−5.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 1,776 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,258 of 1,776tied with 56 others
Score vs region
−4.4 ptsvs 80.4 average · 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville
Region 06: Huntsville placement
212 of 314tied with 12 others
Score vs county
−5.9 ptsvs 81.9 average · 133 rated schools in Montgomery County
Montgomery County placement
97 of 133tied with 3 others
Score vs similar-size group
−4.7 ptsvs 80.7 average · 4,147 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
2,832 of 4,147tied with 129 others
Score vs state
−5.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
5,432 of 7,646tied with 208 others
C76
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 87 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 81.3 average for 1,776 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 80.4 average for 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville.The current score is below the 81.9 average for 133 rated schools in Montgomery County.The current score is below the 80.7 average for 4,147 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
54%vs 51.5% avg · +2.5 pts
Masters
23%vs 21.9% avg · +1.1 pts
Among 1,708 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Wilkinson Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 76 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 1,776 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 12 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,258th of 1,776 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 56 others).
Wilkinson Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 76 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.4 average for 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville. It is down 12 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 212th of 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville (tied with 12 others).
Wilkinson Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 76 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.9 average for 133 rated schools in Montgomery County. It is down 12 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 97th of 133 rated schools in Montgomery County (tied with 3 others).
Wilkinson Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 76 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.7 average for 4,147 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 12 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2,832nd of 4,147 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 129 others).
Wilkinson Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 76 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 12 points since 2021-22.
Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,776 rated schools reporting
Schools on the PEG list
This school
Not listed
Selected comparison
1.4%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,776 rated schools reporting
Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.
These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 87 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement77 C−3.6 vs similar economic context · 1,708 reporting
School Progress78 C−3.3 vs similar economic context · 1,701 reporting
Closing the Gaps71 C−7.5 vs similar economic context · 1,686 reporting
Academic Growth69 D−6.0 vs similar economic context · 1,661 reporting
Relative Performance78 C−1.2 vs similar economic context · 1,701 reporting
Wilkinson Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,776 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
77
C
3
School Progress
78
C
2
Closing the Gaps
71
C
9
Academic Growth
69
D
1
Relative Performance
78
C
2
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 2 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (78), so
Student Achievement (77) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 78.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level74%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,708 reporting
Meets grade level54%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,708 reporting
Masters grade level23%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,708 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level76%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,706 reporting
Meets grade level58%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,706 reporting
Masters grade level23%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,706 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level72%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,697 reporting
Meets grade level51%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,697 reporting
Masters grade level24%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,697 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,776 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
735
Economically disadvantaged
53.9%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
11.4%−2.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
22.1%+3.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.7%+0.2 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
15.4%+0.5 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Wilkinson Elem
African American 12.4%
Hispanic 30.7%
White 43.9%
Asian 5.1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 7.8%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,776 reporting for every category shown · 1,776 in full cohort
African American 9.9%
Hispanic 43.5%
White 39.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.7%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 06: Huntsville · 314 reporting for every category shown · 314 in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 38.9%
White 42.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Montgomery County · 133 reporting for every category shown · 133 in full cohort
African American 9%
Hispanic 43.3%
White 39.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,147 reporting for every category shown · 4,147 in full cohort
African American 12.3%
Hispanic 53.8%
White 24.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.5%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
709
Economically disadvantaged students
382
Emergent bilingual students
81
Special education students
157
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
112
Students in TEA mobility denominator
621
TEA-published mobility rate
18%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 735 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 20 (2.6%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
735
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−20
Decrease · −2.6%
Change since 2021–22
−70
Decrease · −8.7%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
735
Selected comparison
635.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,737 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Wilkinson Elem
School year
Students enrolledWilkinson Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
805
First available year
637.2
2022–23
944
Increase of 139 (17.3%)
643.2
2023–24
989
Increase of 45 (4.8%)
643.4
2024–25
755
Decrease of 234 (23.7%)
640.3
2025–26
735
Decrease of 20 (2.6%)
635.5
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
23
2.8% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
44
5.39 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
817
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
2.8%
Selected comparison
12.4%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,371 rated schools reporting
−9.6 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
5.39
Selected comparison
27.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,479 rated schools reporting
−22.3 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Wilkinson Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
792
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
919
14
1.5%
17
1.85
12.3%
27.8
2022–23
1,035
18
1.7%
23
2.22
12.8%
29.5
2023–24
1,040
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2024–25
817
23
2.8%
44
5.39
12.4%
27.7
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Wilkinson Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
23
2.8%
44
5.39
12.4%
27.7
In-school suspensions
21
2.6%
32
3.92
11.1%
21.4
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
10
1.22
—
8.9
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Wilkinson Elem
Parent district: Conroe ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$10,732
Selected comparison
$12,195
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,750 rated schools reporting
−$1,463 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $10,732 per student for this campus, $20,990 per student for its parent district, Conroe ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Wilkinson Elem
Parent district: Conroe ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,380
$12,724
$13,054
$7,879
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,613 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,384
$12,027
$13,108
$8,067
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,631 rated schools reporting
2020
$6,666
$11,626
$14,058
$8,625
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,646 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,839
$13,576
$14,797
$9,009
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,664 rated schools reporting
2022
$8,160
$14,960
$15,708
$10,304
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,677 rated schools reporting
2023
$9,739
$15,772
$16,792
$10,822
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,700 rated schools reporting
2024
$8,943
$16,120
$18,125
$11,723
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,724 rated schools reporting
2025
$10,732
$20,990
$18,972
$12,195
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,750 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$68,884+$2,276 vs similar economic context
Teachers
55+13.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12.9−6.6 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Wilkinson Elem
Beginning 9.1%
1 to 5 years 25.5%
6 to 10 years 18.2%
11 to 20 years 40%
21 to 30 years 5.5%
Over 30 years 1.8%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,776 reporting for every category shown · 1,776 in full cohort
Beginning 5.8%
1 to 5 years 24.9%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.8%
21 to 30 years 16.4%
Over 30 years 4.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 06: Huntsville · 314 reporting for every category shown · 314 in full cohort
Beginning 7.5%
1 to 5 years 27.7%
6 to 10 years 18.9%
11 to 20 years 27.6%
21 to 30 years 13.6%
Over 30 years 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Montgomery County · 133 reporting for every category shown · 133 in full cohort
Beginning 7.4%
1 to 5 years 29.1%
6 to 10 years 22.3%
11 to 20 years 27.6%
21 to 30 years 11.5%
Over 30 years 2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,147 reporting for every category shown · 4,147 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.6%
6 to 10 years 20%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.1%
Over 30 years 2.9%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Wilkinson Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classWilkinson Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
19.5
18
Grade 1
19.3
18.3
Grade 2
17.7
18.5
Grade 3
21
18.9
Grade 4
18.9
19
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 170902126.