+6.1 ptsvs 86.9 average · 1,081 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
149 of 1,081tied with 63 others
Score vs region
+9.7 ptsvs 83.3 average · 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston
Region 04: Houston placement
131 of 1,303tied with 53 others
Score vs county
+9.6 ptsvs 83.4 average · 911 rated schools in Harris County
Harris County placement
98 of 911tied with 31 others
Score vs similar-size group
+10.2 ptsvs 82.8 average · 1,808 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
152 of 1,808tied with 71 others
Score vs state
+11.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
588 of 7,646tied with 249 others
A93
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is flat; under the rules in force back then it scored 95 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 86.9 average for 1,081 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston.The current score is above the 83.4 average for 911 rated schools in Harris County.The current score is above the 82.8 average for 1,808 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
76%vs 63.6% avg · +12.4 pts
Masters
48%vs 31.5% avg · +16.5 pts
Among 1,058 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Willow Wood JH is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 86.9 average for 1,081 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 149th of 1,081 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 63 others).
Willow Wood JH is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 131st of 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston (tied with 53 others).
Willow Wood JH is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.4 average for 911 rated schools in Harris County. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 98th of 911 rated schools in Harris County (tied with 31 others).
Willow Wood JH is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.8 average for 1,808 similarly sized rated schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 152nd of 1,808 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 71 others).
Willow Wood JH is rated A by TEA, scoring 93 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 95 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement93 A+5.4 vs similar economic context · 1,058 reporting
School Progress92 A+8.0 vs similar economic context · 1,056 reporting
Closing the Gaps94 A+9.6 vs similar economic context · 1,048 reporting
Academic Growth92 A+12.0 vs similar economic context · 1,038 reporting
Relative Performance91 A+11.0 vs similar economic context · 1,056 reporting
Willow Wood JH
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,081 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
93
A
—
School Progress
92
A
—
Closing the Gaps
94
A
—
Academic Growth
92
A
—
Relative Performance
91
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (93), so
School Progress (92) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 93.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level90%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,058 reporting
Meets grade level76%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,058 reporting
Masters grade level48%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,058 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level93%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,057 reporting
Meets grade level78%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,057 reporting
Masters grade level51%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,057 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level92%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,055 reporting
Meets grade level83%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,055 reporting
Masters grade level50%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,055 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level90%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 966 reporting
Meets grade level77%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 966 reporting
Masters grade level55%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 966 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level78%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 546 reporting
Meets grade level58%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 546 reporting
Masters grade level35%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 546 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,081 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
1,172
Economically disadvantaged
31.5%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
11.3%+1.0 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
14.2%−3.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.4%+0.2 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
10.6%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Willow Wood JH
African American 8.4%
Hispanic 32.5%
White 39.1%
American Indian 0.1%
Asian 15.2%
Two or More Races 4.7%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,081 reporting for every category shown · 1,081 in full cohort
African American 9.1%
Hispanic 30.5%
White 48%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 7.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
African American 19.1%
Hispanic 53.8%
White 16.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Harris County · 911 reporting for every category shown · 911 in full cohort
African American 19.3%
Hispanic 59.1%
White 13.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 1,808 reporting for every category shown · 1,808 in full cohort
African American 12.9%
Hispanic 51%
White 24.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 7.4%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
1,172
Economically disadvantaged students
369
Emergent bilingual students
132
Special education students
166
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
66
Students in TEA mobility denominator
922
TEA-published mobility rate
7.2%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 1,172 students in 2025–26, an increase of 288 (32.6%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
1,172
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+288
Increase · +32.6%
Change since 2021–22
+343
Increase · +41.4%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
1,172
Selected comparison
787.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,068 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Willow Wood JH
School year
Students enrolledWillow Wood JH
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
829
First available year
799.5
2022–23
834
Increase of 5 (0.6%)
802.3
2023–24
844
Increase of 10 (1.2%)
799.3
2024–25
884
Increase of 40 (4.7%)
795.9
2025–26
1,172
Increase of 288 (32.6%)
787.4
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
36
3.9% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
58
6.35 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
914
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
3.9%
Selected comparison
9.1%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 815 rated schools reporting
−5.2 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
6.35
Selected comparison
18.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 898 rated schools reporting
−12.5 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Willow Wood JH
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
1,583
107
6.8%
196
12.38
7.4%
13.3
2021–22
873
80
9.2%
158
18.10
9.6%
19.6
2022–23
864
91
10.5%
204
23.61
9.8%
20.2
2023–24
874
76
8.7%
184
21.05
9.4%
20.1
2024–25
914
36
3.9%
58
6.35
9.1%
18.8
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Willow Wood JH in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
36
3.9%
58
6.35
9.1%
18.8
In-school suspensions
36
3.9%
44
4.81
8.2%
14.6
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Willow Wood JH
Parent district: Tomball ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$8,470
Selected comparison
$11,757
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,060 rated schools reporting
−$3,287 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $8,470 per student for this campus, $21,509 per student for its parent district, Tomball ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Willow Wood JH
Parent district: Tomball ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$5,709
$11,700
$13,054
$7,649
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 954 rated schools reporting
2019
$5,325
$11,319
$13,108
$7,788
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 971 rated schools reporting
2020
$5,439
$15,650
$14,058
$8,122
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 981 rated schools reporting
2021
$5,896
$18,409
$14,797
$8,537
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 993 rated schools reporting
2022
$8,030
$14,749
$15,708
$9,772
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,013 rated schools reporting
2023
$8,383
$14,385
$16,792
$10,334
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,031 rated schools reporting
2024
$8,638
$19,421
$18,125
$11,445
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,043 rated schools reporting
2025
$8,470
$21,509
$18,972
$11,757
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,060 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$72,811+$4,672 vs similar economic context
Teachers
65+13.8 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
18+3.5 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Willow Wood JH
Beginning 0.5%
1 to 5 years 25.8%
6 to 10 years 12.1%
11 to 20 years 39%
21 to 30 years 19.8%
Over 30 years 2.9%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,081 reporting for every category shown · 1,081 in full cohort
Beginning 4.9%
1 to 5 years 22.5%
6 to 10 years 19.7%
11 to 20 years 32.2%
21 to 30 years 17.3%
Over 30 years 3.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
Beginning 7.7%
1 to 5 years 27.3%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 13.5%
Over 30 years 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Harris County · 911 reporting for every category shown · 911 in full cohort
Beginning 8.9%
1 to 5 years 28.4%
6 to 10 years 20.3%
11 to 20 years 26.2%
21 to 30 years 13%
Over 30 years 2.5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 1,808 reporting for every category shown · 1,808 in full cohort
Beginning 6.4%
1 to 5 years 27.1%
6 to 10 years 20.5%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 14.2%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Willow Wood JH in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classWillow Wood JH · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English
19.9
16.6
Secondary languages other than English
21.9
18.6
Secondary math
23.3
17.4
Secondary science
23.6
18.9
Secondary social studies
24.9
18.9
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
6 measures
28of 1,055
Math — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,055 that report this measure · tied with 3
39of 1,055
Math — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,055 that report this measure · tied with 4
220of 7,090
Academic Growth
Texas average · of the 7,090 that report this measure · tied with 125
325of 6,717
Science — Masters
Texas average · of the 6,717 that report this measure · tied with 24
339of 7,185
Closing the Gaps
Texas average · of the 7,185 that report this measure · tied with 136 · full ranking
344of 7,260
All Subjects — Masters
Texas average · of the 7,260 that report this measure · tied with 40
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101921043.