Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
Westhoff ElemB82vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
Westhoff Elem
Dewitt County · Region 03: Victoria · 92 students
Current score
82/1002025-26
Change
−7 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+0.3 ptsvs 81.7 average · 1,752 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
869 of 1,752tied with 70 others
Score vs region
+2.2 ptsvs 79.8 average · 129 rated schools in Region 03: Victoria
Region 03: Victoria placement
64 of 129tied with 4 others
Score vs county
−0.6 ptsvs 82.6 average · 16 rated schools in Dewitt County
Dewitt County placement
12 of 16among reporting schools
Score vs similar-size group
+0.2 ptsvs 81.8 average · 338 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
180 of 338tied with 12 others
Score vs state
+0.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
3,846 of 7,646tied with 294 others
B82
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 91 in 2021-22. The current score is level with the 81.7 average for 1,752 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 79.8 average for 129 rated schools in Region 03: Victoria.The current score is below the 82.6 average for 16 rated schools in Dewitt County.The current score is level with the 81.8 average for 338 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
57%vs 52.4% avg · +4.6 pts
Masters
26%vs 22.5% avg · +3.5 pts
Among 1,690 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Westhoff Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 81.7 average for 1,752 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 869th of 1,752 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 70 others).
Westhoff Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.8 average for 129 rated schools in Region 03: Victoria. It is down 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 64th of 129 rated schools in Region 03: Victoria (tied with 4 others).
Westhoff Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 82.6 average for 16 rated schools in Dewitt County. It is down 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 12th of 16 rated schools in Dewitt County.
Westhoff Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 81.8 average for 338 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 7 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 180th of 338 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 12 others).
Westhoff Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 82 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 7 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 91 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement86 B+4.9 vs similar economic context · 1,690 reporting
School Progress85 B+3.6 vs similar economic context · 1,684 reporting
Closing the Gaps73 C−6.0 vs similar economic context · 1,670 reporting
Academic Growth71 C−4.4 vs similar economic context · 1,647 reporting
Relative Performance85 B+5.7 vs similar economic context · 1,684 reporting
Westhoff Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,752 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
86
B
4
School Progress
85
B
5
Closing the Gaps
73
C
7
Academic Growth
71
C
9
Relative Performance
85
B
5
Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 4 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (86), so
School Progress (85) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 86.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level87%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,690 reporting
Meets grade level57%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,690 reporting
Masters grade level26%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,690 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level89%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,688 reporting
Meets grade level64%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,688 reporting
Masters grade level36%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,688 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level82%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,682 reporting
Meets grade level48%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,682 reporting
Masters grade level13%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,682 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level94%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,556 reporting
Meets grade level47%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,556 reporting
Masters grade level35%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,556 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level100%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 880 reporting
Meets grade level86%+37 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 880 reporting
Masters grade level29%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 880 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,752 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
92
Economically disadvantaged
52.2%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
12.0%−1.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
8.7%−10.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.2%+1.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
5.3%−9.4 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Westhoff Elem
African American 5.4%
Hispanic 44.6%
White 50%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,752 reporting for every category shown · 1,752 in full cohort
African American 9.7%
Hispanic 42.2%
White 40.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.9%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 03: Victoria · 129 reporting for every category shown · 129 in full cohort
African American 6%
Hispanic 57.6%
White 33.3%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 0.7%
Two or More Races 2.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Dewitt County · 16 reporting for every category shown · 16 in full cohort
African American 4.6%
Hispanic 52.1%
White 40.4%
American Indian 0.1%
Asian 0.6%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.1%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 338 reporting for every category shown · 338 in full cohort
African American 7.1%
Hispanic 46.7%
White 42.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 0.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.9%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
92
Economically disadvantaged students
48
Emergent bilingual students
11
Special education students
8
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
11
Students in TEA mobility denominator
78
TEA-published mobility rate
14.1%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA did not publish an enrollment count for 2025–26 in this PEIMS report, so no current year-over-year change is calculated. The latest available PEIMS count is 85 students in 2024–25.
Latest available PEIMS enrollment
85
2024–25
Change since 2021–22
+14
Increase · +19.7%
Enrollment in 2024–25
This school
85
Selected comparison
647.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,693 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Westhoff Elem
School year
Students enrolledWesthoff Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
71
First available year
644.6
2022–23
81
Increase of 10 (14.1%)
650.6
2023–24
88
Increase of 7 (8.6%)
650.8
2024–25
85
Decrease of 3 (3.4%)
647.2
2025–26
Not reported
Not available
—
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Suppressed
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
96
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Westhoff Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
73
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2021–22
78
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2022–23
83
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2023–24
94
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2024–25
96
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Westhoff Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Westhoff Elem
Parent district: Westhoff ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$20,894
Selected comparison
$12,158
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,724 rated schools reporting
+$8,736 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $20,894 per student for this campus, $30,683 per student for its parent district, Westhoff ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Westhoff Elem
Parent district: Westhoff ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$14,285
$18,859
$13,054
$7,869
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,603 rated schools reporting
2019
$13,265
$17,303
$13,108
$8,053
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,619 rated schools reporting
2020
$16,582
$20,675
$14,058
$8,592
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,633 rated schools reporting
2021
$20,170
$31,098
$14,797
$8,992
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,649 rated schools reporting
2022
$34,083
$39,371
$15,708
$10,277
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,659 rated schools reporting
2023
$21,544
$25,425
$16,792
$10,776
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,676 rated schools reporting
2024
$18,990
$23,863
$18,125
$11,709
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,700 rated schools reporting
2025
$20,894
$30,683
$18,972
$12,158
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,724 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$67,666+$975 vs similar economic context
Teachers
7−35.1 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12.8−6.8 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Westhoff Elem
1 to 5 years 34.7%
11 to 20 years 26.4%
21 to 30 years 38.9%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,752 reporting for every category shown · 1,752 in full cohort
Beginning 5.8%
1 to 5 years 24.7%
6 to 10 years 19.3%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 16.6%
Over 30 years 4.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 03: Victoria · 129 reporting for every category shown · 129 in full cohort
Beginning 7.1%
1 to 5 years 24.6%
6 to 10 years 15.4%
11 to 20 years 29.3%
21 to 30 years 17.1%
Over 30 years 6.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Dewitt County · 16 reporting for every category shown · 16 in full cohort
Beginning 4.1%
1 to 5 years 25%
6 to 10 years 12.3%
11 to 20 years 32.1%
21 to 30 years 19.3%
Over 30 years 7.4%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 338 reporting for every category shown · 338 in full cohort
Beginning 7%
1 to 5 years 22.9%
6 to 10 years 16.2%
11 to 20 years 26.3%
21 to 30 years 18%
Over 30 years 7.3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Westhoff Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classWesthoff Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
9
18
Grade 1
10
18.3
Grade 2
13
18.5
Grade 3
12
18.9
Grade 4
10
19
Grade 5
12
19.9
Grade 6
15
17.7
Secondary English
7
15
Secondary math
7
15.9
Secondary science
7
17.4
Secondary social studies
7
17.4
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 11 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 117 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
1 measure
1of 12
Reading — Approaches
Dewitt County · of the 12 that report this measure
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
9 measures
2of 14
Attendance
Dewitt County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1
2of 14
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Dewitt County · of the 14 that report this measure
2of 12
Reading — Meets
Dewitt County · of the 12 that report this measure · tied with 1
2of 12
Reading — Masters
Dewitt County · of the 12 that report this measure
2of 12
Science — Approaches
Dewitt County · of the 12 that report this measure
2of 12
Science — Masters
Dewitt County · of the 12 that report this measure
3of 66
Social Studies — Meets
Region 03: Victoria · of the 66 that report this measure
3of 15
Per-student spending
Dewitt County · of the 15 that report this measure
3of 13
All Subjects — Approaches
Dewitt County · of the 13 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
11 measures
4of 13
Relative Performance
Dewitt County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1
4of 13
All Subjects — Masters
Dewitt County · of the 13 that report this measure
4of 12
Math — Approaches
Dewitt County · of the 12 that report this measure
4of 12
Math — Meets
Dewitt County · of the 12 that report this measure · tied with 2
5of 13
All Subjects — Meets
Dewitt County · of the 13 that report this measure
6of 13
Student Achievement
Dewitt County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1
6of 13
School Progress
Dewitt County · of the 13 that report this measure · tied with 1
6of 12
Math — Masters
Dewitt County · of the 12 that report this measure
6of 12
Science — Meets
Dewitt County · of the 12 that report this measure
8of 12
Academic Growth
Dewitt County · of the 12 that report this measure
10of 12
Closing the Gaps
Dewitt County · of the 12 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 062905101.