Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
Young JHB88vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
Young JH
Tarrant County · Region 11: Fort Worth · 684 students
Current score
88/1002025-26
Change
−3 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+5.9 ptsvs 82.1 average · 1,691 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
435 of 1,691tied with 66 others
Score vs region
+7.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth
Region 11: Fort Worth placement
216 of 839tied with 26 others
Score vs county
+8.0 ptsvs 80 average · 466 rated schools in Tarrant County
Tarrant County placement
115 of 466tied with 14 others
Score vs similar-size group
+7.4 ptsvs 80.6 average · 4,395 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
1,164 of 4,395tied with 130 others
Score vs state
+6.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
2,199 of 7,646tied with 256 others
B88
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 93 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 82.1 average for 1,691 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth.The current score is above the 80 average for 466 rated schools in Tarrant County.The current score is above the 80.6 average for 4,395 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
56%vs 53.4% avg · +2.6 pts
Masters
30%vs 23.3% avg · +6.7 pts
Among 1,633 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Young JH is rated B by TEA, scoring 88 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.1 average for 1,691 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 435th of 1,691 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 66 others).
Young JH is rated B by TEA, scoring 88 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 216th of 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth (tied with 26 others).
Young JH is rated B by TEA, scoring 88 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80 average for 466 rated schools in Tarrant County. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 115th of 466 rated schools in Tarrant County (tied with 14 others).
Young JH is rated B by TEA, scoring 88 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.6 average for 4,395 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,164th of 4,395 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 130 others).
Young JH is rated B by TEA, scoring 88 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 93 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement85 B+3.2 vs similar economic context · 1,633 reporting
School Progress86 B+4.3 vs similar economic context · 1,628 reporting
Closing the Gaps91 A+11.6 vs similar economic context · 1,614 reporting
Academic Growth79 C+3.1 vs similar economic context · 1,598 reporting
Relative Performance86 B+6.7 vs similar economic context · 1,628 reporting
Young JH
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,691 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
85
B
5
School Progress
86
B
4
Closing the Gaps
91
A
—
Academic Growth
79
C
1
Relative Performance
86
B
4
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 4 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (86), so
Student Achievement (85) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 86.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level79%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,633 reporting
Meets grade level56%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,633 reporting
Masters grade level30%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,633 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level83%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,631 reporting
Meets grade level58%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,631 reporting
Masters grade level30%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,631 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level75%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,625 reporting
Meets grade level52%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,625 reporting
Masters grade level23%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,625 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level85%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,511 reporting
Meets grade level72%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,511 reporting
Masters grade level50%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,511 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level70%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 847 reporting
Meets grade level44%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 847 reporting
Masters grade level25%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 847 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,691 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
684
Economically disadvantaged
49.6%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
8.8%−4.2 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
13.2%−5.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.8%+0.2 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
12.4%−1.8 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Young JH
African American 23.5%
Hispanic 28.7%
White 34.6%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 6.7%
Two or More Races 5.8%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,691 reporting for every category shown · 1,691 in full cohort
African American 9.5%
Hispanic 40.6%
White 42.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
African American 15.4%
Hispanic 39.6%
White 34.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.3%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 4.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Tarrant County · 466 reporting for every category shown · 466 in full cohort
African American 21.3%
Hispanic 45.2%
White 22.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 4.6%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,395 reporting for every category shown · 4,395 in full cohort
African American 12.4%
Hispanic 54.1%
White 24.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
684
Economically disadvantaged students
339
Emergent bilingual students
60
Special education students
90
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
66
Students in TEA mobility denominator
745
TEA-published mobility rate
8.9%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 684 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 26 (3.7%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
684
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−26
Decrease · −3.7%
Change since 2021–22
−143
Decrease · −17.3%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
684
Selected comparison
647.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,653 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Young JH
School year
Students enrolledYoung JH
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
827
First available year
649.4
2022–23
777
Decrease of 50 (6.0%)
653.6
2023–24
756
Decrease of 21 (2.7%)
653.6
2024–25
710
Decrease of 46 (6.1%)
650.5
2025–26
684
Decrease of 26 (3.7%)
647.9
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
54
7.3% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
81
10.98 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
738
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
7.3%
Selected comparison
12.0%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,306 rated schools reporting
−4.7 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
10.98
Selected comparison
26.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,401 rated schools reporting
−15.8 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Young JH
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
839
24
2.9%
38
4.53
9.6%
18.3
2021–22
859
103
12.0%
199
23.17
11.9%
26.1
2022–23
842
66
7.8%
116
13.78
12.4%
28
2023–24
794
101
12.7%
190
23.93
12.3%
28.4
2024–25
738
54
7.3%
81
10.98
12.0%
26.8
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Young JH in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
54
7.3%
81
10.98
12.0%
26.8
In-school suspensions
19
2.6%
21
2.85
10.8%
20.6
Out-of-school suspensions
34
4.6%
39
5.28
6.0%
8.5
DAEP placements
17
2.3%
19
2.57
4.5%
5.3
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Young JH
Parent district: Arlington ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$10,864
Selected comparison
$12,010
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,663 rated schools reporting
−$1,146 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $10,864 per student for this campus, $18,997 per student for its parent district, Arlington ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Young JH
Parent district: Arlington ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$8,953
$13,175
$13,054
$7,840
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,536 rated schools reporting
2019
$9,154
$11,881
$13,108
$8,023
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,555 rated schools reporting
2020
$10,356
$12,353
$14,058
$8,522
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,567 rated schools reporting
2021
$8,095
$14,707
$14,797
$8,924
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,585 rated schools reporting
2022
$8,473
$15,494
$15,708
$10,265
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,596 rated schools reporting
2023
$9,556
$15,882
$16,792
$10,744
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,616 rated schools reporting
2024
$10,256
$17,946
$18,125
$11,523
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,636 rated schools reporting
2025
$10,864
$18,997
$18,972
$12,010
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,663 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$74,225+$7,313 vs similar economic context
Teachers
46+3.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.9−5.0 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Young JH
Beginning 2.2%
1 to 5 years 13%
6 to 10 years 30.4%
11 to 20 years 39.1%
21 to 30 years 15.2%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,691 reporting for every category shown · 1,691 in full cohort
Beginning 5.6%
1 to 5 years 24.3%
6 to 10 years 19.3%
11 to 20 years 29.5%
21 to 30 years 16.7%
Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
Beginning 5.6%
1 to 5 years 24%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 30%
21 to 30 years 16.7%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Tarrant County · 466 reporting for every category shown · 466 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 24%
6 to 10 years 20.5%
11 to 20 years 29.9%
21 to 30 years 16.3%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,395 reporting for every category shown · 4,395 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.6%
6 to 10 years 19.9%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.3%
Over 30 years 2.9%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Young JH in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classYoung JH · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English
19.7
15.1
Secondary languages other than English
22.5
17.5
Secondary math
22.6
16
Secondary science
27
17.5
Secondary social studies
25.4
17.5
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
1 measure
53of 1,511
Science — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,511 that report this measure · tied with 10
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 220901049.