Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.
Traditional public school campus
Coke County · Region 15: San Angelo · 6 students
Official school websiteSchool information and family resources
At a glance
The current score is above the 77.4 average for 2,273 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80.2 average for 124 rated schools in Region 15: San Angelo.The current score is above the 88.3 average for 3 rated schools in Coke County.The current score is above the 86.8 average for 6 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
STAAR result
Among 2,106 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measureCurrent strength
90 +12.6 pts vs 77.4
Current strength
90 +11.4 pts vs 78.6
STAAR result
Among 120 schools in Region 15: San Angelo reporting this measure.
See the full measureCurrent strength
90 +9.8 pts vs 80.2
Current strength
90 +9.8 pts vs 80.2
No academic result met this site’s published threshold for a selected positive signal against Coke County.
No academic result met this site’s published threshold for a selected positive signal against similarly sized schools.
STAAR result
Among 7,260 Texas schools reporting this measure.
See the full measureCurrent strength
90 +8.7 pts vs 81.3
Current strength
90 +8.8 pts vs 81.2
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Wall Sp Prog is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.4 average for 2,273 rated schools serving a similar economic context. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 208th of 2,273 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 79 others).
Wall Sp Prog is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.2 average for 124 rated schools in Region 15: San Angelo. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 18th of 124 rated schools in Region 15: San Angelo (tied with 3 others).
Wall Sp Prog is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 88.3 average for 3 rated schools in Coke County. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Wall Sp Prog is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 86.8 average for 6 similarly sized rated schools. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Wall Sp Prog is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 1,571st of 7,646 rated Texas schools (tied with 341 others).
Put the numbers in context
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
| Year | Rating | Score | Selected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rate | StateTexas average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | A | 90 | 77.4 2,273 reporting | 81.3 7,646 reporting |
| 2024-25 | Not Rated | — | 77.1 2,259 reporting | 81.2 7,554 reporting |
| 2023-24 | Not Rated | — | 74.3 2,243 reporting | 78.9 7,466 reporting |
| 2022-23 | Not Rated | — | 74.7 2,229 reporting | 79.1 7,377 reporting |
| 2021-22 | Not Rated | — | 81.7 2,208 reporting | 83.7 7,283 reporting |
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
| Domain | Score | Grade | Points to next grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Achievement | 86 | B | 4 |
| School Progress | 90 | A | — |
| Closing the Gaps | — | Not rated | — |
| Academic Growth | — | Not rated | — |
| Relative Performance | 90 | A | — |
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (90), so Student Achievement (86) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 90.
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Wall Sp Prog
Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,273 reporting for every category shown · 2,273 in full cohort
Selected comparison average For Region 15: San Angelo · 124 reporting for every category shown · 124 in full cohort
Selected comparison average For Coke County · 3 reporting for every category shown · 3 in full cohort
Selected comparison average For similarly sized schools · 6 reporting for every category shown · 6 in full cohort
Statewide average 7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Rate not available
Rate not available
2024–25
| School year | Cumulative enrollment | Studentsall discipline | Students% of enrollment | Actionsall discipline | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | Suppressed | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2021–22 | Suppressed | Suppressed | — | Suppressed | — | — | — |
| 2022–23 | Suppressed | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2023–24 | Suppressed | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| 2024–25 | Suppressed | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Category | Students | Students% of enrollment | Actions | Actionsper 100 students | Studentsselected comparison average % | Actionsselected comparison average per 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All discipline | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| In-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Out-of-school suspensions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary DAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary JJAEP placements | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Mandatory expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
| Discretionary expulsions | Not reported | — | Not reported | — | — | — |
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Out of 27 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
Fourth- through tenth-place results
1 measure
All Subjects — Masters
Region 15: San Angelo · of the 120 that report this measure · tied with 1
High placements in larger reporting groups
1 measure
All Subjects — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,106 that report this measure · tied with 11
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Download the full dataset · this campus's district
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 041902180.