txschools.net

Unofficial · not affiliated with the Texas Education Agency · what this is

District · Traditional

Prosper ISD

Collin County · Region 10: Richardson · 33,583 students

Learn more & enroll

A91

Prosper ISD is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 90.7 average of the 26 districts serving a similar share of economically disadvantaged students, and above the statewide average of 81.7. It is up 2 points since 2021-22 — both years scored under TEA's current rules, since TEA rewrote them in 2023; under the rules in force back then it scored 94.

Ranks 98th of 1,019 Texas districts (tied with 30 others), and 7th of 80 in Region 10: Richardson (tied with 4 others).

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. How this district's change over time is ranked
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. Who this district serves
  7. Spending per student
  8. Teachers
  9. Where this district ranks best
  10. 32 schools in this district
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Compare against
908070 Districts like this oneTexas averageProsper ISD 8990899191 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 94 that year.

Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSimilarState
2025-26A9190.781.7
2024-25A9190.780.3
2023-24B8989.178.7
2022-23A9089.679.2
2021-22B8991.080.6

How this district's change over time is ranked

TEA publishes most measures for one year only, so a change ranking exists just where the same figure is published across years — the overall score, the five score domains, and per-student spending. This page does not yet state where Prosper ISD itself places on these lists, only that the lists exist; open one to find this district's own row.

Texas districts

Region 10: Richardson

Collin County

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement92 A+0.5 vs similar · +10.0 vs region
  • School Progress82 B+1.5 vs similar · +2.1 vs region
  • Closing the Gaps90 A+0.2 vs similar · +10.5 vs region
  • Academic Growth82 B+2.9 vs similar · +7.8 vs region
  • Relative Performance71 C−5.6 vs similar · −8.2 vs region
  • Prosper ISD
  • Similar student population (26)
  • Region 10: Richardson (80)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement92A
School Progress82B8
Closing the Gaps90A
Academic Growth82B8
Relative Performance71C9

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this district that better measure is Student Achievement (92), so School Progress (82) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 92.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level90%−1 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level73%−1 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level40%+0 vs Similar student population

Reading

  • Approaches grade level92%−1 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level79%−0 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level42%−1 vs Similar student population

Math

  • Approaches grade level88%−1 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level67%−1 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level36%+2 vs Similar student population

Science

  • Approaches grade level90%+2 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level73%+3 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level45%+2 vs Similar student population

Social Studies

  • Approaches grade level88%+3 vs Similar student population
  • Meets grade level69%+1 vs Similar student population
  • Masters grade level41%+0 vs Similar student population
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar student population (26)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The tick on each bar marks the average for Similar student population (26 districts) — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
99.3%+1.2 pts vs similar
Five-Year
99.4%+4.5 pts vs similar
Six-Year
99.4%+4.3 pts vs similar
Dropout Rate
0.2%+0.1 pts vs similar

College, career and military readiness

CCMR criteria
CriterionThis districtsimilarGap
Total credit for CCMR criteria88.0%89.9%−1.9
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course66.0%66.5%−0.5
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA57.2%58.4%−1.2
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)45.3%34.6%+10.7
Earned college credit for a dual credit course36.8%44.1%−7.3
Earned an industry-based certification32.7%25.2%+7.5
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.2%0.2%+0.0
Earned an associate degree1.0%0.1%+0.9
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.1%8.3%−8.2
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness1.9%1.9%+0.0
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student6.2%5.1%+1.1
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces1.9%1.3%+0.6

Who this district serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
33,583
Economically disadvantaged
6.1%−2.2 pts vs similar
English learners
13.6%+9.4 pts vs similar
Special education
14.2%+1.6 pts vs similar
Attendance
95.5%−0.4 pts vs similar
Chronically absent
8.6%+1.2 pts vs similar

Student demographics

African American: 9.3%Hispanic: 11.1%White: 34.7%American Indian: 1%Asian: 37.8%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 6.1%
  • African American 9.3%
  • Hispanic 11.1%
  • White 34.7%
  • American Indian 1%
  • Asian 37.8%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 6.1%

Spending per student

Compared against TEA's own peer group, which controls for size and student population, and against the state.

$12k$24k$35k20182020202220242025
  • Prosper ISD
  • TEA peer group
  • Texas average

Spends $15,328 more per student than its peer group, and $14,739 more than the state average.

Teachers

Average salary
$69,741+$1,274 vs similar
Teachers
2,447
Students per staff member
13.7

Teaching experience

Beginning: 4.7%1 to 5 years: 29.4%6 to 10 years: 20.1%11 to 20 years: 31.6%21 to 30 years: 13%Over 30 years: 1.2%
  • Beginning 4.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 29.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 20.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 31.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 13%
  • Over 30 years 1.2%

Where this district ranks best

Out of 164 rankings computed across every published metric and every comparison group, these are the placements that stand out. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

  • 2of 22

    Earned an associate degree

    Similar student population · of the 22 that report this measure

  • 2of 14

    Reading — Approaches

    Collin County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 2of 14

    Per-student spending

    Collin County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 3of 14

    Overall score

    Collin County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 2 · full ranking

  • 3of 14

    Closing the Gaps

    Collin County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 3of 14

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Collin County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 3of 14

    Reading — Meets

    Collin County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 4of 80

    Reading — Approaches

    Region 10: Richardson · of the 80 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 4of 22

    Earned a level I or level II certificate

    Similar student population · of the 22 that report this measure

  • 4of 22

    Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces

    Similar student population · of the 22 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 4of 14

    Academic Growth

    Collin County · of the 14 that report this measure

  • 4of 14

    Math — Approaches

    Collin County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this district ranks poorly. Each statement below states its cohort and its denominator so it can be checked — a rank without an n is a boast, not a fact. Ties are shown because a shared ceiling is not a sole first place. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no district would put in a press release.

32 schools in this district

Schools in this district
SchoolTypeRatingScoreStudents
Lorene Rogers MSMiddle / Jr. HighA941,591
Jim Spradley ElemElementaryA94752
Walnut Grove HSHigh SchoolA932,516
Daniel L Jones MSMiddle / Jr. HighA931,472
Ralph and Mary Lynn Boyer ElemElementaryA93836
Lilyana ElemElementaryA93865
Prosper HSHigh SchoolA922,603
Rock Hill HSHigh SchoolA922,534
Reynolds MSMiddle / Jr. HighA921,464
Bill Hays MSMiddle / Jr. HighA921,145
Moseley MSMiddle / Jr. HighA921,391
Cynthia A Cockrell ElemElementaryA92752
Jana L Thomson ElemElementaryA92622
William Rushing MSMiddle / Jr. HighA911,094
R Steve Folsom ElemElementaryA91874
Mike and Janie Reeves ElemElementaryA91818
Mrs Jerry Bryant ElemElementaryA91971
Brenda Calhoun Early Childhood SchoolElementaryA91742
Richland HSHigh SchoolA901,794
Chuck and Cindy Stuber ElemElementaryA90946
Joyce Hall ElemElementaryA90714
Light Farms ElemElementaryB881,042
Dan Christie ElemElementaryB88865
Betty Jackson ElemElementaryB88548
John A Baker ElemElementaryB87546
Jack and June Furr ElemElementaryB87733
Jim and Betty Hughes ElemElementaryB86754
Sam Johnson ElemElementaryB86823
Windsong Ranch ElemElementaryB84744
Virgie Witt Smothermon ElemElementaryB84737
Judy Rucker ElemElementaryC78294
Collin Co JJAEPHigh SchoolNot Rated1

Where this comes from

Every figure on this page comes from data the Texas Education Agency publishes at txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026 and archived with a checksum so each number stays traceable to the bytes TEA served.

Download this district as CSV · JSON · the whole dataset