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 934 rated schools reporting
−$3,852 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $7,582 per student for this campus, $20,990 per student for its parent district, Conroe ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Suchma Elem
Parent district: Conroe ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2020
$6,662
$11,626
$14,058
$8,036
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 864 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,339
$13,576
$14,797
$8,504
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 873 rated schools reporting
2022
$7,587
$14,960
$15,708
$9,722
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 890 rated schools reporting
2023
$7,769
$15,772
$16,792
$10,194
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 906 rated schools reporting
2024
$7,653
$16,120
$18,125
$11,382
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 920 rated schools reporting
2025
$7,582
$20,990
$18,972
$11,434
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 934 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$70,257+$1,888 vs similar economic context
Teachers
60+7.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.8+0.2 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Suchma Elem
Beginning 8.1%
1 to 5 years 11.6%
6 to 10 years 33.1%
11 to 20 years 29.8%
21 to 30 years 14.2%
Over 30 years 3.3%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 947 reporting for every category shown · 947 in full cohort
Beginning 4.8%
1 to 5 years 22.5%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 32.4%
21 to 30 years 17.4%
Over 30 years 3.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 06: Huntsville · 314 reporting for every category shown · 314 in full cohort
Beginning 7.5%
1 to 5 years 27.7%
6 to 10 years 18.9%
11 to 20 years 27.6%
21 to 30 years 13.6%
Over 30 years 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Montgomery County · 133 reporting for every category shown · 133 in full cohort
Beginning 7.4%
1 to 5 years 29.1%
6 to 10 years 22.3%
11 to 20 years 27.6%
21 to 30 years 11.5%
Over 30 years 2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,153 reporting for every category shown · 3,153 in full cohort
Beginning 6.3%
1 to 5 years 26.9%
6 to 10 years 20.3%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 14.7%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Suchma Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classSuchma Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
19.1
18.5
Grade 1
17.4
18.9
Grade 2
21
19.5
Grade 3
19.8
20.5
Grade 4
19.9
20
Grade 5
25.3
21.8
Grade 6
22.6
18.9
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 7 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 170902133.