Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Worthing HS

Harris County · Region 04: Houston · 645 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
83/1002025-26
Change
+22 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+5.3 ptsvs 77.7 average · 1,598 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
550 of 1,598tied with 47 others
B83

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 77 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.7 average for 1,598 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 2 points

81 to 83 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 83 is 5.3 points above the 77.7 average among 1,598 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Closing the Gaps rose 3 points

79 to 82 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 82 is 6.9 points above the 75.1 average among 1,473 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
53%vs 39% avg · +14 pts
Masters
26%vs 15.1% avg · +10.9 pts

Among 1,482 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Worthing HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 83 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.7 average for 1,598 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 22 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 550th of 1,598 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 47 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
9080706050 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageWorthing HS 6161788183 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 77 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8377.7 1,598 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8177.4 1,581 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7873.8 1,565 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23D6173.2 1,562 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22D6181.9 1,546 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement70 C−0.1 vs similar economic context · 1,485 reporting
  • School Progress83 B+4.1 vs similar economic context · 1,482 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps82 B+6.9 vs similar economic context · 1,473 reporting
  • Academic Growth83 B+9.5 vs similar economic context · 1,461 reporting
  • Relative Performance79 C+2.2 vs similar economic context · 1,481 reporting
  • Worthing HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,598 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement70C10
School Progress83B7
Closing the Gaps82B8
Academic Growth83B7
Relative Performance79C1

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 7 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (83), so Student Achievement (70) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 83.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level75%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,485 reporting
  • Meets grade level45%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,485 reporting
  • Masters grade level15%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,485 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level61%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,485 reporting
  • Meets grade level38%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,485 reporting
  • Masters grade level6%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,485 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level85%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,482 reporting
  • Meets grade level53%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,482 reporting
  • Masters grade level26%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,482 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level91%+28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,404 reporting
  • Meets grade level56%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,404 reporting
  • Masters grade level24%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,404 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level90%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 463 reporting
  • Meets grade level49%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 463 reporting
  • Masters grade level22%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 463 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,598 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
80.7%−7.2 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 151 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
75.2%−13.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 151 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
80.5%−8.2 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 151 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
4.5%+2.5 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 152 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
70.0%−13.7 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria70.0%83.7%−13.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 181 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course38.5%57.4%−18.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 182 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA6.1%19.3%−13.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 182 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)9.5%14.0%−4.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 182 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course10.1%26.2%−16.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 182 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification40.2%32.8%+7.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 182 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%2.9%−2.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 182 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%7.2%−7.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 182 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit8.9%6.7%+2.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 182 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%2.5%−2.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 182 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student8.9%7.3%+1.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 182 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces5.0%2.5%+2.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 182 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
163

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
47

28.8% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
100

61.3% of graduates

Not trackable
16

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
163
Selected comparison
251.3

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 170 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
47
Selected comparison
89.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 170 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
28.8%
Selected comparison
34.9%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 170 rated schools reporting

−6.1 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
61.3%
Selected comparison
56.2%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 170 rated schools reporting

+5.1 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
9.8%
Selected comparison
8.8%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 170 rated schools reporting

+1.0 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. HOUSTON CITY COLLEGE (010633)17
  2. TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY (003615)5

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
645
Economically disadvantaged
96.9%+3.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
17.1%−25.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
19.3%+2.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
90.9%−2.0 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
36.6%+12.9 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Worthing HS

African American: 65.9%Hispanic: 30.2%White: 1.4%American Indian: 0.2%Asian: 0.9%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 1.2%
  • African American 65.9%
  • Hispanic 30.2%
  • White 1.4%
  • American Indian 0.2%
  • Asian 0.9%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 1.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,598 reporting for every category shown · 1,598 in full cohort

African American: 15.1%Hispanic: 77.4%White: 4.5%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.2%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 1.4%
  • African American 15.1%
  • Hispanic 77.4%
  • White 4.5%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 1.4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
642
Economically disadvantaged students
622
Emergent bilingual students
110
Special education students
124

Early college pathways

Early College High School
120

TEA-published share: 18.7%

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
317
Students in TEA mobility denominator
938
TEA-published mobility rate
33.8%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 645 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 106 (14.1%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
645

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−106

Decrease · −14.1%

Change since 2021–22
−179

Decrease · −21.7%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
645
Selected comparison
552.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,580 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Worthing HS
School yearStudents enrolledWorthing HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 824 First available year 603
2022–23 827 Increase of 3 (0.4%) 598.7
2023–24 831 Increase of 4 (0.5%) 588.6
2024–25 751 Decrease of 80 (9.6%) 580.7
2025–26 645 Decrease of 106 (14.1%) 552.9

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
200

22.1% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
372

41.20 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
903

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
22.1%
Selected comparison
13.2%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 912 rated schools reporting

+8.9 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
41.2
Selected comparison
31.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 987 rated schools reporting

+9.7 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Worthing HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 917 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 943 215 22.8% 429 45.49 12.9% 30.5
2022–23 963 245 25.4% 521 54.10 13.8% 33.1
2023–24 989 219 22.1% 402 40.65 13.9% 33.3
2024–25 903 200 22.1% 372 41.20 13.2% 31.5
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Worthing HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 200 22.1% 372 41.20 13.2% 31.5
In-school suspensions 86 9.5% 96 10.63 11.6% 22.4
Out-of-school suspensions 145 16.1% 251 27.80 9.8% 16.3
DAEP placements 21 2.3% 25 2.77 5.1% 6.2
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Worthing HS
  • Parent district: Houston ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$18,534
Selected comparison
$13,463

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,580 rated schools reporting

+$5,071 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $18,534 per student for this campus, $17,026 per student for its parent district, Houston ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearWorthing HSParent district: Houston ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$9,965$14,470$13,054$8,386 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,511 rated schools reporting
2019$13,084$13,643$13,108$8,375 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,528 rated schools reporting
2020$11,308$13,627$14,058$8,877 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,531 rated schools reporting
2021$10,043$13,515$14,797$9,757 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,533 rated schools reporting
2022$11,528$14,985$15,708$11,230 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,547 rated schools reporting
2023$12,907$16,350$16,792$11,763 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,562 rated schools reporting
2024$17,508$18,150$18,125$12,827 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,569 rated schools reporting
2025$18,534$17,026$18,972$13,463 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,580 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$85,314+$16,673 vs similar economic context
Teachers
59+19.9 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
10.9−3.9 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Worthing HS

Beginning: 13.6%1 to 5 years: 42.1%6 to 10 years: 19.2%11 to 20 years: 14.4%21 to 30 years: 8.8%Over 30 years: 1.7%
  • Beginning 13.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 42.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.2%
  • 11 to 20 years 14.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 8.8%
  • Over 30 years 1.7%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,598 reporting for every category shown · 1,598 in full cohort

Beginning: 7.7%1 to 5 years: 27.1%6 to 10 years: 18.6%11 to 20 years: 27.1%21 to 30 years: 14.8%Over 30 years: 3.4%
  • Beginning 7.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 18.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 14.8%
  • Over 30 years 3.4%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Worthing HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classWorthing HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English19.215
Secondary languages other than English21.118.1
Secondary math18.916.7
Secondary science20.517.5
Secondary social studies17.417.5

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

1 measure

  • 6of 136

    Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces

    Harris County · of the 136 that report this measure

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

2 measures

  • 36of 906

    Per-student spending

    Harris County · of the 906 that report this measure

  • 82of 1,482

    Math — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,482 that report this measure · tied with 21

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101912019.