Current strength
Attendance above the similar-context average
95.7% +1.5 pts vs 94.2%
- 95.7% is 1.5 percentage points above the 94.2% average among 360 districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Geographic public school district
Boys Ranch ISD
Oldham County · Region 16: Amarillo · 186 students
Official district websiteEnrollment, registration and eligibility
Not Rated
At a glance
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Boys Ranch ISD for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this district is below.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average
15.5% −1.3 pts vs 16.8%
- 15.5% is 1.3 percentage points lower than the 16.8% average among 360 districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Current strength
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces above the similar-context average
8.3% +4.8 pts vs 3.5%
- 8.3% is 4.8 percentage points above the 3.5% average among 348 districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Current strength
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces above the Region 16: Amarillo average
8.3% +6.3 pts vs 2%
- 8.3% is 6.3 percentage points above the 2% average among 56 districts in Region 16: Amarillo reporting this measure.
No academic result met this site’s published threshold for a selected positive signal against Oldham County.
Current strength
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces above the similar-size average
8.3% +4.7 pts vs 3.6%
- 8.3% is 4.7 percentage points above the 3.6% average among 147 similarly sized districts reporting this measure.
Current strength
Attendance above the Texas average
95.7% +1.2 pts vs 94.5%
- 95.7% is 1.2 percentage points above the 94.5% average among 1,019 Texas districts reporting this measure.
Current strength
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces above the Texas average
8.3% +4.9 pts vs 3.4%
- 8.3% is 4.9 percentage points above the 3.4% average among 978 Texas districts reporting this measure.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this district.
Read the full rating context and placement
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Boys Ranch ISD for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this district is below.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Boys Ranch ISD for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this district is below.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Boys Ranch ISD for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this district is below.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Boys Ranch ISD for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this district is below.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for Boys Ranch ISD for 2025-26. Everything TEA did publish for this district is below.
TEA did not issue an overall rating for this district. Scores below are the figures TEA published; the letter grades are the state's where it issued them.
Put the numbers in context
Compare with
Jump to a section
- Overview
- 5 years of ratings
- Where the score comes from
- Student outcomes
- After high school: the following fall
- Who this district serves
- Student counts behind the percentages
- Enrollment over time
- Students crossing district lines
- Discipline and removal from class
- Community around the district
- 3 schools in this district
- Spending per student
- Teachers
- Where this comes from
5 years of ratings
Follow the solid line to see how this district has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
View the yearly scores and comparisons
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Not Rated | — | 79.5 360 reporting | 81.7 1,019 reporting |
| 2024-25 | Not Rated | — | 77.8 360 reporting | 80.3 1,019 reporting |
| 2023-24 | Not Rated | — | 76.0 360 reporting | 78.7 1,017 reporting |
| 2022-23 | Not Rated | — | 76.7 360 reporting | 79.2 1,018 reporting |
| 2021-22 | Not Rated | — | 78.5 360 reporting | 80.6 1,017 reporting |
Where the score comes from
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
- Boys Ranch ISD
- Similar economic-disadvantage rate (360 in cohort)
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | — | Not rated | — |
| School Progress | — | Not rated | — |
| Closing the Gaps | — | Not rated | — |
| Academic Growth | — | Not rated | — |
| Relative Performance | — | Not rated | — |
The scores above are the ones TEA published. TEA did not issue letter grades for this district, so none are shown: the A–F thresholds marked on the chart are the state's, but applying them here would produce a grade the state chose to withhold.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
- Approaches grade level
- Meets grade level
- Masters grade level
- Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (360 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
College, career and military readiness
- Total credit for CCMR criteria
- 38.0%−50.7 pts vs similar economic context
| Criterion | This district% of graduates | Averagesimilar economic context | Differencepercentage points | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total credit for CCMR criteria | 38.0% | 88.7% | −50.7 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 344 rated districts reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course | 12.5% | 57.1% | −44.6 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated districts reporting |
| Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA | 12.5% | 23.6% | −11.1 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated districts reporting |
| Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s) | 0.0% | 5.6% | −5.6 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated districts reporting |
| Earned college credit for a dual credit course | 8.3% | 31.6% | −23.3 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated districts reporting |
| Earned an industry-based certification | 12.5% | 44.3% | −31.8 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated districts reporting |
| Earned a level I or level II certificate | 0.0% | 1.9% | −1.9 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated districts reporting |
| Earned an associate degree | 0.0% | 3.9% | −3.9 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated districts reporting |
| Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit | 0.0% | 2.6% | −2.6 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated districts reporting |
| Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness | 0.0% | 3.8% | −3.8 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated districts reporting |
| Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student | 4.2% | 9.5% | −5.3 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated districts reporting |
| Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces | 8.3% | 3.5% | +4.8 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 348 rated districts reporting |
Every row is a share of this district's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this district minus the average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported district percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only districts for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where district graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
- Graduates in the report
- 30
Class of 2023–24
- Enrolled in Texas public higher education
- 13
43.3% of graduates
- Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
- 17
56.7% of graduates
- Not trackable
- 0
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
- This district
- 30
- Selected comparison
- 412
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
- This district
- 13
- Selected comparison
- 177.8
Texas-public enrollment rate
- This district
- 43.3%
- Selected comparison
- 42.9%
Not-found rate
- This district
- 56.7%
- Selected comparison
- 53.4%
Not-trackable rate
- This district
- 0.0%
- Selected comparison
- 3.7%
Most common named Texas public destinations
- AMARILLO COLLEGE (003540)5
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this district serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
- Students
- 186
- Economically disadvantaged
- 69.9%+1.0 pts vs similar economic context
- English learners
- 2.7%−11.9 pts vs similar economic context
- Special education
- 22.0%+3.4 pts vs similar economic context
- Attendance
- 95.7%+1.5 pts vs similar economic context
- Chronically absent
- 15.5%−1.3 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Boys Ranch ISD
- African American 10.8%
- Hispanic 27.4%
- White 51.6%
- American Indian 1.1%
- Asian 2.2%
- Two or More Races 7%
Selected comparison average For districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 360 reporting for every category shown · 360 in full cohort
- African American 7.3%
- Hispanic 50.3%
- White 37.9%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 0.8%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.3%
Selected comparison average For Region 16: Amarillo · 59 reporting for every category shown · 59 in full cohort
- African American 1.3%
- Hispanic 45%
- White 50.1%
- American Indian 0.4%
- Asian 0.6%
- Two or More Races 2.5%
Selected comparison average For Oldham County · 3 reporting for every category shown · 3 in full cohort
- Hispanic 36%
- White 60.3%
- American Indian 1.2%
- Asian 0.6%
- Two or More Races 1.9%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized districts · 167 reporting for every category shown · 167 in full cohort
- African American 3%
- Hispanic 36.9%
- White 56.6%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 0.2%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 2.9%
Statewide average 1,019 reporting for every category shown · 1,019 Texas districts in full cohort
- African American 6.3%
- Hispanic 43.1%
- White 45.4%
- American Indian 0.3%
- Asian 1.4%
- Pacific Islander 0.1%
- Two or More Races 3.3%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
- Students in this TEA accountability summary
- 186
- Economically disadvantaged students
- 130
- Emergent bilingual students
- 5
- Special education students
- 41
TEA context labels
- Residential treatment facility under AEA or AskTED
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 186 students in 2025–26, an increase of 38 (25.7%) from 2024–25.
- Latest enrollment
- 186
2025–26
- Change from 2024–25
- +38
Increase · +25.7%
- Change since 2021–22
- +8
Increase · +4.5%
Enrollment in 2025–26
- This district
- 186
- Selected comparison
- 4,362.3
| School year | Students enrolledBoys Ranch ISD | Change from previous school year | Average enrollmentselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 178 | First available year | 4,453 |
| 2022–23 | 164 | Decrease of 14 (7.9%) | 4,495.1 |
| 2023–24 | 153 | Decrease of 11 (6.7%) | 4,466.4 |
| 2024–25 | 148 | Decrease of 5 (3.3%) | 4,451.4 |
| 2025–26 | 186 | Increase of 38 (25.7%) | 4,362.3 |
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting districts in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this district's own counts do not.
Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Students crossing district lines
How many students live in one public-school district and attend in another. These are movement counts, not a measure of family satisfaction or school quality.
- Transfers in
- 24
Live in another district; attend here · 2025–26
- Transfers out
- Suppressed
Live here; attend in another public district or charter · 2025–26
- Transfers in minus transfers out
- Not available
Arithmetic context only
Transfers in · 2025–26
- This district
- 24
- Selected comparison
- 304
| School year | Transfers inBoys Ranch ISD | Transfers outBoys Ranch ISD | In minus outBoys Ranch ISD | Transfers inselected comparison average | Transfers outselected comparison average | In minus outselected comparison average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021–22 | 27 | Suppressed | Not available | 208.9 | — | — |
| 2022–23 | 30 | Suppressed | Not available | 235.9 | — | — |
| 2023–24 | 29 | Suppressed | Not available | 256.8 | — | — |
| 2024–25 | 29 | Not reported | Not available | 289.5 | — | — |
| 2025–26 | 24 | Suppressed | Not available | 304 | — | — |
Largest reported origins for transfers in
- Channing ISD 10390111
Top reported flows only. TEA published 1 of 5 counterpart counts and masked 4.
Selected comparison figures are average reported counts, not rates; group size and district enrollment affect them. They provide scale context and are not a performance judgment. This district's official totals do not change when the comparison does.
Source: TEA Student Transfer Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The totals are TEA's official district rows; this site does not add masked detail cells. A transfer records a mismatch between district of residence and public district or charter of attendance. It does not say why a family transferred, whether the move was optional, or whether either school is better.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
- Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
- 62
32.1% of cumulative year-end enrollment
- Disciplinary actions
- 238
123.32 per 100 students
- Cumulative year-end enrollment
- 193
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
- This district
- 32.1%
- Selected comparison
- 11.8%
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
- This district
- 123.32
- Selected comparison
- 26.9
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 236 | 61 | 25.9% | 114 | 48.31 | 8.8% | 18.4 |
| 2021–22 | 212 | 64 | 30.2% | 151 | 71.23 | 12.1% | 27.6 |
| 2022–23 | 189 | 55 | 29.1% | 209 | 110.58 | 12.6% | 29.8 |
| 2023–24 | 168 | 64 | 38.1% | 218 | 129.76 | 12.3% | 29 |
| 2024–25 | 193 | 62 | 32.1% | 238 | 123.32 | 11.8% | 26.9 |
See 2024–25 discipline categories
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | 62 | 32.1% | 238 | 123.32 | 11.8% | 26.9 |
| In-school suspensions | 55 | 28.5% | 152 | 78.76 | 10.1% | 19.6 |
| Out-of-school suspensions | 36 | 18.6% | 66 | 34.20 | 4.1% | 6.4 |
| DAEP placements | 15 | 7.8% | 20 | 10.36 | 2.9% | 3.6 |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized districts can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this district's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Community around the district
A district serves a place as well as a roster. These Census estimates describe the resident community without treating its circumstances as an explanation or a verdict on students.
- People living inside the district boundary
- 125
2024 Census estimate
- Children ages 5–17
- 50
Living inside the boundary
- Children ages 5–17 in families in poverty
- 4
8.0%
- School-age child poverty rate
- 8.0%
4 of 50
Boundary population
- This district
- 125
- Selected comparison
- 28,132.6
School-age population
- This district
- 50
- Selected comparison
- 5,005.4
School-age population in poverty
- This district
- 4
- Selected comparison
- 1,031.2
School-age child poverty rate
- This district
- 8.0%
- Selected comparison
- 20.1%
Population averages provide neutral scale context and can differ sharply across a region, county or the state. The poverty-rate comparison is the like-for-like percentage; none of these Census measures is treated as school performance.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2024 Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates, fetched 24 August 2026. These are modeled estimates for residents inside the geographic district, not the students enrolled by the district. A family's poverty status is context, never a school-quality measure.
3 schools in this district
Number of schools in the district
- This district
- 3
- Selected comparison
- 7.6
The selected comparison is a neutral average district size. This district's school count and school-type mix remain its own facts.
- Elementary
- 1
- High School
- 1
- Middle / Jr. High
- 1
Browse all 3 schoolsName, type, rating, score and enrollment
| School | Type | Rating | Score | Students |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boys Ranch HS | High School | Not Rated | — | 115 |
| Blakemore MS | Middle / Jr. High | Not Rated | — | 42 |
| Mimi Farley Elem | Elementary | Not Rated | — | 29 |
Spending per student
The selected txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference stay visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
- Boys Ranch ISD
- TEA peer group
- Texas average
- Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
- This district
- $43,033
- Selected comparison
- $22,846
This district spends $11,936 more per student than TEA's peer group, and $24,061 more per student than the state average.
View yearly spending figures
| Year | Boys Ranch ISD | TEA peer group | Texas average | Selected comparison average | Reportingselected comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $22,090 | $14,290 | $13,054 | $13,946 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 360 rated districts reporting |
| 2019 | $22,922 | $14,384 | $13,108 | $14,333 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 360 rated districts reporting |
| 2020 | $24,048 | $16,581 | $14,058 | $15,312 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 360 rated districts reporting |
| 2021 | $34,485 | $22,787 | $14,797 | $16,489 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 360 rated districts reporting |
| 2022 | $42,723 | $19,817 | $15,708 | $17,824 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 360 rated districts reporting |
| 2023 | $40,892 | $35,111 | $16,792 | $19,609 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 360 rated districts reporting |
| 2024 | $41,646 | $33,004 | $18,125 | $21,029 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 360 rated districts reporting |
| 2025 | $43,033 | $31,097 | $18,972 | $22,846 | average for districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 360 rated districts reporting |
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers
- Average salary
- $67,899+$4,179 vs similar economic context
- Teachers
- 43−249.0 vs similar economic context
- Students per staff member
- 4.4−8.8 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Boys Ranch ISD
- Beginning 22.1%
- 1 to 5 years 32.2%
- 6 to 10 years 4.5%
- 11 to 20 years 26.1%
- 21 to 30 years 10.4%
- Over 30 years 4.7%
Selected comparison average For districts with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 360 reporting for every category shown · 360 in full cohort
- Beginning 7.3%
- 1 to 5 years 26.6%
- 6 to 10 years 17.3%
- 11 to 20 years 26.4%
- 21 to 30 years 16.8%
- Over 30 years 5.6%
Selected comparison average For Region 16: Amarillo · 59 reporting for every category shown · 59 in full cohort
- Beginning 6.1%
- 1 to 5 years 27.2%
- 6 to 10 years 16%
- 11 to 20 years 28.4%
- 21 to 30 years 15.9%
- Over 30 years 6.5%
Selected comparison average For Oldham County · 3 reporting for every category shown · 3 in full cohort
- Beginning 9.5%
- 1 to 5 years 35%
- 6 to 10 years 15.5%
- 11 to 20 years 18.4%
- 21 to 30 years 19.5%
- Over 30 years 2.5%
Selected comparison average For similarly sized districts · 167 reporting for every category shown · 167 in full cohort
- Beginning 7.9%
- 1 to 5 years 23.1%
- 6 to 10 years 15.7%
- 11 to 20 years 27.8%
- 21 to 30 years 18.5%
- Over 30 years 7.1%
Statewide average 1,019 reporting for every category shown · 1,019 Texas districts in full cohort
- Beginning 6.4%
- 1 to 5 years 23.9%
- 6 to 10 years 17.7%
- 11 to 20 years 28.7%
- 21 to 30 years 17.7%
- Over 30 years 5.5%
Teacher turnover over time
TEA reported a 9.7% teacher turnover rate in 2024–25.
Teacher turnover rate · 2024–25
- This district
- 9.7%
- Selected comparison
- 23.1%
| School year | Teacher turnover rateBoys Ranch ISD | Average turnover rateselected comparison |
|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | 17.5% | 18.2% |
| 2021–22 | 16.5% | 21.9% |
| 2022–23 | 20.9% | 25.7% |
| 2023–24 | 33.1% | 22.7% |
| 2024–25 | 9.7% | 23.1% |
TEA defines this district rate as the share of teacher full-time equivalents from the prior fall who are not employed as teachers in the district in the current fall. That can include leaving the district or remaining in a different role; it is not a campus-level measure. The comparison average changes with the selected group; this district's reported rate does not.
Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.