+15.1 ptsvs 81.9 average · 1,729 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
17 of 1,729tied with 12 others
Score vs region
+13.1 ptsvs 83.9 average · 207 rated schools in Region 19: El Paso
Region 19: El Paso placement
2 of 207tied with 3 others
Score vs county
+12.9 ptsvs 84.1 average · 203 rated schools in El Paso County
El Paso County placement
2 of 203tied with 3 others
Score vs similar-size group
+16.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 3,112 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
52 of 3,112tied with 37 others
Score vs state
+15.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
82 of 7,646tied with 63 others
A97
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 95 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 81.9 average for 1,729 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 83.9 average for 207 rated schools in Region 19: El Paso.The current score is above the 84.1 average for 203 rated schools in El Paso County.The current score is above the 80.5 average for 3,112 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
72%vs 52.8% avg · +19.2 pts
Masters
37%vs 22.9% avg · +14.1 pts
Among 1,666 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Young Women's Leadership Academy is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.9 average for 1,729 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 17th of 1,729 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 12 others).
Young Women's Leadership Academy is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.9 average for 207 rated schools in Region 19: El Paso. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2nd of 207 rated schools in Region 19: El Paso (tied with 3 others).
Young Women's Leadership Academy is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 84.1 average for 203 rated schools in El Paso County. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2nd of 203 rated schools in El Paso County (tied with 3 others).
Young Women's Leadership Academy is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.5 average for 3,112 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 52nd of 3,112 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 37 others).
Young Women's Leadership Academy is rated A by TEA, scoring 97 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 4 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 95 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement97 A+15.5 vs similar economic context · 1,666 reporting
School Progress96 A+14.5 vs similar economic context · 1,661 reporting
Closing the Gaps97 A+17.8 vs similar economic context · 1,646 reporting
Academic Growth80 B+4.4 vs similar economic context · 1,625 reporting
Relative Performance96 A+16.7 vs similar economic context · 1,661 reporting
Young Women's Leadership Academy
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,729 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
97
A
—
School Progress
96
A
—
Closing the Gaps
97
A
—
Academic Growth
80
B
10
Relative Performance
96
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (97), so
School Progress (96) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 97.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level91%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,666 reporting
Meets grade level72%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,666 reporting
Masters grade level37%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,666 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level93%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,664 reporting
Meets grade level82%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,664 reporting
Masters grade level44%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,664 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level91%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,658 reporting
Meets grade level63%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,658 reporting
Masters grade level28%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,658 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level94%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,541 reporting
Meets grade level78%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,541 reporting
Masters grade level45%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,541 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level81%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 866 reporting
Meets grade level57%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 866 reporting
Masters grade level31%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 866 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,729 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
Four-Year
100.0%+6.6 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 444 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
100.0%+6.8 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 441 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
0.0%−92.7 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 442 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.4 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 446 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%+11.9 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
Criterion
This school% of graduates
Averagesimilar economic context
Differencepercentage points
Reportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%
88.1%
+11.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 467 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
90.5%
59.2%
+31.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 469 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
90.5%
29.3%
+61.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 469 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
81.0%
10.5%
+70.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 469 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
19.0%
33.3%
−14.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 469 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification
23.8%
38.0%
−14.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 469 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate
0.0%
1.5%
−1.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 469 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree
0.0%
4.6%
−4.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 469 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
4.8%
4.2%
+0.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 469 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
0.0%
3.1%
−3.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 469 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
4.8%
7.5%
−2.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 469 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
9.5%
3.5%
+6.0
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 469 rated schools reporting
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of
meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this
school minus the average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate,
counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that
criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
Graduates in the report
26
Class of 2023–24
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
18
69.2% of graduates
Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
8
30.8% of graduates
Not trackable
0
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
This school
26
Selected comparison
224.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 383 rated schools reporting
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
This school
18
Selected comparison
97.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 383 rated schools reporting
Texas-public enrollment rate
This school
69.2%
Selected comparison
45.2%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 383 rated schools reporting
+24.0 pts vs similar economic context
Not-found rate
This school
30.8%
Selected comparison
50.2%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 383 rated schools reporting
−19.4 pts vs similar economic context
Not-trackable rate
This school
0.0%
Selected comparison
4.6%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 383 rated schools reporting
−4.6 pts vs similar economic context
Most common named Texas public destinations
U. OF TEXAS AT EL PASO (003661)7
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
325
Economically disadvantaged
50.8%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
6.5%−6.7 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
7.4%−11.4 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.0%+1.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
4.6%−9.9 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Young Women's Leadership Academy
African American 1.2%
Hispanic 96.3%
White 1.8%
Asian 0.3%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,729 reporting for every category shown · 1,729 in full cohort
African American 9.5%
Hispanic 41.4%
White 41.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 19: El Paso · 207 reporting for every category shown · 207 in full cohort
African American 1.9%
Hispanic 91.2%
White 4.8%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 0.6%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.1%
Selected comparison averageFor El Paso County · 203 reporting for every category shown · 203 in full cohort
African American 2%
Hispanic 91.3%
White 4.7%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 0.6%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.1%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,112 reporting for every category shown · 3,112 in full cohort
African American 11%
Hispanic 53.8%
White 29.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.3%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.2%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
325
Economically disadvantaged students
165
Emergent bilingual students
21
Special education students
24
Early college pathways
Pathways in Technology Early College High School (P-TECH)
1
TEA-published share: 0.3%
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
16
Students in TEA mobility denominator
325
TEA-published mobility rate
4.9%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 325 students in 2025–26, an increase of 5 (1.6%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
325
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+5
Increase · +1.6%
Change since 2021–22
−44
Decrease · −11.9%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
325
Selected comparison
650.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,689 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Young Women's Leadership Academy
School year
Students enrolledYoung Women's Leadership Academy
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
369
First available year
654.8
2022–23
332
Decrease of 37 (10.0%)
659.7
2023–24
336
Increase of 4 (1.2%)
658.9
2024–25
320
Decrease of 16 (4.8%)
654.1
2025–26
325
Increase of 5 (1.6%)
650.3
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
13
4.09 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
318
2024–25
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
4.09
Selected comparison
27.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,437 rated schools reporting
−23.3 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Young Women's Leadership Academy
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
394
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2021–22
366
18
4.9%
39
10.66
12.0%
26.7
2022–23
343
29
8.4%
35
10.20
12.6%
28.8
2023–24
342
30
8.8%
46
13.45
12.5%
29
2024–25
318
Suppressed
—
13
4.09
—
27.4
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Young Women's Leadership Academy in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
13
4.09
—
27.4
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Young Women's Leadership Academy
Parent district: Ysleta ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$12,554
Selected comparison
$12,086
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,702 rated schools reporting
+$469 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $12,554 per student for this campus, $16,357 per student for its parent district, Ysleta ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Young Women's Leadership Academy
Parent district: Ysleta ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$10,466
$15,777
$13,054
$7,838
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,581 rated schools reporting
2019
$10,327
$14,422
$13,108
$8,017
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,599 rated schools reporting
2020
$11,150
$13,296
$14,058
$8,548
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,611 rated schools reporting
2021
$9,301
$15,128
$14,797
$8,957
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,627 rated schools reporting
2022
$12,085
$19,206
$15,708
$10,253
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,636 rated schools reporting
2023
$24,981
$20,106
$16,792
$10,717
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,656 rated schools reporting
2024
$26,084
$17,973
$18,125
$11,555
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,678 rated schools reporting
2025
$12,554
$16,357
$18,972
$12,086
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,702 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$65,962−$882 vs similar economic context
Teachers
21−21.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.4−4.3 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Young Women's Leadership Academy
Beginning 9.4%
1 to 5 years 28.3%
6 to 10 years 28.3%
11 to 20 years 14.6%
21 to 30 years 19.3%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,729 reporting for every category shown · 1,729 in full cohort
Beginning 5.7%
1 to 5 years 24.4%
6 to 10 years 19.3%
11 to 20 years 29.4%
21 to 30 years 16.7%
Over 30 years 4.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 19: El Paso · 207 reporting for every category shown · 207 in full cohort
Beginning 4.4%
1 to 5 years 18.9%
6 to 10 years 18.5%
11 to 20 years 34%
21 to 30 years 21.5%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor El Paso County · 203 reporting for every category shown · 203 in full cohort
Beginning 3.9%
1 to 5 years 18.8%
6 to 10 years 18.5%
11 to 20 years 34.4%
21 to 30 years 21.7%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 3,112 reporting for every category shown · 3,112 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.1%
6 to 10 years 18.7%
11 to 20 years 28.8%
21 to 30 years 16.9%
Over 30 years 4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Young Women's Leadership Academy in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classYoung Women's Leadership Academy · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 6
23.2
17.7
Secondary English
18.9
15
Secondary languages other than English
16.5
17.5
Secondary math
16.8
16
Secondary science
22.3
17.5
Secondary social studies
16.6
17.5
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
5 measures
1of 201
Student Achievement
Region 19: El Paso · of the 201 that report this measure · tied with 4
1of 45
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
Region 19: El Paso · of the 45 that report this measure
1of 45
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
Region 19: El Paso · of the 45 that report this measure
1of 42
College, career or military ready
El Paso County · of the 42 that report this measure · tied with 2
1of 39
Five-Year Graduation Rate
El Paso County (standard accountability only) · of the 39 that report this measure · tied with 2
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
7 measures
2of 207
Overall score
Region 19: El Paso · of the 207 that report this measure · tied with 3
2of 45
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
Region 19: El Paso · of the 45 that report this measure
3of 203
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Region 19: El Paso · of the 203 that report this measure
3of 201
School Progress
Region 19: El Paso · of the 201 that report this measure · tied with 3
3of 201
Relative Performance
Region 19: El Paso · of the 201 that report this measure · tied with 3
3of 199
Closing the Gaps
Region 19: El Paso · of the 199 that report this measure · tied with 3
3of 45
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
Region 19: El Paso · of the 45 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
6 measures
7of 201
Reading — Meets
Region 19: El Paso · of the 201 that report this measure
8of 197
Science — Masters
Region 19: El Paso · of the 197 that report this measure · tied with 1
9of 203
Attendance
Region 19: El Paso · of the 203 that report this measure · tied with 2
10of 201
All Subjects — Approaches
Region 19: El Paso · of the 201 that report this measure · tied with 4
10of 201
Reading — Approaches
Region 19: El Paso · of the 201 that report this measure · tied with 4
10of 201
Reading — Masters
Region 19: El Paso · of the 201 that report this measure · tied with 2
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
3 measures
11of 197
Science — Meets
Region 19: El Paso · of the 197 that report this measure
12of 201
All Subjects — Meets
Region 19: El Paso · of the 201 that report this measure · tied with 3
79of 1,658
Math — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,658 that report this measure · tied with 28
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 071905018.