+8.2 ptsvs 90.8 average · 668 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1 of 668tied with 5 others
Score vs region
+16.8 ptsvs 82.2 average · 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson
Region 10: Richardson placement
2 of 1,157tied with 3 others
Score vs county
+17.6 ptsvs 81.4 average · 563 rated schools in Dallas County
Dallas County placement
2 of 563tied with 3 others
Score vs similar-size group
+18.8 ptsvs 80.2 average · 4,761 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
3 of 4,761tied with 23 others
Score vs state
+17.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
5 of 7,646tied with 29 others
A99
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 92 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 90.8 average for 668 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson.The current score is above the 81.4 average for 563 rated schools in Dallas County.The current score is above the 80.2 average for 4,761 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Current strength
Overall score above the similar-context average
99+8.2 pts vs 90.8
99 is 8.2 points above
the 90.8 average among 668 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Tied for 1st of 668 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 6 schools share that value.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
William B Travis Vanguard Acad of Academically Tag is rated A by TEA, scoring 99 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 90.8 average for 668 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1st of 668 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 5 others).
William B Travis Vanguard Acad of Academically Tag is rated A by TEA, scoring 99 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2nd of 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson (tied with 3 others).
William B Travis Vanguard Acad of Academically Tag is rated A by TEA, scoring 99 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.4 average for 563 rated schools in Dallas County. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2nd of 563 rated schools in Dallas County (tied with 3 others).
William B Travis Vanguard Acad of Academically Tag is rated A by TEA, scoring 99 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.2 average for 4,761 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 3rd of 4,761 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 23 others).
William B Travis Vanguard Acad of Academically Tag is rated A by TEA, scoring 99 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 2 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 92 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement99 A+7.2 vs similar economic context · 658 reporting
School Progress98 A+10.9 vs similar economic context · 656 reporting
Closing the Gaps98 A+9.6 vs similar economic context · 654 reporting
Academic Growth97 A+11.7 vs similar economic context · 653 reporting
Relative Performance98 A+19.3 vs similar economic context · 656 reporting
William B Travis Vanguard Acad of Academically Tag
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (668 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
99
A
—
School Progress
98
A
—
Closing the Gaps
98
A
—
Academic Growth
97
A
—
Relative Performance
98
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (99), so
School Progress (98) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 99.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level100%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 658 reporting
Meets grade level99%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 658 reporting
Masters grade level88%+45 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 658 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level100%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 658 reporting
Meets grade level100%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 658 reporting
Masters grade level95%+49 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 658 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level100%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 656 reporting
Meets grade level98%+28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 656 reporting
Masters grade level80%+41 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 656 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level100%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 616 reporting
Meets grade level99%+31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 616 reporting
Masters grade level88%+46 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 616 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level100%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 247 reporting
Meets grade level96%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 247 reporting
Masters grade level88%+43 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 247 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (668 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
536
Economically disadvantaged
13.8%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
3.0%−7.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
2.1%−13.8 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
97.3%+1.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
1.0%−6.1 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
William B Travis Vanguard Acad of Academically Tag
African American 4.9%
Hispanic 26.9%
White 47.6%
American Indian 1.7%
Asian 9.7%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 9.1%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 668 reporting for every category shown · 668 in full cohort
African American 6.4%
Hispanic 20.5%
White 48%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 19.1%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
African American 17.4%
Hispanic 43.5%
White 24.5%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 9.9%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Dallas County · 563 reporting for every category shown · 563 in full cohort
African American 21.3%
Hispanic 59%
White 10.9%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,761 reporting for every category shown · 4,761 in full cohort
African American 12.2%
Hispanic 54.9%
White 24.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.5%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
536
Economically disadvantaged students
74
Emergent bilingual students
16
Special education students
11
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
5
Students in TEA mobility denominator
518
TEA-published mobility rate
1%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 536 students in 2025–26, an increase of 19 (3.7%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
536
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+19
Increase · +3.7%
Change since 2021–22
+38
Increase · +7.6%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
536
Selected comparison
866.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 664 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for William B Travis Vanguard Acad of Academically Tag
School year
Students enrolledWilliam B Travis Vanguard Acad of Academically Tag
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
498
First available year
882.1
2022–23
502
Increase of 4 (0.8%)
898.9
2023–24
501
Decrease of 1 (0.2%)
882.8
2024–25
517
Increase of 16 (3.2%)
876.2
2025–26
536
Increase of 19 (3.7%)
866.4
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Not reported
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
517
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for William B Travis Vanguard Acad of Academically Tag
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
501
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2021–22
502
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2022–23
503
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2023–24
503
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2024–25
517
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for William B Travis Vanguard Acad of Academically Tag in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
William B Travis Vanguard Acad of Academically Tag
Parent district: Dallas ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$9,530
Selected comparison
$10,854
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 660 rated schools reporting
−$1,324 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $9,530 per student for this campus, $23,271 per student for its parent district, Dallas ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
William B Travis Vanguard Acad of Academically Tag
Parent district: Dallas ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$8,602
$13,363
$13,054
$7,313
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 569 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,350
$13,990
$13,108
$7,411
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 586 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,608
$14,981
$14,058
$7,720
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 600 rated schools reporting
2021
$8,473
$17,075
$14,797
$8,297
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 609 rated schools reporting
2022
$14,018
$18,716
$15,708
$9,518
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 618 rated schools reporting
2023
$9,835
$20,932
$16,792
$9,715
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 629 rated schools reporting
2024
$9,388
$22,990
$18,125
$10,769
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 646 rated schools reporting
2025
$9,530
$23,271
$18,972
$10,854
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 660 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$83,005+$13,709 vs similar economic context
Teachers
31−24.6 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
17.3+2.4 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
William B Travis Vanguard Acad of Academically Tag
Beginning 6.5%
1 to 5 years 14.5%
6 to 10 years 29%
11 to 20 years 22.6%
21 to 30 years 21%
Over 30 years 6.5%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 668 reporting for every category shown · 668 in full cohort
Beginning 4.4%
1 to 5 years 23.2%
6 to 10 years 20.1%
11 to 20 years 32.5%
21 to 30 years 17%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
Beginning 6.9%
1 to 5 years 29%
6 to 10 years 20.1%
11 to 20 years 27.5%
21 to 30 years 13.7%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Dallas County · 563 reporting for every category shown · 563 in full cohort
Beginning 7.5%
1 to 5 years 30.2%
6 to 10 years 21.2%
11 to 20 years 26.5%
21 to 30 years 11.9%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,761 reporting for every category shown · 4,761 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 26.3%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.7%
Over 30 years 3.1%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for William B Travis Vanguard Acad of Academically Tag in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classWilliam B Travis Vanguard Acad of Academically Tag · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 4
23.8
20.4
Grade 5
23
22.2
Grade 6
22.8
19.3
Secondary English
22.7
18.4
Secondary languages other than English
20
20.8
Secondary math
22.2
18.5
Secondary science
22
21.2
Secondary social studies
22
21.3
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 8 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 120 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
12 measures
1of 7,260
All Subjects — Approaches
Texas average · of the 7,260 that report this measure · tied with 24
1of 7,254
Reading — Approaches
Texas average · of the 7,254 that report this measure · tied with 32
1of 7,254
Reading — Meets
Texas average · of the 7,254 that report this measure · tied with 6
1of 7,227
Math — Approaches
Texas average · of the 7,227 that report this measure · tied with 37
1of 4,149
Science — Approaches
Similar size · of the 4,149 that report this measure · tied with 59
1of 668
Overall score
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 668 that report this measure · tied with 5
1of 658
Student Achievement
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 658 that report this measure · tied with 3
1of 658
All Subjects — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 658 that report this measure · tied with 1
1of 656
School Progress
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 656 that report this measure · tied with 5
1of 656
Relative Performance
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 656 that report this measure · tied with 3
1of 656
Math — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 656 that report this measure · tied with 1
1of 616
Science — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 616 that report this measure · tied with 2
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
6 measures
2of 7,254
Reading — Masters
Texas average · of the 7,254 that report this measure · tied with 1
2of 4,557
All Subjects — Masters
Similar size · of the 4,557 that report this measure
2of 4,557
Math — Masters
Similar size · of the 4,557 that report this measure
2of 1,089
Academic Growth
Region 10: Richardson · of the 1,089 that report this measure · tied with 1
2of 552
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Dallas County · of the 552 that report this measure
3of 1,037
Science — Masters
Region 10: Richardson · of the 1,037 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
4 measures
4of 247
Social Studies — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 247 that report this measure
5of 552
Attendance
Dallas County · of the 552 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 549
Closing the Gaps
Dallas County · of the 549 that report this measure · tied with 7
8of 247
Social Studies — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 247 that report this measure · tied with 4
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 057905217.