Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Geographic public school district

Devers ISD

Liberty County · Region 05: Beaumont · 200 students

Official district websiteEnrollment, registration and eligibility

Current score
93/1002025-26
Change
−2 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+4.6 ptsvs 88.4 average · 88 rated districts serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
14 of 88tied with 5 others
A93

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 96 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 88.4 average for 88 rated districts serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
87%vs 64.6% avg · +22.4 pts
Masters
58%vs 30.5% avg · +27.5 pts

Among 88 districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

  • 1st of 88 districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
  • 1st of 88 districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
87%vs 58.8% avg · +28.2 pts
Masters
45%vs 25.4% avg · +19.6 pts

Among 88 districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

  • Tied for 1st of 88 districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 2 districts share that value.
  • 2nd of 88 districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
87%vs 69.1% avg · +17.9 pts
Masters
68%vs 32.3% avg · +35.7 pts

Among 88 districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

  • Tied for 2nd of 88 districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 2 districts share that value.
  • 1st of 88 districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this district.

Read the full rating context and placement

Devers ISD is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 88.4 average for 88 rated districts serving a similar economic context. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 14th of 88 rated districts serving a similar economic context (tied with 5 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this district serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Students crossing district lines
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Community around the district
  11. 2 schools in this district
  12. Spending per student
  13. Teachers
  14. Where this district ranks best
  15. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this district has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageDevers ISD 9592949593 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 96 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9388.4 88 reporting81.7 1,019 reporting
2024-25A9587.6 88 reporting80.3 1,019 reporting
2023-24A9486.4 87 reporting78.7 1,017 reporting
2022-23A9286.4 88 reporting79.2 1,018 reporting
2021-22A9587.1 88 reporting80.6 1,017 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement95 A+5.6 vs similar economic context · 88 reporting
  • School Progress92 A+10.9 vs similar economic context · 88 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps89 B+2.9 vs similar economic context · 87 reporting
  • Academic Growth83 B+5.2 vs similar economic context · 87 reporting
  • Relative Performance92 A+12.9 vs similar economic context · 88 reporting
  • Devers ISD
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (88 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement95A—
School Progress92A—
Closing the Gaps89B1
Academic Growth83B7
Relative Performance92A—

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 1 point below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this district that better measure is Student Achievement (95), so School Progress (92) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 95.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level98%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 88 reporting
  • Meets grade level87%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 88 reporting
  • Masters grade level58%+28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 88 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level97%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 88 reporting
  • Meets grade level87%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 88 reporting
  • Masters grade level68%+36 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 88 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level97%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 88 reporting
  • Meets grade level87%+28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 88 reporting
  • Masters grade level45%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 88 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level100%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 87 reporting
  • Meets grade level93%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 87 reporting
  • Masters grade level73%+37 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 87 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level100%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 87 reporting
  • Meets grade level77%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 87 reporting
  • Masters grade level46%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 87 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (88 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only districts for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this district serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
200
Economically disadvantaged
22.2%−2.2 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
4.5%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
11.6%−3.7 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.5%+1.0 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
6.2%−2.9 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Devers ISD

African American: 4.5%Hispanic: 17.2%White: 74.2%Asian: 0.5%Two or More Races: 3.5%
  • African American 4.5%
  • Hispanic 17.2%
  • White 74.2%
  • Asian 0.5%
  • Two or More Races 3.5%

Selected comparison average For districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 88 reporting for every category shown · 88 in full cohort

African American: 3.2%Hispanic: 23.6%White: 65.3%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 3.5%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 3.9%
  • African American 3.2%
  • Hispanic 23.6%
  • White 65.3%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 3.5%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 3.9%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
198
Economically disadvantaged students
44
Emergent bilingual students
9
Special education students
23

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 200 students in 2025–26, an increase of 9 (4.7%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
200

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+9

Increase · +4.7%

Change since 2021–22
−16

Decrease · −7.4%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This district
200
Selected comparison
5,191.3

average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 88 rated districts reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Devers ISD
School yearStudents enrolledDevers ISDChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 216 First available year 4,947.1
2022–23 204 Decrease of 12 (5.6%) 5,098.3
2023–24 185 Decrease of 19 (9.3%) 5,176
2024–25 191 Increase of 6 (3.2%) 5,252.7
2025–26 200 Increase of 9 (4.7%) 5,191.3

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting districts in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this district's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Students crossing district lines

How many students live in one public-school district and attend in another. These are movement counts, not a measure of family satisfaction or school quality.

Transfers in
114

Live in another district; attend here · 2025–26

Transfers out
74

Live here; attend in another public district or charter · 2025–26

Transfers in minus transfers out
+40

Arithmetic context only

Transfers in · 2025–26

This district
114
Selected comparison
231.7

average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 87 rated districts reporting

Transfers out · 2025–26

This district
74
Selected comparison
400.2

average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 78 rated districts reporting

Transfers in minus out · 2025–26

This district
+40
Selected comparison
−168

average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 78 rated districts reporting

Official transfer totals by school year for Devers ISD
School yearTransfers inDevers ISDTransfers outDevers ISDIn minus outDevers ISDTransfers inselected comparison averageTransfers outselected comparison averageIn minus outselected comparison average
2021–22 114 62 +52 206 289.6 −80
2022–23 105 72 +33 203.5 308.8 −103
2023–24 90 70 +20 201.3 338.1 −131
2024–25 97 72 +25 216.8 362.8 −145
2025–26 114 74 +40 231.7 400.2 −168

Largest reported origins for transfers in

  1. Dayton ISD 14690234
  2. Liberty ISD 14690629
  3. Hardin ISD 14690415
  4. Hull-Daisetta ISD 14690514

Top reported flows only. TEA published 4 of 10 counterpart counts and masked 6.

Largest reported destinations for transfers out

  1. Liberty ISD 14690651

Top reported flows only. TEA published 1 of 8 counterpart counts and masked 7.

Selected comparison figures are average reported counts, not rates; group size and district enrollment affect them. They provide scale context and are not a performance judgment. This district's official totals do not change when the comparison does.

Source: TEA Student Transfer Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The totals are TEA's official district rows; this site does not add masked detail cells. A transfer records a mismatch between district of residence and public district or charter of attendance. It does not say why a family transferred, whether the move was optional, or whether either school is better.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Not reported

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
209

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Devers ISD
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 225 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 243 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2022–23 213 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2023–24 195 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2024–25 209 Not reported — Not reported — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Devers ISD in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Not reported — Not reported — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized districts can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this district's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Community around the district

A district serves a place as well as a roster. These Census estimates describe the resident community without treating its circumstances as an explanation or a verdict on students.

People living inside the district boundary
1,086

2024 Census estimate

Children ages 5–17
251

Living inside the boundary

Children ages 5–17 in families in poverty
26

10.4%

School-age child poverty rate
10.4%

26 of 251

Boundary population

This district
1,086
Selected comparison
28,300.3

average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 87 rated districts reporting

School-age population

This district
251
Selected comparison
5,399

average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 87 rated districts reporting

School-age population in poverty

This district
26
Selected comparison
298.7

average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 87 rated districts reporting

School-age child poverty rate

This district
10.4%
Selected comparison
8.0%

average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 87 rated districts reporting

+2.4 pts vs similar economic context

Population averages provide neutral scale context and can differ sharply across a region, county or the state. The poverty-rate comparison is the like-for-like percentage; none of these Census measures is treated as school performance.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2024 Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates, fetched 24 August 2026. These are modeled estimates for residents inside the geographic district, not the students enrolled by the district. A family's poverty status is context, never a school-quality measure.

2 schools in this district

Number of schools in the district

This district
2
Selected comparison
7.3

average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 88 rated districts reporting

The selected comparison is a neutral average district size. This district's school count and school-type mix remain its own facts.

Elementary
1
Middle / Jr. High
1
Browse all 2 schoolsName, type, rating, score and enrollment
Schools in this district
SchoolTypeRatingScoreStudents
Devers JHMiddle / Jr. HighA9950
Devers ElemElementaryA90150

Spending per student

The selected txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference stay visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$11k$22k$33k20182020202220242025
  • Devers ISD
  • TEA peer group
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This district
$16,862
Selected comparison
$31,025

average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 88 rated districts reporting

−$14,163 vs similar economic context

This district spends $9,067 less per student than TEA's peer group, and $2,110 less per student than the state average.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearDevers ISDTEA peer groupTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$12,099$14,290$13,054$18,339 average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 87 rated districts reporting
2019$13,082$14,384$13,108$18,091 average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 87 rated districts reporting
2020$12,127$16,581$14,058$19,990 average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 87 rated districts reporting
2021$12,229$17,863$14,797$22,909 average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 87 rated districts reporting
2022$13,535$19,817$15,708$22,699 average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 88 rated districts reporting
2023$14,268$21,827$16,792$25,865 average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 88 rated districts reporting
2024$15,315$23,517$18,125$29,016 average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 88 rated districts reporting
2025$16,862$25,929$18,972$31,025 average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 88 rated districts reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers

Average salary
$93,317+$26,334 vs similar economic context
Teachers
13−336.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.6+2.2 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Devers ISD

1 to 5 years: 13.4%6 to 10 years: 13.4%11 to 20 years: 33.1%21 to 30 years: 26.8%Over 30 years: 13.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 13.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 13.4%
  • 11 to 20 years 33.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 26.8%
  • Over 30 years 13.4%

Selected comparison average For districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 88 reporting for every category shown · 88 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.1%1 to 5 years: 18.6%6 to 10 years: 18%11 to 20 years: 33.3%21 to 30 years: 20.3%Over 30 years: 4.7%
  • Beginning 5.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 18.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 18%
  • 11 to 20 years 33.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 20.3%
  • Over 30 years 4.7%

Teacher turnover over time

TEA reported a 0.0% teacher turnover rate in 2024–25.

Teacher turnover rate · 2024–25

This district
0.0%
Selected comparison
18.7%

average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 88 rated districts reporting

−18.7 pts vs similar economic context
District teacher turnover rate by school year for Devers ISD
School yearTeacher turnover rateDevers ISDAverage turnover rateselected comparison
2020–210.0%12.7%
2021–220.0%16.3%
2022–236.6%19.1%
2023–2413.3%19.4%
2024–250.0%18.7%

TEA defines this district rate as the share of teacher full-time equivalents from the prior fall who are not employed as teachers in the district in the current fall. That can include leaving the district or remaining in a different role; it is not a campus-level measure. The comparison average changes with the selected group; this district's reported rate does not.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this district ranks best

Out of 96 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

21 measures

  • 1of 1,019

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Texas average · of the 1,019 that report this measure · full ranking

  • 1of 1,019

    Reading — Masters

    Texas average · of the 1,019 that report this measure · full ranking

  • 1of 1,012

    Science — Approaches

    Texas average · of the 1,012 that report this measure · tied with 7 · full ranking

  • 1of 1,012

    Science — Meets

    Texas average · of the 1,012 that report this measure · tied with 1 · full ranking

  • 1of 998

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Texas average · of the 998 that report this measure · tied with 3 · full ranking

  • 1of 183

    All Subjects — Masters

    Similar size · of the 183 that report this measure

  • 1of 88

    All Subjects — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 88 that report this measure

  • 1of 88

    Math — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 88 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 1of 88

    Math — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 88 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 1of 87

    Science — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 87 that report this measure

  • 1of 36

    Overall score

    Region 05: Beaumont · of the 36 that report this measure · full ranking

  • 1of 36

    Student Achievement

    Region 05: Beaumont · of the 36 that report this measure

  • 1of 36

    School Progress

    Region 05: Beaumont · of the 36 that report this measure

  • 1of 36

    Relative Performance

    Region 05: Beaumont · of the 36 that report this measure

  • 1of 36

    Reading — Approaches

    Region 05: Beaumont · of the 36 that report this measure

  • 1of 36

    Reading — Meets

    Region 05: Beaumont · of the 36 that report this measure

  • 1of 36

    Math — Masters

    Region 05: Beaumont · of the 36 that report this measure

  • 1of 36

    Social Studies — Meets

    Region 05: Beaumont · of the 36 that report this measure

  • 1of 36

    Social Studies — Masters

    Region 05: Beaumont · of the 36 that report this measure

  • 1of 36

    Attendance

    Region 05: Beaumont · of the 36 that report this measure

  • 1of 36

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Region 05: Beaumont · of the 36 that report this measure

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

1 measure

  • 2of 36

    Academic Growth

    Region 05: Beaumont · of the 36 that report this measure · tied with 1

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

1 measure

  • 4of 36

    Closing the Gaps

    Region 05: Beaumont · of the 36 that report this measure · tied with 1

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this district ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this district; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no district would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download this district as CSV · JSON · the whole dataset