Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average
0% −25.4 pts vs 25.4%
- 0% is 25.4 percentage points lower than the 25.4% average among 222 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Open-enrollment charter campus · Alternative Education Accountability
Texasworks - Tyler
Texasworks · Tyler · 11 students
Official school websiteSchool information and family resources
Not Rated
At a glance
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Texasworks - Tyler for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this charter campus is below.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Attendance above the similar-context average
99.8% +7.6 pts vs 92.2%
- 99.8% is 7.6 percentage points above the 92.2% average among 222 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the Texas charter average
0% −22.5 pts vs 22.5%
- 0% is 22.5 percentage points lower than the 22.5% average among 807 Texas charter campuses reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the Texas charter average
99.8% +6.9 pts vs 92.9%
- 99.8% is 6.9 percentage points above the 92.9% average among 807 Texas charter campuses reporting this measure.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Texasworks - Tyler for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this charter campus is below.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Texasworks - Tyler for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this charter campus is below.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for this school. Scores below are the figures TEA published; the letter grades are the state's where it issued them.
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
2 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas charter average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Not Rated | — | 81.6 226 reporting | 81.7 829 reporting |
| 2024-25 | Not Rated | — | 82.3 220 reporting | 81.3 797 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Texasworks - Tyler
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (226 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | — | Not rated | — |
| School Progress | — | Not rated | — |
| Closing the Gaps | — | Not rated | — |
| Academic Growth | — | Not rated | — |
| Relative Performance | — | Not rated | — |
The scores above are the ones TEA published. TEA did not issue letter grades for this school, so none are shown: the A–F thresholds marked on the chart are the state's, but applying them here would produce a grade the state chose to withhold.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (226 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Completion
- Four-Year
- 0.0%−49.1 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 41 rated charter campuses reporting
- Five-Year
- 0.0%−58.3 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 41 rated charter campuses reporting
- Six-Year
- 0.0%−57.9 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 41 rated charter campuses reporting
- Dropout Rate
- 57.1%+46.4 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 41 rated charter campuses reporting
These measures use TEA's alternative-education accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter campuses in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter campus rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
| Criterion | This school% of graduates | Averagesimilar economic context | Differencepercentage points | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course | 0.0% | 72.0% | −72.0 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 100 rated charter campuses reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA | 0.0% | 37.5% | −37.5 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 100 rated charter campuses reporting |
| Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s) | 0.0% | 24.9% | −24.9 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 100 rated charter campuses reporting |
| Earned college credit for a dual credit course | 0.0% | 15.3% | −15.3 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 100 rated charter campuses reporting |
| Earned an industry-based certification | 0.0% | 11.8% | −11.8 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 100 rated charter campuses reporting |
| Earned a level I or level II certificate | 0.0% | 0.4% | −0.4 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 100 rated charter campuses reporting |
| Earned an associate degree | 0.0% | 1.5% | −1.5 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 100 rated charter campuses reporting |
| Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit | 0.0% | 3.8% | −3.8 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 100 rated charter campuses reporting |
| Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness | 0.0% | 1.6% | −1.6 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 100 rated charter campuses reporting |
| Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student | 0.0% | 7.3% | −7.3 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 100 rated charter campuses reporting |
| Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces | 0.0% | 1.9% | −1.9 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 100 rated charter campuses reporting |
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported charter campus percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 11
- Economically disadvantaged
- 72.7%−1.8 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 0.0%−30.6 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 9.1%−3.8 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 99.8%+7.6 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 0.0%−25.4 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Texasworks - Tyler
- African American 36.4%
- Hispanic 54.5%
- White 9.1%
Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 226 reporting for every category shown · 226 in full cohort
- African American 19.1%
- Hispanic 66.6%
- White 8.4%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 3.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 2.3%
Texas charter average 829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
- African American 17.5%
- Hispanic 61.8%
- White 12.2%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 5.5%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 2.5%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 11
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 8
- Emergent bilingual students
- 0
- Special education students
- 1
TEA context labels
- Alternative education campus under AEA procedures
- Alternative education type: dropout recovery school
- Rated under AEA procedures
- Adult Education High School Charter Program
Campus mobility · 2024–25
- Mobile students
- 16
- Students in TEA mobility denominator
- 17
- TEA-published mobility rate
- 94.1%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- Not reported
Rate not available
- Disciplinary actions
- Not reported
Rate not available
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 17
2024–25
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024–25 | 17 | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| In-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Texasworks - Tyler
- Parent district: Texasworks
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This school
- $5,758
- Selected comparison
- $11,493
For 2025, TEA reported $5,758 per student for this campus, $4,060 per student for its parent district, Texasworks, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Texasworks - Tyler | Parent district: Texasworks | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $5,758 | $4,060 | $18,972 | $11,493 | average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 219 rated charter campuses reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers
- Average salary
- $2,420−$60,103 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 1−28.4 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 11−7.3 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Texasworks - Tyler
- 1 to 5 years 100%
Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 226 reporting for every category shown · 226 in full cohort
- Beginning 13.5%
- 1 to 5 years 46.3%
- 6 to 10 years 20%
- 11 to 20 years 15.5%
- 21 to 30 years 4%
- Over 30 years 0.7%
Texas charter average 829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
- Beginning 13%
- 1 to 5 years 44.3%
- 6 to 10 years 19.6%
- 11 to 20 years 15.4%
- 21 to 30 years 4.8%
- Over 30 years 0.9%
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 061806016.