Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Moseley MS

Collin County · Region 10: Richardson · 1,391 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
92/1002025-26
Score vs similar economic context
+0.4 ptsvs 91.6 average · 444 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
214 of 444tied with 48 others
A92

At a glance

The current score is level with the 91.6 average for 444 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
80%vs 69.4% avg · +10.6 pts
Masters
61%vs 43.3% avg · +17.7 pts

Among 403 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Moseley MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 91.6 average for 444 rated schools serving a similar economic context. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.

Ranks 214th of 444 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 48 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 1 year of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Teachers
  8. Where this school ranks best
  9. Where this comes from

1 year of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 92 2025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9291.6 444 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement93 A+0.3 vs similar economic context · 436 reporting
  • School Progress88 B+0.2 vs similar economic context · 434 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps91 A+1.8 vs similar economic context · 431 reporting
  • Academic Growth88 B+1.7 vs similar economic context · 431 reporting
  • Relative Performance74 C−4.1 vs similar economic context · 434 reporting
  • Moseley MS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (444 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement93A—
School Progress88B2
Closing the Gaps91A—
Academic Growth88B2
Relative Performance74C6

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (93), so School Progress (88) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 93.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level89%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 436 reporting
  • Meets grade level73%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 436 reporting
  • Masters grade level50%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 436 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level91%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 436 reporting
  • Meets grade level80%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 436 reporting
  • Masters grade level58%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 436 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level88%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 434 reporting
  • Meets grade level70%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 434 reporting
  • Masters grade level45%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 434 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level92%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 403 reporting
  • Meets grade level80%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 403 reporting
  • Masters grade level61%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 403 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level79%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 145 reporting
  • Meets grade level53%−21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 145 reporting
  • Masters grade level27%−21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 145 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (444 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
1,391
Economically disadvantaged
6.6%−2.8 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
6.7%−4.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
8.7%−6.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
—
Chronically absent
—

Student demographics

Moseley MS

African American: 11.6%Hispanic: 9.3%White: 17.5%American Indian: 1.2%Asian: 54.7%Two or More Races: 5.6%
  • African American 11.6%
  • Hispanic 9.3%
  • White 17.5%
  • American Indian 1.2%
  • Asian 54.7%
  • Two or More Races 5.6%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 444 reporting for every category shown · 444 in full cohort

African American: 4.8%Hispanic: 17.4%White: 48.5%American Indian: 0.5%Asian: 23.1%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 5.7%
  • African American 4.8%
  • Hispanic 17.4%
  • White 48.5%
  • American Indian 0.5%
  • Asian 23.1%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 5.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
1,391
Economically disadvantaged students
92
Emergent bilingual students
93
Special education students
121

TEA context labels

  • New campus compared with last year’s fall enrollment

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
Not reported
Students in TEA mobility denominator
Not reported
TEA-published mobility rate
Not reported

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Teachers

Average salary
$68,035−$1,467 vs similar economic context
Teachers
94+37.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.9+0.1 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Moseley MS

Beginning: 11.6%1 to 5 years: 28.9%6 to 10 years: 28%11 to 20 years: 23%21 to 30 years: 7.5%Over 30 years: 1.1%
  • Beginning 11.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 28.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 28%
  • 11 to 20 years 23%
  • 21 to 30 years 7.5%
  • Over 30 years 1.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 444 reporting for every category shown · 444 in full cohort

Beginning: 4.2%1 to 5 years: 23.8%6 to 10 years: 19.9%11 to 20 years: 31.8%21 to 30 years: 16.9%Over 30 years: 2.5%
  • Beginning 4.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 23.8%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 31.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.9%
  • Over 30 years 2.5%

Where this school ranks best

Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

4 measures

  • 50of 1,037

    Science — Masters

    Region 10: Richardson · of the 1,037 that report this measure · tied with 5

  • 219of 7,254

    Reading — Masters

    Texas average · of the 7,254 that report this measure · tied with 22

  • 280of 7,260

    All Subjects — Masters

    Texas average · of the 7,260 that report this measure · tied with 33

  • 351of 7,227

    Math — Masters

    Texas average · of the 7,227 that report this measure · tied with 31

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 043912046.