+1.1 ptsvs 85.9 average · 1,185 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
580 of 1,185tied with 73 others
Score vs region
+5.2 ptsvs 81.8 average · 208 rated schools in Region 16: Amarillo
Region 16: Amarillo placement
74 of 208tied with 11 others
Score vs county
+6.4 ptsvs 80.6 average · 62 rated schools in Potter County
Potter County placement
17 of 62tied with 1 other
Score vs similar-size group
+6.9 ptsvs 80.1 average · 4,417 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
1,218 of 4,417tied with 187 others
Score vs state
+5.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
2,456 of 7,646tied with 307 others
B87
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 90 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 85.9 average for 1,185 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 81.8 average for 208 rated schools in Region 16: Amarillo.The current score is above the 80.6 average for 62 rated schools in Potter County.The current score is above the 80.1 average for 4,417 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
70%vs 61.4% avg · +8.6 pts
Masters
38%vs 29.6% avg · +8.4 pts
Among 1,158 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Windsor Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 85.9 average for 1,185 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 580th of 1,185 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 73 others).
Windsor Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.8 average for 208 rated schools in Region 16: Amarillo. It is down 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 74th of 208 rated schools in Region 16: Amarillo (tied with 11 others).
Windsor Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.6 average for 62 rated schools in Potter County. It is down 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 17th of 62 rated schools in Potter County (tied with 1 other).
Windsor Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.1 average for 4,417 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 6 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,218th of 4,417 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 187 others).
Windsor Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 6 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 90 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement91 A+4.5 vs similar economic context · 1,158 reporting
School Progress85 B+1.6 vs similar economic context · 1,155 reporting
Closing the Gaps76 C−7.4 vs similar economic context · 1,146 reporting
Academic Growth70 C−9.1 vs similar economic context · 1,136 reporting
Relative Performance85 B+5.2 vs similar economic context · 1,155 reporting
Windsor Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,185 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
91
A
—
School Progress
85
B
5
Closing the Gaps
76
C
4
Academic Growth
70
C
10
Relative Performance
85
B
5
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 4 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (91), so
School Progress (85) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 91.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level88%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,158 reporting
Meets grade level70%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,158 reporting
Masters grade level38%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,158 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level92%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,157 reporting
Meets grade level74%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,157 reporting
Masters grade level43%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,157 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level83%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,154 reporting
Meets grade level66%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,154 reporting
Masters grade level30%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,154 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level94%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,066 reporting
Meets grade level69%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,066 reporting
Masters grade level51%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,066 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,185 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
446
Economically disadvantaged
34.9%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
2.7%−7.9 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
20.5%+2.7 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.9%+0.8 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
4.1%−7.6 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Windsor Elem
African American 5.6%
Hispanic 22.3%
White 67.3%
American Indian 0.5%
Asian 0.9%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,185 reporting for every category shown · 1,185 in full cohort
African American 9.1%
Hispanic 32.2%
White 47.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.9%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 16: Amarillo · 208 reporting for every category shown · 208 in full cohort
African American 4.1%
Hispanic 49.5%
White 41.7%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 1.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Potter County · 62 reporting for every category shown · 62 in full cohort
African American 9.6%
Hispanic 46.4%
White 35.8%
American Indian 0.5%
Asian 4.1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,417 reporting for every category shown · 4,417 in full cohort
African American 11.9%
Hispanic 55%
White 25.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.6%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
444
Economically disadvantaged students
155
Emergent bilingual students
12
Special education students
91
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
22
Students in TEA mobility denominator
346
TEA-published mobility rate
6.4%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 446 students in 2025–26, an increase of 16 (3.7%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
446
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+16
Increase · +3.7%
Change since 2021–22
−1
Decrease · −0.2%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
446
Selected comparison
761
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,161 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Windsor Elem
School year
Students enrolledWindsor Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
447
First available year
771.2
2022–23
442
Decrease of 5 (1.1%)
772.9
2023–24
440
Decrease of 2 (0.5%)
772.9
2024–25
430
Decrease of 10 (2.3%)
768.3
2025–26
446
Increase of 16 (3.7%)
761
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
18
4.0% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
49
10.99 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
446
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
4.0%
Selected comparison
9.8%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 914 rated schools reporting
−5.8 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
10.99
Selected comparison
20.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 992 rated schools reporting
−9.9 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Windsor Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
477
15
3.1%
21
4.40
8.1%
14.8
2021–22
464
16
3.5%
45
9.70
10.1%
20.9
2022–23
459
18
3.9%
49
10.68
10.4%
22.1
2023–24
462
20
4.3%
49
10.61
10.2%
22.3
2024–25
446
18
4.0%
49
10.99
9.8%
20.9
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Windsor Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
18
4.0%
49
10.99
9.8%
20.9
In-school suspensions
17
3.8%
42
9.42
8.8%
16
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Windsor Elem
Parent district: Amarillo ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$14,647
Selected comparison
$11,923
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,162 rated schools reporting
+$2,724 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $14,647 per student for this campus, $14,058 per student for its parent district, Amarillo ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Windsor Elem
Parent district: Amarillo ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$8,175
$10,152
$13,054
$7,671
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,058 rated schools reporting
2019
$8,215
$10,834
$13,108
$7,806
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,074 rated schools reporting
2020
$8,841
$11,942
$14,058
$8,134
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,082 rated schools reporting
2021
$10,145
$13,611
$14,797
$8,593
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,096 rated schools reporting
2022
$10,563
$13,291
$15,708
$9,810
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,115 rated schools reporting
2023
$10,457
$13,092
$16,792
$10,407
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,134 rated schools reporting
2024
$10,640
$13,483
$18,125
$11,538
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,146 rated schools reporting
2025
$14,647
$14,058
$18,972
$11,923
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,162 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$69,346+$1,472 vs similar economic context
Teachers
29−20.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.1+0.8 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Windsor Elem
1 to 5 years 13.6%
6 to 10 years 13.6%
11 to 20 years 45.6%
21 to 30 years 17%
Over 30 years 10.2%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,185 reporting for every category shown · 1,185 in full cohort
Beginning 5.1%
1 to 5 years 22.9%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 31.6%
21 to 30 years 17.3%
Over 30 years 3.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 16: Amarillo · 208 reporting for every category shown · 208 in full cohort
Beginning 6%
1 to 5 years 26.5%
6 to 10 years 18%
11 to 20 years 28.4%
21 to 30 years 16.2%
Over 30 years 5%
Selected comparison averageFor Potter County · 62 reporting for every category shown · 62 in full cohort
Beginning 6.5%
1 to 5 years 23.3%
6 to 10 years 20.3%
11 to 20 years 30.8%
21 to 30 years 16.2%
Over 30 years 2.9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,417 reporting for every category shown · 4,417 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 25.9%
6 to 10 years 19.3%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 16.2%
Over 30 years 3.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Windsor Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classWindsor Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
17.7
18.5
Grade 1
19
19
Grade 2
21.3
19.3
Grade 3
16.5
20
Grade 4
21
19.7
Grade 5
22.7
21.2
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
1 measure
1of 62
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Potter County · of the 62 that report this measure
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
5 measures
2of 62
Attendance
Potter County · of the 62 that report this measure · tied with 2
2of 59
Math — Meets
Potter County · of the 59 that report this measure
3of 62
Per-student spending
Potter County · of the 62 that report this measure
3of 59
Reading — Approaches
Potter County · of the 59 that report this measure
3of 54
Science — Masters
Potter County · of the 54 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
7 measures
4of 59
All Subjects — Approaches
Potter County · of the 59 that report this measure · tied with 1
4of 59
All Subjects — Meets
Potter County · of the 59 that report this measure
5of 59
Reading — Meets
Potter County · of the 59 that report this measure
5of 59
Reading — Masters
Potter County · of the 59 that report this measure
6of 59
Math — Masters
Potter County · of the 59 that report this measure
6of 54
Science — Meets
Potter County · of the 54 that report this measure · tied with 2
7of 54
Science — Approaches
Potter County · of the 54 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 188901141.