Current strength
School Progress above the similar-context average
93 +14.7 pts vs 78.3
- 93 is 14.7 points above the 78.3 average among 64 charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.
Charter school system · Alternative Education Accountability
Administrative office: Pharr · 282 students
Official charter system websiteEnrollment, registration and eligibility
At a glance
TEA did not issue an overall rating for The Possable Dream for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this charter school system is below.
Evidence worth noticing
Current strength
93 +14.7 pts vs 78.3
Current strength
89 +16.8 pts vs 72.2
Current strength
93 +16.8 pts vs 76.2
Current strength
93 +13.3 pts vs 79.7
Current strength
89 +14.5 pts vs 74.5
Current strength
93 +19.6 pts vs 73.4
Current strength
93 +14.3 pts vs 78.7
Current strength
89 +12.2 pts vs 76.8
Current strength
93 +17.5 pts vs 75.5
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this charter school system.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for The Possable Dream for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this charter school system is below.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for The Possable Dream for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this charter school system is below.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for The Possable Dream for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this charter school system is below.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for this charter school system. Scores below are the figures TEA published; the letter grades are the state's where it issued them.
Put the numbers in context
Follow the solid line to see how this charter school system has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas charter average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Not Rated | — | 77.3 64 reporting | 79.7 165 reporting |
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 89 | Not rated | — |
| School Progress | 93 | Not rated | — |
| Closing the Gaps | 30 | Not rated | — |
| Academic Growth | — | Not rated | — |
| Relative Performance | 93 | Not rated | — |
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this charter school system that better measure is School Progress (93), so Student Achievement (89) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 93.
The scores above are the ones TEA published. TEA did not issue letter grades for this charter school system, so none are shown: the A–F thresholds marked on the chart are the state's, but applying them here would produce a grade the state chose to withhold.
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter school systems for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
The Possable Dream
Selected comparison average For charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 64 reporting for every category shown · 64 in full cohort
Selected comparison average For similarly sized charter school systems · 43 reporting for every category shown · 43 in full cohort
Texas charter average 165 reporting for every category shown · 165 Texas charter school systems in full cohort
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
How many students live in a geographic school district and attend this charter system. These are movement counts, not a quality rating.
Live in a geographic district; attend this charter system · 2025–26
| School year | Transfers inThe Possable Dream | Transfers inselected charter comparison average |
|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | Not reported | — |
| 2022–23 | Not reported | — |
| 2023–24 | Not reported | — |
| 2024–25 | Not reported | — |
| 2025–26 | 282 | 1,785 |
Top reported flows only. TEA published 9 of 16 counterpart counts and masked 7.
TEA does not publish a transfers-out total or a resident population for this charter system. A charter system is not a geographic attendance boundary, so a net transfer balance cannot be calculated and this page does not label the system a transfer gainer or loser.
Selected comparison figures are average reported transfer-in counts among charter systems, not rates; system size affects them. They provide scale context and are not a performance judgment. This charter system’s official total does not change when the comparison does.
Source: TEA Student Transfer Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The total and origin rows are TEA’s published charter-system figures; this site does not add masked detail cells. A transfer-in count does not say why a family chose the charter or whether one school is better.
The selected comparison is a neutral average charter school system size. This charter school system's school count and school-type mix remain its own facts.
| School | Type | Rating | Score | Students |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Possable Dream School | High School | Not Rated | — | 282 |
The Possable Dream
Selected comparison average For charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 64 reporting for every category shown · 64 in full cohort
Selected comparison average For similarly sized charter school systems · 43 reporting for every category shown · 43 in full cohort
Texas charter average 165 reporting for every category shown · 165 Texas charter school systems in full cohort
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download this charter school system as CSV · JSON · the whole dataset