−1.9 ptsvs 77.9 average · 62 rated charter school systems serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
37 of 62tied with 3 others
Score vs similar-size group
−3.1 ptsvs 79.1 average · 42 similarly sized rated charter school systems
Similar size placement
24 of 42tied with 3 others
Score vs state
−3.7 ptsvs 79.7 average · 165 rated Texas charter school systems
Texas charter placement
113 of 165tied with 4 others
C76
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 88 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 77.9 average for 62 rated charter school systems serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 79.1 average for 42 similarly sized rated charter school systems.The current score is below the 79.7 average for 165 rated Texas charter school systems.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
42%vs 35% avg · +7 pts
Masters
17%vs 13% avg · +4 pts
Among 60 charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average
10.3%−17.1 pts vs 27.4%
10.3% is 17.1 percentage points lower than
the 27.4% average among 62 charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this charter school system.
Read the full rating context and placement
Ser-Ninos Charter School is rated C by TEA, scoring 76 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 77.9 average for 62 rated charter school systems serving a similar economic context. It is down 11 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 37th of 62 rated charter school systems serving a similar economic context (tied with 3 others).
Ser-Ninos Charter School is rated C by TEA, scoring 76 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 79.1 average for 42 similarly sized rated charter school systems. It is down 11 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 24th of 42 similarly sized rated charter school systems (tied with 3 others).
Ser-Ninos Charter School is rated C by TEA, scoring 76 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 79.7 average for 165 rated Texas charter school systems. It is down 11 points since 2021-22.
Dated TEA notices for campuses in this charter school system. They are shown separately from the charter school system rating because they describe specific campuses, support programs and transfer eligibility.
Campuses identified for federal improvement support
1
2026 TEA list
Campuses on the final PEG transfer list
0
2026–27 school year
Share of campuses identified for improvement
This charter school system
25.0%
Selected comparison
35.1%
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 62 rated charter school systems reporting
−10.1 pts vs similar economic context
Share of campuses on the PEG list
This charter school system
0.0%
Selected comparison
0.0%
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 62 rated charter school systems reporting
±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
See the campuses and official reasons
Official improvement and Public Education Grant notices for campuses in Ser-Ninos Charter School
Comprehensive Support and Improvement · CSI Low Performance
Selected comparison percentages describe how common each dated campus notice is across reporting charter school systems in that group. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes a campus's official status.
Follow the solid line to see how this charter school system has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 88 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement71 C−2.6 vs similar economic context · 62 reporting
School Progress77 C−1.6 vs similar economic context · 62 reporting
Closing the Gaps72 C−3.5 vs similar economic context · 61 reporting
Academic Growth69 D−3.4 vs similar economic context · 60 reporting
Relative Performance77 C+0.2 vs similar economic context · 61 reporting
Ser-Ninos Charter School
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (62 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
71
C
9
School Progress
77
C
3
Closing the Gaps
72
C
8
Academic Growth
69
D
1
Relative Performance
77
C
3
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 3 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this charter school system that better measure is School Progress (77), so
Student Achievement (71) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 77.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level68%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 62 reporting
Meets grade level41%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 62 reporting
Masters grade level14%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 62 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level71%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 62 reporting
Meets grade level47%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 62 reporting
Masters grade level16%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 62 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level67%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 62 reporting
Meets grade level35%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 62 reporting
Masters grade level10%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 62 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level68%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 60 reporting
Meets grade level42%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 60 reporting
Masters grade level17%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 60 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level59%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 51 reporting
Meets grade level36%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 51 reporting
Masters grade level15%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 51 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (62 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
Four-Year
0.0%−80.0 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 27 rated charter school systems reporting
Five-Year
0.0%−74.9 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 27 rated charter school systems reporting
Six-Year
0.0%−75.3 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 27 rated charter school systems reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.9 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 27 rated charter school systems reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter school systems in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter school system rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter school systems for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this charter school system serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
1,206
Economically disadvantaged
81.7%−1.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
80.1%+50.3 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
5.4%−9.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.6%+3.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
10.3%−17.1 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Ser-Ninos Charter School
African American 0.6%
Hispanic 97.4%
White 0.3%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 1.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Selected comparison averageFor charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 62 reporting for every category shown · 62 in full cohort
African American 24.7%
Hispanic 65.6%
White 5.6%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 1.9%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter school systems · 42 reporting for every category shown · 42 in full cohort
African American 15%
Hispanic 59%
White 16.2%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 6.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.9%
Texas charter average165 reporting for every category shown · 165 Texas charter school systems in full cohort
African American 21%
Hispanic 54.7%
White 15.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.9%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
1,206
Economically disadvantaged students
985
Emergent bilingual students
966
Special education students
65
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 1,206 students in 2025–26, an increase of 13 (1.1%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
1,206
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+13
Increase · +1.1%
Change since 2021–22
+197
Increase · +19.5%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This charter school system
1,206
Selected comparison
3,500.2
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 62 rated charter school systems reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Ser-Ninos Charter School
School year
Students enrolledSer-Ninos Charter School
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
1,009
First available year
3,097.1
2022–23
1,113
Increase of 104 (10.3%)
3,257.8
2023–24
1,154
Increase of 41 (3.7%)
3,337.5
2024–25
1,193
Increase of 39 (3.4%)
3,464.7
2025–26
1,206
Increase of 13 (1.1%)
3,500.2
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter school systems in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this charter school system's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Students entering this charter system
How many students live in a geographic school district and attend this charter system. These are movement counts, not a quality rating.
Transfers in
1,206
Live in a geographic district; attend this charter system · 2025–26
Transfers in · 2025–26
This charter school system
1,206
Selected comparison
3,500.2
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 62 rated charter school systems reporting
Official transfers into Ser-Ninos Charter School by school year
School year
Transfers inSer-Ninos Charter School
Transfers inselected charter comparison average
2021–22
1,009
3,097.1
2022–23
1,113
3,257.8
2023–24
1,154
3,337.5
2024–25
1,193
3,464.7
2025–26
1,206
3,500.2
Largest reported resident-district origins
Houston ISD 1019121,130
Alief ISD 10190334
Fort Bend ISD 07990719
Top reported flows only. TEA published 3 of 16 counterpart counts and masked 13.
TEA does not publish a transfers-out total or a resident population for this charter system. A charter system is not a geographic attendance boundary, so a net transfer balance cannot be calculated and this page does not label the system a transfer gainer or loser.
Selected comparison figures are average reported transfer-in counts among charter systems, not rates; system size affects them. They provide scale context and are not a performance judgment. This charter system’s official total does not change when the comparison does.
Source: TEA Student Transfer Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The total and origin rows are TEA’s published charter-system figures; this site does not add masked detail cells. A transfer-in count does not say why a family chose the charter or whether one school is better.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Not reported
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
1,247
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Ser-Ninos Charter School
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
1,135
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2021–22
1,046
20
1.9%
23
2.20
8.3%
12.1
2022–23
1,152
16
1.4%
17
1.48
8.7%
14.5
2023–24
1,208
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2024–25
1,247
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Ser-Ninos Charter School in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter school systems can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this charter school system's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
4 schools in this charter school system
Number of schools in the charter school system
This charter school system
4
Selected comparison
6.5
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 62 rated charter school systems reporting
The selected comparison is a neutral average charter school system size. This charter school system's school count and school-type mix remain its own facts.
Elementary
2
High School
1
Middle / Jr. High
1
Browse all 4 schoolsName, type, rating, score and enrollment
The selected txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference stay visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Ser-Ninos Charter School
TEA peer group
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This charter school system
$14,791
Selected comparison
$15,672
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 62 rated charter school systems reporting
−$881 vs similar economic context
This charter school system spends $4,970 less per student than TEA's peer group, and $4,181 less per student than the state average.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Ser-Ninos Charter School
TEA peer group
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$9,805
$13,246
$13,054
$10,403
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 53 rated charter school systems reporting
2019
$10,043
$12,865
$13,108
$10,596
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 54 rated charter school systems reporting
2020
$9,952
$13,729
$14,058
$11,346
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 55 rated charter school systems reporting
2021
$10,815
$14,629
$14,797
$12,480
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 57 rated charter school systems reporting
2022
$12,779
$15,859
$15,708
$15,616
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 60 rated charter school systems reporting
2023
$13,200
$17,414
$16,792
$15,303
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 61 rated charter school systems reporting
2024
$13,685
$19,844
$18,125
$15,922
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 62 rated charter school systems reporting
2025
$14,791
$19,761
$18,972
$15,672
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 62 rated charter school systems reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers
Average salary
$79,741+$15,949 vs similar economic context
Teachers
66−141.9 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
18.3+2.0 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Ser-Ninos Charter School
Beginning 3%
1 to 5 years 18.2%
6 to 10 years 22.7%
11 to 20 years 44%
21 to 30 years 10.4%
Over 30 years 1.5%
Selected comparison averageFor charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 62 reporting for every category shown · 62 in full cohort
Beginning 10.3%
1 to 5 years 39.7%
6 to 10 years 20.9%
11 to 20 years 19.5%
21 to 30 years 7.3%
Over 30 years 2.5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter school systems · 42 reporting for every category shown · 42 in full cohort
Beginning 12%
1 to 5 years 35.8%
6 to 10 years 20.1%
11 to 20 years 19.7%
21 to 30 years 8.1%
Over 30 years 2%
Texas charter average165 reporting for every category shown · 165 Texas charter school systems in full cohort
Beginning 11.4%
1 to 5 years 36.3%
6 to 10 years 19.7%
11 to 20 years 20.6%
21 to 30 years 8.2%
Over 30 years 1.9%
Teacher turnover over time
TEA reported a 23.9% teacher turnover rate in 2024–25.
Teacher turnover rate · 2024–25
This charter school system
23.9%
Selected comparison
31.6%
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 62 rated charter school systems reporting
−7.7 pts vs similar economic context
Charter-system teacher turnover rate by school year for Ser-Ninos Charter School
School year
Teacher turnover rateSer-Ninos Charter School
Average turnover rateselected comparison
2020–21
8.6%
24.8%
2021–22
17.5%
28.7%
2022–23
19.1%
35.4%
2023–24
20.7%
33.7%
2024–25
23.9%
31.6%
TEA defines this charter school system rate as the share of teacher full-time equivalents from the prior fall who are not employed as teachers in the charter school system in the current fall. That can include leaving the charter school system or remaining in a different role; it is not a campus-level measure. The comparison average changes with the selected group; this charter school system's reported rate does not.
Out of 84 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
1 measure
8of 62
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 62 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this charter school system ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this charter school system; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no charter school system would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.