Current strength
Student Achievement above the similar-context average
83 +5.4 pts vs 77.6
- 83 is 5.4 points above the 77.6 average among 38 charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Charter school system · Alternative Education Accountability
Texasworks
Administrative office: Lewisville · 1,164 students
Official charter system websiteEnrollment, registration and eligibility
Not Rated
At a glance
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Texasworks for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this charter school system is below.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average
0% −23.8 pts vs 23.8%
- 0% is 23.8 percentage points lower than the 23.8% average among 37 charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the similar-context average
99.9% +7.2 pts vs 92.7%
- 99.9% is 7.2 percentage points above the 92.7% average among 37 charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Current strength
Student Achievement above the similar-size average
83 +5.9 pts vs 77.1
- 83 is 5.9 points above the 77.1 average among 40 similarly sized charter school systems reporting this measure.
Current strength
Relative Performance above the similar-size average
78 +2 pts vs 76
- 78 is 2 points above the 76 average among 40 similarly sized charter school systems reporting this measure.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-size average
0% −17.3 pts vs 17.3%
- 0% is 17.3 percentage points lower than the 17.3% average among 40 similarly sized charter school systems reporting this measure.
Current strength
Student Achievement above the Texas charter average
83 +6.2 pts vs 76.8
- 83 is 6.2 points above the 76.8 average among 165 Texas charter school systems reporting this measure.
Current strength
Relative Performance above the Texas charter average
78 +2.5 pts vs 75.5
- 78 is 2.5 points above the 75.5 average among 164 Texas charter school systems reporting this measure.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the Texas charter average
0% −21.2 pts vs 21.2%
- 0% is 21.2 percentage points lower than the 21.2% average among 162 Texas charter school systems reporting this measure.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this charter school system.
Read the full rating context and placement
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Texasworks for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this charter school system is below.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Texasworks for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this charter school system is below.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Texasworks for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this charter school system is below.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for this charter school system. Scores below are the figures TEA published; the letter grades are the state's where it issued them.
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
- Overview
- 2 years of ratings
- Where the score comes from
- Student outcomes
- Who this charter school system serves
- Student counts behind the percentages
- Enrollment over time
- Students entering this charter system
- Discipline and removal from class
- 41 schools in this charter school system
- Spending per student
- Teachers
- Where this comes from
2 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this charter school system has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas charter average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Not Rated | — | 80.2 38 reporting | 79.7 165 reporting |
| 2024-25 | Not Rated | — | 79.8 37 reporting | 79.2 160 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Texasworks
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (38 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 83 | Not rated | — |
| School Progress | 78 | Not rated | — |
| Closing the Gaps | 61 | Not rated | — |
| Academic Growth | 60 | Not rated | — |
| Relative Performance | 78 | Not rated | — |
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this charter school system that better measure is Student Achievement (83), so School Progress (78) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 83.
The scores above are the ones TEA published. TEA did not issue letter grades for this charter school system, so none are shown: the A–F thresholds marked on the chart are the state's, but applying them here would produce a grade the state chose to withhold.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (38 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Completion
- Four-Year
- 0.0%−57.5 pts vs similar economic context average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 5 rated charter school systems reporting
- Five-Year
- 0.0%−66.9 pts vs similar economic context average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 5 rated charter school systems reporting
- Six-Year
- 0.0%−69.1 pts vs similar economic context average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 5 rated charter school systems reporting
- Dropout Rate
- 46.0%+34.8 pts vs similar economic context average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 5 rated charter school systems reporting
These measures use TEA's alternative-education accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter school systems in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter school system rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
- Total credit for CCMR criteria
- 26.0%−58.2 pts vs similar economic context
| Criterion | This district% of graduates | Averagesimilar economic context | Differencepercentage points | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total credit for CCMR criteria | 26.0% | 84.2% | −58.2 | average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 27 rated charter school systems reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course | 16.4% | 71.0% | −54.6 | average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 27 rated charter school systems reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA | 7.8% | 33.7% | −25.9 | average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 27 rated charter school systems reporting |
| Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s) | 0.0% | 16.4% | −16.4 | average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 27 rated charter school systems reporting |
| Earned college credit for a dual credit course | 0.8% | 30.7% | −29.9 | average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 27 rated charter school systems reporting |
| Earned an industry-based certification | 10.9% | 15.7% | −4.8 | average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 27 rated charter school systems reporting |
| Earned a level I or level II certificate | 0.0% | 0.6% | −0.6 | average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 27 rated charter school systems reporting |
| Earned an associate degree | 0.0% | 6.7% | −6.7 | average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 27 rated charter school systems reporting |
| Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit | 0.0% | 7.3% | −7.3 | average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 27 rated charter school systems reporting |
| Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness | 0.0% | 1.4% | −1.4 | average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 27 rated charter school systems reporting |
| Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student | 0.8% | 7.6% | −6.8 | average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 27 rated charter school systems reporting |
| Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces | 0.0% | 2.1% | −2.1 | average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 27 rated charter school systems reporting |
Every row is a share of this charter school system's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this charter school system minus the average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported charter school system percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter school systems for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this charter school system serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 1,164
- Economically disadvantaged
- 69.5%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 7.1%−17.0 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 4.5%−8.2 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 99.9%+7.2 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 0.0%−23.8 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Texasworks
- African American 12.7%
- Hispanic 71.6%
- White 13%
- American Indian 0.2%
- Asian 0.6%
- Pacific Islander 0.3%
- Two or More Races 1.7%
Selected comparison average For charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 38 reporting for every category shown · 38 in full cohort
- African American 26%
- Hispanic 54.8%
- White 10.8%
- American Indian 0.2%
- Asian 5.1%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized charter school systems · 40 reporting for every category shown · 40 in full cohort
- African American 15.8%
- Hispanic 58.7%
- White 16.1%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 6%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 2.9%
Texas charter average 165 reporting for every category shown · 165 Texas charter school systems in full cohort
- African American 21%
- Hispanic 54.7%
- White 15.7%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 5.3%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 2.9%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 1,162
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 808
- Emergent bilingual students
- 82
- Special education students
- 52
TEA context labels
- Adult Education High School Charter Program
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 1,164 students in 2025–26, an increase of 718 (161.0%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 1,164
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- +718
Increase · +161.0%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This charter school system
- 1,164
- Selected comparison
- 3,503.6
| School year | Students enrolledTexasworks | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024–25 | 446 | First available year | 3,454.2 |
| 2025–26 | 1,164 | Increase of 718 (161.0%) | 3,503.6 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter school systems in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this charter school system's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Students entering this charter system
How many students live in a geographic school district and attend this charter system. These are movement counts, not a quality rating.
- Transfers in
- 1,164
Live in a geographic district; attend this charter system · 2025–26
Transfers in · 2025–26
- This charter school system
- 1,164
- Selected comparison
- 3,503.6
| School year | Transfers inTexasworks | Transfers inselected charter comparison average |
|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | Not reported | — |
| 2022–23 | Not reported | — |
| 2023–24 | Not reported | — |
| 2024–25 | 446 | 3,454.2 |
| 2025–26 | 1,164 | 3,503.6 |
Largest reported resident-district origins
- Laredo ISD 24090189
- Lubbock ISD 15290158
- Edinburg CISD 10890457
- Abilene ISD 22190156
- Houston ISD 10191250
Top reported flows only. TEA published 34 of 147 counterpart counts and masked 113.
TEA does not publish a transfers-out total or a resident population for this charter system. A charter system is not a geographic attendance boundary, so a net transfer balance cannot be calculated and this page does not label the system a transfer gainer or loser.
Selected comparison figures are average reported transfer-in counts among charter systems, not rates; system size affects them. They provide scale context and are not a performance judgment. This charter system’s official total does not change when the comparison does.
Source: TEA Student Transfer Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The total and origin rows are TEA’s published charter-system figures; this site does not add masked detail cells. A transfer-in count does not say why a family chose the charter or whether one school is better.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- Suppressed
Rate not available
- Disciplinary actions
- Suppressed
Rate not available
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 892
2024–25
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024–25 | 892 | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| In-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter school systems can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this charter school system's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
41 schools in this charter school system
Number of schools in the charter school system
- This charter school system
- 41
- Selected comparison
- 7.2
The selected comparison is a neutral average charter school system size. This charter school system's school count and school-type mix remain its own facts.
- High School
- 41
Browse all 41 schoolsName, type, rating, score and enrollment
Spending per student
The selected txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference stay visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Texasworks
- TEA peer group
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This charter school system
- $4,060
- Selected comparison
- $14,364
This charter school system spends $21,869 less per student than TEA's peer group, and $14,912 less per student than the state average.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Texasworks | TEA peer group | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $4,060 | $25,929 | $18,972 | $14,364 | average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 37 rated charter school systems reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers
- Average salary
- $8,412−$54,843 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 52−157.7 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 22.3+3.8 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Texasworks
- Beginning 4.6%
- 1 to 5 years 57.5%
- 6 to 10 years 25%
- 11 to 20 years 12.9%
Selected comparison average For charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 38 reporting for every category shown · 38 in full cohort
- Beginning 14.8%
- 1 to 5 years 38.3%
- 6 to 10 years 19.9%
- 11 to 20 years 20%
- 21 to 30 years 5.8%
- Over 30 years 1.3%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized charter school systems · 40 reporting for every category shown · 40 in full cohort
- Beginning 12.2%
- 1 to 5 years 35.2%
- 6 to 10 years 20%
- 11 to 20 years 20%
- 21 to 30 years 7.9%
- Over 30 years 2.1%
Texas charter average 165 reporting for every category shown · 165 Texas charter school systems in full cohort
- Beginning 11.4%
- 1 to 5 years 36.3%
- 6 to 10 years 19.7%
- 11 to 20 years 20.6%
- 21 to 30 years 8.2%
- Over 30 years 1.9%
Teacher turnover over time
| School year | Teacher turnover rateTexasworks | Average turnover rateselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| 2024–25 | Not reported | — |
TEA defines this charter school system rate as the share of teacher full-time equivalents from the prior fall who are not employed as teachers in the charter school system in the current fall. That can include leaving the charter school system or remaining in a different role; it is not a campus-level measure. The comparison average changes with the selected group; this charter school system's reported rate does not.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download this charter school system as CSV · JSON · the whole dataset