Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
University Park ElemA95vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
University Park Elem
Dallas County · Region 10: Richardson · 470 students
Current score
95/1002025-26
Change
±0 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+2.8 ptsvs 92.2 average · 253 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
27 of 253tied with 36 others
Score vs region
+12.8 ptsvs 82.2 average · 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson
Region 10: Richardson placement
40 of 1,157tied with 25 others
Score vs county
+13.6 ptsvs 81.4 average · 563 rated schools in Dallas County
Dallas County placement
27 of 563tied with 11 others
Score vs similar-size group
+14.9 ptsvs 80.1 average · 4,586 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
139 of 4,586tied with 55 others
Score vs state
+13.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
247 of 7,646tied with 131 others
A95
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is flat; under the rules in force back then it scored 97 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 92.2 average for 253 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson.The current score is above the 81.4 average for 563 rated schools in Dallas County.The current score is above the 80.1 average for 4,586 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
86%vs 78.3% avg · +7.7 pts
Masters
66%vs 49.4% avg · +16.6 pts
Among 248 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
University Park Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 92.2 average for 253 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 27th of 253 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 36 others).
University Park Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 82.2 average for 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 40th of 1,157 rated schools in Region 10: Richardson (tied with 25 others).
University Park Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.4 average for 563 rated schools in Dallas County. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 27th of 563 rated schools in Dallas County (tied with 11 others).
University Park Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.1 average for 4,586 similarly sized rated schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Ranks 139th of 4,586 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 55 others).
University Park Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is unchanged since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 97 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement96 A+2.8 vs similar economic context · 248 reporting
School Progress90 A+1.6 vs similar economic context · 247 reporting
Closing the Gaps94 A+3.8 vs similar economic context · 245 reporting
Academic Growth90 A+2.9 vs similar economic context · 245 reporting
Relative Performance87 B+8.9 vs similar economic context · 247 reporting
University Park Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (253 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
96
A
—
School Progress
90
A
—
Closing the Gaps
94
A
—
Academic Growth
90
A
—
Relative Performance
87
B
3
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (96), so
School Progress (90) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 96.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level97%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 248 reporting
Meets grade level86%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 248 reporting
Masters grade level66%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 248 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level98%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 248 reporting
Meets grade level89%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 248 reporting
Masters grade level71%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 248 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level96%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 247 reporting
Meets grade level83%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 247 reporting
Masters grade level61%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 247 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (253 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
470
Economically disadvantaged
0.9%−5.3 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
10.2%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
18.3%+3.4 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
96.5%+0.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
2.8%−3.1 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
University Park Elem
African American 1.3%
Hispanic 8.5%
White 77%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 6.4%
Pacific Islander 0.4%
Two or More Races 5.7%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 253 reporting for every category shown · 253 in full cohort
African American 4.1%
Hispanic 14.6%
White 49%
American Indian 0.5%
Asian 25.9%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 5.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
African American 17.4%
Hispanic 43.5%
White 24.5%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 9.9%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Dallas County · 563 reporting for every category shown · 563 in full cohort
African American 21.3%
Hispanic 59%
White 10.9%
American Indian 0.6%
Asian 5.4%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,586 reporting for every category shown · 4,586 in full cohort
African American 12%
Hispanic 55.1%
White 25.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.8%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
470
Economically disadvantaged students
4
Emergent bilingual students
48
Special education students
86
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
8
Students in TEA mobility denominator
354
TEA-published mobility rate
2.3%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 470 students in 2025–26, an increase of 7 (1.5%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
470
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+7
Increase · +1.5%
Change since 2021–22
+44
Increase · +10.3%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
470
Selected comparison
839.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 250 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for University Park Elem
School year
Students enrolledUniversity Park Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
426
First available year
853.6
2022–23
436
Increase of 10 (2.3%)
868.5
2023–24
453
Increase of 17 (3.9%)
853.9
2024–25
463
Increase of 10 (2.2%)
849.2
2025–26
470
Increase of 7 (1.5%)
839.8
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Not reported
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
477
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for University Park Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
460
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2021–22
439
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2022–23
449
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2023–24
464
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2024–25
477
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for University Park Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
University Park Elem
Parent district: Highland Park ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$11,859
Selected comparison
$10,636
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 244 rated schools reporting
+$1,223 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $11,859 per student for this campus, $22,414 per student for its parent district, Highland Park ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
University Park Elem
Parent district: Highland Park ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$8,366
$24,340
$13,054
$7,140
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 203 rated schools reporting
2019
$8,216
$27,242
$13,108
$7,282
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 209 rated schools reporting
2020
$8,102
$26,719
$14,058
$7,569
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 216 rated schools reporting
2021
$9,695
$18,178
$14,797
$8,027
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 224 rated schools reporting
2022
$10,795
$17,775
$15,708
$9,181
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 227 rated schools reporting
2023
$11,303
$18,180
$16,792
$9,094
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 231 rated schools reporting
2024
$12,550
$20,398
$18,125
$10,050
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 240 rated schools reporting
2025
$11,859
$22,414
$18,972
$10,636
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 244 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$72,875+$3,368 vs similar economic context
Teachers
33−22.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.1−0.6 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
University Park Elem
Beginning 3%
1 to 5 years 15%
6 to 10 years 19.8%
11 to 20 years 33.3%
21 to 30 years 28.8%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 253 reporting for every category shown · 253 in full cohort
Beginning 4%
1 to 5 years 24.4%
6 to 10 years 19.7%
11 to 20 years 31.2%
21 to 30 years 16.7%
Over 30 years 2.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 10: Richardson · 1,157 reporting for every category shown · 1,157 in full cohort
Beginning 6.9%
1 to 5 years 29%
6 to 10 years 20.1%
11 to 20 years 27.5%
21 to 30 years 13.7%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Dallas County · 563 reporting for every category shown · 563 in full cohort
Beginning 7.5%
1 to 5 years 30.2%
6 to 10 years 21.2%
11 to 20 years 26.5%
21 to 30 years 11.9%
Over 30 years 2.7%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,586 reporting for every category shown · 4,586 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.1%
6 to 10 years 19.4%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 16%
Over 30 years 3.3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for University Park Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classUniversity Park Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
20
19
Grade 1
19.3
19.3
Grade 2
19.1
19.7
Grade 3
20.1
21.2
Grade 4
19.4
20.1
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 90 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
1 measure
10of 549
All Subjects — Masters
Dallas County · of the 549 that report this measure · tied with 1
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
13 measures
11of 549
Math — Masters
Dallas County · of the 549 that report this measure
12of 549
Reading — Masters
Dallas County · of the 549 that report this measure
17of 552
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Dallas County · of the 552 that report this measure · tied with 1
18of 549
Math — Meets
Dallas County · of the 549 that report this measure · tied with 3
19of 549
All Subjects — Approaches
Dallas County · of the 549 that report this measure · tied with 6
19of 549
Reading — Approaches
Dallas County · of the 549 that report this measure · tied with 3
20of 549
Math — Approaches
Dallas County · of the 549 that report this measure · tied with 6
21of 549
Student Achievement
Dallas County · of the 549 that report this measure · tied with 8
22of 549
All Subjects — Meets
Dallas County · of the 549 that report this measure · tied with 5
27of 563
Overall score
Dallas County · of the 563 that report this measure · tied with 11
28of 549
Reading — Meets
Dallas County · of the 549 that report this measure · tied with 2
30of 549
Closing the Gaps
Dallas County · of the 549 that report this measure · tied with 10
192of 4,457
Attendance
Similar size · of the 4,457 that report this measure · tied with 48
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 057911104.