Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
Wm B Travis ElemB81vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
Wm B Travis Elem
Harrison County · Region 07: Kilgore · 479 students
Current score
81/1002025-26
Change
−7 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+3.6 ptsvs 77.4 average · 2,384 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
933 of 2,384tied with 82 others
Score vs region
+1.0 ptsvs 80 average · 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore
Region 07: Kilgore placement
178 of 352tied with 16 others
Score vs county
+2.9 ptsvs 78.1 average · 25 rated schools in Harrison County
Harrison County placement
9 of 25tied with 2 others
Score vs similar-size group
+0.9 ptsvs 80.1 average · 4,621 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
2,269 of 4,621tied with 156 others
Score vs state
−0.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
4,141 of 7,646tied with 260 others
B81
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 86 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.4 average for 2,384 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80 average for 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore.The current score is above the 78.1 average for 25 rated schools in Harrison County.The current score is above the 80.1 average for 4,621 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is level with the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
45%vs 40.5% avg · +4.5 pts
Masters
20%vs 15.9% avg · +4.1 pts
Among 2,224 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Wm B Travis Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 81 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.4 average for 2,384 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 933rd of 2,384 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 82 others).
Wm B Travis Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 81 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80 average for 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore. It is down 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 178th of 352 rated schools in Region 07: Kilgore (tied with 16 others).
Wm B Travis Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 81 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.1 average for 25 rated schools in Harrison County. It is down 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 9th of 25 rated schools in Harrison County (tied with 2 others).
Wm B Travis Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 81 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.1 average for 4,621 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2,269th of 4,621 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 156 others).
Wm B Travis Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 81 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 7 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 86 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement74 C+3.4 vs similar economic context · 2,224 reporting
School Progress82 B+3.5 vs similar economic context · 2,218 reporting
Closing the Gaps79 C+4.4 vs similar economic context · 2,204 reporting
Academic Growth79 C+6.4 vs similar economic context · 2,178 reporting
Relative Performance82 B+5.4 vs similar economic context · 2,218 reporting
Wm B Travis Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,384 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
74
C
6
School Progress
82
B
8
Closing the Gaps
79
C
1
Academic Growth
79
C
1
Relative Performance
82
B
8
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 1 point below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (82), so
Student Achievement (74) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 82.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level73%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,224 reporting
Meets grade level45%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,224 reporting
Masters grade level20%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,224 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level78%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,223 reporting
Meets grade level49%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,223 reporting
Masters grade level22%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,223 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level73%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,214 reporting
Meets grade level48%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,214 reporting
Masters grade level20%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,214 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level61%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,075 reporting
Meets grade level24%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,075 reporting
Masters grade level12%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,075 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,384 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
479
Economically disadvantaged
87.6%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
28.7%−8.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
18.4%+0.2 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.9%+1.9 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
11.8%−10.7 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Wm B Travis Elem
African American 33.5%
Hispanic 45.4%
White 16.9%
Asian 0.8%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.2%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,384 reporting for every category shown · 2,384 in full cohort
African American 14.3%
Hispanic 74.4%
White 7.7%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 1.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 07: Kilgore · 352 reporting for every category shown · 352 in full cohort
African American 13.6%
Hispanic 28.4%
White 52.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 0.8%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Harrison County · 25 reporting for every category shown · 25 in full cohort
African American 19.1%
Hispanic 24.6%
White 50.4%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 0.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5.1%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,621 reporting for every category shown · 4,621 in full cohort
African American 12%
Hispanic 55.1%
White 25.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.9%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
474
Economically disadvantaged students
415
Emergent bilingual students
136
Special education students
87
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
70
Students in TEA mobility denominator
427
TEA-published mobility rate
16.4%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 479 students in 2025–26, an increase of 6 (1.3%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
479
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+6
Increase · +1.3%
Change since 2021–22
−109
Decrease · −18.5%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
479
Selected comparison
591
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,356 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Wm B Travis Elem
School year
Students enrolledWm B Travis Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
588
First available year
631.2
2022–23
525
Decrease of 63 (10.7%)
627.2
2023–24
479
Decrease of 46 (8.8%)
618.2
2024–25
473
Decrease of 6 (1.3%)
612.8
2025–26
479
Increase of 6 (1.3%)
591
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
36
7.1% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
39
7.65 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
510
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
7.1%
Selected comparison
13.3%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,560 rated schools reporting
−6.2 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
7.65
Selected comparison
32
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,680 rated schools reporting
−24.4 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Wm B Travis Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
641
14
2.2%
17
2.65
7.6%
14.7
2021–22
630
40
6.3%
57
9.05
12.8%
30.5
2022–23
566
73
12.9%
162
28.62
13.7%
33.6
2023–24
523
78
14.9%
189
36.14
13.8%
33.8
2024–25
510
36
7.1%
39
7.65
13.3%
32
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Wm B Travis Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
36
7.1%
39
7.65
13.3%
32
In-school suspensions
23
4.5%
24
4.71
11.7%
22.9
Out-of-school suspensions
11
2.2%
12
2.35
9.0%
14.6
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Wm B Travis Elem
Parent district: Marshall ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$8,568
Selected comparison
$12,989
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,371 rated schools reporting
−$4,421 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $8,568 per student for this campus, $18,705 per student for its parent district, Marshall ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Wm B Travis Elem
Parent district: Marshall ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,054
$11,838
$13,054
$8,293
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,250 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,254
$10,751
$13,108
$8,337
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,282 rated schools reporting
2020
$6,803
$11,866
$14,058
$8,855
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,292 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,669
$12,611
$14,797
$9,588
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,297 rated schools reporting
2022
$7,530
$12,526
$15,708
$11,095
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,316 rated schools reporting
2023
$7,855
$13,831
$16,792
$11,630
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,342 rated schools reporting
2024
$8,323
$16,170
$18,125
$12,438
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,356 rated schools reporting
2025
$8,568
$18,705
$18,972
$12,989
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,371 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$57,699−$10,153 vs similar economic context
Teachers
31−10.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.4+1.0 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Wm B Travis Elem
Beginning 12.7%
1 to 5 years 38.3%
6 to 10 years 12.7%
11 to 20 years 12.7%
21 to 30 years 14%
Over 30 years 9.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,384 reporting for every category shown · 2,384 in full cohort
Beginning 7.3%
1 to 5 years 27.3%
6 to 10 years 18.9%
11 to 20 years 27.1%
21 to 30 years 15.1%
Over 30 years 3.5%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 07: Kilgore · 352 reporting for every category shown · 352 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 24.6%
6 to 10 years 17.7%
11 to 20 years 28%
21 to 30 years 17.3%
Over 30 years 6%
Selected comparison averageFor Harrison County · 25 reporting for every category shown · 25 in full cohort
Beginning 3.8%
1 to 5 years 24.9%
6 to 10 years 17.1%
11 to 20 years 24.4%
21 to 30 years 20.4%
Over 30 years 5.4%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,621 reporting for every category shown · 4,621 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.1%
6 to 10 years 19.4%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 16%
Over 30 years 3.3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Wm B Travis Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classWm B Travis Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
22.3
18.1
Grade 1
18
18.3
Grade 2
21.6
18.3
Grade 3
15.3
18.6
Grade 4
17.5
18.6
Grade 5
16.8
19.5
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
10 measures
5of 24
Academic Growth
Harrison County · of the 24 that report this measure
7of 24
Closing the Gaps
Harrison County · of the 24 that report this measure
8of 24
Relative Performance
Harrison County · of the 24 that report this measure · tied with 2
8of 24
Math — Masters
Harrison County · of the 24 that report this measure
8of 24
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Harrison County · of the 24 that report this measure
9of 25
Overall score
Harrison County · of the 25 that report this measure · tied with 2
9of 24
School Progress
Harrison County · of the 24 that report this measure · tied with 2
9of 24
Math — Meets
Harrison County · of the 24 that report this measure
10of 24
Reading — Masters
Harrison County · of the 24 that report this measure
10of 24
Math — Approaches
Harrison County · of the 24 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 102902108.