Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Open-enrollment charter campus

Pathway Academy

Pathway Academy · Big Spring · 130 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
49/1002025-26
Score vs similar economic context
−32.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 186 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
184 of 186tied with 1 other
F49

At a glance

The current score is below the 81.3 average for 186 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.

Read the full rating context and placement

Pathway Academy is rated F by TEA, scoring 49 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 186 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this charter campus, so there is no trend to read yet.

Ranks 184th of 186 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 1 other).

1 consecutive year rated unacceptable.

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. Official improvement and transfer notices
  3. 1 year of ratings
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Teachers
  9. Where this comes from

Official improvement and transfer notices

Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.

2026 federal improvement status

Comprehensive Support and Improvement

Official support label: Comprehensive Identified

Identification reason: CSI Low Performance

TEA track year 1 · Title I campus

Open the official TEA list and methodology

Schools identified for improvement

This school
Listed
Selected comparison
25.8%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 186 rated charter campuses reporting

Schools on the PEG list

This school
Not listed
Selected comparison
0.0%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 186 rated charter campuses reporting

Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.

These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.

1 year of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
9080706050 49 2025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas charter average
2025-26F4981.3 186 reporting81.7 829 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement51 F−28.2 vs similar economic context · 186 reporting
  • School Progress50 F−31.6 vs similar economic context · 185 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps44 F−33.6 vs similar economic context · 178 reporting
  • Academic Growth49 F−24.4 vs similar economic context · 169 reporting
  • Relative Performance50 F−30.4 vs similar economic context · 183 reporting
  • Pathway Academy
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (186 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement51F9
School Progress50F10
Closing the Gaps44F16
Academic Growth49F11
Relative Performance50F10

Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 9 points below D in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (51), so School Progress (50) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 51.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level41%−31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 186 reporting
  • Meets grade level18%−26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 186 reporting
  • Masters grade level6%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 186 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level51%−22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 186 reporting
  • Meets grade level27%−22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 186 reporting
  • Masters grade level12%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 186 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level30%−37 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 184 reporting
  • Meets grade level10%−25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 184 reporting
  • Masters grade level0%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 184 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level62%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 180 reporting
  • Meets grade level28%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 180 reporting
  • Masters grade level11%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 180 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level15%−59 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 132 reporting
  • Meets grade level6%−36 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 132 reporting
  • Masters grade level3%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 132 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (186 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
130
Economically disadvantaged
68.5%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
0.0%−25.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
18.5%+5.2 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
—
Chronically absent
—

Student demographics

Pathway Academy

African American: 7.7%Hispanic: 55.4%White: 26.9%Two or More Races: 10%
  • African American 7.7%
  • Hispanic 55.4%
  • White 26.9%
  • Two or More Races 10%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 186 reporting for every category shown · 186 in full cohort

African American: 19.6%Hispanic: 61.5%White: 12%American Indian: 0.2%Asian: 3.8%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 2.7%
  • African American 19.6%
  • Hispanic 61.5%
  • White 12%
  • American Indian 0.2%
  • Asian 3.8%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 2.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
130
Economically disadvantaged students
89
Emergent bilingual students
0
Special education students
24

TEA context labels

  • New campus compared with last year’s fall enrollment

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
Not reported
Students in TEA mobility denominator
Not reported
TEA-published mobility rate
Not reported

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Teachers

Average salary
$69,279+$7,448 vs similar economic context
Teachers
7−21.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
18.1−0.4 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Pathway Academy

Beginning: 33.3%1 to 5 years: 13.9%11 to 20 years: 38.9%21 to 30 years: 13.9%
  • Beginning 33.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 13.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 38.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 13.9%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 186 reporting for every category shown · 186 in full cohort

Beginning: 15.2%1 to 5 years: 44.3%6 to 10 years: 20.3%11 to 20 years: 15.5%21 to 30 years: 4%Over 30 years: 0.8%
  • Beginning 15.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 44.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 20.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 15.5%
  • 21 to 30 years 4%
  • Over 30 years 0.8%

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 114801001.