Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
Conroe Virtual SchoolD66vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus · Online school
Conroe Virtual School
Conroe ISD · 246 students
Current score
66/1002025-26
Change
−17 ptssince 2022-23
Score vs similar economic context
−22.3 ptsvs 88.3 average · 913 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
908 of 913tied with 1 other
Score vs region
−14.4 ptsvs 80.4 average · 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville
Region 06: Huntsville placement
288 of 314tied with 4 others
Score vs county
−15.9 ptsvs 81.9 average · 133 rated schools in Montgomery County
Montgomery County placement
126 of 133tied with 1 other
Score vs similar-size group
−14.7 ptsvs 80.7 average · 1,881 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
1,689 of 1,881tied with 22 others
Score vs state
−15.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
7,013 of 7,646tied with 80 others
D66
At a glance
The available rating history is moving down. The current score is below the 88.3 average for 913 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 80.4 average for 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville.The current score is below the 81.9 average for 133 rated schools in Montgomery County.The current score is below the 80.7 average for 1,881 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average
0%−9.8 pts vs 9.8%
0% is 9.8 percentage points lower than
the 9.8% average among 896 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Tied for 1st-lowest of 896 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 4 schools share that value.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Conroe Virtual School is rated D by TEA, scoring 66 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 88.3 average for 913 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 17 points since 2022-23.
Ranks 908th of 913 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 1 other).
Conroe Virtual School is rated D by TEA, scoring 66 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.4 average for 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville. It is down 17 points since 2022-23.
Ranks 288th of 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville (tied with 4 others).
Conroe Virtual School is rated D by TEA, scoring 66 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.9 average for 133 rated schools in Montgomery County. It is down 17 points since 2022-23.
Ranks 126th of 133 rated schools in Montgomery County (tied with 1 other).
Conroe Virtual School is rated D by TEA, scoring 66 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.7 average for 1,881 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 17 points since 2022-23.
Ranks 1,689th of 1,881 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 22 others).
Conroe Virtual School is rated D by TEA, scoring 66 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 17 points since 2022-23.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement72 C−17.1 vs similar economic context · 894 reporting
School Progress57 F−27.8 vs similar economic context · 892 reporting
Closing the Gaps52 F−33.8 vs similar economic context · 887 reporting
Academic Growth56 F−25.6 vs similar economic context · 878 reporting
Relative Performance57 F−22.9 vs similar economic context · 892 reporting
Conroe Virtual School
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (913 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
72
C
8
School Progress
57
F
3
Closing the Gaps
52
F
8
Academic Growth
56
F
4
Relative Performance
57
F
3
Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 8 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (72), so
School Progress (57) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 72.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level71%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 894 reporting
Meets grade level43%−24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 894 reporting
Masters grade level17%−18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 894 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level77%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 894 reporting
Meets grade level55%−16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 894 reporting
Masters grade level19%−18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 894 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level45%−39 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 892 reporting
Meets grade level17%−44 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 892 reporting
Masters grade level10%−20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 892 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level83%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 818 reporting
Meets grade level53%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 818 reporting
Masters grade level22%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 818 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level81%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 432 reporting
Meets grade level44%−20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 432 reporting
Masters grade level18%−19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 432 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (913 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
Four-Year
0.0%−92.0 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 241 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
0.0%−91.8 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 241 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
0.0%−91.5 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 242 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.5%+0.2 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 242 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
246
Economically disadvantaged
26.1%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
3.3%−6.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
17.6%+0.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
100.0%+4.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
0.0%−9.8 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Conroe Virtual School
African American 6.9%
Hispanic 31.8%
White 53.5%
Asian 2%
Two or More Races 5.7%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 913 reporting for every category shown · 913 in full cohort
African American 8.7%
Hispanic 27.9%
White 48.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 9.6%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 06: Huntsville · 314 reporting for every category shown · 314 in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 38.9%
White 42.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Montgomery County · 133 reporting for every category shown · 133 in full cohort
African American 9%
Hispanic 43.3%
White 39.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 1,881 reporting for every category shown · 1,881 in full cohort
African American 9.7%
Hispanic 50.8%
White 34.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
245
Economically disadvantaged students
64
Emergent bilingual students
8
Special education students
43
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
232
Students in TEA mobility denominator
375
TEA-published mobility rate
61.9%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 246 students in 2025–26, an increase of 35 (16.6%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
246
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+35
Increase · +16.6%
Change since 2022–23
+161
Increase · +189.4%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
246
Selected comparison
829.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 906 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Conroe Virtual School
School year
Students enrolledConroe Virtual School
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2022–23
85
First available year
848.7
2023–24
189
Increase of 104 (122.4%)
844.4
2024–25
211
Increase of 22 (11.6%)
840.3
2025–26
246
Increase of 35 (16.6%)
829.9
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Not reported
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
306
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Conroe Virtual School
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2022–23
127
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2023–24
279
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2024–25
306
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Conroe Virtual School in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Conroe Virtual School
Parent district: Conroe ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$7,090
Selected comparison
$11,353
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 902 rated schools reporting
−$4,263 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $7,090 per student for this campus, $20,990 per student for its parent district, Conroe ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Conroe Virtual School
Parent district: Conroe ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2023
$13,811
$15,772
$16,792
$10,152
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 877 rated schools reporting
2024
$7,601
$16,120
$18,125
$11,321
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 890 rated schools reporting
2025
$7,090
$20,990
$18,972
$11,353
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 902 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$75,054+$6,613 vs similar economic context
Teachers
18−35.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.6−1.1 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Conroe Virtual School
Beginning 5.6%
1 to 5 years 5.6%
6 to 10 years 29.4%
11 to 20 years 48.3%
21 to 30 years 10.6%
Over 30 years 0.6%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 913 reporting for every category shown · 913 in full cohort
Beginning 4.8%
1 to 5 years 22.5%
6 to 10 years 19.7%
11 to 20 years 32.4%
21 to 30 years 17.3%
Over 30 years 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 06: Huntsville · 314 reporting for every category shown · 314 in full cohort
Beginning 7.5%
1 to 5 years 27.7%
6 to 10 years 18.9%
11 to 20 years 27.6%
21 to 30 years 13.6%
Over 30 years 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Montgomery County · 133 reporting for every category shown · 133 in full cohort
Beginning 7.4%
1 to 5 years 29.1%
6 to 10 years 22.3%
11 to 20 years 27.6%
21 to 30 years 11.5%
Over 30 years 2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 1,881 reporting for every category shown · 1,881 in full cohort
Beginning 6.6%
1 to 5 years 24.3%
6 to 10 years 17.9%
11 to 20 years 28.5%
21 to 30 years 17.4%
Over 30 years 4.8%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Conroe Virtual School in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classConroe Virtual School · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 5
13.5
21.8
Grade 6
12
19.1
Secondary English
12.2
17.1
Secondary languages other than English
12.4
19.4
Secondary math
12.6
17.6
Secondary science
12
19.4
Secondary social studies
12
19.5
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 7 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 140 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
2 measures
1of 7,366
Attendance
Texas average · of the 7,366 that report this measure · tied with 18 · full ranking
1of 7,358
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Texas average · of the 7,358 that report this measure · tied with 21 · full ranking
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
1 measure
10of 17
Dropout Rate (lowest is best)
Montgomery County (standard accountability only) · of the 17 that report this measure · tied with 1
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 170902220.