+14.6 ptsvs 76.4 average · 38 rated charter school systems serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
2 of 38among reporting charter school systems
Score vs similar-size group
+14.8 ptsvs 76.2 average · 29 similarly sized rated charter school systems
Similar size placement
5 of 29tied with 2 others
Score vs state
+11.3 ptsvs 79.7 average · 165 rated Texas charter school systems
Texas charter placement
18 of 165tied with 4 others
A91
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 95 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 76.4 average for 38 rated charter school systems serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 76.2 average for 29 similarly sized rated charter school systems.The current score is above the 79.7 average for 165 rated Texas charter school systems.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Recent domain gain
Student Achievement rose 9 points
79 to 882024-25 to 2025-26
88 is 16.8 points above
the 71.2 average among 38 charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Tied for 2nd of 38 charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 3 charter school systems share that value.
97.7% is 4.8 percentage points above
the 92.9% average among 38 charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
1st of 38 charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this charter school system.
Read the full rating context and placement
Accelerated Intermediate Academy is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 76.4 average for 38 rated charter school systems serving a similar economic context. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2nd of 38 rated charter school systems serving a similar economic context.
Accelerated Intermediate Academy is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 76.2 average for 29 similarly sized rated charter school systems. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 5th of 29 similarly sized rated charter school systems (tied with 2 others).
Accelerated Intermediate Academy is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.7 average for 165 rated Texas charter school systems. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this charter school system has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 95 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement88 B+16.8 vs similar economic context · 38 reporting
School Progress91 A+13.3 vs similar economic context · 38 reporting
Closing the Gaps90 A+16.9 vs similar economic context · 37 reporting
Academic Growth89 B+17.1 vs similar economic context · 38 reporting
Relative Performance91 A+15.5 vs similar economic context · 37 reporting
Accelerated Intermediate Academy
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (38 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
88
B
2
School Progress
91
A
—
Closing the Gaps
90
A
—
Academic Growth
89
B
1
Relative Performance
91
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this charter school system that better measure is School Progress (91), so
Student Achievement (88) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 91.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level92%+27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 38 reporting
Meets grade level56%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 38 reporting
Masters grade level26%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 38 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level96%+30 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 38 reporting
Meets grade level65%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 38 reporting
Masters grade level38%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 38 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level93%+30 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 38 reporting
Meets grade level55%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 38 reporting
Masters grade level23%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 38 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level84%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 38 reporting
Meets grade level44%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 38 reporting
Masters grade level8%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 38 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level78%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 34 reporting
Meets grade level22%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 34 reporting
Masters grade level11%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 34 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (38 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter school systems for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this charter school system serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
166
Economically disadvantaged
98.2%+3.7 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
39.8%−2.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
6.6%−5.2 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
97.7%+4.8 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
2.5%−20.6 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Accelerated Intermediate Academy
African American 48.2%
Hispanic 47%
White 4.2%
Asian 0.6%
Selected comparison averageFor charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 38 reporting for every category shown · 38 in full cohort
African American 26.9%
Hispanic 67%
White 3.2%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 1.7%
Two or More Races 0.9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter school systems · 29 reporting for every category shown · 29 in full cohort
African American 23.1%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 20.2%
American Indian 0.1%
Asian 1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.9%
Texas charter average165 reporting for every category shown · 165 Texas charter school systems in full cohort
African American 21%
Hispanic 54.7%
White 15.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.9%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
166
Economically disadvantaged students
163
Emergent bilingual students
66
Special education students
11
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 166 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 16 (8.8%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
166
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−16
Decrease · −8.8%
Change since 2021–22
−48
Decrease · −22.4%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This charter school system
166
Selected comparison
2,156.8
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 38 rated charter school systems reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Accelerated Intermediate Academy
School year
Students enrolledAccelerated Intermediate Academy
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
214
First available year
2,087.8
2022–23
138
Decrease of 76 (35.5%)
2,109.9
2023–24
192
Increase of 54 (39.1%)
2,204.5
2024–25
182
Decrease of 10 (5.2%)
2,176.7
2025–26
166
Decrease of 16 (8.8%)
2,156.8
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter school systems in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this charter school system's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Students entering this charter system
How many students live in a geographic school district and attend this charter system. These are movement counts, not a quality rating.
Transfers in
166
Live in a geographic district; attend this charter system · 2025–26
Transfers in · 2025–26
This charter school system
166
Selected comparison
2,156.8
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 38 rated charter school systems reporting
Official transfers into Accelerated Intermediate Academy by school year
School year
Transfers inAccelerated Intermediate Academy
Transfers inselected charter comparison average
2021–22
214
2,087.8
2022–23
138
2,109.9
2023–24
192
2,204.5
2024–25
182
2,176.7
2025–26
166
2,156.8
Largest reported resident-district origins
Houston ISD 101912134
Fort Bend ISD 07990730
Top reported flows only. TEA published 2 of 4 counterpart counts and masked 2.
TEA does not publish a transfers-out total or a resident population for this charter system. A charter system is not a geographic attendance boundary, so a net transfer balance cannot be calculated and this page does not label the system a transfer gainer or loser.
Selected comparison figures are average reported transfer-in counts among charter systems, not rates; system size affects them. They provide scale context and are not a performance judgment. This charter system’s official total does not change when the comparison does.
Source: TEA Student Transfer Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The total and origin rows are TEA’s published charter-system figures; this site does not add masked detail cells. A transfer-in count does not say why a family chose the charter or whether one school is better.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Not reported
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
193
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Accelerated Intermediate Academy
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
243
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2021–22
225
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2022–23
156
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2023–24
198
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2024–25
193
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Accelerated Intermediate Academy in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter school systems can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this charter school system's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
2 schools in this charter school system
Number of schools in the charter school system
This charter school system
2
Selected comparison
4.5
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 38 rated charter school systems reporting
The selected comparison is a neutral average charter school system size. This charter school system's school count and school-type mix remain its own facts.
Elementary
1
Middle / Jr. High
1
Browse all 2 schoolsName, type, rating, score and enrollment
The selected txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference stay visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Accelerated Intermediate Academy
TEA peer group
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This charter school system
$17,744
Selected comparison
$16,066
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 38 rated charter school systems reporting
+$1,678 vs similar economic context
This charter school system spends $8,185 less per student than TEA's peer group, and $1,228 less per student than the state average.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Accelerated Intermediate Academy
TEA peer group
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,858
$14,290
$13,054
$10,469
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 33 rated charter school systems reporting
2019
$8,524
$14,384
$13,108
$10,528
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 36 rated charter school systems reporting
2020
$7,686
$16,581
$14,058
$10,878
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 36 rated charter school systems reporting
2021
$7,877
$17,863
$14,797
$12,139
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 36 rated charter school systems reporting
2022
$9,424
$19,817
$15,708
$15,287
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 37 rated charter school systems reporting
2023
$16,921
$21,827
$16,792
$15,219
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 37 rated charter school systems reporting
2024
$15,944
$23,517
$18,125
$15,231
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 37 rated charter school systems reporting
2025
$17,744
$25,929
$18,972
$16,066
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 38 rated charter school systems reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers
Average salary
$57,429−$8,224 vs similar economic context
Teachers
12−109.4 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.8−2.9 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Accelerated Intermediate Academy
1 to 5 years 33.3%
6 to 10 years 3.3%
11 to 20 years 38.3%
21 to 30 years 25%
Selected comparison averageFor charter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 38 reporting for every category shown · 38 in full cohort
Beginning 12.8%
1 to 5 years 40%
6 to 10 years 20.4%
11 to 20 years 18.2%
21 to 30 years 7.1%
Over 30 years 1.5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized charter school systems · 29 reporting for every category shown · 29 in full cohort
Beginning 12.1%
1 to 5 years 30.2%
6 to 10 years 17.6%
11 to 20 years 24.7%
21 to 30 years 13.6%
Over 30 years 2%
Texas charter average165 reporting for every category shown · 165 Texas charter school systems in full cohort
Beginning 11.4%
1 to 5 years 36.3%
6 to 10 years 19.7%
11 to 20 years 20.6%
21 to 30 years 8.2%
Over 30 years 1.9%
Teacher turnover over time
TEA reported a 36.2% teacher turnover rate in 2024–25.
Teacher turnover rate · 2024–25
This charter school system
36.2%
Selected comparison
33.6%
average forcharter school systems with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 37 rated charter school systems reporting
+2.6 pts vs similar economic context
Charter-system teacher turnover rate by school year for Accelerated Intermediate Academy
School year
Teacher turnover rateAccelerated Intermediate Academy
Average turnover rateselected comparison
2020–21
16.7%
26.3%
2021–22
33.3%
33.2%
2022–23
75.0%
36.4%
2023–24
39.7%
34.2%
2024–25
36.2%
33.6%
TEA defines this charter school system rate as the share of teacher full-time equivalents from the prior fall who are not employed as teachers in the charter school system in the current fall. That can include leaving the charter school system or remaining in a different role; it is not a campus-level measure. The comparison average changes with the selected group; this charter school system's reported rate does not.
Out of 72 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
6 measures
1of 38
All Subjects — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 38 that report this measure
1of 38
Reading — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 38 that report this measure
1of 38
Reading — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 38 that report this measure · tied with 1
1of 38
Reading — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 38 that report this measure
1of 38
Math — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 38 that report this measure
1of 38
Attendance
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 38 that report this measure
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
10 measures
2of 38
Overall score
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 38 that report this measure
2of 38
Student Achievement
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 38 that report this measure · tied with 2
2of 38
Academic Growth
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 38 that report this measure · tied with 1
2of 38
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 38 that report this measure
2of 37
Closing the Gaps
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 37 that report this measure · tied with 1
2of 37
Relative Performance
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 37 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 38
School Progress
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 38 that report this measure · tied with 1
3of 38
All Subjects — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 38 that report this measure
3of 38
All Subjects — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 38 that report this measure
3of 38
Math — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 38 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
5 measures
4of 38
Math — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 38 that report this measure
4of 38
Science — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 38 that report this measure
6of 38
Per-student spending
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 38 that report this measure
8of 38
Science — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 38 that report this measure
8of 34
Social Studies — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 34 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this charter school system ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this charter school system; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no charter school system would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.