Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
Campbell ElemB83vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
Campbell Elem
Montgomery County · Region 06: Huntsville · 605 students
Current score
83/1002025-26
Score vs similar economic context
+0.9 ptsvs 82.1 average · 1,694 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
811 of 1,694tied with 67 others
Score vs region
+2.6 ptsvs 80.4 average · 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville
Region 06: Huntsville placement
134 of 314tied with 8 others
Score vs county
+1.1 ptsvs 81.9 average · 133 rated schools in Montgomery County
Montgomery County placement
66 of 133tied with 1 other
Score vs similar-size group
+2.6 ptsvs 80.4 average · 4,670 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
2,020 of 4,670tied with 152 others
Score vs state
+1.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
3,601 of 7,646tied with 244 others
B83
At a glance
The current score is above the 82.1 average for 1,694 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80.4 average for 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville.The current score is above the 81.9 average for 133 rated schools in Montgomery County.The current score is above the 80.4 average for 4,670 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
55%vs 53.4% avg · +1.6 pts
Masters
28%vs 23.3% avg · +4.7 pts
Among 1,636 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Campbell Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 83 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.1 average for 1,694 rated schools serving a similar economic context. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 811th of 1,694 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 67 others).
Campbell Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 83 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.4 average for 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 134th of 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville (tied with 8 others).
Campbell Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 83 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.9 average for 133 rated schools in Montgomery County. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 66th of 133 rated schools in Montgomery County (tied with 1 other).
Campbell Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 83 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.4 average for 4,670 similarly sized rated schools. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 2,020th of 4,670 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 152 others).
Campbell Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 83 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement80 B−1.8 vs similar economic context · 1,636 reporting
School Progress83 B+1.3 vs similar economic context · 1,631 reporting
Closing the Gaps82 B+2.6 vs similar economic context · 1,617 reporting
Academic Growth83 B+7.1 vs similar economic context · 1,601 reporting
Relative Performance80 B+0.7 vs similar economic context · 1,631 reporting
Campbell Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,694 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
80
B
10
School Progress
83
B
7
Closing the Gaps
82
B
8
Academic Growth
83
B
7
Relative Performance
80
B
10
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 7 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (83), so
Student Achievement (80) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 83.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level77%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,636 reporting
Meets grade level55%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,636 reporting
Masters grade level28%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,636 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level82%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,634 reporting
Meets grade level63%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,634 reporting
Masters grade level34%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,634 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level75%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,628 reporting
Meets grade level54%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,628 reporting
Masters grade level27%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,628 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level69%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,512 reporting
Meets grade level26%−26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,512 reporting
Masters grade level11%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,512 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,694 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
605
Economically disadvantaged
49.7%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
18.6%+5.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
19.8%+1.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
—
Chronically absent
—
Student demographics
Campbell Elem
African American 20.5%
Hispanic 39.9%
White 26.1%
Asian 7.8%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 5.6%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,694 reporting for every category shown · 1,694 in full cohort
African American 9.4%
Hispanic 40.7%
White 42%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 06: Huntsville · 314 reporting for every category shown · 314 in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 38.9%
White 42.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Montgomery County · 133 reporting for every category shown · 133 in full cohort
African American 9%
Hispanic 43.3%
White 39.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,670 reporting for every category shown · 4,670 in full cohort
African American 12.2%
Hispanic 54.5%
White 24.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.8%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
591
Economically disadvantaged students
294
Emergent bilingual students
110
Special education students
117
TEA context labels
New campus compared with last year’s fall enrollment
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
Not reported
Students in TEA mobility denominator
Not reported
TEA-published mobility rate
Not reported
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Teachers
Average salary
$66,662−$249 vs similar economic context
Teachers
49+6.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12−7.9 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Campbell Elem
Beginning 8.7%
1 to 5 years 45.6%
6 to 10 years 20.5%
11 to 20 years 19.3%
21 to 30 years 6.1%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,694 reporting for every category shown · 1,694 in full cohort
Beginning 5.6%
1 to 5 years 24.3%
6 to 10 years 19.3%
11 to 20 years 29.5%
21 to 30 years 16.7%
Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 06: Huntsville · 314 reporting for every category shown · 314 in full cohort
Beginning 7.5%
1 to 5 years 27.7%
6 to 10 years 18.9%
11 to 20 years 27.6%
21 to 30 years 13.6%
Over 30 years 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Montgomery County · 133 reporting for every category shown · 133 in full cohort
Beginning 7.4%
1 to 5 years 29.1%
6 to 10 years 22.3%
11 to 20 years 27.6%
21 to 30 years 11.5%
Over 30 years 2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,670 reporting for every category shown · 4,670 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.5%
6 to 10 years 19.8%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.4%
Over 30 years 3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 170902139.