Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
Wellington ElemA92vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
Wellington Elem
Denton County · Region 11: Fort Worth · 719 students
Current score
92/1002025-26
Change
−2 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+0.4 ptsvs 91.6 average · 421 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
202 of 421tied with 46 others
Score vs region
+11.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth
Region 11: Fort Worth placement
90 of 839tied with 31 others
Score vs county
+12.0 ptsvs 80 average · 179 rated schools in Denton County
Denton County placement
14 of 179tied with 7 others
Score vs similar-size group
+11.3 ptsvs 80.7 average · 4,221 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
368 of 4,221tied with 171 others
Score vs state
+10.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
838 of 7,646tied with 318 others
A92
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 90 in 2021-22. The current score is level with the 91.6 average for 421 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth.The current score is above the 80 average for 179 rated schools in Denton County.The current score is above the 80.7 average for 4,221 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
82%vs 76.3% avg · +5.7 pts
Masters
52%vs 47.1% avg · +4.9 pts
Among 413 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Wellington Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 91.6 average for 421 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 202nd of 421 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 46 others).
Wellington Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.5 average for 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 90th of 839 rated schools in Region 11: Fort Worth (tied with 31 others).
Wellington Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80 average for 179 rated schools in Denton County. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 14th of 179 rated schools in Denton County (tied with 7 others).
Wellington Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.7 average for 4,221 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 368th of 4,221 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 171 others).
Wellington Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 2 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 90 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement94 A+1.3 vs similar economic context · 413 reporting
School Progress87 B−0.9 vs similar economic context · 411 reporting
Closing the Gaps88 B−1.2 vs similar economic context · 408 reporting
Academic Growth87 B+0.5 vs similar economic context · 408 reporting
Relative Performance81 B+3.1 vs similar economic context · 411 reporting
Wellington Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (421 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
94
A
—
School Progress
87
B
3
Closing the Gaps
88
B
2
Academic Growth
87
B
3
Relative Performance
81
B
9
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 2 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (94), so
School Progress (87) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 94.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level94%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 413 reporting
Meets grade level82%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 413 reporting
Masters grade level52%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 413 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level97%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 413 reporting
Meets grade level88%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 413 reporting
Masters grade level59%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 413 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level91%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 411 reporting
Meets grade level79%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 411 reporting
Masters grade level45%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 411 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level94%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 381 reporting
Meets grade level76%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 381 reporting
Masters grade level56%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 381 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (421 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
719
Economically disadvantaged
5.9%−3.2 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
12.2%+1.2 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
17.6%+2.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.6%+0.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
2.8%−3.5 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Wellington Elem
African American 3.1%
Hispanic 24.9%
White 46.1%
American Indian 0.7%
Asian 17.9%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 7.3%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 421 reporting for every category shown · 421 in full cohort
African American 4.7%
Hispanic 17.2%
White 48.3%
American Indian 0.5%
Asian 23.6%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
African American 15.4%
Hispanic 39.6%
White 34.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.3%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 4.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Denton County · 179 reporting for every category shown · 179 in full cohort
African American 13.9%
Hispanic 33.2%
White 36.5%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 10.1%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 5.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,221 reporting for every category shown · 4,221 in full cohort
African American 12.3%
Hispanic 53.9%
White 24.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
716
Economically disadvantaged students
42
Emergent bilingual students
87
Special education students
126
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
23
Students in TEA mobility denominator
639
TEA-published mobility rate
3.6%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 719 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 12 (1.6%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
719
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−12
Decrease · −1.6%
Change since 2021–22
−33
Decrease · −4.4%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
719
Selected comparison
860.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 416 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Wellington Elem
School year
Students enrolledWellington Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
752
First available year
868.6
2022–23
739
Decrease of 13 (1.7%)
889.8
2023–24
726
Decrease of 13 (1.8%)
878.1
2024–25
731
Increase of 5 (0.7%)
871
2025–26
719
Decrease of 12 (1.6%)
860.2
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
18
2.4% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
31
4.18 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
741
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
2.4%
Selected comparison
4.6%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 232 rated schools reporting
−2.2 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
4.18
Selected comparison
7.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 277 rated schools reporting
−3.4 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Wellington Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
837
Suppressed
—
12
1.43
—
5
2021–22
771
25
3.2%
39
5.06
4.6%
7.6
2022–23
750
Suppressed
—
16
2.13
—
7.5
2023–24
736
28
3.8%
40
5.43
4.6%
7.7
2024–25
741
18
2.4%
31
4.18
4.6%
7.6
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Wellington Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
18
2.4%
31
4.18
4.6%
7.6
In-school suspensions
18
2.4%
27
3.64
4.3%
6.1
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Wellington Elem
Parent district: Lewisville ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$8,186
Selected comparison
$10,874
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 412 rated schools reporting
−$2,688 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $8,186 per student for this campus, $19,986 per student for its parent district, Lewisville ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Wellington Elem
Parent district: Lewisville ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,278
$13,687
$13,054
$7,199
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 347 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,098
$15,471
$13,108
$7,348
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 356 rated schools reporting
2020
$6,651
$18,091
$14,058
$7,651
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 366 rated schools reporting
2021
$6,978
$17,403
$14,797
$8,279
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 376 rated schools reporting
2022
$13,185
$16,558
$15,708
$9,546
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 383 rated schools reporting
2023
$8,523
$17,007
$16,792
$9,496
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 389 rated schools reporting
2024
$7,906
$18,110
$18,125
$10,216
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 402 rated schools reporting
2025
$8,186
$19,986
$18,972
$10,874
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 412 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$71,702+$2,193 vs similar economic context
Teachers
53−2.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
13.4−1.4 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Wellington Elem
Beginning 3.8%
1 to 5 years 15.2%
6 to 10 years 7.5%
11 to 20 years 41.5%
21 to 30 years 29.5%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 421 reporting for every category shown · 421 in full cohort
Beginning 4.2%
1 to 5 years 23.8%
6 to 10 years 19.9%
11 to 20 years 31.7%
21 to 30 years 17%
Over 30 years 2.5%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 11: Fort Worth · 839 reporting for every category shown · 839 in full cohort
Beginning 5.6%
1 to 5 years 24%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 30%
21 to 30 years 16.7%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Denton County · 179 reporting for every category shown · 179 in full cohort
Beginning 4.6%
1 to 5 years 25.7%
6 to 10 years 21.2%
11 to 20 years 29.4%
21 to 30 years 16.8%
Over 30 years 2.4%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,221 reporting for every category shown · 4,221 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.6%
6 to 10 years 20%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.2%
Over 30 years 2.9%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Wellington Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classWellington Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
16.8
19
Grade 1
18.3
19.2
Grade 2
17.5
19.6
Grade 3
19.7
21.7
Grade 4
19.6
20.4
Grade 5
23.5
22.4
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
2 measures
2of 174
Reading — Meets
Denton County · of the 174 that report this measure · tied with 2
3of 174
Reading — Approaches
Denton County · of the 174 that report this measure · tied with 1
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
6 measures
6of 174
All Subjects — Meets
Denton County · of the 174 that report this measure · tied with 1
7of 174
All Subjects — Masters
Denton County · of the 174 that report this measure · tied with 2
7of 174
Reading — Masters
Denton County · of the 174 that report this measure · tied with 1
7of 174
Math — Meets
Denton County · of the 174 that report this measure · tied with 2
8of 174
All Subjects — Approaches
Denton County · of the 174 that report this measure · tied with 2
10of 170
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Denton County · of the 170 that report this measure · tied with 1
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
3 measures
30of 815
Attendance
Region 11: Fort Worth · of the 815 that report this measure · tied with 6
30of 730
Science — Masters
Region 11: Fort Worth · of the 730 that report this measure · tied with 5
37of 810
Math — Masters
Region 11: Fort Worth · of the 810 that report this measure · tied with 2
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 061902130.