+12.0 ptsvs 80 average · 2,003 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
154 of 2,003tied with 39 others
Score vs region
+9.8 ptsvs 82.2 average · 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson
Region 10: Richardson placement
161 of 1,157tied with 55 others
Score vs county
+10.6 ptsvs 81.4 average · 563 rated schools in Dallas County
Dallas County placement
66 of 563tied with 12 others
Score vs similar-size group
+11.8 ptsvs 80.2 average · 4,745 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
404 of 4,745tied with 170 others
Score vs state
+10.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
838 of 7,646tied with 318 others
A92
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is flat; under the rules in force back then it scored 93 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 80 average for 2,003 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson.The current score is above the 81.4 average for 563 rated schools in Dallas County.The current score is above the 80.2 average for 4,745 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
71%vs 48.1% avg · +22.9 pts
Masters
46%vs 19.6% avg · +26.4 pts
Among 1,898 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Watson Technology Center is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80 average for 2,003 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 154th of 2,003 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 39 others).
Watson Technology Center is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 161st of 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson (tied with 55 others).
Watson Technology Center is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.4 average for 563 rated schools in Dallas County. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 66th of 563 rated schools in Dallas County (tied with 12 others).
Watson Technology Center is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.2 average for 4,745 similarly sized rated schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 404th of 4,745 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 170 others).
Watson Technology Center is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 93 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement92 A+14.1 vs similar economic context · 1,898 reporting
School Progress92 A+11.2 vs similar economic context · 1,890 reporting
Closing the Gaps91 A+13.8 vs similar economic context · 1,871 reporting
Academic Growth92 A+18.1 vs similar economic context · 1,831 reporting
Relative Performance92 A+12.8 vs similar economic context · 1,890 reporting
Watson Technology Center
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,003 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
92
A
—
School Progress
92
A
—
Closing the Gaps
91
A
—
Academic Growth
92
A
—
Relative Performance
92
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level88%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,898 reporting
Meets grade level71%+23 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,898 reporting
Masters grade level46%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,898 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level89%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
Meets grade level78%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
Masters grade level57%+36 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level89%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,885 reporting
Meets grade level74%+32 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,885 reporting
Masters grade level45%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,885 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level80%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,734 reporting
Meets grade level47%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,734 reporting
Masters grade level22%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,734 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,003 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
561
Economically disadvantaged
64.5%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
38.9%+21.2 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
11.6%−7.2 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.2%+2.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
6.3%−10.4 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Watson Technology Center
African American 14.6%
Hispanic 55.7%
White 12.5%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 13.2%
Two or More Races 3.8%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,003 reporting for every category shown · 2,003 in full cohort
African American 11.2%
Hispanic 51.5%
White 30.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.7%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
African American 17.4%
Hispanic 43.5%
White 24.5%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 9.9%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Dallas County · 563 reporting for every category shown · 563 in full cohort
African American 21.3%
Hispanic 59%
White 10.9%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,745 reporting for every category shown · 4,745 in full cohort
African American 12.2%
Hispanic 54.8%
White 24.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.5%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.5%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
560
Economically disadvantaged students
361
Emergent bilingual students
218
Special education students
65
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
23
Students in TEA mobility denominator
482
TEA-published mobility rate
4.8%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 561 students in 2025–26, an increase of 32 (6.0%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
561
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+32
Increase · +6.0%
Change since 2021–22
+33
Increase · +6.3%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
561
Selected comparison
624.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,969 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Watson Technology Center
School year
Students enrolledWatson Technology Center
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
528
First available year
640.4
2022–23
527
Decrease of 1 (0.2%)
647
2023–24
553
Increase of 26 (4.9%)
643
2024–25
529
Decrease of 24 (4.3%)
638.4
2025–26
561
Increase of 32 (6.0%)
624.4
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Suppressed
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
534
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Watson Technology Center
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
571
Suppressed
—
18
3.15
—
19.4
2021–22
537
15
2.8%
23
4.28
12.9%
30.1
2022–23
538
10
1.9%
15
2.79
13.4%
32.2
2023–24
570
10
1.8%
15
2.63
13.2%
31.8
2024–25
534
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Watson Technology Center in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Watson Technology Center
Parent district: Garland ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$9,330
Selected comparison
$12,669
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,976 rated schools reporting
−$3,339 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $9,330 per student for this campus, $18,172 per student for its parent district, Garland ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Watson Technology Center
Parent district: Garland ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,665
$13,522
$13,054
$7,916
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,834 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,368
$11,776
$13,108
$8,070
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,850 rated schools reporting
2020
$6,532
$11,425
$14,058
$8,656
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,872 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,307
$12,273
$14,797
$9,085
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,884 rated schools reporting
2022
$8,302
$12,983
$15,708
$10,418
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,905 rated schools reporting
2023
$8,304
$14,377
$16,792
$11,137
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,928 rated schools reporting
2024
$8,070
$17,363
$18,125
$12,051
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,957 rated schools reporting
2025
$9,330
$18,172
$18,972
$12,669
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,976 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$69,893+$3,497 vs similar economic context
Teachers
31−12.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
18.4+4.5 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Watson Technology Center
Beginning 3.3%
1 to 5 years 44.3%
6 to 10 years 9.8%
11 to 20 years 26.2%
21 to 30 years 9.8%
Over 30 years 6.6%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,003 reporting for every category shown · 2,003 in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 26.2%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 28%
21 to 30 years 15.8%
Over 30 years 4.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
Beginning 6.9%
1 to 5 years 29%
6 to 10 years 20.1%
11 to 20 years 27.5%
21 to 30 years 13.7%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Dallas County · 563 reporting for every category shown · 563 in full cohort
Beginning 7.5%
1 to 5 years 30.2%
6 to 10 years 21.2%
11 to 20 years 26.5%
21 to 30 years 11.9%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,745 reporting for every category shown · 4,745 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.4%
6 to 10 years 19.6%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.6%
Over 30 years 3.1%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Watson Technology Center in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classWatson Technology Center · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
19.5
18
Grade 1
24
18.3
Grade 2
14.3
18.4
Grade 3
19
18.6
Grade 4
21
19
Grade 5
24
19.8
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
1 measure
8of 1,894
Reading — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,894 that report this measure
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
9 measures
14of 1,885
Math — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,885 that report this measure · tied with 2
15of 1,898
All Subjects — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,898 that report this measure
15of 1,831
Academic Growth
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,831 that report this measure · tied with 16
36of 1,885
Math — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,885 that report this measure · tied with 3
54of 1,106
Relative Performance
Region 10: Richardson · of the 1,106 that report this measure · tied with 15
58of 1,894
Reading — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,894 that report this measure · tied with 6
72of 1,939
Attendance
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,939 that report this measure · tied with 23
77of 1,898
All Subjects — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,898 that report this measure · tied with 6
107of 1,939
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,939 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 057909115.