Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Young Men's Leadership Academy

Bexar County · Region 20: San Antonio · 217 students

Current score
83/1002025-26
Change
+2 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+3.0 ptsvs 80 average · 2,003 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
796 of 2,003tied with 73 others
B83

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 80 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 80 average for 2,003 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Overall score above the similar-context average

83 +3 pts vs 80

  • 83 is 3 points above the 80 average among 2,003 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

School Progress above the similar-context average

83 +2.2 pts vs 80.8

  • 83 is 2.2 points above the 80.8 average among 1,890 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Student Achievement above the similar-context average

85 +7.1 pts vs 77.9

  • 85 is 7.1 points above the 77.9 average among 1,898 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Young Men's Leadership Academy is rated B by TEA, scoring 83 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80 average for 2,003 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 796th of 2,003 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 73 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageYoung Men's Leadership Academy 8190808383 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 80 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8380.0 2,003 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8379.7 1,980 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8077.7 1,961 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23A9078.3 1,928 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8182.2 1,904 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement85 B+7.1 vs similar economic context · 1,898 reporting
  • School Progress83 B+2.2 vs similar economic context · 1,890 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps79 C+1.8 vs similar economic context · 1,871 reporting
  • Academic Growth58 F−15.9 vs similar economic context · 1,831 reporting
  • Relative Performance83 B+3.8 vs similar economic context · 1,890 reporting
  • Young Men's Leadership Academy
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,003 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement85B5
School Progress83B7
Closing the Gaps79C1
Academic Growth58F2
Relative Performance83B7

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 1 point below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (85), so School Progress (83) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 85.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level70%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,898 reporting
  • Meets grade level38%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,898 reporting
  • Masters grade level10%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,898 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level70%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
  • Meets grade level44%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
  • Masters grade level11%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level60%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,885 reporting
  • Meets grade level23%−19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,885 reporting
  • Masters grade level3%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,885 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level83%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,734 reporting
  • Meets grade level56%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,734 reporting
  • Masters grade level19%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,734 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level79%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 944 reporting
  • Meets grade level38%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 944 reporting
  • Masters grade level14%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 944 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,003 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
95.7%+1.8 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 462 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
100.0%+6.5 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 458 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
0.0%−92.9 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 459 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.9%+0.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 464 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
95.0%+7.1 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria95.0%87.9%+7.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 499 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course77.3%59.9%+17.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 502 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA68.2%27.8%+40.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 502 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)9.1%10.8%−1.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 502 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course72.7%33.9%+38.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 502 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification18.2%38.1%−19.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 502 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%1.8%−1.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 502 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%6.9%−6.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 502 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%3.7%−3.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 502 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%3.2%−3.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 502 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student13.6%7.8%+5.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 502 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces4.5%3.3%+1.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 502 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
33

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
30

90.9% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
3

9.1% of graduates

Not trackable
0

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
33
Selected comparison
236.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 400 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
30
Selected comparison
104.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 400 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
90.9%
Selected comparison
43.9%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 400 rated schools reporting

+47.0 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
9.1%
Selected comparison
50.8%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 400 rated schools reporting

−41.7 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
0.0%
Selected comparison
5.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 400 rated schools reporting

−5.3 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. U. OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO (010115)6
  2. ALAMO CCD ST. PHILIPS COLLEGE (003608)5
  3. TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY (003615)5

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
217
Economically disadvantaged
64.5%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
12.0%−5.7 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
22.1%+3.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.8%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
16.5%−0.2 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Young Men's Leadership Academy

African American: 19.4%Hispanic: 73.3%White: 2.3%American Indian: 0.5%Asian: 2.3%Two or More Races: 2.3%
  • African American 19.4%
  • Hispanic 73.3%
  • White 2.3%
  • American Indian 0.5%
  • Asian 2.3%
  • Two or More Races 2.3%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,003 reporting for every category shown · 2,003 in full cohort

African American: 11.2%Hispanic: 51.5%White: 30.9%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.2%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.7%
  • African American 11.2%
  • Hispanic 51.5%
  • White 30.9%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
217
Economically disadvantaged students
140
Emergent bilingual students
26
Special education students
48

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
29
Students in TEA mobility denominator
252
TEA-published mobility rate
11.5%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 217 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 25 (10.3%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
217

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−25

Decrease · −10.3%

Change since 2021–22
−168

Decrease · −43.6%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
217
Selected comparison
624.4

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,969 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Young Men's Leadership Academy
School yearStudents enrolledYoung Men's Leadership AcademyChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 385 First available year 640.4
2022–23 333 Decrease of 52 (13.5%) 647
2023–24 297 Decrease of 36 (10.8%) 643
2024–25 242 Decrease of 55 (18.5%) 638.4
2025–26 217 Decrease of 25 (10.3%) 624.4

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
20

8.1% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
35

14.23 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
246

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
8.1%
Selected comparison
12.9%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,542 rated schools reporting

−4.8 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
14.23
Selected comparison
30.4

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,654 rated schools reporting

−16.2 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Young Men's Leadership Academy
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 388 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 395 108 27.3% 281 71.14 12.9% 30.1
2022–23 337 66 19.6% 162 48.07 13.4% 32.2
2023–24 288 27 9.4% 37 12.85 13.2% 31.8
2024–25 246 20 8.1% 35 14.23 12.9% 30.4
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Young Men's Leadership Academy in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 20 8.1% 35 14.23 12.9% 30.4
In-school suspensions 11 4.5% 15 6.10 11.6% 23.2
Out-of-school suspensions 11 4.5% 16 6.50 7.1% 10.6
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$15k$24k20182020202220242025
  • Young Men's Leadership Academy
  • Parent district: San Antonio ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$15,358
Selected comparison
$12,669

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,976 rated schools reporting

+$2,689 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $15,358 per student for this campus, $22,411 per student for its parent district, San Antonio ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearYoung Men's Leadership AcademyParent district: San Antonio ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$10,882$13,895$13,054$7,916 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,834 rated schools reporting
2019$9,818$15,168$13,108$8,070 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,850 rated schools reporting
2020$11,233$19,020$14,058$8,656 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,872 rated schools reporting
2021$11,075$18,196$14,797$9,085 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,884 rated schools reporting
2022$13,109$18,722$15,708$10,418 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,905 rated schools reporting
2023$15,962$18,189$16,792$11,137 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,928 rated schools reporting
2024$15,631$21,627$18,125$12,051 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,957 rated schools reporting
2025$15,358$22,411$18,972$12,669 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,976 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$66,035−$361 vs similar economic context
Teachers
17−25.6 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12.8−1.1 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Young Men's Leadership Academy

Beginning: 5.9%1 to 5 years: 39.1%6 to 10 years: 19.5%11 to 20 years: 17.8%21 to 30 years: 11.8%Over 30 years: 5.9%
  • Beginning 5.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 39.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 17.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 11.8%
  • Over 30 years 5.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,003 reporting for every category shown · 2,003 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.2%1 to 5 years: 26.2%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 28%21 to 30 years: 15.8%Over 30 years: 4.1%
  • Beginning 6.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 26.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 28%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.8%
  • Over 30 years 4.1%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Young Men's Leadership Academy in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classYoung Men's Leadership Academy · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 617.517.7
Secondary English11.715
Secondary languages other than English9.717.5
Secondary math12.315.9
Secondary science17.517.3
Secondary social studies13.617.2

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

3 measures

  • 4of 65

    Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student

    Bexar County · of the 65 that report this measure

  • 7of 65

    Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA

    Bexar County · of the 65 that report this measure

  • 8of 65

    Earned college credit for a dual credit course

    Bexar County · of the 65 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 015907177.