+18.0 ptsvs 81 average · 352 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1 of 352among reporting charter campuses
Score vs similar-size group
+11.2 ptsvs 87.8 average · 24 similarly sized rated charter campuses
Similar size placement
1 of 24among reporting charter campuses
Score vs state
+17.3 ptsvs 81.7 average · 829 rated Texas charter campuses
Texas charter placement
1 of 829tied with 1 other
A99
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 82 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 81 average for 352 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 87.8 average for 24 similarly sized rated charter campuses.The current score is above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Recent movement
Overall score rose 26 points
73 to 992024-25 to 2025-26
99 is 18 points above
the 81 average among 352 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
1st of 352 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Tekoa Academy of Accelerated Studies is rated A by TEA, scoring 99 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81 average for 352 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is up 30 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1st of 352 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.
Tekoa Academy of Accelerated Studies is rated A by TEA, scoring 99 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 87.8 average for 24 similarly sized rated charter campuses. It is up 30 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1st of 24 similarly sized rated charter campuses.
Tekoa Academy of Accelerated Studies is rated A by TEA, scoring 99 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.7 average for 829 rated Texas charter campuses. It is up 30 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 82 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement88 B+12.2 vs similar economic context · 352 reporting
School Progress100 A+17.9 vs similar economic context · 351 reporting
Closing the Gaps96 A+18.3 vs similar economic context · 348 reporting
Academic Growth100 A+26.2 vs similar economic context · 333 reporting
Relative Performance87 B+6.8 vs similar economic context · 350 reporting
Tekoa Academy of Accelerated Studies
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (352 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
88
B
2
School Progress
100
A
—
Closing the Gaps
96
A
—
Academic Growth
100
A
—
Relative Performance
87
B
3
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (100), so
Student Achievement (88) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 100.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level99%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 352 reporting
Meets grade level79%+37 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 352 reporting
Masters grade level45%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 352 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level96%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 352 reporting
Meets grade level71%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 352 reporting
Masters grade level4%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 352 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level100%+33 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 352 reporting
Meets grade level76%+41 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 352 reporting
Masters grade level52%+39 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 352 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level100%+27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 341 reporting
Meets grade level87%+47 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 341 reporting
Masters grade level87%+72 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 341 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level100%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 233 reporting
Meets grade level100%+60 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 233 reporting
Masters grade level100%+83 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 233 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (352 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
Four-Year
100.0%+35.5 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 112 rated charter campuses reporting
Five-Year
92.9%+34.3 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 112 rated charter campuses reporting
Six-Year
100.0%+47.4 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 111 rated charter campuses reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.9 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 112 rated charter campuses reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter campuses in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter campus rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
Total credit for CCMR criteria
73.0%−10.6 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
Criterion
This school% of graduates
Averagesimilar economic context
Differencepercentage points
Reportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria
73.0%
83.6%
−10.6
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 136 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
0.0%
68.3%
−68.3
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 138 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
0.0%
39.4%
−39.4
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 138 rated charter campuses reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
0.0%
29.2%
−29.2
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 138 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
72.7%
13.9%
+58.8
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 138 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an industry-based certification
0.0%
14.0%
−14.0
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 138 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate
0.0%
0.4%
−0.4
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 138 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an associate degree
0.0%
2.1%
−2.1
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 138 rated charter campuses reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
0.0%
4.8%
−4.8
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 138 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
0.0%
1.5%
−1.5
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 138 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
0.0%
8.3%
−8.3
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 138 rated charter campuses reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
0.0%
2.0%
−2.0
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 138 rated charter campuses reporting
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of
meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this
school minus the average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate,
counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that
criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported charter campus percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
38
Economically disadvantaged
81.6%−1.7 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
0.0%−38.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
2.6%−10.7 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.8%+4.4 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
5.2%−20.1 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Tekoa Academy of Accelerated Studies
African American 89.5%
Hispanic 10.5%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 352 reporting for every category shown · 352 in full cohort
African American 17.9%
Hispanic 73.4%
White 5.2%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 1.6%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 24 reporting for every category shown · 24 in full cohort
African American 21.2%
Hispanic 43.9%
White 30.1%
American Indian 0.1%
Asian 0.9%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.8%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
African American 17.5%
Hispanic 61.8%
White 12.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.5%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
38
Economically disadvantaged students
31
Emergent bilingual students
0
Special education students
1
Early college pathways
Pathways in Technology Early College High School (P-TECH)
24
TEA-published share: 63.2%
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
11
Students in TEA mobility denominator
58
TEA-published mobility rate
19%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 38 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 14 (26.9%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
38
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−14
Decrease · −26.9%
Change since 2021–22
−34
Decrease · −47.2%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
38
Selected comparison
509.6
average forcharter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 352 rated charter campuses reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Tekoa Academy of Accelerated Studies
School year
Students enrolledTekoa Academy of Accelerated Studies
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
72
First available year
482.4
2022–23
52
Decrease of 20 (27.8%)
504.2
2023–24
58
Increase of 6 (11.5%)
504.5
2024–25
52
Decrease of 6 (10.3%)
508.6
2025–26
38
Decrease of 14 (26.9%)
509.6
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Suppressed
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
58
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Tekoa Academy of Accelerated Studies
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
104
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2021–22
88
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2022–23
56
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2023–24
65
11
16.9%
12
18.46
10.7%
17.3
2024–25
58
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Tekoa Academy of Accelerated Studies in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$44,024−$19,146 vs similar economic context
Teachers
5−24.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
7.6−10.3 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Tekoa Academy of Accelerated Studies
6 to 10 years 46%
11 to 20 years 52%
21 to 30 years 2%
Selected comparison averageFor charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 352 reporting for every category shown · 352 in full cohort
Beginning 12.9%
1 to 5 years 47.5%
6 to 10 years 19.9%
11 to 20 years 14.6%
21 to 30 years 4.4%
Over 30 years 0.8%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter campuses · 24 reporting for every category shown · 24 in full cohort
Beginning 4.4%
1 to 5 years 40.3%
6 to 10 years 12.4%
11 to 20 years 31.4%
21 to 30 years 11.8%
Texas charter average829 reporting for every category shown · 829 Texas charter campuses in full cohort
Beginning 13%
1 to 5 years 44.3%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 15.4%
21 to 30 years 4.8%
Over 30 years 0.9%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Tekoa Academy of Accelerated Studies in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classTekoa Academy of Accelerated Studies · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary math
14.5
18.3
Secondary science
20.7
19.3
Secondary social studies
15.3
19.4
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 3 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 113 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
15 measures
1of 829
Overall score
Texas charter average · of the 829 that report this measure · tied with 1 · full ranking
1of 829
All Subjects — Approaches
Texas charter average · of the 829 that report this measure · tied with 1
1of 823
School Progress
Texas charter average · of the 823 that report this measure · tied with 1 · full ranking
1of 822
Math — Approaches
Texas charter average · of the 822 that report this measure · tied with 8
1of 788
Science — Masters
Texas charter average · of the 788 that report this measure
1of 784
Academic Growth
Texas charter average · of the 784 that report this measure · tied with 1
1of 548
Social Studies — Meets
Texas charter average · of the 548 that report this measure · tied with 1
1of 548
Social Studies — Masters
Texas charter average · of the 548 that report this measure
1of 352
All Subjects — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 352 that report this measure
1of 352
All Subjects — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 352 that report this measure
1of 352
Math — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 352 that report this measure · tied with 2
1of 352
Math — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 352 that report this measure
1of 341
Science — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 341 that report this measure · tied with 3
1of 341
Science — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 341 that report this measure
1of 19
Social Studies — Approaches
Similar size · of the 19 that report this measure · tied with 2
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
3 measures
2of 352
Reading — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 352 that report this measure
2of 15
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
Similar size · of the 15 that report this measure
2of 14
Closing the Gaps
Similar size · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 2
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
5 measures
5of 352
Attendance
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 352 that report this measure
5of 21
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Similar size · of the 21 that report this measure
6of 23
Reading — Meets
Similar size · of the 23 that report this measure
6of 14
College, career or military ready
Similar size · of the 14 that report this measure
7of 17
Relative Performance
Similar size · of the 17 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 123803001.