+3.0 ptsvs 81 average · 406 rated districts serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
132 of 406tied with 13 others
Score vs region
+2.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 94 rated districts in Region 07: Kilgore
Region 07: Kilgore placement
35 of 94tied with 4 others
Score vs county
−1.8 ptsvs 85.8 average · 8 rated districts in Nacogdoches County
Score vs similar-size group
+1.9 ptsvs 82.1 average · 279 similarly sized rated districts
Similar size placement
106 of 279tied with 10 others
Score vs state
+2.3 ptsvs 81.7 average · 1,019 rated Texas districts
Texas placement
401 of 1,019tied with 32 others
B84
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 94 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 81 average for 406 rated districts serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 94 rated districts in Region 07: Kilgore.The current score is below the 85.8 average for 8 rated districts in Nacogdoches County.The current score is above the 82.1 average for 279 similarly sized rated districts.The current score is above the 81.7 average for 1,019 rated Texas districts.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
56%vs 48.2% avg · +7.8 pts
Masters
21%vs 17.9% avg · +3.1 pts
Among 406 districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this district.
Read the full rating context and placement
Woden ISD is rated B by TEA, scoring 84 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81 average for 406 rated districts serving a similar economic context. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 132nd of 406 rated districts serving a similar economic context (tied with 13 others).
Woden ISD is rated B by TEA, scoring 84 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 94 rated districts in Region 07: Kilgore. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Woden ISD is rated B by TEA, scoring 84 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 85.8 average for 8 rated districts in Nacogdoches County. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Woden ISD is rated B by TEA, scoring 84 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.1 average for 279 similarly sized rated districts. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 106th of 279 similarly sized rated districts (tied with 10 others).
Woden ISD is rated B by TEA, scoring 84 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.7 average for 1,019 rated Texas districts. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Dated TEA notices for campuses in this district. They are shown separately from the district rating because they describe specific campuses, support programs and transfer eligibility.
Campuses identified for federal improvement support
1
2026 TEA list
Campuses on the final PEG transfer list
0
2026–27 school year
Share of campuses identified for improvement
This district
33.3%
Selected comparison
21.9%
average fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated districts reporting
+11.4 pts vs similar economic context
Share of campuses on the PEG list
This district
0.0%
Selected comparison
2.8%
average fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated districts reporting
−2.8 pts vs similar economic context
See the campuses and official reasons
Official improvement and Public Education Grant notices for campuses in Woden ISD
Selected comparison percentages describe how common each dated campus notice is across reporting districts in that group. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes a campus's official status.
Follow the solid line to see how this district has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 94 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement82 B+1.1 vs similar economic context · 406 reporting
School Progress85 B+3.9 vs similar economic context · 406 reporting
Closing the Gaps83 B+4.5 vs similar economic context · 405 reporting
Academic Growth70 C−1.5 vs similar economic context · 406 reporting
Relative Performance85 B+4.3 vs similar economic context · 406 reporting
Woden ISD
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (406 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
82
B
8
School Progress
85
B
5
Closing the Gaps
83
B
7
Academic Growth
70
C
10
Relative Performance
85
B
5
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 5 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this district that better measure is School Progress (85), so
Student Achievement (82) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 85.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level82%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 reporting
Meets grade level56%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 reporting
Masters grade level21%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level84%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 reporting
Meets grade level59%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 reporting
Masters grade level23%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level80%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 reporting
Meets grade level52%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 reporting
Masters grade level18%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level82%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 404 reporting
Meets grade level54%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 404 reporting
Masters grade level17%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 404 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level82%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 399 reporting
Meets grade level57%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 399 reporting
Masters grade level30%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 399 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (406 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
Four-Year
98.0%+2.0 pts vs similar economic contextaverage fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 391 rated districts reporting
Five-Year
98.1%+1.9 pts vs similar economic contextaverage fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 388 rated districts reporting
Six-Year
100.0%+3.8 pts vs similar economic contextaverage fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 388 rated districts reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.4 pts vs similar economic contextaverage fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 394 rated districts reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only districts in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported district rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
Total credit for CCMR criteria
75.0%−14.2 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
Criterion
This district% of graduates
Averagesimilar economic context
Differencepercentage points
Reportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria
75.0%
89.2%
−14.2
average fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 390 rated districts reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
41.7%
56.8%
−15.1
average fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 393 rated districts reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
41.7%
25.5%
+16.2
average fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 393 rated districts reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
0.0%
5.2%
−5.2
average fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 393 rated districts reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
43.8%
34.3%
+9.5
average fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 393 rated districts reporting
Earned an industry-based certification
47.9%
43.0%
+4.9
average fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 393 rated districts reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate
0.0%
1.5%
−1.5
average fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 393 rated districts reporting
Earned an associate degree
0.0%
3.2%
−3.2
average fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 393 rated districts reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
0.0%
2.8%
−2.8
average fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 393 rated districts reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
0.0%
3.3%
−3.3
average fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 393 rated districts reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
8.3%
8.7%
−0.4
average fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 393 rated districts reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
4.2%
3.7%
+0.5
average fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 393 rated districts reporting
Every row is a share of this district's graduates, and every row is a way of
meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this
district minus the average fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate,
counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that
criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported district percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only districts for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where district graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
Graduates in the report
52
Class of 2023–24
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
23
44.2% of graduates
Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
27
51.9% of graduates
Not trackable
2
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
This district
52
Selected comparison
326.4
average fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 292 rated districts reporting
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
This district
23
Selected comparison
144
average fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 292 rated districts reporting
Texas-public enrollment rate
This district
44.2%
Selected comparison
44.9%
average fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 292 rated districts reporting
−0.7 pts vs similar economic context
Not-found rate
This district
51.9%
Selected comparison
51.9%
average fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 292 rated districts reporting
+0.0 pts vs similar economic context
Not-trackable rate
This district
3.8%
Selected comparison
3.2%
average fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 292 rated districts reporting
+0.6 pts vs similar economic context
Most common named Texas public destinations
STEPHEN F. AUSTIN STATE UNIV (003624)13
ANGELINA COLLEGE (006661)6
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this district serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
825
Economically disadvantaged
60.6%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
10.4%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
14.0%−4.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.2%+0.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
11.5%−3.4 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Woden ISD
African American 1.6%
Hispanic 26.3%
White 68.7%
American Indian 0.1%
Asian 0.6%
Two or More Races 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 reporting for every category shown · 406 in full cohort
African American 5.6%
Hispanic 40.3%
White 49.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 0.8%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 07: Kilgore · 94 reporting for every category shown · 94 in full cohort
African American 10.3%
Hispanic 24%
White 60.1%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 0.6%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Nacogdoches County · 8 reporting for every category shown · 8 in full cohort
African American 8.2%
Hispanic 24.4%
White 62.1%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 0.8%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized districts · 279 reporting for every category shown · 279 in full cohort
African American 5%
Hispanic 39.3%
White 51.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 0.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Statewide average1,019 reporting for every category shown · 1,019 Texas districts in full cohort
African American 6.3%
Hispanic 43.1%
White 45.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.3%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
824
Economically disadvantaged students
499
Emergent bilingual students
86
Special education students
115
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 825 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 60 (6.8%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
825
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−60
Decrease · −6.8%
Change since 2021–22
+65
Increase · +8.6%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This district
825
Selected comparison
3,377
average fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated districts reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Woden ISD
School year
Students enrolledWoden ISD
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
760
First available year
3,399
2022–23
835
Increase of 75 (9.9%)
3,441.2
2023–24
856
Increase of 21 (2.5%)
3,424
2024–25
885
Increase of 29 (3.4%)
3,425.1
2025–26
825
Decrease of 60 (6.8%)
3,377
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting districts in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this district's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Students crossing district lines
How many students live in one public-school district and attend in another. These are movement counts, not a measure of family satisfaction or school quality.
Transfers in
169
Live in another district; attend here · 2025–26
Transfers out
62
Live here; attend in another public district or charter · 2025–26
Transfers in minus transfers out
+107
Arithmetic context only
Transfers in · 2025–26
This district
169
Selected comparison
167.9
average fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 386 rated districts reporting
Transfers out · 2025–26
This district
62
Selected comparison
448.7
average fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 386 rated districts reporting
Transfers in minus out · 2025–26
This district
+107
Selected comparison
−297
average fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 369 rated districts reporting
Official transfer totals by school year for Woden ISD
School year
Transfers inWoden ISD
Transfers outWoden ISD
In minus outWoden ISD
Transfers inselected comparison average
Transfers outselected comparison average
In minus outselected comparison average
2021–22
182
30
+152
145.6
357.6
−225
2022–23
160
63
+97
159.8
386.6
−240
2023–24
169
71
+98
153.2
409.2
−268
2024–25
165
53
+112
161.2
440.2
−291
2025–26
169
62
+107
167.9
448.7
−297
Largest reported origins for transfers in
Nacogdoches ISD 174904148
Top reported flows only. TEA published 1 of 8 counterpart counts and masked 7.
Largest reported destinations for transfers out
Nacogdoches ISD 17490416
Top reported flows only. TEA published 1 of 14 counterpart counts and masked 13.
Selected comparison figures are average reported counts, not rates; group size and district enrollment affect them. They provide scale context and are not a performance judgment. This district's official totals do not change when the comparison does.
Source: TEA Student Transfer Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The totals are TEA's official district rows; this site does not add masked detail cells. A transfer records a mismatch between district of residence and public district or charter of attendance. It does not say why a family transferred, whether the move was optional, or whether either school is better.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
61
6.6% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
136
14.67 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
927
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This district
6.6%
Selected comparison
11.1%
average fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 360 rated districts reporting
−4.5 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This district
14.67
Selected comparison
24.2
average fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 372 rated districts reporting
−9.5 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Woden ISD
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
820
47
5.7%
61
7.44
8.5%
16.8
2021–22
809
48
5.9%
79
9.77
11.2%
24.1
2022–23
925
95
10.3%
173
18.70
11.5%
25.8
2023–24
912
69
7.6%
113
12.39
11.3%
25.3
2024–25
927
61
6.6%
136
14.67
11.1%
24.2
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Woden ISD in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
61
6.6%
136
14.67
11.1%
24.2
In-school suspensions
46
5.0%
83
8.95
9.7%
18.2
Out-of-school suspensions
24
2.6%
41
4.42
3.5%
5.3
DAEP placements
12
1.3%
12
1.29
2.6%
3.2
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
12
1.3%
12
1.29
1.4%
1.7
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized districts can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this district's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Community around the district
A district serves a place as well as a roster. These Census estimates describe the resident community without treating its circumstances as an explanation or a verdict on students.
People living inside the district boundary
4,318
2024 Census estimate
Children ages 5–17
759
Living inside the boundary
Children ages 5–17 in families in poverty
144
19.0%
School-age child poverty rate
19.0%
144 of 759
Boundary population
This district
4,318
Selected comparison
21,340.2
average fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated districts reporting
School-age population
This district
759
Selected comparison
3,814.2
average fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated districts reporting
School-age population in poverty
This district
144
Selected comparison
621.6
average fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated districts reporting
School-age child poverty rate
This district
19.0%
Selected comparison
17.9%
average fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated districts reporting
+1.1 pts vs similar economic context
Population averages provide neutral scale context and can differ sharply across a region, county or the state. The poverty-rate comparison is the like-for-like percentage; none of these Census measures is treated as school performance.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2024 Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates, fetched 24 August 2026. These are modeled estimates for residents inside the geographic district, not the students enrolled by the district. A family's poverty status is context, never a school-quality measure.
3 schools in this district
Number of schools in the district
This district
3
Selected comparison
5.9
average fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated districts reporting
The selected comparison is a neutral average district size. This district's school count and school-type mix remain its own facts.
Elementary
1
High School
1
Middle / Jr. High
1
Browse all 3 schoolsName, type, rating, score and enrollment
The selected txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference stay visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Woden ISD
TEA peer group
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This district
$15,378
Selected comparison
$23,468
average fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated districts reporting
−$8,090 vs similar economic context
This district spends $6,097 less per student than TEA's peer group, and $3,594 less per student than the state average.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Woden ISD
TEA peer group
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$10,626
$13,378
$13,054
$14,369
average fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated districts reporting
2019
$11,151
$14,225
$13,108
$14,562
average fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated districts reporting
2020
$13,321
$15,250
$14,058
$15,559
average fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated districts reporting
2021
$18,388
$15,636
$14,797
$16,425
average fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated districts reporting
2022
$16,922
$16,982
$15,708
$18,261
average fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated districts reporting
2023
$16,275
$18,148
$16,792
$20,024
average fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated districts reporting
2024
$16,298
$19,654
$18,125
$22,060
average fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated districts reporting
2025
$15,378
$21,475
$18,972
$23,468
average fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated districts reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers
Average salary
$58,902−$5,324 vs similar economic context
Teachers
77−157.9 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
10.7−1.3 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Woden ISD
Beginning 5.2%
1 to 5 years 20.9%
6 to 10 years 15.5%
11 to 20 years 31.1%
21 to 30 years 19.6%
Over 30 years 7.8%
Selected comparison averageFor districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 reporting for every category shown · 406 in full cohort
Beginning 6.6%
1 to 5 years 24.3%
6 to 10 years 17.5%
11 to 20 years 28%
21 to 30 years 17.7%
Over 30 years 5.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 07: Kilgore · 94 reporting for every category shown · 94 in full cohort
Beginning 5.4%
1 to 5 years 22.7%
6 to 10 years 17.3%
11 to 20 years 28.8%
21 to 30 years 19.1%
Over 30 years 6.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Nacogdoches County · 8 reporting for every category shown · 8 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 21.2%
6 to 10 years 17.7%
11 to 20 years 26.9%
21 to 30 years 21.7%
Over 30 years 6.5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized districts · 279 reporting for every category shown · 279 in full cohort
Beginning 6%
1 to 5 years 22.2%
6 to 10 years 17.4%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 18.9%
Over 30 years 6.2%
Statewide average1,019 reporting for every category shown · 1,019 Texas districts in full cohort
Beginning 6.4%
1 to 5 years 23.9%
6 to 10 years 17.7%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 17.7%
Over 30 years 5.5%
Teacher turnover over time
TEA reported a 13.0% teacher turnover rate in 2024–25.
Teacher turnover rate · 2024–25
This district
13.0%
Selected comparison
21.9%
average fordistricts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 406 rated districts reporting
−8.9 pts vs similar economic context
District teacher turnover rate by school year for Woden ISD
School year
Teacher turnover rateWoden ISD
Average turnover rateselected comparison
2020–21
13.9%
16.6%
2021–22
10.6%
20.7%
2022–23
16.7%
24.0%
2023–24
18.0%
21.8%
2024–25
13.0%
21.9%
TEA defines this district rate as the share of teacher full-time equivalents from the prior fall who are not employed as teachers in the district in the current fall. That can include leaving the district or remaining in a different role; it is not a campus-level measure. The comparison average changes with the selected group; this district's reported rate does not.
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.