Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Open-enrollment charter campus · Alternative Education Accountability

Texasworks - Elem Paso-Mesa

Texasworks · El Paso · 31 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Not Rated

At a glance

TEA did not issue an overall rating for Texasworks - Elem Paso-Mesa for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this charter campus is below.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Student Achievement above the similar-context average

88 +9.2 pts vs 78.8

  • 88 is 9.2 points above the 78.8 average among 213 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average

0% −25.4 pts vs 25.4%

  • 0% is 25.4 percentage points lower than the 25.4% average among 209 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Attendance above the similar-context average

100% +7.8 pts vs 92.2%

  • 100% is 7.8 percentage points above the 92.2% average among 209 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

TEA did not issue an overall rating for Texasworks - Elem Paso-Mesa for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this charter campus is below.

TEA did not issue an overall rating for this school. Scores below are the figures TEA published; the letter grades are the state's where it issued them.

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 2 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers
  11. Where this comes from

2 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas charter average 2024-252025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas charter average
2025-26Not Rated—81.3 213 reporting81.7 829 reporting
2024-25Not Rated—82.4 209 reporting81.3 797 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement88+9.2 vs similar economic context · 213 reporting
  • School Progress—Not reported · similar economic context 81.8 · 212 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps—Not reported · similar economic context 77.8 · 206 reporting
  • Academic Growth—Not reported · similar economic context 72.5 · 197 reporting
  • Relative Performance—Not reported · similar economic context 80.6 · 210 reporting
  • Texasworks - Elem Paso-Mesa
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (213 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement88Not rated—
School Progress—Not rated—
Closing the Gaps—Not rated—
Academic Growth—Not rated—
Relative Performance—Not rated—

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.

The scores above are the ones TEA published. TEA did not issue letter grades for this school, so none are shown: the A–F thresholds marked on the chart are the state's, but applying them here would produce a grade the state chose to withhold.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level83%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 213 reporting
  • Meets grade level22%−21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 213 reporting
  • Masters grade level6%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 213 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level100%+28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 213 reporting
  • Meets grade level20%−29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 213 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 213 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 66.9% · 211 reporting
  • Meets grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 34.3% · 211 reporting
  • Masters grade level—Not reported · Similar economic-disadvantage rate 13.1% · 211 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level80%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 206 reporting
  • Meets grade level20%−22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 206 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 206 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level100%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 148 reporting
  • Meets grade level20%−22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 148 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 148 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (213 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Completion

Four-Year
0.0%−51.2 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 40 rated charter campuses reporting
Five-Year
0.0%−59.3 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 40 rated charter campuses reporting
Six-Year
0.0%−59.2 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 40 rated charter campuses reporting
Dropout Rate
44.4%+33.3 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 40 rated charter campuses reporting

These measures use TEA's alternative-education accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter campuses in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter campus rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course0.0%73.7%−73.7 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 96 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA0.0%36.9%−36.9 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 96 rated charter campuses reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)0.0%23.8%−23.8 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 96 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course0.0%14.6%−14.6 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 96 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an industry-based certification0.0%11.5%−11.5 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 96 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%0.5%−0.5 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 96 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%1.6%−1.6 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 96 rated charter campuses reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%4.0%−4.0 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 96 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%1.7%−1.7 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 96 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student0.0%7.8%−7.8 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 96 rated charter campuses reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces0.0%1.8%−1.8 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 96 rated charter campuses reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported charter campus percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
31
Economically disadvantaged
71.0%−1.3 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
0.0%−28.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
0.0%−13.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
100.0%+7.8 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
0.0%−25.4 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Texasworks - Elem Paso-Mesa

African American: 6.5%Hispanic: 93.5%
  • African American 6.5%
  • Hispanic 93.5%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 213 reporting for every category shown · 213 in full cohort

African American: 19.3%Hispanic: 63.8%White: 10.3%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 3.7%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 2.5%
  • African American 19.3%
  • Hispanic 63.8%
  • White 10.3%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 3.7%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 2.5%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
31
Economically disadvantaged students
22
Emergent bilingual students
0
Special education students
0

TEA context labels

  • Alternative education campus under AEA procedures
  • Alternative education type: dropout recovery school
  • Rated under AEA procedures
  • Adult Education High School Charter Program

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
20
Students in TEA mobility denominator
26
TEA-published mobility rate
76.9%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 31 students in 2025–26, an increase of 21 (210.0%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
31

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+21

Increase · +210.0%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
31
Selected comparison
510.6

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 213 rated charter campuses reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Texasworks - Elem Paso-Mesa
School yearStudents enrolledTexasworks - Elem Paso-MesaChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2024–25 10 First available year 506.2
2025–26 31 Increase of 21 (210.0%) 510.6

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Not reported

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
26

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Texasworks - Elem Paso-Mesa
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2024–25 26 Not reported — Not reported — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Texasworks - Elem Paso-Mesa in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Not reported — Not reported — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$3k$12k$20k2025
  • Texasworks - Elem Paso-Mesa
  • Parent district: Texasworks
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$3,442
Selected comparison
$11,512

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 207 rated charter campuses reporting

−$8,070 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $3,442 per student for this campus, $4,060 per student for its parent district, Texasworks, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearTexasworks - Elem Paso-MesaParent district: TexasworksTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2025$3,442$4,060$18,972$11,512 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 207 rated charter campuses reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers

Average salary
$573−$61,790 vs similar economic context
Teachers
1−29.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
43.4+25.0 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Texasworks - Elem Paso-Mesa

11 to 20 years: 100%
  • 11 to 20 years 100%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 213 reporting for every category shown · 213 in full cohort

Beginning: 14.1%1 to 5 years: 45.7%6 to 10 years: 19.8%11 to 20 years: 15.6%21 to 30 years: 4.1%Over 30 years: 0.8%
  • Beginning 14.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 45.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 15.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 4.1%
  • Over 30 years 0.8%

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 061806006.