+8.6 ptsvs 81.4 average · 1,772 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
287 of 1,772tied with 71 others
Score vs region
+6.1 ptsvs 83.9 average · 207 rated schools in Region 19: El Paso
Region 19: El Paso placement
52 of 207tied with 12 others
Score vs county
+5.9 ptsvs 84.1 average · 203 rated schools in El Paso County
El Paso County placement
51 of 203tied with 12 others
Score vs similar-size group
+9.9 ptsvs 80.1 average · 4,394 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
743 of 4,394tied with 180 others
Score vs state
+8.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
1,571 of 7,646tied with 341 others
A90
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 82 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 81.4 average for 1,772 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 83.9 average for 207 rated schools in Region 19: El Paso.The current score is above the 84.1 average for 203 rated schools in El Paso County.The current score is above the 80.1 average for 4,394 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
61%vs 51.7% avg · +9.3 pts
Masters
27%vs 22.1% avg · +4.9 pts
Among 1,702 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Young Women's STEAM Research & Preparatory Academy is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.4 average for 1,772 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 287th of 1,772 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 71 others).
Young Women's STEAM Research & Preparatory Academy is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.9 average for 207 rated schools in Region 19: El Paso. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 52nd of 207 rated schools in Region 19: El Paso (tied with 12 others).
Young Women's STEAM Research & Preparatory Academy is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 84.1 average for 203 rated schools in El Paso County. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 51st of 203 rated schools in El Paso County (tied with 12 others).
Young Women's STEAM Research & Preparatory Academy is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.1 average for 4,394 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 743rd of 4,394 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 180 others).
Young Women's STEAM Research & Preparatory Academy is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 82 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement82 B+1.2 vs similar economic context · 1,702 reporting
School Progress88 B+6.7 vs similar economic context · 1,695 reporting
Closing the Gaps93 A+14.4 vs similar economic context · 1,680 reporting
Academic Growth72 C−3.1 vs similar economic context · 1,655 reporting
Relative Performance88 B+8.8 vs similar economic context · 1,695 reporting
Young Women's STEAM Research & Preparatory Academy
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,772 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
82
B
8
School Progress
88
B
2
Closing the Gaps
93
A
—
Academic Growth
72
C
8
Relative Performance
88
B
2
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 2 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (88), so
Student Achievement (82) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 88.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level88%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,702 reporting
Meets grade level61%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,702 reporting
Masters grade level27%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,702 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level94%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,700 reporting
Meets grade level76%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,700 reporting
Masters grade level36%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,700 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level84%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,692 reporting
Meets grade level48%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,692 reporting
Masters grade level15%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,692 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level91%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,560 reporting
Meets grade level66%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,560 reporting
Masters grade level34%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,560 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level75%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 878 reporting
Meets grade level38%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 878 reporting
Masters grade level20%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 878 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,772 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
Four-Year
89.7%−3.4 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 452 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
0.0%−92.9 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 448 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
0.0%−92.0 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 449 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.4 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 454 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
Total credit for CCMR criteria
84.0%−4.4 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
Criterion
This school% of graduates
Averagesimilar economic context
Differencepercentage points
Reportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria
84.0%
88.4%
−4.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 475 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
56.0%
59.2%
−3.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 478 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
56.0%
28.5%
+27.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 478 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
68.0%
10.1%
+57.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 478 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
4.0%
33.4%
−29.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 478 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification
32.0%
38.6%
−6.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 478 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate
0.0%
1.6%
−1.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 478 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree
0.0%
4.9%
−4.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 478 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
0.0%
4.3%
−4.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 478 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
0.0%
3.2%
−3.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 478 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
4.0%
7.6%
−3.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 478 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
8.0%
3.5%
+4.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 478 rated schools reporting
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of
meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this
school minus the average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate,
counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that
criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
Graduates in the report
36
Class of 2023–24
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
20
55.6% of graduates
Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
13
36.1% of graduates
Not trackable
3
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
This school
36
Selected comparison
219.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
This school
20
Selected comparison
95.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting
Texas-public enrollment rate
This school
55.6%
Selected comparison
45.2%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting
+10.4 pts vs similar economic context
Not-found rate
This school
36.1%
Selected comparison
50.2%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting
−14.1 pts vs similar economic context
Not-trackable rate
This school
8.3%
Selected comparison
4.6%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 379 rated schools reporting
+3.7 pts vs similar economic context
Most common named Texas public destinations
U. OF TEXAS AT EL PASO (003661)14
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
443
Economically disadvantaged
53.5%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
10.4%−3.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
10.4%−8.4 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.0%+0.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
10.8%−4.1 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Young Women's STEAM Research & Preparatory Academy
African American 4.1%
Hispanic 76.3%
White 14.4%
Asian 2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 2.9%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,772 reporting for every category shown · 1,772 in full cohort
African American 9.9%
Hispanic 43.1%
White 39.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.8%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 19: El Paso · 207 reporting for every category shown · 207 in full cohort
African American 1.9%
Hispanic 91.2%
White 4.8%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 0.6%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.1%
Selected comparison averageFor El Paso County · 203 reporting for every category shown · 203 in full cohort
African American 2%
Hispanic 91.3%
White 4.7%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 0.6%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.1%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,394 reporting for every category shown · 4,394 in full cohort
African American 11.8%
Hispanic 55%
White 25.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.6%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
443
Economically disadvantaged students
237
Emergent bilingual students
46
Special education students
46
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
28
Students in TEA mobility denominator
455
TEA-published mobility rate
6.2%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 443 students in 2025–26, no change from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
443
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
0
No change
Change since 2021–22
+8
Increase · +1.8%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
443
Selected comparison
637
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,732 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Young Women's STEAM Research & Preparatory Academy
School year
Students enrolledYoung Women's STEAM Research & Preparatory Academy
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
435
First available year
639.2
2022–23
425
Decrease of 10 (2.3%)
645.5
2023–24
450
Increase of 25 (5.9%)
645.2
2024–25
443
Decrease of 7 (1.6%)
642.1
2025–26
443
No change
637
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
21
4.7% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
29
6.55 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
443
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
4.7%
Selected comparison
12.3%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,373 rated schools reporting
−7.6 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
6.55
Selected comparison
27.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,479 rated schools reporting
−21.1 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Young Women's STEAM Research & Preparatory Academy
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
442
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
433
Suppressed
—
17
3.93
—
27.7
2022–23
436
23
5.3%
47
10.78
12.7%
29.4
2023–24
463
31
6.7%
42
9.07
12.7%
29.5
2024–25
443
21
4.7%
29
6.55
12.3%
27.6
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Young Women's STEAM Research & Preparatory Academy in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
21
4.7%
29
6.55
12.3%
27.6
In-school suspensions
14
3.2%
16
3.61
11.1%
21.4
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Young Women's STEAM Research & Preparatory Academy
Parent district: El Paso ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$10,372
Selected comparison
$12,175
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,747 rated schools reporting
−$1,803 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $10,372 per student for this campus, $15,914 per student for its parent district, El Paso ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Young Women's STEAM Research & Preparatory Academy
Parent district: El Paso ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$9,549
$11,694
$13,054
$7,886
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,615 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,707
$12,747
$13,108
$8,068
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,631 rated schools reporting
2020
$6,688
$15,863
$14,058
$8,614
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,646 rated schools reporting
2021
$6,544
$17,837
$14,797
$9,008
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,663 rated schools reporting
2022
$7,349
$15,944
$15,708
$10,279
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,676 rated schools reporting
2023
$9,990
$15,526
$16,792
$10,851
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,697 rated schools reporting
2024
$10,367
$16,512
$18,125
$11,736
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,721 rated schools reporting
2025
$10,372
$15,914
$18,972
$12,175
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,747 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$66,311−$305 vs similar economic context
Teachers
29−13.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.3−4.2 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Young Women's STEAM Research & Preparatory Academy
Beginning 3.5%
1 to 5 years 24.2%
6 to 10 years 17.3%
11 to 20 years 45%
21 to 30 years 7.3%
Over 30 years 2.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,772 reporting for every category shown · 1,772 in full cohort
Beginning 5.8%
1 to 5 years 24.9%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 16.5%
Over 30 years 4.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 19: El Paso · 207 reporting for every category shown · 207 in full cohort
Beginning 4.4%
1 to 5 years 18.9%
6 to 10 years 18.5%
11 to 20 years 34%
21 to 30 years 21.5%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor El Paso County · 203 reporting for every category shown · 203 in full cohort
Beginning 3.9%
1 to 5 years 18.8%
6 to 10 years 18.5%
11 to 20 years 34.4%
21 to 30 years 21.7%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,394 reporting for every category shown · 4,394 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 25.9%
6 to 10 years 19.3%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 16.2%
Over 30 years 3.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Young Women's STEAM Research & Preparatory Academy in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classYoung Women's STEAM Research & Preparatory Academy · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 6
20.1
17.6
Secondary English
9.8
14.9
Secondary languages other than English
10.9
17.5
Secondary math
14.1
15.8
Secondary science
27.3
17.4
Secondary social studies
23.7
17.3
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
2 measures
2of 42
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
El Paso County · of the 42 that report this measure
3of 45
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
Region 19: El Paso · of the 45 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
2 measures
5of 45
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
Region 19: El Paso · of the 45 that report this measure
8of 201
Reading — Approaches
Region 19: El Paso · of the 201 that report this measure · tied with 1
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
1 measure
79of 1,700
Reading — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,700 that report this measure · tied with 18
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 071902019.