+18.9 ptsvs 77.1 average · 46 rated charter school systems serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1 of 46among reporting charter school systems
Score vs similar-size group
+16.2 ptsvs 79.8 average · 46 similarly sized rated charter school systems
Similar size placement
2 of 46among reporting charter school systems
Score vs state
+16.3 ptsvs 79.7 average · 165 rated Texas charter school systems
Texas charter placement
4 of 165tied with 2 others
A96
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 84 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.1 average for 46 rated charter school systems serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 79.8 average for 46 similarly sized rated charter school systems.The current score is above the 79.7 average for 165 rated Texas charter school systems.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Recent movement
Overall score rose 37 points
59 to 962024-25 to 2025-26
96 is 18.9 points above
the 77.1 average among 46 charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
1st of 46 charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this charter school system.
Read the full rating context and placement
Tekoa Academy of Accelerated Studies STEM School is rated A by TEA, scoring 96 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.1 average for 46 rated charter school systems serving a similar economic context. It is up 14 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1st of 46 rated charter school systems serving a similar economic context.
Tekoa Academy of Accelerated Studies STEM School is rated A by TEA, scoring 96 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.8 average for 46 similarly sized rated charter school systems. It is up 14 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2nd of 46 similarly sized rated charter school systems.
Tekoa Academy of Accelerated Studies STEM School is rated A by TEA, scoring 96 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.7 average for 165 rated Texas charter school systems. It is up 14 points since 2021-22.
Dated TEA notices for campuses in this charter school system. They are shown separately from the charter school system rating because they describe specific campuses, support programs and transfer eligibility.
Campuses identified for federal improvement support
2
2026 TEA list
Campuses on the final PEG transfer list
0
2026–27 school year
Share of campuses identified for improvement
This charter school system
50.0%
Selected comparison
43.9%
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 46 rated charter school systems reporting
+6.1 pts vs similar economic context
Share of campuses on the PEG list
This charter school system
0.0%
Selected comparison
0.0%
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 46 rated charter school systems reporting
±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
See the campuses and official reasons
Official improvement and Public Education Grant notices for campuses in Tekoa Academy of Accelerated Studies STEM School
Comprehensive Support and Improvement · CSI Low Performance
Selected comparison percentages describe how common each dated campus notice is across reporting charter school systems in that group. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes a campus's official status.
Follow the solid line to see how this charter school system has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 84 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement88 B+16.4 vs similar economic context · 46 reporting
School Progress96 A+17.7 vs similar economic context · 46 reporting
Closing the Gaps95 A+21.2 vs similar economic context · 45 reporting
Academic Growth96 A+23.6 vs similar economic context · 45 reporting
Relative Performance90 A+13.8 vs similar economic context · 45 reporting
Tekoa Academy of Accelerated Studies STEM School
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (46 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
88
B
2
School Progress
96
A
—
Closing the Gaps
95
A
—
Academic Growth
96
A
—
Relative Performance
90
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this charter school system that better measure is School Progress (96), so
Student Achievement (88) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 96.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level82%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 46 reporting
Meets grade level70%+33 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 46 reporting
Masters grade level35%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 46 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level81%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 46 reporting
Meets grade level65%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 46 reporting
Masters grade level20%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 46 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level83%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 46 reporting
Meets grade level73%+41 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 46 reporting
Masters grade level38%+27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 46 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level81%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 46 reporting
Meets grade level68%+34 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 46 reporting
Masters grade level55%+42 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 46 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level87%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 40 reporting
Meets grade level87%+51 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 40 reporting
Masters grade level73%+56 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 40 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (46 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
Four-Year
100.0%+22.3 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 16 rated charter school systems reporting
Five-Year
92.9%+15.9 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 16 rated charter school systems reporting
Six-Year
100.0%+22.0 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 16 rated charter school systems reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.8 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 16 rated charter school systems reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter school systems in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter school system rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
Total credit for CCMR criteria
73.0%+6.5 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
Criterion
This district% of graduates
Averagesimilar economic context
Differencepercentage points
Reportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria
73.0%
66.5%
+6.5
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 22 rated charter school systems reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
0.0%
41.9%
−41.9
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 22 rated charter school systems reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
0.0%
14.2%
−14.2
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 22 rated charter school systems reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
0.0%
9.5%
−9.5
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 22 rated charter school systems reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
72.7%
16.6%
+56.1
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 22 rated charter school systems reporting
Earned an industry-based certification
0.0%
12.1%
−12.1
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 22 rated charter school systems reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate
0.0%
0.4%
−0.4
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 22 rated charter school systems reporting
Earned an associate degree
0.0%
1.2%
−1.2
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 22 rated charter school systems reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
0.0%
7.9%
−7.9
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 22 rated charter school systems reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
0.0%
3.1%
−3.1
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 22 rated charter school systems reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
0.0%
8.3%
−8.3
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 22 rated charter school systems reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
0.0%
2.6%
−2.6
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 22 rated charter school systems reporting
Every row is a share of this charter school system's graduates, and every row is a way of
meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this
charter school system minus the average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate,
counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that
criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported charter school system percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter school systems for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this charter school system serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
395
Economically disadvantaged
96.2%+2.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
0.0%−38.3 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
3.5%−10.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.5%+2.0 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
15.9%−8.7 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Tekoa Academy of Accelerated Studies STEM School
African American 87.1%
Hispanic 8.1%
White 2.5%
Asian 0.3%
Two or More Races 2%
Selected comparison averageFor charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 46 reporting for every category shown · 46 in full cohort
African American 27.2%
Hispanic 66.1%
White 3.7%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 1.5%
Two or More Races 1.3%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter school systems · 46 reporting for every category shown · 46 in full cohort
African American 32.7%
Hispanic 47.7%
White 12.3%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.9%
Texas charter average165 reporting for every category shown · 165 Texas charter school systems in full cohort
African American 21%
Hispanic 54.7%
White 15.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.9%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
395
Economically disadvantaged students
380
Emergent bilingual students
0
Special education students
14
Early college pathways
Pathways in Technology Early College High School (P-TECH)
24
TEA-published share: 6.1%
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 395 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 24 (5.7%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
395
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−24
Decrease · −5.7%
Change since 2021–22
+27
Increase · +7.3%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This charter school system
395
Selected comparison
1,832
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 46 rated charter school systems reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Tekoa Academy of Accelerated Studies STEM School
School year
Students enrolledTekoa Academy of Accelerated Studies STEM School
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
368
First available year
1,766.3
2022–23
337
Decrease of 31 (8.4%)
1,792.3
2023–24
429
Increase of 92 (27.3%)
1,867.4
2024–25
419
Decrease of 10 (2.3%)
1,849.7
2025–26
395
Decrease of 24 (5.7%)
1,832
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter school systems in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this charter school system's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Students entering this charter system
How many students live in a geographic school district and attend this charter system. These are movement counts, not a quality rating.
Transfers in
395
Live in a geographic district; attend this charter system · 2025–26
Transfers in · 2025–26
This charter school system
395
Selected comparison
1,832
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 46 rated charter school systems reporting
Official transfers into Tekoa Academy of Accelerated Studies STEM School by school year
School year
Transfers inTekoa Academy of Accelerated Studies STEM School
Transfers inselected charter comparison average
2021–22
368
1,766.3
2022–23
337
1,792.3
2023–24
429
1,867.4
2024–25
419
1,849.7
2025–26
395
1,832
Largest reported resident-district origins
Port Arthur ISD 123907281
West Orange-Cove CISD 181906105
Top reported flows only. TEA published 2 of 6 counterpart counts and masked 4.
TEA does not publish a transfers-out total or a resident population for this charter system. A charter system is not a geographic attendance boundary, so a net transfer balance cannot be calculated and this page does not label the system a transfer gainer or loser.
Selected comparison figures are average reported transfer-in counts among charter systems, not rates; system size affects them. They provide scale context and are not a performance judgment. This charter system’s official total does not change when the comparison does.
Source: TEA Student Transfer Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The total and origin rows are TEA’s published charter-system figures; this site does not add masked detail cells. A transfer-in count does not say why a family chose the charter or whether one school is better.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
16
3.2% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
19
3.80 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
500
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This charter school system
3.2%
Selected comparison
7.3%
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 31 rated charter school systems reporting
−4.1 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This charter school system
3.8
Selected comparison
11.7
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 31 rated charter school systems reporting
−7.9 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Tekoa Academy of Accelerated Studies STEM School
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
497
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2021–22
430
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2022–23
401
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2023–24
520
24
4.6%
29
5.58
7.1%
11
2024–25
500
16
3.2%
19
3.80
7.3%
11.7
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Tekoa Academy of Accelerated Studies STEM School in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
16
3.2%
19
3.80
7.3%
11.7
In-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
14
2.8%
16
3.20
5.0%
6.3
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter school systems can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this charter school system's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
4 schools in this charter school system
Number of schools in the charter school system
This charter school system
4
Selected comparison
3.9
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 46 rated charter school systems reporting
The selected comparison is a neutral average charter school system size. This charter school system's school count and school-type mix remain its own facts.
Elementary
2
High School
1
Middle / Jr. High
1
Browse all 4 schoolsName, type, rating, score and enrollment
The selected txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference stay visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Tekoa Academy of Accelerated Studies STEM School
TEA peer group
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This charter school system
$12,475
Selected comparison
$16,147
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 46 rated charter school systems reporting
−$3,672 vs similar economic context
This charter school system spends $13,454 less per student than TEA's peer group, and $6,497 less per student than the state average.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Tekoa Academy of Accelerated Studies STEM School
TEA peer group
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$12,138
$14,290
$13,054
$10,419
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 40 rated charter school systems reporting
2019
$10,886
$14,384
$13,108
$10,421
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 43 rated charter school systems reporting
2020
$9,896
$16,581
$14,058
$11,153
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 44 rated charter school systems reporting
2021
$10,072
$17,863
$14,797
$12,260
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 44 rated charter school systems reporting
2022
$15,638
$19,817
$15,708
$15,211
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 45 rated charter school systems reporting
2023
$16,277
$21,827
$16,792
$15,265
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 45 rated charter school systems reporting
2024
$11,962
$23,517
$18,125
$15,536
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 45 rated charter school systems reporting
2025
$12,475
$25,929
$18,972
$16,147
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 46 rated charter school systems reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers
Average salary
$42,760−$21,772 vs similar economic context
Teachers
32−72.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12.3−4.0 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Tekoa Academy of Accelerated Studies STEM School
1 to 5 years 15.3%
6 to 10 years 36.8%
11 to 20 years 40.5%
21 to 30 years 7.5%
Selected comparison averageFor charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 46 reporting for every category shown · 46 in full cohort
Beginning 11.5%
1 to 5 years 38.6%
6 to 10 years 20.3%
11 to 20 years 18.6%
21 to 30 years 8.2%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter school systems · 46 reporting for every category shown · 46 in full cohort
Beginning 11.3%
1 to 5 years 37.2%
6 to 10 years 19.4%
11 to 20 years 19.3%
21 to 30 years 8.4%
Over 30 years 2.2%
Texas charter average165 reporting for every category shown · 165 Texas charter school systems in full cohort
Beginning 11.4%
1 to 5 years 36.3%
6 to 10 years 19.7%
11 to 20 years 20.6%
21 to 30 years 8.2%
Over 30 years 1.9%
Teacher turnover over time
TEA reported a 26.1% teacher turnover rate in 2024–25.
Teacher turnover rate · 2024–25
This charter school system
26.1%
Selected comparison
34.1%
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 45 rated charter school systems reporting
−8.0 pts vs similar economic context
Charter-system teacher turnover rate by school year for Tekoa Academy of Accelerated Studies STEM School
School year
Teacher turnover rateTekoa Academy of Accelerated Studies STEM School
Average turnover rateselected comparison
2020–21
10.6%
25.7%
2021–22
29.0%
32.7%
2022–23
30.3%
36.9%
2023–24
34.3%
34.4%
2024–25
26.1%
34.1%
TEA defines this charter school system rate as the share of teacher full-time equivalents from the prior fall who are not employed as teachers in the charter school system in the current fall. That can include leaving the charter school system or remaining in a different role; it is not a campus-level measure. The comparison average changes with the selected group; this charter school system's reported rate does not.
Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
12 measures
1of 165
School Progress
Texas charter average · of the 165 that report this measure · full ranking
1of 162
Academic Growth
Texas charter average · of the 162 that report this measure · full ranking
1of 141
Social Studies — Meets
Texas charter average · of the 141 that report this measure · full ranking
1of 141
Social Studies — Masters
Texas charter average · of the 141 that report this measure · full ranking
1of 46
Overall score
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 46 that report this measure
1of 46
All Subjects — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 46 that report this measure
1of 46
Math — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 46 that report this measure
1of 46
Science — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 46 that report this measure
1of 46
Science — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 46 that report this measure
1of 45
Closing the Gaps
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 45 that report this measure
1of 22
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 22 that report this measure
1of 16
Six-Year Graduation Rate
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (standard accountability only) · of the 16 that report this measure · tied with 2
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
6 measures
2of 46
All Subjects — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 46 that report this measure
2of 46
Math — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 46 that report this measure
3of 46
Student Achievement
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 46 that report this measure · tied with 2
3of 46
All Subjects — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 46 that report this measure · tied with 2
3of 46
Reading — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 46 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 46
Math — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 46 that report this measure · tied with 1
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
6 measures
5of 46
Relative Performance
Similar size · of the 46 that report this measure · tied with 1
5of 34
Social Studies — Approaches
Similar size · of the 34 that report this measure
6of 46
Reading — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 46 that report this measure
9of 46
Science — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 46 that report this measure · tied with 1
9of 17
College, career or military ready
Similar size · of the 17 that report this measure · tied with 1
9of 13
Five-Year Graduation Rate
Similar size (standard accountability only) · of the 13 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this charter school system ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this charter school system; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no charter school system would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.