Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
Woden JHB89vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
Woden JH
Nacogdoches County · Region 07: Kilgore · 195 students
Current score
89/1002025-26
Change
−4 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+9.0 ptsvs 80 average · 2,000 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
349 of 2,000tied with 66 others
Score vs region
+9.0 ptsvs 80 average · 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore
Region 07: Kilgore placement
70 of 352tied with 15 others
Score vs county
+8.6 ptsvs 80.4 average · 24 rated schools in Nacogdoches County
Nacogdoches County placement
7 of 24tied with 1 other
Score vs similar-size group
+7.6 ptsvs 81.4 average · 1,235 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
308 of 1,235tied with 44 others
Score vs state
+7.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
1,913 of 7,646tied with 285 others
B89
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 95 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 80 average for 2,000 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80 average for 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore.The current score is above the 80.4 average for 24 rated schools in Nacogdoches County.The current score is above the 81.4 average for 1,235 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
55%vs 48.2% avg · +6.8 pts
Masters
22%vs 19.6% avg · +2.4 pts
Among 1,897 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Woden JH is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80 average for 2,000 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 349th of 2,000 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 66 others).
Woden JH is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80 average for 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 70th of 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore (tied with 15 others).
Woden JH is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.4 average for 24 rated schools in Nacogdoches County. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 7th of 24 rated schools in Nacogdoches County (tied with 1 other).
Woden JH is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.4 average for 1,235 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 308th of 1,235 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 44 others).
Woden JH is rated B by TEA, scoring 89 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 95 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement84 B+6.1 vs similar economic context · 1,897 reporting
School Progress90 A+9.2 vs similar economic context · 1,889 reporting
Closing the Gaps85 B+7.8 vs similar economic context · 1,870 reporting
Academic Growth82 B+8.1 vs similar economic context · 1,832 reporting
Relative Performance90 A+10.9 vs similar economic context · 1,889 reporting
Woden JH
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,000 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
84
B
6
School Progress
90
A
—
Closing the Gaps
85
B
5
Academic Growth
82
B
8
Relative Performance
90
A
—
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 5 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (90), so
Student Achievement (84) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 90.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level83%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,897 reporting
Meets grade level55%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,897 reporting
Masters grade level22%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,897 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level90%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,893 reporting
Meets grade level58%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,893 reporting
Masters grade level32%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,893 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level81%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,884 reporting
Meets grade level54%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,884 reporting
Masters grade level14%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,884 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level85%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,736 reporting
Meets grade level66%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,736 reporting
Masters grade level21%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,736 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level69%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 939 reporting
Meets grade level34%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 939 reporting
Masters grade level16%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 939 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,000 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
195
Economically disadvantaged
64.1%−0.2 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
7.7%−9.9 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
15.9%−3.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.6%+1.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
9.9%−6.7 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Woden JH
African American 2.6%
Hispanic 28.2%
White 64.6%
Asian 1.5%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,000 reporting for every category shown · 2,000 in full cohort
African American 11.1%
Hispanic 51.2%
White 31.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 07: Kilgore · 352 reporting for every category shown · 352 in full cohort
African American 13.6%
Hispanic 28.4%
White 52.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 0.8%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Nacogdoches County · 24 reporting for every category shown · 24 in full cohort
African American 16.3%
Hispanic 30.6%
White 48.1%
American Indian 0.1%
Asian 0.9%
Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 1,235 reporting for every category shown · 1,235 in full cohort
African American 7.9%
Hispanic 46.8%
White 40.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
195
Economically disadvantaged students
125
Emergent bilingual students
15
Special education students
31
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
20
Students in TEA mobility denominator
203
TEA-published mobility rate
9.9%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 195 students in 2025–26, an increase of 1 (0.5%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
195
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+1
Increase · +0.5%
Change since 2021–22
+47
Increase · +31.8%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
195
Selected comparison
621.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,963 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Woden JH
School year
Students enrolledWoden JH
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
148
First available year
636
2022–23
163
Increase of 15 (10.1%)
642.5
2023–24
181
Increase of 18 (11.0%)
639.1
2024–25
194
Increase of 13 (7.2%)
634.5
2025–26
195
Increase of 1 (0.5%)
621.2
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
18
8.9% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
47
23.15 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
203
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
8.9%
Selected comparison
12.9%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,536 rated schools reporting
−4.0 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
23.15
Selected comparison
30.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,654 rated schools reporting
−7.0 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Woden JH
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
185
21
11.3%
29
15.68
9.7%
19.3
2021–22
157
13
8.3%
25
15.92
12.8%
29.7
2022–23
178
37
20.8%
69
38.76
13.3%
31.9
2023–24
192
29
15.1%
42
21.88
13.1%
31.6
2024–25
203
18
8.9%
47
23.15
12.9%
30.1
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Woden JH in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
18
8.9%
47
23.15
12.9%
30.1
In-school suspensions
18
8.9%
39
19.21
11.5%
23.1
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Woden JH
Parent district: Woden ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$8,488
Selected comparison
$12,657
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,972 rated schools reporting
−$4,169 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $8,488 per student for this campus, $15,378 per student for its parent district, Woden ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Woden JH
Parent district: Woden ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$4,866
$10,626
$13,054
$7,919
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,827 rated schools reporting
2019
$5,545
$11,151
$13,108
$8,077
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,843 rated schools reporting
2020
$5,582
$13,321
$14,058
$8,661
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,866 rated schools reporting
2021
$5,983
$18,388
$14,797
$9,089
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,878 rated schools reporting
2022
$7,699
$16,922
$15,708
$10,429
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,900 rated schools reporting
2023
$8,743
$16,275
$16,792
$11,140
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,923 rated schools reporting
2024
$7,832
$16,298
$18,125
$12,058
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,952 rated schools reporting
2025
$8,488
$15,378
$18,972
$12,657
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,972 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$56,189−$10,185 vs similar economic context
Teachers
16−26.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12.5−1.4 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Woden JH
Beginning 12.8%
1 to 5 years 21.2%
6 to 10 years 14.7%
11 to 20 years 23.1%
21 to 30 years 23.1%
Over 30 years 5.8%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,000 reporting for every category shown · 2,000 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 26.3%
6 to 10 years 19.1%
11 to 20 years 28%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 4.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 07: Kilgore · 352 reporting for every category shown · 352 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 24.6%
6 to 10 years 17.7%
11 to 20 years 28%
21 to 30 years 17.3%
Over 30 years 6%
Selected comparison averageFor Nacogdoches County · 24 reporting for every category shown · 24 in full cohort
Beginning 7%
1 to 5 years 25.2%
6 to 10 years 17.9%
11 to 20 years 26.1%
21 to 30 years 17.6%
Over 30 years 6.3%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 1,235 reporting for every category shown · 1,235 in full cohort
Beginning 6.7%
1 to 5 years 23.5%
6 to 10 years 17.4%
11 to 20 years 28.3%
21 to 30 years 17.7%
Over 30 years 5.5%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Woden JH in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classWoden JH · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 6
17.6
17.7
Secondary English
17
15.1
Secondary math
11.5
15.9
Secondary science
17.5
17.3
Secondary social studies
17.5
17.2
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
1 measure
3of 23
Reading — Approaches
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
15 measures
4of 23
Reading — Masters
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure · tied with 1
5of 23
School Progress
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure · tied with 2
5of 22
Academic Growth
Nacogdoches County · of the 22 that report this measure
6of 23
Math — Meets
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure · tied with 2
7of 24
Overall score
Nacogdoches County · of the 24 that report this measure · tied with 1
7of 23
Science — Meets
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 23
All Subjects — Masters
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure
8of 23
Attendance
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure · tied with 1
9of 23
Closing the Gaps
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure
9of 23
Reading — Meets
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure
9of 23
Math — Approaches
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure · tied with 1
10of 23
All Subjects — Approaches
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure
10of 23
All Subjects — Meets
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure
10of 23
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Nacogdoches County · of the 23 that report this measure
10of 14
Social Studies — Masters
Nacogdoches County · of the 14 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 174906041.