Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Young JH

Tarrant County · Region 11: Fort Worth · 684 students

Current score
88/1002025-26
Change
−3 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+5.9 ptsvs 82.1 average · 1,691 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
435 of 1,691tied with 66 others
B88

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 93 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 82.1 average for 1,691 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
56%vs 53.4% avg · +2.6 pts
Masters
30%vs 23.3% avg · +6.7 pts

Among 1,633 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
52%vs 47.2% avg · +4.8 pts
Masters
23%vs 19.2% avg · +3.8 pts

Among 1,625 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
72%vs 52.4% avg · +19.6 pts
Masters
50%vs 25% avg · +25 pts

Among 1,511 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Young JH is rated B by TEA, scoring 88 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.1 average for 1,691 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 435th of 1,691 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 66 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageYoung JH 9184878888 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 93 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8882.1 1,691 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8882.4 1,665 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8780.4 1,638 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8481.0 1,617 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9183.6 1,594 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement85 B+3.2 vs similar economic context · 1,633 reporting
  • School Progress86 B+4.3 vs similar economic context · 1,628 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps91 A+11.6 vs similar economic context · 1,614 reporting
  • Academic Growth79 C+3.1 vs similar economic context · 1,598 reporting
  • Relative Performance86 B+6.7 vs similar economic context · 1,628 reporting
  • Young JH
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,691 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement85B5
School Progress86B4
Closing the Gaps91A—
Academic Growth79C1
Relative Performance86B4

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 4 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (86), so Student Achievement (85) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 86.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level79%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,633 reporting
  • Meets grade level56%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,633 reporting
  • Masters grade level30%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,633 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level83%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,631 reporting
  • Meets grade level58%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,631 reporting
  • Masters grade level30%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,631 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level75%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,625 reporting
  • Meets grade level52%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,625 reporting
  • Masters grade level23%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,625 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level85%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,511 reporting
  • Meets grade level72%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,511 reporting
  • Masters grade level50%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,511 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level70%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 847 reporting
  • Meets grade level44%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 847 reporting
  • Masters grade level25%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 847 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,691 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
684
Economically disadvantaged
49.6%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
8.8%−4.2 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
13.2%−5.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.8%+0.2 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
12.4%−1.8 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Young JH

African American: 23.5%Hispanic: 28.7%White: 34.6%American Indian: 0.6%Asian: 6.7%Two or More Races: 5.8%
  • African American 23.5%
  • Hispanic 28.7%
  • White 34.6%
  • American Indian 0.6%
  • Asian 6.7%
  • Two or More Races 5.8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,691 reporting for every category shown · 1,691 in full cohort

African American: 9.5%Hispanic: 40.6%White: 42.1%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 3.2%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.2%
  • African American 9.5%
  • Hispanic 40.6%
  • White 42.1%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 3.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.2%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
684
Economically disadvantaged students
339
Emergent bilingual students
60
Special education students
90

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
66
Students in TEA mobility denominator
745
TEA-published mobility rate
8.9%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 684 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 26 (3.7%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
684

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−26

Decrease · −3.7%

Change since 2021–22
−143

Decrease · −17.3%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
684
Selected comparison
647.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,653 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Young JH
School yearStudents enrolledYoung JHChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 827 First available year 649.4
2022–23 777 Decrease of 50 (6.0%) 653.6
2023–24 756 Decrease of 21 (2.7%) 653.6
2024–25 710 Decrease of 46 (6.1%) 650.5
2025–26 684 Decrease of 26 (3.7%) 647.9

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
54

7.3% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
81

10.98 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
738

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
7.3%
Selected comparison
12.0%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,306 rated schools reporting

−4.7 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
10.98
Selected comparison
26.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,401 rated schools reporting

−15.8 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Young JH
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 839 24 2.9% 38 4.53 9.6% 18.3
2021–22 859 103 12.0% 199 23.17 11.9% 26.1
2022–23 842 66 7.8% 116 13.78 12.4% 28
2023–24 794 101 12.7% 190 23.93 12.3% 28.4
2024–25 738 54 7.3% 81 10.98 12.0% 26.8
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Young JH in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 54 7.3% 81 10.98 12.0% 26.8
In-school suspensions 19 2.6% 21 2.85 10.8% 20.6
Out-of-school suspensions 34 4.6% 39 5.28 6.0% 8.5
DAEP placements 17 2.3% 19 2.57 4.5% 5.3
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Young JH
  • Parent district: Arlington ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$10,864
Selected comparison
$12,010

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,663 rated schools reporting

−$1,146 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $10,864 per student for this campus, $18,997 per student for its parent district, Arlington ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearYoung JHParent district: Arlington ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$8,953$13,175$13,054$7,840 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,536 rated schools reporting
2019$9,154$11,881$13,108$8,023 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,555 rated schools reporting
2020$10,356$12,353$14,058$8,522 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,567 rated schools reporting
2021$8,095$14,707$14,797$8,924 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,585 rated schools reporting
2022$8,473$15,494$15,708$10,265 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,596 rated schools reporting
2023$9,556$15,882$16,792$10,744 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,616 rated schools reporting
2024$10,256$17,946$18,125$11,523 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,636 rated schools reporting
2025$10,864$18,997$18,972$12,010 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,663 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$74,225+$7,313 vs similar economic context
Teachers
46+3.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.9−5.0 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Young JH

Beginning: 2.2%1 to 5 years: 13%6 to 10 years: 30.4%11 to 20 years: 39.1%21 to 30 years: 15.2%
  • Beginning 2.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 13%
  • 6 to 10 years 30.4%
  • 11 to 20 years 39.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,691 reporting for every category shown · 1,691 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.6%1 to 5 years: 24.3%6 to 10 years: 19.3%11 to 20 years: 29.5%21 to 30 years: 16.7%Over 30 years: 4.2%
  • Beginning 5.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.3%
  • 11 to 20 years 29.5%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.7%
  • Over 30 years 4.2%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Young JH in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classYoung JH · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English19.715.1
Secondary languages other than English22.517.5
Secondary math22.616
Secondary science2717.5
Secondary social studies25.417.5

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

1 measure

  • 53of 1,511

    Science — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,511 that report this measure · tied with 10

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 220901049.