Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Charter school system

Pathway Academy

Administrative office: Big Spring · 130 students

Official charter system websiteEnrollment, registration and eligibility

Current score
49/1002025-26
Score vs similar economic context
−30.9 ptsvs 79.9 average · 34 rated charter school systems serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
34 of 34among reporting charter school systems
F49

At a glance

The current score is below the 79.9 average for 34 rated charter school systems serving a similar economic context.

Read the full rating context and placement

Pathway Academy is rated F by TEA, scoring 49 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 79.9 average for 34 rated charter school systems serving a similar economic context. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this charter school system, so there is no trend to read yet.

Ranks 34th of 34 rated charter school systems serving a similar economic context.

1 consecutive year rated unacceptable.

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. Official improvement and transfer notices
  3. 1 year of ratings
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. Who this charter school system serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Students entering this charter system
  9. 1 schools in this charter school system
  10. Teachers
  11. Where this comes from

Official improvement and transfer notices

Dated TEA notices for campuses in this charter school system. They are shown separately from the charter school system rating because they describe specific campuses, support programs and transfer eligibility.

Campuses identified for federal improvement support
1

2026 TEA list

Campuses on the final PEG transfer list
0

2026–27 school year

Share of campuses identified for improvement

This charter school system
100.0%
Selected comparison
24.7%

average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 34 rated charter school systems reporting

+75.3 pts vs similar economic context

Share of campuses on the PEG list

This charter school system
0.0%
Selected comparison
0.0%

average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 34 rated charter school systems reporting

±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
See the campuses and official reasons
Official improvement and Public Education Grant notices for campuses in Pathway Academy
CampusNoticeOfficial status or reason
Pathway AcademyCSIComprehensive Support and Improvement · CSI Low Performance

Selected comparison percentages describe how common each dated campus notice is across reporting charter school systems in that group. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes a campus's official status.

Sources: TEA's 2026 Schools Identified for Improvement and Public Education Grant program, fetched 24 August 2026. A PEG listing makes a student assigned to that campus eligible to request a transfer; it does not guarantee acceptance, available space or transportation.

1 year of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this charter school system has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
9080706050 49 2025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas charter average
2025-26F4979.9 34 reporting79.7 165 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement51 F−26.1 vs similar economic context · 34 reporting
  • School Progress50 F−29.5 vs similar economic context · 34 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps44 F−34.9 vs similar economic context · 34 reporting
  • Academic Growth49 F−23.4 vs similar economic context · 34 reporting
  • Relative Performance50 F−27.5 vs similar economic context · 34 reporting
  • Pathway Academy
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (34 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement51F9
School Progress50F10
Closing the Gaps44F16
Academic Growth49F11
Relative Performance50F10

Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 9 points below D in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this charter school system that better measure is Student Achievement (51), so School Progress (50) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 51.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level41%−28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 34 reporting
  • Meets grade level18%−23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 34 reporting
  • Masters grade level6%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 34 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level51%−21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 34 reporting
  • Meets grade level27%−20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 34 reporting
  • Masters grade level12%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 34 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level30%−35 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 34 reporting
  • Meets grade level10%−25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 34 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 34 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level62%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 34 reporting
  • Meets grade level28%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 34 reporting
  • Masters grade level11%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 34 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level15%−55 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 31 reporting
  • Meets grade level6%−35 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 31 reporting
  • Masters grade level3%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 31 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (34 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter school systems for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this charter school system serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
130
Economically disadvantaged
68.5%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
0.0%−22.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
18.5%+5.6 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
—
Chronically absent
—

Student demographics

Pathway Academy

African American: 7.7%Hispanic: 55.4%White: 26.9%Two or More Races: 10%
  • African American 7.7%
  • Hispanic 55.4%
  • White 26.9%
  • Two or More Races 10%

Selected comparison average For charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 34 reporting for every category shown · 34 in full cohort

African American: 25.5%Hispanic: 55.8%White: 11.2%American Indian: 0.2%Asian: 4.1%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 2.9%
  • African American 25.5%
  • Hispanic 55.8%
  • White 11.2%
  • American Indian 0.2%
  • Asian 4.1%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 2.9%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
130
Economically disadvantaged students
89
Emergent bilingual students
0
Special education students
24

TEA context labels

  • New charter district compared with last year’s fall enrollment

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Students entering this charter system

How many students live in a geographic school district and attend this charter system. These are movement counts, not a quality rating.

Transfers in
130

Live in a geographic district; attend this charter system · 2025–26

Transfers in · 2025–26

This charter school system
130
Selected comparison
3,171.8

average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 34 rated charter school systems reporting

Official transfers into Pathway Academy by school year
School yearTransfers inPathway AcademyTransfers inselected charter comparison average
2021–22 Not reported —
2022–23 Not reported —
2023–24 Not reported —
2024–25 Not reported —
2025–26 130 3,171.8

Largest reported resident-district origins

  1. Big Spring ISD 114901111

Top reported flows only. TEA published 1 of 7 counterpart counts and masked 6.

TEA does not publish a transfers-out total or a resident population for this charter system. A charter system is not a geographic attendance boundary, so a net transfer balance cannot be calculated and this page does not label the system a transfer gainer or loser.

Selected comparison figures are average reported transfer-in counts among charter systems, not rates; system size affects them. They provide scale context and are not a performance judgment. This charter system’s official total does not change when the comparison does.

Source: TEA Student Transfer Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The total and origin rows are TEA’s published charter-system figures; this site does not add masked detail cells. A transfer-in count does not say why a family chose the charter or whether one school is better.

1 schools in this charter school system

Number of schools in the charter school system

This charter school system
1
Selected comparison
6.6

average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 34 rated charter school systems reporting

The selected comparison is a neutral average charter school system size. This charter school system's school count and school-type mix remain its own facts.

Middle / Jr. High
1
Browse all 1 schoolsName, type, rating, score and enrollment
Schools in this charter school system
SchoolTypeRatingScoreStudents
Pathway AcademyMiddle / Jr. HighF49130

Teachers

Average salary
$69,279+$6,330 vs similar economic context
Teachers
7−184.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
18.1−0.4 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Pathway Academy

Beginning: 33.3%1 to 5 years: 13.9%11 to 20 years: 38.9%21 to 30 years: 13.9%
  • Beginning 33.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 13.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 38.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 13.9%

Selected comparison average For charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 34 reporting for every category shown · 34 in full cohort

Beginning: 13.4%1 to 5 years: 38.7%6 to 10 years: 20.5%11 to 20 years: 20.1%21 to 30 years: 5.9%Over 30 years: 1.4%
  • Beginning 13.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 38.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 20.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 20.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 5.9%
  • Over 30 years 1.4%

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download this charter school system as CSV · JSON · the whole dataset