−19.5 ptsvs 81.5 average · 297 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
277 of 297tied with 1 other
Score vs similar-size group
−18.0 ptsvs 80 average · 420 similarly sized rated charter campuses
Similar size placement
388 of 420tied with 1 other
Score vs state
−19.7 ptsvs 81.7 average · 829 rated Texas charter campuses
Texas charter placement
779 of 829tied with 2 others
D62
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 86 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 81.5 average for 297 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 80 average for 420 similarly sized rated charter campuses.The current score is below the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average
11.2%−14.2 pts vs 25.4%
11.2% is 14.2 percentage points lower than
the 25.4% average among 294 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Ser-Ninos Charter Elem is rated D by TEA, scoring 62 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.5 average for 297 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is down 23 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 277th of 297 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 1 other).
Ser-Ninos Charter Elem is rated D by TEA, scoring 62 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80 average for 420 similarly sized rated charter campuses. It is down 23 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 388th of 420 similarly sized rated charter campuses (tied with 1 other).
Ser-Ninos Charter Elem is rated D by TEA, scoring 62 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses. It is down 23 points since 2021-22.
Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 297 rated charter campuses reporting
Schools on the PEG list
This school
Not listed
Selected comparison
0.0%
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 297 rated charter campuses reporting
Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.
These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 86 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement64 D−13.0 vs similar economic context · 297 reporting
School Progress66 D−16.3 vs similar economic context · 296 reporting
Closing the Gaps54 F−24.2 vs similar economic context · 291 reporting
Academic Growth60 D−13.6 vs similar economic context · 280 reporting
Relative Performance66 D−14.6 vs similar economic context · 294 reporting
Ser-Ninos Charter Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (297 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
64
D
6
School Progress
66
D
4
Closing the Gaps
54
F
6
Academic Growth
60
D
10
Relative Performance
66
D
4
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 4 points below C in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (66), so
Student Achievement (64) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 66.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level63%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 297 reporting
Meets grade level34%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 297 reporting
Masters grade level13%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 297 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level66%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 297 reporting
Meets grade level39%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 297 reporting
Masters grade level18%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 297 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level66%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 296 reporting
Meets grade level37%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 296 reporting
Masters grade level12%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 296 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level45%−29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 289 reporting
Meets grade level12%−28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 289 reporting
Masters grade level4%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 289 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (297 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
469
Economically disadvantaged
77.6%−1.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
86.8%+52.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
4.3%−8.8 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.3%+3.0 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
11.2%−14.2 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Ser-Ninos Charter Elem
African American 1.3%
Hispanic 95.3%
White 0.4%
Asian 2.8%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 297 reporting for every category shown · 297 in full cohort
African American 18.8%
Hispanic 70.4%
White 6.5%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 420 reporting for every category shown · 420 in full cohort
African American 16.7%
Hispanic 66.1%
White 9.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.1%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
African American 17.5%
Hispanic 61.8%
White 12.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.5%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
469
Economically disadvantaged students
364
Emergent bilingual students
407
Special education students
20
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
25
Students in TEA mobility denominator
401
TEA-published mobility rate
6.2%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 469 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 43 (8.4%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
469
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−43
Decrease · −8.4%
Change since 2021–22
−13
Decrease · −2.7%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
469
Selected comparison
508.1
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 297 rated charter campuses reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Ser-Ninos Charter Elem
School year
Students enrolledSer-Ninos Charter Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
482
First available year
491.3
2022–23
516
Increase of 34 (7.1%)
506.9
2023–24
526
Increase of 10 (1.9%)
506.5
2024–25
512
Decrease of 14 (2.7%)
511.2
2025–26
469
Decrease of 43 (8.4%)
508.1
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Not reported
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
548
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Ser-Ninos Charter Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
551
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2021–22
507
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2022–23
538
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2023–24
563
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2024–25
548
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Ser-Ninos Charter Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Ser-Ninos Charter Elem
Parent district: Ser-Ninos Charter School
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$11,797
Selected comparison
$11,590
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 291 rated charter campuses reporting
+$207 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $11,797 per student for this campus, $14,791 per student for its parent district, Ser-Ninos Charter School, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Ser-Ninos Charter Elem
Parent district: Ser-Ninos Charter School
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,595
$9,805
$13,054
$8,207
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 200 rated charter campuses reporting
2019
$8,149
$10,043
$13,108
$8,752
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 219 rated charter campuses reporting
2020
$8,738
$9,952
$14,058
$9,492
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 237 rated charter campuses reporting
2021
$8,500
$10,815
$14,797
$9,380
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 256 rated charter campuses reporting
2022
$10,074
$12,779
$15,708
$10,898
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 268 rated charter campuses reporting
2023
$12,270
$13,200
$16,792
$11,234
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 275 rated charter campuses reporting
2024
$11,462
$13,685
$18,125
$11,676
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 282 rated charter campuses reporting
2025
$11,797
$14,791
$18,972
$11,590
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 291 rated charter campuses reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers
Average salary
$79,202+$16,394 vs similar economic context
Teachers
24−6.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
19.4+1.4 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Ser-Ninos Charter Elem
Beginning 4.1%
1 to 5 years 4.1%
6 to 10 years 29%
11 to 20 years 53.9%
21 to 30 years 8.7%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 297 reporting for every category shown · 297 in full cohort
Beginning 13.1%
1 to 5 years 46.6%
6 to 10 years 20.1%
11 to 20 years 15.1%
21 to 30 years 4.5%
Over 30 years 0.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 420 reporting for every category shown · 420 in full cohort
Beginning 13.5%
1 to 5 years 47.3%
6 to 10 years 19.4%
11 to 20 years 13.5%
21 to 30 years 4%
Over 30 years 0.6%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
Beginning 13%
1 to 5 years 44.3%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 15.4%
21 to 30 years 4.8%
Over 30 years 0.9%
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101802101.