Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Wilson MS

Jefferson County · Region 05: Beaumont · 692 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
90/1002025-26
Change
+3 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+5.2 ptsvs 84.8 average · 1,288 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
369 of 1,288tied with 73 others
A90

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 86 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 84.8 average for 1,288 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 2 points

88 to 90 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 90 is 5.2 points above the 84.8 average among 1,288 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Relative Performance rose 4 points

82 to 86 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 86 is 6.4 points above the 79.6 average among 1,248 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
63%vs 59.1% avg · +3.9 pts
Masters
33%vs 27.7% avg · +5.3 pts

Among 1,252 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Wilson MS is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 84.8 average for 1,288 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 369th of 1,288 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 73 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageWilson MS 8783828890 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 86 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9084.8 1,288 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8885.0 1,262 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8283.3 1,243 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8383.8 1,231 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8785.6 1,213 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement90 A+4.6 vs similar economic context · 1,252 reporting
  • School Progress86 B+3.1 vs similar economic context · 1,248 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps91 A+8.8 vs similar economic context · 1,239 reporting
  • Academic Growth83 B+4.7 vs similar economic context · 1,229 reporting
  • Relative Performance86 B+6.4 vs similar economic context · 1,248 reporting
  • Wilson MS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,288 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement90A—
School Progress86B4
Closing the Gaps91A—
Academic Growth83B7
Relative Performance86B4

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (90), so School Progress (86) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 90.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level84%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,252 reporting
  • Meets grade level63%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,252 reporting
  • Masters grade level33%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,252 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level89%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,251 reporting
  • Meets grade level67%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,251 reporting
  • Masters grade level38%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,251 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level79%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,247 reporting
  • Meets grade level59%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,247 reporting
  • Masters grade level26%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,247 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level90%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,154 reporting
  • Meets grade level74%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,154 reporting
  • Masters grade level45%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,154 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level80%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 656 reporting
  • Meets grade level53%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 656 reporting
  • Masters grade level28%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 656 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,288 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
692
Economically disadvantaged
38.3%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
10.5%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
17.9%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.1%+0.2 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
13.8%+1.5 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Wilson MS

African American: 4.5%Hispanic: 29.6%White: 53.6%American Indian: 0.1%Asian: 7.4%Two or More Races: 4.8%
  • African American 4.5%
  • Hispanic 29.6%
  • White 53.6%
  • American Indian 0.1%
  • Asian 7.4%
  • Two or More Races 4.8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,288 reporting for every category shown · 1,288 in full cohort

African American: 9.2%Hispanic: 34.5%White: 46.3%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 5%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 4.5%
  • African American 9.2%
  • Hispanic 34.5%
  • White 46.3%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 5%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 4.5%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
692
Economically disadvantaged students
265
Emergent bilingual students
73
Special education students
124

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
61
Students in TEA mobility denominator
716
TEA-published mobility rate
8.5%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 692 students in 2025–26, an increase of 14 (2.1%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
692

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+14

Increase · +2.1%

Change since 2021–22
−114

Decrease · −14.1%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
692
Selected comparison
716.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,258 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Wilson MS
School yearStudents enrolledWilson MSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 806 First available year 724.6
2022–23 812 Increase of 6 (0.7%) 727.5
2023–24 640 Decrease of 172 (21.2%) 727.7
2024–25 678 Increase of 38 (5.9%) 723.9
2025–26 692 Increase of 14 (2.1%) 716.9

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
160

22.4% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
297

41.65 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
713

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
22.4%
Selected comparison
10.4%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,003 rated schools reporting

+12.0 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
41.65
Selected comparison
22.4

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,086 rated schools reporting

+19.3 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Wilson MS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 840 110 13.1% 209 24.88 8.7% 16.1
2021–22 853 182 21.3% 445 52.17 10.6% 22.5
2022–23 865 211 24.4% 576 66.59 11.1% 23.7
2023–24 675 146 21.6% 363 53.78 10.8% 24.1
2024–25 713 160 22.4% 297 41.65 10.4% 22.4
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Wilson MS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 160 22.4% 297 41.65 10.4% 22.4
In-school suspensions 144 20.2% 244 34.22 9.4% 17.3
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements 35 4.9% 45 6.31 3.8% 4.5
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$17k$29k20182020202220242025
  • Wilson MS
  • Parent district: Nederland ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$8,760
Selected comparison
$11,975

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,263 rated schools reporting

−$3,215 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $8,760 per student for this campus, $14,709 per student for its parent district, Nederland ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearWilson MSParent district: Nederland ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$6,679$9,892$13,054$7,734 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,154 rated schools reporting
2019$7,319$10,236$13,108$7,881 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,170 rated schools reporting
2020$7,771$13,761$14,058$8,245 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,176 rated schools reporting
2021$8,142$15,909$14,797$8,702 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,194 rated schools reporting
2022$8,249$21,094$15,708$9,934 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,213 rated schools reporting
2023$8,188$27,159$16,792$10,515 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,231 rated schools reporting
2024$9,216$19,212$18,125$11,726 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,244 rated schools reporting
2025$8,760$14,709$18,972$11,975 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,263 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$66,581−$939 vs similar economic context
Teachers
48±0.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.6+0.5 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Wilson MS

Beginning: 4.2%1 to 5 years: 26.5%6 to 10 years: 16.6%11 to 20 years: 29.3%21 to 30 years: 14.7%Over 30 years: 8.4%
  • Beginning 4.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 26.5%
  • 6 to 10 years 16.6%
  • 11 to 20 years 29.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 14.7%
  • Over 30 years 8.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,288 reporting for every category shown · 1,288 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.2%1 to 5 years: 23.2%6 to 10 years: 19.5%11 to 20 years: 31.3%21 to 30 years: 17%Over 30 years: 3.6%
  • Beginning 5.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 23.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 31.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 17%
  • Over 30 years 3.6%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Wilson MS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classWilson MS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 622.518.3
Secondary English14.916
Secondary math16.917
Secondary science22.218.4
Secondary social studies2318.4

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

1 measure

  • 2of 47

    Science — Masters

    Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

19 measures

  • 4of 47

    Reading — Masters

    Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 4of 47

    Science — Meets

    Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure

  • 5of 47

    All Subjects — Masters

    Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure

  • 5of 47

    Reading — Approaches

    Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 6of 53

    Overall score

    Jefferson County · of the 53 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 6of 47

    Closing the Gaps

    Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 6of 47

    Math — Masters

    Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure

  • 6of 47

    Science — Approaches

    Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 7of 47

    Student Achievement

    Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure

  • 7of 47

    Reading — Meets

    Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 7of 47

    Math — Meets

    Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure

  • 8of 47

    Academic Growth

    Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure

  • 8of 47

    Relative Performance

    Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 8of 47

    All Subjects — Meets

    Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 8of 20

    Social Studies — Meets

    Jefferson County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 8of 20

    Social Studies — Masters

    Jefferson County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 9of 47

    School Progress

    Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 9of 47

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Jefferson County · of the 47 that report this measure

  • 9of 20

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Jefferson County · of the 20 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 123905042.