+0.9 ptsvs 79.1 average · 2,023 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
967 of 2,023tied with 98 others
Score vs region
−3.3 ptsvs 83.3 average · 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston
Region 04: Houston placement
848 of 1,303tied with 46 others
Score vs county
−3.4 ptsvs 83.4 average · 911 rated schools in Harris County
Harris County placement
595 of 911tied with 29 others
Score vs similar-size group
−1.7 ptsvs 81.7 average · 2,570 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
1,510 of 2,570tied with 77 others
Score vs state
−1.3 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
4,402 of 7,646tied with 276 others
B80
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 88 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 79.1 average for 2,023 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is below the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston.The current score is below the 83.4 average for 911 rated schools in Harris County.The current score is below the 81.7 average for 2,570 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
48%vs 46.2% avg · +1.8 pts
Masters
24%vs 18.5% avg · +5.5 pts
Among 1,905 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Walker Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.1 average for 2,023 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 11 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 967th of 2,023 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 98 others).
Walker Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston. It is down 11 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 848th of 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston (tied with 46 others).
Walker Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 83.4 average for 911 rated schools in Harris County. It is down 11 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 595th of 911 rated schools in Harris County (tied with 29 others).
Walker Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.7 average for 2,570 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 11 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,510th of 2,570 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 77 others).
Walker Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 80 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 11 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 88 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement76 C−0.1 vs similar economic context · 1,905 reporting
School Progress81 B+0.8 vs similar economic context · 1,898 reporting
Closing the Gaps76 C−0.4 vs similar economic context · 1,885 reporting
Academic Growth71 C−2.3 vs similar economic context · 1,838 reporting
Relative Performance81 B+2.5 vs similar economic context · 1,898 reporting
Walker Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,023 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
76
C
4
School Progress
81
B
9
Closing the Gaps
76
C
4
Academic Growth
71
C
9
Relative Performance
81
B
9
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 4 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (81), so
Student Achievement (76) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 81.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level71%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,905 reporting
Meets grade level48%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,905 reporting
Masters grade level24%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,905 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level78%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,903 reporting
Meets grade level57%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,903 reporting
Masters grade level32%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,903 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level64%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,895 reporting
Meets grade level42%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,895 reporting
Masters grade level18%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,895 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level69%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,751 reporting
Meets grade level39%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,751 reporting
Masters grade level17%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,751 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,023 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
1,012
Economically disadvantaged
69.6%+0.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
29.5%+9.1 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
20.5%+1.7 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.5%+0.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
15.2%−2.4 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Walker Elem
African American 34.1%
Hispanic 49.7%
White 6.4%
American Indian 0.5%
Asian 5.1%
Two or More Races 4.3%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,023 reporting for every category shown · 2,023 in full cohort
African American 12.3%
Hispanic 56.3%
White 25.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.1%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.5%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
African American 19.1%
Hispanic 53.8%
White 16.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Harris County · 911 reporting for every category shown · 911 in full cohort
African American 19.3%
Hispanic 59.1%
White 13.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 2,570 reporting for every category shown · 2,570 in full cohort
African American 12.6%
Hispanic 51.9%
White 24.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.8%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
1,009
Economically disadvantaged students
702
Emergent bilingual students
298
Special education students
207
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
124
Students in TEA mobility denominator
839
TEA-published mobility rate
14.8%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 1,012 students in 2025–26, an increase of 28 (2.8%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
1,012
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+28
Increase · +2.8%
Change since 2021–22
+35
Increase · +3.6%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
1,012
Selected comparison
638.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,986 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Walker Elem
School year
Students enrolledWalker Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
977
First available year
651.6
2022–23
1,025
Increase of 48 (4.9%)
659
2023–24
813
Decrease of 212 (20.7%)
657.4
2024–25
984
Increase of 171 (21.0%)
654.7
2025–26
1,012
Increase of 28 (2.8%)
638.9
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
63
5.8% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
97
8.96 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
1,083
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
5.8%
Selected comparison
13.0%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,546 rated schools reporting
−7.2 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
8.96
Selected comparison
30.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,659 rated schools reporting
−21.9 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Walker Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
1,004
17
1.7%
44
4.38
9.6%
19.1
2021–22
1,078
57
5.3%
146
13.54
12.9%
30.3
2022–23
1,132
50
4.4%
90
7.95
13.4%
32.3
2023–24
936
31
3.3%
40
4.27
13.3%
32.2
2024–25
1,083
63
5.8%
97
8.96
13.0%
30.9
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Walker Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
63
5.8%
97
8.96
13.0%
30.9
In-school suspensions
51
4.7%
65
6.00
11.6%
23.5
Out-of-school suspensions
23
2.1%
31
2.86
7.4%
11.1
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Walker Elem
Parent district: Cypress-Fairbanks ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$8,363
Selected comparison
$13,191
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,002 rated schools reporting
−$4,828 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $8,363 per student for this campus, $16,633 per student for its parent district, Cypress-Fairbanks ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Walker Elem
Parent district: Cypress-Fairbanks ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,537
$12,265
$13,054
$8,009
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,865 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,949
$12,730
$13,108
$8,164
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,882 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,809
$12,750
$14,058
$8,714
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,903 rated schools reporting
2021
$8,183
$14,470
$14,797
$9,213
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,917 rated schools reporting
2022
$8,434
$15,507
$15,708
$10,460
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,940 rated schools reporting
2023
$8,465
$15,990
$16,792
$11,140
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,960 rated schools reporting
2024
$9,558
$16,047
$18,125
$12,406
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,986 rated schools reporting
2025
$8,363
$16,633
$18,972
$13,191
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,002 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$71,221+$4,773 vs similar economic context
Teachers
70+26.6 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.5+0.5 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Walker Elem
Beginning 8.6%
1 to 5 years 33%
6 to 10 years 14.5%
11 to 20 years 30.3%
21 to 30 years 10.8%
Over 30 years 2.9%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,023 reporting for every category shown · 2,023 in full cohort
Beginning 6.5%
1 to 5 years 26.9%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 27.6%
21 to 30 years 15.4%
Over 30 years 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
Beginning 7.7%
1 to 5 years 27.3%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 13.5%
Over 30 years 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Harris County · 911 reporting for every category shown · 911 in full cohort
Beginning 8.9%
1 to 5 years 28.4%
6 to 10 years 20.3%
11 to 20 years 26.2%
21 to 30 years 13%
Over 30 years 2.5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 2,570 reporting for every category shown · 2,570 in full cohort
Beginning 6.3%
1 to 5 years 27%
6 to 10 years 20.4%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 14.5%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Walker Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classWalker Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
16.9
18
Grade 1
17.9
18.2
Grade 2
21.8
18.4
Grade 3
21.2
18.6
Grade 4
23.4
18.9
Grade 5
21.9
19.9
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101907137.