Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Open-enrollment charter campus · Alternative Education Accountability

Texasworks - San Juan

Texasworks · San Juan · 41 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Not Rated

At a glance

TEA did not issue an overall rating for Texasworks - San Juan for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this charter campus is below.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Student Achievement above the similar-context average

91 +16.6 pts vs 74.4

  • 91 is 16.6 points above the 74.4 average among 415 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average

0% −23.9 pts vs 23.9%

  • 0% is 23.9 percentage points lower than the 23.9% average among 412 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Attendance above the similar-context average

99.4% +6.7 pts vs 92.7%

  • 99.4% is 6.7 percentage points above the 92.7% average among 412 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

TEA did not issue an overall rating for Texasworks - San Juan for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this charter campus is below.

TEA did not issue an overall rating for this school. Scores below are the figures TEA published; the letter grades are the state's where it issued them.

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 2 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Discipline and removal from class
  8. Spending per student
  9. Teachers
  10. Where this comes from

2 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas charter average 2024-252025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas charter average
2025-26Not Rated—80.4 415 reporting81.7 829 reporting
2024-25Not Rated—78.7 407 reporting81.3 797 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement91+16.6 vs similar economic context · 415 reporting
  • School Progress—Not reported · similar economic context 81.4 · 415 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps—Not reported · similar economic context 77.2 · 409 reporting
  • Academic Growth—Not reported · similar economic context 73.4 · 395 reporting
  • Relative Performance—Not reported · similar economic context 79.5 · 410 reporting
  • Texasworks - San Juan
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (415 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement91Not rated—
School Progress—Not rated—
Closing the Gaps—Not rated—
Academic Growth—Not rated—
Relative Performance—Not rated—

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.

The scores above are the ones TEA published. TEA did not issue letter grades for this school, so none are shown: the A–F thresholds marked on the chart are the state's, but applying them here would produce a grade the state chose to withhold.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level95%+27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 415 reporting
  • Meets grade level30%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 415 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 415 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level88%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 415 reporting
  • Meets grade level25%−20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 415 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 415 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level100%+33 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 413 reporting
  • Meets grade level20%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 413 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 413 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level100%+31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 265 reporting
  • Meets grade level43%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 265 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 265 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (415 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Completion

Four-Year
0.0%−46.0 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 49 rated charter campuses reporting
Five-Year
0.0%−52.6 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 49 rated charter campuses reporting
Six-Year
0.0%−55.0 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 49 rated charter campuses reporting
Dropout Rate
42.9%+32.1 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 49 rated charter campuses reporting

These measures use TEA's alternative-education accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter campuses in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter campus rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course0.0%65.9%−65.9 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 142 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA0.0%33.3%−33.3 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 142 rated charter campuses reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)0.0%28.1%−28.1 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 142 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course0.0%10.1%−10.1 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 142 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an industry-based certification100.0%14.3%+85.7 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 142 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%0.4%−0.4 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 142 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%1.6%−1.6 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 142 rated charter campuses reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%3.9%−3.9 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 142 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%2.0%−2.0 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 142 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student0.0%8.2%−8.2 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 142 rated charter campuses reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces0.0%1.8%−1.8 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 142 rated charter campuses reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported charter campus percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
41
Economically disadvantaged
90.2%+0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
31.7%−11.9 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
7.3%−5.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
99.4%+6.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
0.0%−23.9 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Texasworks - San Juan

Hispanic: 100%
  • Hispanic 100%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 415 reporting for every category shown · 415 in full cohort

African American: 18.6%Hispanic: 74.7%White: 3.5%American Indian: 0.2%Asian: 1.4%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 1.4%
  • African American 18.6%
  • Hispanic 74.7%
  • White 3.5%
  • American Indian 0.2%
  • Asian 1.4%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 1.4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
41
Economically disadvantaged students
37
Emergent bilingual students
13
Special education students
3

TEA context labels

  • Alternative education campus under AEA procedures
  • Alternative education type: dropout recovery school
  • Rated under AEA procedures
  • Adult Education High School Charter Program

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
8
Students in TEA mobility denominator
14
TEA-published mobility rate
57.1%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Not reported

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
14

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Texasworks - San Juan
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2024–25 14 Not reported — Not reported — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Texasworks - San Juan in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Not reported — Not reported — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$4k$12k$20k2025
  • Texasworks - San Juan
  • Parent district: Texasworks
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$4,288
Selected comparison
$11,835

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 409 rated charter campuses reporting

−$7,547 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $4,288 per student for this campus, $4,060 per student for its parent district, Texasworks, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearTexasworks - San JuanParent district: TexasworksTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2025$4,288$4,060$18,972$11,835 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 409 rated charter campuses reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers

Average salary
$2,807−$61,052 vs similar economic context
Teachers
2−27.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
20.5+2.7 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Texasworks - San Juan

6 to 10 years: 50%11 to 20 years: 50%
  • 6 to 10 years 50%
  • 11 to 20 years 50%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 415 reporting for every category shown · 415 in full cohort

Beginning: 13%1 to 5 years: 47.3%6 to 10 years: 19.8%11 to 20 years: 14.8%21 to 30 years: 4.4%Over 30 years: 0.8%
  • Beginning 13%
  • 1 to 5 years 47.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 14.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 4.4%
  • Over 30 years 0.8%

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 061806015.