Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Open-enrollment charter campus · Alternative Education Accountability

The Possable Dream School

The Possable Dream · Pharr · 282 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Not Rated

At a glance

TEA did not issue an overall rating for The Possable Dream School for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this charter campus is below.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

School Progress above the similar-context average

93 +11.7 pts vs 81.3

  • 93 is 11.7 points above the 81.3 average among 385 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Student Achievement above the similar-context average

89 +14.8 pts vs 74.2

  • 89 is 14.8 points above the 74.2 average among 385 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Relative Performance above the similar-context average

93 +13.6 pts vs 79.4

  • 93 is 13.6 points above the 79.4 average among 381 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

TEA did not issue an overall rating for The Possable Dream School for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this charter campus is below.

TEA did not issue an overall rating for this school. Scores below are the figures TEA published; the letter grades are the state's where it issued them.

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 1 year of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Teachers
  8. Where this comes from

1 year of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 2025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas charter average
2025-26Not Rated—80.2 385 reporting81.7 829 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement89+14.8 vs similar economic context · 385 reporting
  • School Progress93+11.7 vs similar economic context · 385 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps30−47.0 vs similar economic context · 379 reporting
  • Academic Growth—Not reported · similar economic context 73.3 · 368 reporting
  • Relative Performance93+13.6 vs similar economic context · 381 reporting
  • The Possable Dream School
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (385 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement89Not rated—
School Progress93Not rated—
Closing the Gaps30Not rated—
Academic Growth—Not rated—
Relative Performance93Not rated—

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (93), so Student Achievement (89) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 93.

The scores above are the ones TEA published. TEA did not issue letter grades for this school, so none are shown: the A–F thresholds marked on the chart are the state's, but applying them here would produce a grade the state chose to withhold.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level78%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 385 reporting
  • Meets grade level32%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 385 reporting
  • Masters grade level3%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 385 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level67%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 385 reporting
  • Meets grade level38%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 385 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 385 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level78%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 383 reporting
  • Meets grade level33%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 383 reporting
  • Masters grade level11%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 383 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level94%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 363 reporting
  • Meets grade level24%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 363 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 363 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (385 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Completion

Four-Year
0.0%−47.9 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 45 rated charter campuses reporting
Five-Year
0.0%−55.2 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 45 rated charter campuses reporting
Six-Year
0.0%−57.6 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 45 rated charter campuses reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−10.9 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 45 rated charter campuses reporting

These measures use TEA's alternative-education accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter campuses in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter campus rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
282
Economically disadvantaged
91.8%+1.3 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
0.0%−43.9 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
0.4%−12.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
—
Chronically absent
—

Student demographics

The Possable Dream School

Hispanic: 98.6%White: 1.4%
  • Hispanic 98.6%
  • White 1.4%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 385 reporting for every category shown · 385 in full cohort

African American: 18.5%Hispanic: 74.9%White: 3.5%American Indian: 0.2%Asian: 1.5%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 1.4%
  • African American 18.5%
  • Hispanic 74.9%
  • White 3.5%
  • American Indian 0.2%
  • Asian 1.5%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 1.4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
282
Economically disadvantaged students
259
Emergent bilingual students
0
Special education students
1

TEA context labels

  • New campus compared with last year’s fall enrollment
  • Alternative education campus under AEA procedures
  • Alternative education type: dropout recovery school
  • Rated under AEA procedures
  • Adult Education High School Charter Program

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
Not reported
Students in TEA mobility denominator
Not reported
TEA-published mobility rate
Not reported

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Teachers

Average salary
$79,167+$15,160 vs similar economic context
Teachers
13−16.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
22.4+4.6 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

The Possable Dream School

Beginning: 84.1%1 to 5 years: 7.9%Over 30 years: 7.9%
  • Beginning 84.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 7.9%
  • Over 30 years 7.9%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 385 reporting for every category shown · 385 in full cohort

Beginning: 13.2%1 to 5 years: 47.3%6 to 10 years: 19.8%11 to 20 years: 14.6%21 to 30 years: 4.4%Over 30 years: 0.8%
  • Beginning 13.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 47.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 14.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 4.4%
  • Over 30 years 0.8%

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 108811001.