+2.7 ptsvs 91.3 average · 589 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
99 of 589tied with 67 others
Score vs region
+13.6 ptsvs 80.4 average · 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville
Region 06: Huntsville placement
10 of 314tied with 8 others
Score vs county
+12.1 ptsvs 81.9 average · 133 rated schools in Montgomery County
Montgomery County placement
4 of 133tied with 4 others
Score vs similar-size group
+12.6 ptsvs 81.4 average · 2,877 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
103 of 2,877tied with 83 others
Score vs state
+12.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
379 of 7,646tied with 208 others
A94
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 91 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 91.3 average for 589 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80.4 average for 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville.The current score is above the 81.9 average for 133 rated schools in Montgomery County.The current score is above the 81.4 average for 2,877 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
80%vs 74.9% avg · +5.1 pts
Masters
55%vs 45.2% avg · +9.8 pts
Among 580 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Stewart Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 91.3 average for 589 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 99th of 589 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 67 others).
Stewart Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.4 average for 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 10th of 314 rated schools in Region 06: Huntsville (tied with 8 others).
Stewart Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.9 average for 133 rated schools in Montgomery County. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 4th of 133 rated schools in Montgomery County (tied with 4 others).
Stewart Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.4 average for 2,877 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Ranks 103rd of 2,877 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 83 others).
Stewart Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 94 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 1 point since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 91 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement94 A+1.7 vs similar economic context · 580 reporting
School Progress94 A+6.4 vs similar economic context · 578 reporting
Closing the Gaps94 A+5.2 vs similar economic context · 577 reporting
Academic Growth94 A+8.0 vs similar economic context · 576 reporting
Relative Performance85 B+6.4 vs similar economic context · 578 reporting
Stewart Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (589 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
94
A
—
School Progress
94
A
—
Closing the Gaps
94
A
—
Academic Growth
94
A
—
Relative Performance
85
B
5
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level93%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 580 reporting
Meets grade level80%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 580 reporting
Masters grade level55%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 580 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level93%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 580 reporting
Meets grade level81%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 580 reporting
Masters grade level57%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 580 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level92%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 578 reporting
Meets grade level82%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 578 reporting
Masters grade level57%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 578 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level92%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 545 reporting
Meets grade level73%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 545 reporting
Masters grade level44%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 545 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (589 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
953
Economically disadvantaged
11.2%−1.2 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
4.3%−6.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
20.4%+4.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.7%−0.2 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
7.9%+1.2 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Stewart Elem
African American 2.8%
Hispanic 21.6%
White 67.6%
American Indian 0.1%
Asian 1.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 6.6%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 589 reporting for every category shown · 589 in full cohort
African American 5.8%
Hispanic 18.8%
White 48.1%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 21%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 06: Huntsville · 314 reporting for every category shown · 314 in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 38.9%
White 42.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Montgomery County · 133 reporting for every category shown · 133 in full cohort
African American 9%
Hispanic 43.3%
White 39.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 2,877 reporting for every category shown · 2,877 in full cohort
African American 12.7%
Hispanic 52.2%
White 24.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.6%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
944
Economically disadvantaged students
106
Emergent bilingual students
41
Special education students
193
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
59
Students in TEA mobility denominator
814
TEA-published mobility rate
7.2%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 953 students in 2025–26, an increase of 39 (4.3%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
953
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+39
Increase · +4.3%
Change since 2021–22
−172
Decrease · −15.3%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
953
Selected comparison
866.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 585 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Stewart Elem
School year
Students enrolledStewart Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
1,125
First available year
876.6
2022–23
815
Decrease of 310 (27.6%)
898.2
2023–24
868
Increase of 53 (6.5%)
884.6
2024–25
914
Increase of 46 (5.3%)
877.6
2025–26
953
Increase of 39 (4.3%)
866.2
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
11
1.2% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
15
1.59 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
942
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
1.2%
Selected comparison
5.1%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 347 rated schools reporting
−3.9 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
1.59
Selected comparison
8.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 411 rated schools reporting
−7.3 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Stewart Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
1,096
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
1,176
Suppressed
—
14
1.19
—
9.1
2022–23
829
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2023–24
909
Suppressed
—
12
1.32
—
9.2
2024–25
942
11
1.2%
15
1.59
5.1%
8.9
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Stewart Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
11
1.2%
15
1.59
5.1%
8.9
In-school suspensions
11
1.2%
13
1.38
4.8%
7.2
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Stewart Elem
Parent district: Conroe ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$8,854
Selected comparison
$10,714
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 580 rated schools reporting
−$1,860 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $8,854 per student for this campus, $20,990 per student for its parent district, Conroe ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Stewart Elem
Parent district: Conroe ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,437
$12,724
$13,054
$7,218
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 493 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,608
$12,027
$13,108
$7,284
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 507 rated schools reporting
2020
$6,853
$11,626
$14,058
$7,608
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 519 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,571
$13,576
$14,797
$8,205
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 529 rated schools reporting
2022
$7,671
$14,960
$15,708
$9,373
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 540 rated schools reporting
2023
$9,679
$15,772
$16,792
$9,512
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 549 rated schools reporting
2024
$8,909
$16,120
$18,125
$10,422
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 567 rated schools reporting
2025
$8,854
$20,990
$18,972
$10,714
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 580 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$70,828+$1,528 vs similar economic context
Teachers
66+10.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.3−0.6 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Stewart Elem
1 to 5 years 18.2%
6 to 10 years 24.2%
11 to 20 years 34.8%
21 to 30 years 18.2%
Over 30 years 4.5%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 589 reporting for every category shown · 589 in full cohort
Beginning 4.2%
1 to 5 years 23.6%
6 to 10 years 20%
11 to 20 years 32.3%
21 to 30 years 16.8%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 06: Huntsville · 314 reporting for every category shown · 314 in full cohort
Beginning 7.5%
1 to 5 years 27.7%
6 to 10 years 18.9%
11 to 20 years 27.6%
21 to 30 years 13.6%
Over 30 years 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Montgomery County · 133 reporting for every category shown · 133 in full cohort
Beginning 7.4%
1 to 5 years 29.1%
6 to 10 years 22.3%
11 to 20 years 27.6%
21 to 30 years 11.5%
Over 30 years 2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 2,877 reporting for every category shown · 2,877 in full cohort
Beginning 6.3%
1 to 5 years 27.1%
6 to 10 years 20.3%
11 to 20 years 28.8%
21 to 30 years 14.6%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Stewart Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classStewart Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
19.8
18.9
Grade 1
18.6
19.1
Grade 2
19.6
19.7
Grade 3
21.5
21.4
Grade 4
18.4
20.4
Grade 5
22.6
22.3
Grade 6
18.5
19.1
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 7 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
2 measures
2of 298
Academic Growth
Region 06: Huntsville · of the 298 that report this measure · tied with 3
3of 302
Math — Masters
Region 06: Huntsville · of the 302 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
9 measures
4of 302
Math — Meets
Region 06: Huntsville · of the 302 that report this measure
4of 132
School Progress
Montgomery County · of the 132 that report this measure · tied with 2
5of 304
All Subjects — Masters
Region 06: Huntsville · of the 304 that report this measure · tied with 2
5of 132
Reading — Masters
Montgomery County · of the 132 that report this measure
6of 132
Reading — Approaches
Montgomery County · of the 132 that report this measure · tied with 2
6of 132
Reading — Meets
Montgomery County · of the 132 that report this measure · tied with 1
7of 132
All Subjects — Meets
Montgomery County · of the 132 that report this measure · tied with 1
9of 302
Closing the Gaps
Region 06: Huntsville · of the 302 that report this measure · tied with 6
10of 132
Math — Approaches
Montgomery County · of the 132 that report this measure · tied with 2
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
1 measure
11of 304
All Subjects — Approaches
Region 06: Huntsville · of the 304 that report this measure · tied with 6
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 170902130.