Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Campbell Elem

Montgomery County · Region 06: Huntsville · 605 students

Current score
83/1002025-26
Score vs similar economic context
+0.9 ptsvs 82.1 average · 1,694 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
811 of 1,694tied with 67 others
B83

At a glance

The current score is above the 82.1 average for 1,694 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
55%vs 53.4% avg · +1.6 pts
Masters
28%vs 23.3% avg · +4.7 pts

Among 1,636 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
54%vs 47.2% avg · +6.8 pts
Masters
27%vs 19.2% avg · +7.8 pts

Among 1,628 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
63%vs 58.4% avg · +4.6 pts
Masters
34%vs 25.2% avg · +8.8 pts

Among 1,634 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Campbell Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 83 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.1 average for 1,694 rated schools serving a similar economic context. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.

Ranks 811th of 1,694 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 67 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 1 year of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Teachers
  8. Where this comes from

1 year of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 83 2025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8382.1 1,694 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement80 B−1.8 vs similar economic context · 1,636 reporting
  • School Progress83 B+1.3 vs similar economic context · 1,631 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps82 B+2.6 vs similar economic context · 1,617 reporting
  • Academic Growth83 B+7.1 vs similar economic context · 1,601 reporting
  • Relative Performance80 B+0.7 vs similar economic context · 1,631 reporting
  • Campbell Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,694 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement80B10
School Progress83B7
Closing the Gaps82B8
Academic Growth83B7
Relative Performance80B10

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 7 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (83), so Student Achievement (80) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 83.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level77%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,636 reporting
  • Meets grade level55%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,636 reporting
  • Masters grade level28%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,636 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level82%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,634 reporting
  • Meets grade level63%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,634 reporting
  • Masters grade level34%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,634 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level75%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,628 reporting
  • Meets grade level54%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,628 reporting
  • Masters grade level27%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,628 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level69%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,512 reporting
  • Meets grade level26%−26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,512 reporting
  • Masters grade level11%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,512 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,694 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
605
Economically disadvantaged
49.7%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
18.6%+5.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
19.8%+1.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
—
Chronically absent
—

Student demographics

Campbell Elem

African American: 20.5%Hispanic: 39.9%White: 26.1%Asian: 7.8%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 5.6%
  • African American 20.5%
  • Hispanic 39.9%
  • White 26.1%
  • Asian 7.8%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 5.6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,694 reporting for every category shown · 1,694 in full cohort

African American: 9.4%Hispanic: 40.7%White: 42%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 3.2%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.2%
  • African American 9.4%
  • Hispanic 40.7%
  • White 42%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 3.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.2%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
591
Economically disadvantaged students
294
Emergent bilingual students
110
Special education students
117

TEA context labels

  • New campus compared with last year’s fall enrollment

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
Not reported
Students in TEA mobility denominator
Not reported
TEA-published mobility rate
Not reported

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Teachers

Average salary
$66,662−$249 vs similar economic context
Teachers
49+6.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12−7.9 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Campbell Elem

Beginning: 8.7%1 to 5 years: 45.6%6 to 10 years: 20.5%11 to 20 years: 19.3%21 to 30 years: 6.1%
  • Beginning 8.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 45.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 20.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 19.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 6.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,694 reporting for every category shown · 1,694 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.6%1 to 5 years: 24.3%6 to 10 years: 19.3%11 to 20 years: 29.5%21 to 30 years: 16.7%Over 30 years: 4.2%
  • Beginning 5.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 29.5%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.7%
  • Over 30 years 4.2%

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 170902139.