+21.5 ptsvs 77.5 average · 2,227 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
2 of 2,227tied with 5 others
Score vs region
+15.7 ptsvs 83.3 average · 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston
Region 04: Houston placement
2 of 1,303tied with 12 others
Score vs county
+15.6 ptsvs 83.4 average · 911 rated schools in Harris County
Harris County placement
2 of 911tied with 11 others
Score vs similar-size group
+18.9 ptsvs 80.1 average · 4,160 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
3 of 4,160tied with 23 others
Score vs state
+17.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
5 of 7,646tied with 29 others
A99
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 93 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.5 average for 2,227 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston.The current score is above the 83.4 average for 911 rated schools in Harris County.The current score is above the 80.1 average for 4,160 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
Recent movement
Overall score rose 2 points
97 to 992024-25 to 2025-26
99 is 21.5 points above
the 77.5 average among 2,227 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
Tied for 2nd of 2,227 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure; 6 schools share that value.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Victory Early College HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 99 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.5 average for 2,227 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2nd of 2,227 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 5 others).
Victory Early College HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 99 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2nd of 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston (tied with 12 others).
Victory Early College HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 99 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.4 average for 911 rated schools in Harris County. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 2nd of 911 rated schools in Harris County (tied with 11 others).
Victory Early College HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 99 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.1 average for 4,160 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 3rd of 4,160 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 23 others).
Victory Early College HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 99 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 3 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 93 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement98 A+26.2 vs similar economic context · 2,060 reporting
School Progress97 A+18.3 vs similar economic context · 2,052 reporting
Closing the Gaps100 A+25.4 vs similar economic context · 2,038 reporting
Academic Growth88 B+15.7 vs similar economic context · 2,005 reporting
Relative Performance97 A+20.0 vs similar economic context · 2,052 reporting
Victory Early College HS
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,227 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
98
A
—
School Progress
97
A
—
Closing the Gaps
100
A
—
Academic Growth
88
B
2
Relative Performance
97
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (98), so
School Progress (97) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 98.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level99%+31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,060 reporting
Meets grade level90%+48 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,060 reporting
Masters grade level45%+29 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,060 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level98%+28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,058 reporting
Meets grade level92%+46 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,058 reporting
Masters grade level37%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,058 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level97%+31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,048 reporting
Meets grade level77%+39 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,048 reporting
Masters grade level30%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,048 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level100%+34 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,901 reporting
Meets grade level96%+60 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,901 reporting
Masters grade level60%+45 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,901 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level100%+34 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 798 reporting
Meets grade level92%+55 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 798 reporting
Masters grade level61%+45 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 798 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,227 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
Four-Year
100.0%+7.8 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 318 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
100.0%+8.1 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 319 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
100.0%+8.8 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 319 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.2%−1.2 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 321 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
Total credit for CCMR criteria
99.0%+14.9 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
Criterion
This school% of graduates
Averagesimilar economic context
Differencepercentage points
Reportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria
99.0%
84.1%
+14.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 365 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
65.1%
56.3%
+8.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 368 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
56.6%
22.1%
+34.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 368 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
43.4%
11.3%
+32.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 368 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
99.1%
29.3%
+69.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 368 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification
60.4%
34.8%
+25.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 368 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate
2.8%
2.8%
+0.0
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 368 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree
56.6%
6.6%
+50.0
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 368 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
0.0%
5.6%
−5.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 368 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
0.0%
3.2%
−3.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 368 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
3.8%
8.1%
−4.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 368 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
0.0%
2.7%
−2.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 368 rated schools reporting
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of
meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this
school minus the average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate,
counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that
criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
After high school: the following fall
Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.
Graduates in the report
76
Class of 2023–24
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
44
57.9% of graduates
Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
28
36.8% of graduates
Not trackable
4
Fall 2024
Graduates in the report
This school
76
Selected comparison
261.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 321 rated schools reporting
Enrolled in Texas public higher education
This school
44
Selected comparison
104.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 321 rated schools reporting
Texas-public enrollment rate
This school
57.9%
Selected comparison
39.6%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 321 rated schools reporting
+18.3 pts vs similar economic context
Not-found rate
This school
36.8%
Selected comparison
54.1%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 321 rated schools reporting
−17.3 pts vs similar economic context
Not-trackable rate
This school
5.3%
Selected comparison
6.3%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 321 rated schools reporting
−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
Most common named Texas public destinations
LONE STAR COLLEGE - N. HARRIS (000722)7
SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY (003606)5
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON (003652)5
Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.
Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.
“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.
“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
417
Economically disadvantaged
82.0%−0.7 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
11.8%−19.7 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
1.7%−16.9 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.5%+2.2 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
11.6%−9.6 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Victory Early College HS
African American 15.8%
Hispanic 77.9%
White 1.4%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 2.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 2.2%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,227 reporting for every category shown · 2,227 in full cohort
African American 14.3%
Hispanic 69.8%
White 11.5%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.6%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 2.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
African American 19.1%
Hispanic 53.8%
White 16.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Harris County · 911 reporting for every category shown · 911 in full cohort
African American 19.3%
Hispanic 59.1%
White 13.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,160 reporting for every category shown · 4,160 in full cohort
African American 11.8%
Hispanic 55%
White 26.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
417
Economically disadvantaged students
342
Emergent bilingual students
49
Special education students
7
Early college pathways
Early College High School
417
TEA-published share: 100%
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
33
Students in TEA mobility denominator
455
TEA-published mobility rate
7.3%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 417 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 25 (5.7%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
417
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−25
Decrease · −5.7%
Change since 2021–22
+8
Increase · +2.0%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
417
Selected comparison
620.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,198 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Victory Early College HS
School year
Students enrolledVictory Early College HS
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
409
First available year
650
2022–23
405
Decrease of 4 (1.0%)
651.4
2023–24
416
Increase of 11 (2.7%)
644.4
2024–25
442
Increase of 26 (6.3%)
640.5
2025–26
417
Decrease of 25 (5.7%)
620.5
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
22
5.1% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
41
9.49 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
432
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
5.1%
Selected comparison
13.4%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,597 rated schools reporting
−8.3 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
9.49
Selected comparison
32.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,705 rated schools reporting
−23.0 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Victory Early College HS
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
419
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
408
26
6.4%
48
11.76
12.9%
31.1
2022–23
398
15
3.8%
22
5.53
13.8%
34.3
2023–24
407
16
3.9%
23
5.65
13.8%
34.2
2024–25
432
22
5.1%
41
9.49
13.4%
32.5
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Victory Early College HS in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
22
5.1%
41
9.49
13.4%
32.5
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
18
4.2%
26
6.02
8.5%
13.5
DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Victory Early College HS
Parent district: Aldine ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$11,418
Selected comparison
$13,232
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,212 rated schools reporting
−$1,814 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $11,418 per student for this campus, $17,481 per student for its parent district, Aldine ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Victory Early College HS
Parent district: Aldine ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,010
$16,847
$13,054
$8,233
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,096 rated schools reporting
2019
$6,820
$11,964
$13,108
$8,335
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,123 rated schools reporting
2020
$6,749
$11,579
$14,058
$8,836
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,136 rated schools reporting
2021
$6,450
$13,398
$14,797
$9,513
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,145 rated schools reporting
2022
$7,111
$13,566
$15,708
$10,983
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,162 rated schools reporting
2023
$7,597
$15,592
$16,792
$11,495
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,181 rated schools reporting
2024
$7,284
$17,695
$18,125
$12,478
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,196 rated schools reporting
2025
$11,418
$17,481
$18,972
$13,232
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,212 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$72,735+$5,332 vs similar economic context
Teachers
22−20.5 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
18.8+4.5 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Victory Early College HS
Beginning 4.5%
1 to 5 years 27.5%
6 to 10 years 23%
11 to 20 years 27%
21 to 30 years 18%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,227 reporting for every category shown · 2,227 in full cohort
Beginning 6.9%
1 to 5 years 27.6%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 27.1%
21 to 30 years 15%
Over 30 years 3.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
Beginning 7.7%
1 to 5 years 27.3%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 13.5%
Over 30 years 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Harris County · 911 reporting for every category shown · 911 in full cohort
Beginning 8.9%
1 to 5 years 28.4%
6 to 10 years 20.3%
11 to 20 years 26.2%
21 to 30 years 13%
Over 30 years 2.5%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,160 reporting for every category shown · 4,160 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 25.7%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 16.3%
Over 30 years 3.5%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Victory Early College HS in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classVictory Early College HS · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English
19.3
15.3
Secondary languages other than English
20.8
18.2
Secondary math
17.7
16.5
Secondary science
24.1
17.7
Secondary social studies
21.9
17.7
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
3 measures
1of 7,185
Closing the Gaps
Texas average · of the 7,185 that report this measure · tied with 39 · full ranking
1of 3,541
Science — Approaches
Similar size · of the 3,541 that report this measure · tied with 70
1of 2,060
Student Achievement
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,060 that report this measure · tied with 11
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
2 measures
2of 2,227
Overall score
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,227 that report this measure · tied with 5
3of 2,060
All Subjects — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,060 that report this measure · tied with 10
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
6 measures
5of 136
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
Harris County · of the 136 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 2,060
All Subjects — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,060 that report this measure · tied with 2
8of 1,901
Science — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,901 that report this measure · tied with 1
9of 136
Earned an associate degree
Harris County · of the 136 that report this measure
10of 798
Social Studies — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 798 that report this measure
10of 798
Social Studies — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 798 that report this measure · tied with 1
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
12 measures
12of 2,058
Reading — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,058 that report this measure · tied with 7
12of 2,052
Relative Performance
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,052 that report this measure · tied with 9
12of 1,241
School Progress
Region 04: Houston · of the 1,241 that report this measure · tied with 18
13of 2,060
All Subjects — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,060 that report this measure · tied with 5
13of 2,058
Reading — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,058 that report this measure · tied with 1
13of 2,048
Math — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,048 that report this measure · tied with 11
14of 1,901
Science — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,901 that report this measure · tied with 1
17of 368
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 368 that report this measure
24of 2,048
Math — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,048 that report this measure
53of 2,058
Reading — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,058 that report this measure · tied with 6
86of 2,048
Math — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,048 that report this measure · tied with 10
91of 2,005
Academic Growth
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,005 that report this measure · tied with 34
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101902008.