Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Windsor Elem

Potter County · Region 16: Amarillo · 446 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
87/1002025-26
Change
−6 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+1.1 ptsvs 85.9 average · 1,185 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
580 of 1,185tied with 73 others
B87

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 90 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 85.9 average for 1,185 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
70%vs 61.4% avg · +8.6 pts
Masters
38%vs 29.6% avg · +8.4 pts

Among 1,158 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
66%vs 55.3% avg · +10.7 pts
Masters
30%vs 24.7% avg · +5.3 pts

Among 1,154 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
74%vs 65.9% avg · +8.1 pts
Masters
43%vs 30.9% avg · +12.1 pts

Among 1,157 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Windsor Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 85.9 average for 1,185 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 6 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 580th of 1,185 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 73 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageWindsor Elem 9386908787 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 90 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8785.9 1,185 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8785.9 1,162 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24A9084.4 1,146 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8684.7 1,133 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9386.4 1,116 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement91 A+4.5 vs similar economic context · 1,158 reporting
  • School Progress85 B+1.6 vs similar economic context · 1,155 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps76 C−7.4 vs similar economic context · 1,146 reporting
  • Academic Growth70 C−9.1 vs similar economic context · 1,136 reporting
  • Relative Performance85 B+5.2 vs similar economic context · 1,155 reporting
  • Windsor Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,185 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement91A—
School Progress85B5
Closing the Gaps76C4
Academic Growth70C10
Relative Performance85B5

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 4 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (91), so School Progress (85) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 91.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level88%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,158 reporting
  • Meets grade level70%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,158 reporting
  • Masters grade level38%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,158 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level92%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,157 reporting
  • Meets grade level74%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,157 reporting
  • Masters grade level43%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,157 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level83%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,154 reporting
  • Meets grade level66%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,154 reporting
  • Masters grade level30%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,154 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level94%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,066 reporting
  • Meets grade level69%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,066 reporting
  • Masters grade level51%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,066 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,185 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
446
Economically disadvantaged
34.9%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
2.7%−7.9 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
20.5%+2.7 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.9%+0.8 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
4.1%−7.6 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Windsor Elem

African American: 5.6%Hispanic: 22.3%White: 67.3%American Indian: 0.5%Asian: 0.9%Two or More Races: 3.4%
  • African American 5.6%
  • Hispanic 22.3%
  • White 67.3%
  • American Indian 0.5%
  • Asian 0.9%
  • Two or More Races 3.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,185 reporting for every category shown · 1,185 in full cohort

African American: 9.1%Hispanic: 32.2%White: 47.5%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 5.9%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 4.7%
  • African American 9.1%
  • Hispanic 32.2%
  • White 47.5%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 5.9%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 4.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
444
Economically disadvantaged students
155
Emergent bilingual students
12
Special education students
91

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
22
Students in TEA mobility denominator
346
TEA-published mobility rate
6.4%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 446 students in 2025–26, an increase of 16 (3.7%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
446

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+16

Increase · +3.7%

Change since 2021–22
−1

Decrease · −0.2%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
446
Selected comparison
761

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,161 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Windsor Elem
School yearStudents enrolledWindsor ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 447 First available year 771.2
2022–23 442 Decrease of 5 (1.1%) 772.9
2023–24 440 Decrease of 2 (0.5%) 772.9
2024–25 430 Decrease of 10 (2.3%) 768.3
2025–26 446 Increase of 16 (3.7%) 761

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
18

4.0% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
49

10.99 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
446

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
4.0%
Selected comparison
9.8%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 914 rated schools reporting

−5.8 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
10.99
Selected comparison
20.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 992 rated schools reporting

−9.9 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Windsor Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 477 15 3.1% 21 4.40 8.1% 14.8
2021–22 464 16 3.5% 45 9.70 10.1% 20.9
2022–23 459 18 3.9% 49 10.68 10.4% 22.1
2023–24 462 20 4.3% 49 10.61 10.2% 22.3
2024–25 446 18 4.0% 49 10.99 9.8% 20.9
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Windsor Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 18 4.0% 49 10.99 9.8% 20.9
In-school suspensions 17 3.8% 42 9.42 8.8% 16
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Windsor Elem
  • Parent district: Amarillo ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$14,647
Selected comparison
$11,923

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,162 rated schools reporting

+$2,724 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $14,647 per student for this campus, $14,058 per student for its parent district, Amarillo ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearWindsor ElemParent district: Amarillo ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$8,175$10,152$13,054$7,671 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,058 rated schools reporting
2019$8,215$10,834$13,108$7,806 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,074 rated schools reporting
2020$8,841$11,942$14,058$8,134 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,082 rated schools reporting
2021$10,145$13,611$14,797$8,593 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,096 rated schools reporting
2022$10,563$13,291$15,708$9,810 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,115 rated schools reporting
2023$10,457$13,092$16,792$10,407 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,134 rated schools reporting
2024$10,640$13,483$18,125$11,538 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,146 rated schools reporting
2025$14,647$14,058$18,972$11,923 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,162 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$69,346+$1,472 vs similar economic context
Teachers
29−20.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.1+0.8 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Windsor Elem

1 to 5 years: 13.6%6 to 10 years: 13.6%11 to 20 years: 45.6%21 to 30 years: 17%Over 30 years: 10.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 13.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 13.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 45.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 17%
  • Over 30 years 10.2%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,185 reporting for every category shown · 1,185 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.1%1 to 5 years: 22.9%6 to 10 years: 19.6%11 to 20 years: 31.6%21 to 30 years: 17.3%Over 30 years: 3.4%
  • Beginning 5.1%
  • 1 to 5 years 22.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 31.6%
  • 21 to 30 years 17.3%
  • Over 30 years 3.4%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Windsor Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classWindsor Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten17.718.5
Grade 11919
Grade 221.319.3
Grade 316.520
Grade 42119.7
Grade 522.721.2

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

1 measure

  • 1of 62

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Potter County · of the 62 that report this measure

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

5 measures

  • 2of 62

    Attendance

    Potter County · of the 62 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 2of 59

    Math — Meets

    Potter County · of the 59 that report this measure

  • 3of 62

    Per-student spending

    Potter County · of the 62 that report this measure

  • 3of 59

    Reading — Approaches

    Potter County · of the 59 that report this measure

  • 3of 54

    Science — Masters

    Potter County · of the 54 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

7 measures

  • 4of 59

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Potter County · of the 59 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 4of 59

    All Subjects — Meets

    Potter County · of the 59 that report this measure

  • 5of 59

    Reading — Meets

    Potter County · of the 59 that report this measure

  • 5of 59

    Reading — Masters

    Potter County · of the 59 that report this measure

  • 6of 59

    Math — Masters

    Potter County · of the 59 that report this measure

  • 6of 54

    Science — Meets

    Potter County · of the 54 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 7of 54

    Science — Approaches

    Potter County · of the 54 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 188901141.