−2.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 424 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
267 of 424tied with 11 others
Score vs similar-size group
−2.2 ptsvs 80.2 average · 221 similarly sized rated charter campuses
Similar size placement
138 of 221tied with 2 others
Score vs state
−3.7 ptsvs 81.7 average · 829 rated Texas charter campuses
Texas charter placement
551 of 829tied with 20 others
C78
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 90 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 80.5 average for 424 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 80.2 average for 221 similarly sized rated charter campuses.The current score is below the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
51%vs 45.1% avg · +5.9 pts
Masters
21%vs 16.7% avg · +4.3 pts
Among 424 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average
7.1%−16.8 pts vs 23.9%
7.1% is 16.8 percentage points lower than
the 23.9% average among 421 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Ser-Ninos Charter MS is rated C by TEA, scoring 78 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.5 average for 424 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is down 13 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 267th of 424 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 11 others).
Ser-Ninos Charter MS is rated C by TEA, scoring 78 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.2 average for 221 similarly sized rated charter campuses. It is down 13 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 138th of 221 similarly sized rated charter campuses (tied with 2 others).
Ser-Ninos Charter MS is rated C by TEA, scoring 78 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses. It is down 13 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 90 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement70 C−4.7 vs similar economic context · 424 reporting
School Progress80 B−1.6 vs similar economic context · 424 reporting
Closing the Gaps72 C−5.3 vs similar economic context · 420 reporting
Academic Growth70 C−3.2 vs similar economic context · 405 reporting
Relative Performance80 B+0.1 vs similar economic context · 421 reporting
Ser-Ninos Charter MS
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (424 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
70
C
10
School Progress
80
B
10
Closing the Gaps
72
C
8
Academic Growth
70
C
10
Relative Performance
80
B
10
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 8 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (80), so
Student Achievement (70) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 80.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level65%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 424 reporting
Meets grade level37%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 424 reporting
Masters grade level12%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 424 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level74%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 424 reporting
Meets grade level51%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 424 reporting
Masters grade level21%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 424 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level65%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 423 reporting
Meets grade level34%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 423 reporting
Masters grade level9%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 423 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level58%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 400 reporting
Meets grade level25%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 400 reporting
Masters grade level2%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 400 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level40%−30 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 270 reporting
Meets grade level14%−25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 270 reporting
Masters grade level5%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 270 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (424 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
281
Economically disadvantaged
88.6%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
77.2%+34.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
5.3%−7.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.5%+3.8 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
7.1%−16.8 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Ser-Ninos Charter MS
African American 0.4%
Hispanic 98.2%
White 0.4%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 0.7%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 424 reporting for every category shown · 424 in full cohort
African American 18.1%
Hispanic 75%
White 3.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.6%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.3%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 221 reporting for every category shown · 221 in full cohort
African American 21.8%
Hispanic 57.8%
White 13%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.7%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
African American 17.5%
Hispanic 61.8%
White 12.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.5%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
281
Economically disadvantaged students
249
Emergent bilingual students
217
Special education students
15
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
8
Students in TEA mobility denominator
271
TEA-published mobility rate
3%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 281 students in 2025–26, an increase of 15 (5.6%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
281
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+15
Increase · +5.6%
Change since 2021–22
+24
Increase · +9.3%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
281
Selected comparison
515.3
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 424 rated charter campuses reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Ser-Ninos Charter MS
School year
Students enrolledSer-Ninos Charter MS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
257
First available year
498.3
2022–23
258
Increase of 1 (0.4%)
512.3
2023–24
251
Decrease of 7 (2.7%)
517.5
2024–25
266
Increase of 15 (6.0%)
519.6
2025–26
281
Increase of 15 (5.6%)
515.3
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Not reported
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
271
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Ser-Ninos Charter MS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
277
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2021–22
264
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2022–23
261
16
6.1%
17
6.51
11.5%
19.7
2023–24
256
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2024–25
271
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Ser-Ninos Charter MS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Ser-Ninos Charter MS
Parent district: Ser-Ninos Charter School
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$11,672
Selected comparison
$11,814
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 418 rated charter campuses reporting
−$142 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $11,672 per student for this campus, $14,791 per student for its parent district, Ser-Ninos Charter School, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Ser-Ninos Charter MS
Parent district: Ser-Ninos Charter School
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$10,165
$9,805
$13,054
$8,502
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 253 rated charter campuses reporting
2019
$9,471
$10,043
$13,108
$8,658
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 314 rated charter campuses reporting
2020
$8,924
$9,952
$14,058
$9,233
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 334 rated charter campuses reporting
2021
$9,620
$10,815
$14,797
$9,531
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 362 rated charter campuses reporting
2022
$10,059
$12,779
$15,708
$11,355
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 382 rated charter campuses reporting
2023
$9,998
$13,200
$16,792
$11,392
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 394 rated charter campuses reporting
2024
$12,918
$13,685
$18,125
$11,545
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 404 rated charter campuses reporting
2025
$11,672
$14,791
$18,972
$11,814
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 418 rated charter campuses reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$73,232+$9,296 vs similar economic context
Teachers
16−14.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
18.1+0.2 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Ser-Ninos Charter MS
1 to 5 years 46.5%
6 to 10 years 25.8%
11 to 20 years 25.8%
21 to 30 years 1.9%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 424 reporting for every category shown · 424 in full cohort
Beginning 13.2%
1 to 5 years 47.6%
6 to 10 years 19.7%
11 to 20 years 14.8%
21 to 30 years 4%
Over 30 years 0.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 221 reporting for every category shown · 221 in full cohort
Beginning 12.1%
1 to 5 years 41.2%
6 to 10 years 20.3%
11 to 20 years 16.7%
21 to 30 years 5.7%
Over 30 years 1.3%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
Beginning 13%
1 to 5 years 44.3%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 15.4%
21 to 30 years 4.8%
Over 30 years 0.9%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Ser-Ninos Charter MS in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classSer-Ninos Charter MS · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 6
25
23.5
Secondary English
22
18.8
Secondary languages other than English
20.3
18
Secondary math
21
19.4
Secondary science
21
20.1
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 72 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
1 measure
11of 216
Attendance
Similar size · of the 216 that report this measure · tied with 2
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101802041.